Current Events > People are actually bitching over the green M&M...

(+) Yeah! (+)

It's just a fucking M&M! There are people on Youtube actually bitching about this! Jesus Christ...

Would love to crack open her hard green shell and go to town

Turbam posted...

Would love to crack open her hard green shell and go to town

She melts in your mouth not in your hand

Turbam posted...

Would love to crack open her hard green shell and go to town

You need help.

Oh? What outrage did I miss out on this time?

Lara got a reduction.
Samus got a reduction.
Tifa got a reduction.

There is a pattern here.

You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.

I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.

No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.

If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.

Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.

It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.

Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.

It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.

Fuck!

SydneySweenHero posted...

Lara got a reduction.
Samus got a reduction.
Tifa got a reduction.

There is a pattern here.

You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.

I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.

No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.

If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.

Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.

It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.

Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.

It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.

Fuck!

Sir, the green M&M never had breasts.

segasaturn posted...

It's just a fucking M&M!

Yeah that's the problem. They want to fuck it

segasaturn posted...

Sir, the green M&M never had breasts.

Its a copy pasta.

spikethedevil posted...

Its a copy pasta.

That makes me feel better that he didn't fully write that actually.

Pretty sure what little outrage there is mostly stems from how pointless the change was, rather than any desire to keep an M&M sexualized.

segasaturn posted...

That makes me feel better that he didn't fully write that actually.

Yeah, but somebody did.

Gobstoppers12 posted...

Yeah, but somebody did.

I'm 90% sure it was written ironically.

Also, the characters got reductions because pixel graphics and early 3D graphics were shit quality-wise, so enlarged features were needed. Enter good graphics and you have to reduce the sizes of things to make things proportional.

And notice that nobody complained about Cloud being turned into a twink in the remake.

K181 posted...

And notice that nobody complained about Cloud being turned into a twink in the remake.

that's because Tits are life! Ass is hometown!

SydneySweenHero posted...

I'm 90% sure it was written ironically.

Nah Skye bitched about this stuff so much that he was definitely serious

KeeperOfShadows posted...

Pretty sure what little outrage there is mostly stems from how pointless the change was, rather than any desire to keep an M&M sexualized.

How many logo or branding changes have a point on any meaningful scale?

It's not really about the M&M. It's about soulless corporations hijacking a movement for inclusiveness and acceptance for a broad spectrum of people but lacing it in puritanical sex negative trappings. It's happening in nearly everything. It's literally the battle that has been going on forever but played on different fields from different angles. Used to be the "Family Values" people, now it's companies pretending to be progressive. It's insulting to everyone's intelligence and damages people actually trying to make positive changes.

If someone was actually bitching about the candy itself then I dunno what to say to that, they are being ridiculous. Yellow was always the stealth sexy one anyway.

Vyrulisse posted...

It's not really about the M&M. It's about soulless corporations hijacking a movement for inclusiveness and acceptance for a broad spectrum of people but lacing it in puritanical sex negative trappings. It's happening in nearly everything. It's literally the battle that has been going on forever but played on different fields from different angles. Used to be the "Family Values" people, now it's companies pretending to be progressive. It's insulting to everyone's intelligence and damages people actually trying to make positive changes.

If someone was actually bitching about the candy itself then I dunno what to say to that, they are being ridiculous. Yellow was always the stealth sexy one anyway.

Exactly. We want big boobs on Tifa.

I don't care one way or another but it's not about the M&Ms

They just plain killed Yellow over Halloween.

All this M&M character talk made me look if there was M&M porn out there. There is and it is pretty good.

Dakimakura posted...

All this M&M character talk made me look if there was M&M porn out there. There is and it is pretty good.

"Why don't you get in there?!"

hockeybub89 posted...

How many logo or branding changes have a point on any meaningful scale?

I was so sad when Mr peanut died and then.... He wasn't.

hockeybub89 posted...

How many logo or branding changes have a point on any meaningful scale?

Starbucks has gotten a lot less porny over time.

GranolaPanic posted...

Tucker Carlson wants to have sex with an M&M.

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1484723825606479872

I can't believe I'm saying this about Fucker Carlson, but....based

They definitely had big chocolate boobs under that hard shell of their's! Brown M&M's boobs are probably fudge flavored too.

hockeybub89 posted...

How many logo or branding changes have a point on any meaningful scale?

Almost never. Hence why the outrage isn't anything worth noting. There's always a handful of people who get annoyed when things change for no real reason.

Also, after looking up the characters, I agree that Ms. Brown is hotter.

I think this is dumb but I dont really care that much. I also think its funny that this has brought out the memes

People shouldnt actually be outraged at this

I never would have even noticed the change if it wasnt for the outrage. Wtf

Ratchetrockon posted...

I never would have even noticed the change if it wasnt for the outrage. Wtf

Wouldn't surprise me if this was some guerilla marketing technique. Hell, that Tucker clip was probably paid for by M&Ms lol