Current Events > Juror fined $11k for mistrial after Googling ICE agent's supremacist patch

Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3
Jerry_Hellyeah
07/03/21 4:38:02 PM
#102:


Stalolin posted...
This. It's the dang 21st century. People have access to so much information at any given moment - how can you expect them not to use it? If it needs to be contextualised or debunked that's what the adversarial system and the courtroom itself is for.

You can expect them not to use it because they are told to do so under penalty of law.

Zikten posted...
That is a rule I have always opposed. There have many cases where someone was found guilty and later the jurors said they would have found them innocent if they had seen evidence that was hidden from them

So you are completely aware that inadmissable evidence could easily alter the outcome of a case if someone were to search for it the way this juror was instructed not to? Youre proposing a system where internet jackasses get to influence court cases, and thats not gonna work.

---
This is a cool sig
... Copied to Clipboard!
Mearcstapa
07/03/21 4:53:05 PM
#103:


Judge is probably a white supremacist himself.

Hope the defendant is acquitted and the ICE agent gets his face caved in.

---
after years of waiting
nothing came
... Copied to Clipboard!
1337toothbrush
07/03/21 10:48:57 PM
#104:


Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
So you are completely aware that inadmissable evidence could easily alter the outcome of a case if someone were to search for it the way this juror was instructed not to? Youre proposing a system where internet jackasses get to influence court cases, and thats not gonna work.
Or we can see a system where jackasses within the courts who lick the police's asses will "suggest" incorrect things to get the outcome they want. You're living a dream if you think what we have here is anywhere close to justice.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Crazyman93
07/03/21 10:51:14 PM
#105:


Middle hope posted...
How long until we can just get an all AI jury that determines guilt?
That would most likely violate the us constitution

---
let's lubricate friction material!
~nickels, Cars & Trucks
... Copied to Clipboard!
Thaumaturge
07/03/21 11:00:58 PM
#107:


Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
You can expect them not to use it because they are told to do so under penalty of law.

Yeah like it did her- Oh wait, no it didn't!
... Copied to Clipboard!
UnholyMudcrab
07/03/21 11:03:14 PM
#108:


... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick
07/03/21 11:53:48 PM
#109:


UnholyMudcrab posted...
The absolute state of civic education in this country
They can't get over their feelings long enough to realize this is a horrible idea.

---
The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM
... Copied to Clipboard!
1337toothbrush
07/04/21 12:25:07 AM
#110:


Crazyman93 posted...
That would most likely violate the us constitution
Not if AI is considered our peer.

---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Crazyman93
07/04/21 12:29:32 AM
#111:


1337toothbrush posted...
Not if AI is considered our peer.
It likely wouldn't be. But we are decades from THAT court argument.

---
let's lubricate friction material!
~nickels, Cars & Trucks
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3