Current Events > Fetuses have NO rights as a human being.

(+) Yeah! (+)

This is sorta on topic, but is it possible for a vagina to be haunted post abortion?

bubbascal posted...

I faintly remember that, LAAG was only made political afterwards, which made Lord_Shadow leave the board...

And no, I believe Pooh was saying stuff after they came back from suspension, and it wasn't conspiracy theories.

Shadow was banned from LAAG for anti trans shit man. You literally know nothing of the board apparently. Was a big stink on Hellhole.

bubbascal posted...

Did you actually just focus on "probably" and ignore everything else?

Why would I go any further if you arent feeling strong enough with a statement to make it definitive? Probably is what you say when you think you know something with absolutely no evidence. Its purely based on your personal bias. Considering who you are as a person, once that bias comes in I literally dont give a fuck anymore. Like I said, you probably think the FBI are behind 1/6 and that Trump will be president again in a few months. Youre delusional.

Women should have a limit on abortions, though.

Can't go abusing it!

---

Thefaqs4u posted...

You didn't say I was wrong.
Think you need to take a deep breath and calm down. You seem really worked up

You didn't deny I'm right about you being on hahaevents. :)

BTW, I am on the server, but I barely go on there. lmao I love avoiding places like that and this, I hate talking about current issues.

Means nothing anyways. I care about getting info, I don't agree with half of the things they say on there. But if you're gonna go "NAH NAH UR ON THERE, UR BAD", then you should be mocking Caution for admitting he's on gwwak's.

---

Badmotorfinger posted...

Bubba why are you friends with Tails bro

Why are you believing a liar who gets everything on LAAG wrong, alt?

---

McgeesAlice808 posted...

Sapience is determined by the ability to make judgment and be aware of their surroundings. ie, cry when they're scared, calm down when comforted, and laugh when amused.

Reacting to simple stimuli isn't consciousness. Plants do that. Animals aren't sapient and neither are fetuses. The source say they can't determine when consciousness first starts, higher cooardinated brain activity starts but that might not be any more than a spider's higher brain activity relative to an ant's.

Consciousness, then? Babies have actual thoughts at week 25. I shouldn't have to explain how that's killing a baby at that point, and no amount of "HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA" mockery from the others will change that.

---

bubbascal posted...

Why are you believing a liar who gets everything on LAAG wrong, alt?

Why u friends with tails breh?

---

Conflict posted...

You see what happens when you get upset and tag me 20 times on discord because "a lie was being spread"? Now you're being trolled solely because of how seriously you take that accusation.

Gj

Probably a alt of yours or someone on the server, let's be honest. Gwwak's has people who have several alts.

I mean, you don't get to tell me to "not take it seriously" when you enter a topic, say something you can't prove to others in order to give them a "good" reason to leave (you admit it made the topic "funnier") and then say stuff like this when the subject tries to correct things.

Maybe I'll tag you some more since you didn't get the point and refuse to admit you were spreading libel.

---

Conflict posted...

You can tag me all you want, I really don't care lol. The more you demonstrate how seriously you take this the more people are going to troll you.

And like I said, some people believed that. That's plenty reason to try and correct things.

---

Fishstick posted...

To some people this place is taken way to seriously. It's very scary actually

bubbascal posted...

And like I said, some people believed that. That's plenty reason to try and correct things.

---

This topic is a burden to CE society. We need to abort it before we're stuck with it.

---

bubbascal posted...

Why are you believing a liar who gets everything on LAAG wrong, alt?

why are you friends with tails?

---

Where are the Canadians at?

I read that abortion is legal there at any gestation date, so technically they can abort late term, as in ninth month. Im wondering if thats true and how that would square with the conversation here, which only accounts for early fetal development.

---

McgeesAlice808 posted...

There is zero evidence that they do. The source itself says there isn't any evidence of actual consciousness and there's only signs of coordinated brain activity, which any vertebrate and some invertebrates do and is nowhere close to a baby that can communicate and express their feelings.

Can I have a link to the source? I don't think littlebro ever posted it and I want to confirm that you're looking at the same one.

I assume you're going to keep going with this so abortion will be fine regardless of stage?

---

bubbascal posted...

Can I have a link to the source? I don't think littlebro ever posted it and I want to confirm that you're looking at the same one.

I assume you're going to keep going with this so abortion will be fine regardless of stage?

Why are you friends with tails homie?

McgeesAlice808 posted...

That's the one I'm assuming you're referring to. Notice they themselves say they don't know when it first emerges, just that coordinated brain activity it requires doesn't start beginning to happen until then meaning it's guaranteed there is no consciousness before then but even after it starts there's no indication there's a consciousness right then. Any more than a spider or a rat has consciousness anyway.
Personally I'd say somewhere in the middle of the third trimester but even then it's still up to the woman's choice and it's only if the doctors can have it survive outside the womb without there being too many issues. I mean, if a fetus can't naturally survive outside the womb and needs to be inside an organic or artificial protection like some sort of lab experiment and doesn't have the capacity to communicate its needs like crying and screaming you can't really call that a person.

Yes, but I thought you said that you actually found the link? That's what I was referencing this entire time, but a source on where this came from was never posted.


---

SrRd_RacinG posted...

Hard concept to accept, but a necessary one to understand.

Necessary to understand? Yes. Hard to accept? Not at all. Very easy to accept.
---

bubbascal posted...

I faintly remember that, LAAG was only made political afterwards, which made Lord_Shadow leave the board...

And no, I believe Pooh was saying stuff after they came back from suspension, and it wasn't conspiracy theories.

Not accurate. Pooh and interweb both regularly posted conspiracy bullshit. Pooh also blatantly pro-trump trolling and posted rape fantasies about greta thunberg and nancy pelosi (this was on maga, not laag. He denied it after maga was shut down). There is no ounce of any kind of decency in any aspect of the life of the person behind that account.
---

Machete posted...

Not accurate. Pooh and interweb both regularly posted conspiracy bullshit. Pooh also blatantly pro-trump trolling and posted rape fantasies about greta thunberg and nancy pelosi (this was on maga, not laag. He denied it after maga was shut down). There is no ounce of any kind of decency in any aspect of the life of the person behind that account.

Yeah, see, this is exactly what I mean. You aren't the first to say this to me, and you're probably going to call me a "friend of Tails" if I don't immediately accept every single unproven thing here.

Like, that's literally the basis: I didn't go along with "POOH/TAILS SAID THIS" and wanted to see evidence, plus I was calling out their lack of evidence and poor attempts to convince me, therefore I was "defending Tails".

I sincerely doubt he did, I saw the OP of the "conspiracy topic" via a screenshot, it was implied to be about the Capitol thing.

---

bubbascal posted...

Yeah, see, this is exactly what I mean. You aren't the first to say this to me, and you're probably going to call me a "friend of Tails" if I don't immediately accept every single unproven thing here.

Like, that's literally the basis: I didn't go along with "POOH/TAILS SAID THIS" and wanted to see evidence, plus I was calling out their lack of evidence and poor attempts to convince me, therefore I was "defending Tails".

I sincerely doubt he did, I saw the OP of the "conspiracy topic" via a screenshot, it was implied to be about the Capitol thing.

I don't even know you and I don't recall seeing you interact with tails. He was low profile and gimmicky anyway, easy to dismiss and not take seriously, like a dawkins or a newportbox or a smal. He just trolled about being reformed, ignored callouts of his racism, homophobia, etc. and spammed walls of text from breitbart links for 50 posts without anyone else even showing up in the topic.

Interweb was full on conspiracist, also citing exclusively fake sources. He was like tails but with less entertainment value. Anything ever negatove said about pooh was 100% true. He never said anything that wasn't trolling, and his worst comment about greta was one that I personally got out of him and went above and beyond the level of self-incrimination that I was even expecting from him. After he got modded for it, he repeatedly denied the comments. Because of greta's age, he pulled the same sort of thing about pelosi as if to say "she's much older. See? Not about age" and purposely made the comments more tame. There are no redeeming qualities to that person. You heard these things before because a fuckton of people saw them, it took a long time for him to get modded and everyone who saw them continued to call him out for them for the remainder of maga and laag.
---

Honestly, replace Fetuses with black people in the title, and we are back in the 50s. Babies deserve better from us.

---