Current Events > Why doesn't Bandai-Namco acknowledge Ms Pac-Man?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Tyranthraxus 05/10/21 8:56:48 PM #1:	They would still own the rights to it even though it wasn't created by them right? --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:953772380] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>They would still own the rights to it even though it wasn't created by them right? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pojr 05/10/21 9:02:11 PM #2:	Tyranthraxus posted... They would still own the rights to it even though it wasn't created by them right? no they dont. atgames owns it. --- pojr I summon it. You spell it. <cite>pojr posted [p:953772529] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>They would still own the rights to it even though it wasn't created by them right?</quote>no they dont. atgames owns it. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Star_FAQs 05/10/21 9:04:48 PM #3:	Ms. Pac-Man should be an alt in SSBU baffling as to why she isn't since other characters have male/female variants <cite>Star_FAQs posted [p:953772592] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>Ms. Pac-Man should be an alt in SSBU baffling as to why she isn't since other characters have male/female variants </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KFHEWUI 05/10/21 9:07:17 PM #4:	It is a messy situation with Ms. Pac-Man. The article below covers it well. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/the-rights-to-ms-pac-man-are-caught-in-a-messy-legal-battle/ pojr posted... no they dont. atgames owns it. BN owns the copyright and trademark. AtGames owns the royalty rights. --- R.I.P. SaikyoMog! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-seAIeu3Og "If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism" Ronald Reagan <cite>KFHEWUI posted [p:953772676] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>It is a messy situation with Ms. Pac-Man. The article below covers it well. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/the-rights-to-ms-pac-man-are-caught-in-a-messy-legal-battle/ pojr posted... </cite> <quote>no they dont. atgames owns it.</quote> BN owns the copyright and trademark. AtGames owns the royalty rights. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Strider102 05/10/21 9:07:20 PM #5:	They need to acknowledge .hack so Cyber Connect Japan can do remasters of IMOQ, Link, or an entirely new game. --- Last Cloudia ID: 188850453 <cite>Strider102 posted [p:953772678] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>They need to acknowledge .hack so Cyber Connect Japan can do remasters of IMOQ, Link, or an entirely new game. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/10/21 9:08:41 PM #6:	KFHEWUI posted... It is a messy situation with Ms. Pac-Man. The article below covers it well. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/the-rights-to-ms-pac-man-are-caught-in-a-messy-legal-battle/ BN owns the copyright and trademark. AtGames owns the royalty rights. Ah I see. This is literally the same situation as Hulk / Disney lmao --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:953772721] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>KFHEWUI posted... </cite> <quote>It is a messy situation with Ms. Pac-Man. The article below covers it well. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/the-rights-to-ms-pac-man-are-caught-in-a-messy-legal-battle/ BN owns the copyright and trademark. AtGames owns the royalty rights.</quote> Ah I see. This is literally the same situation as Hulk / Disney lmao </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pojr 05/10/21 9:10:43 PM #7:	KFHEWUI posted... It is a messy situation with Ms. Pac-Man. The article below covers it well. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/the-rights-to-ms-pac-man-are-caught-in-a-messy-legal-battle/ BN owns the copyright and trademark. AtGames owns the royalty rights. so it sounds like namco could make a ms pac man game, but if they do they must pay royalties to atgames. --- pojr I summon it. You spell it. <cite>pojr posted [p:953772783] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>KFHEWUI posted... </cite> <quote>It is a messy situation with Ms. Pac-Man. The article below covers it well. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/the-rights-to-ms-pac-man-are-caught-in-a-messy-legal-battle/ BN owns the copyright and trademark. AtGames owns the royalty rights.</quote>so it sounds like namco could make a ms pac man game, but if they do they must pay royalties to atgames. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Star_FAQs 05/10/21 9:11:22 PM #8:	I've always liked Ms. Pac-man better, I dunno what it is. Maybe it's because she has actual character? <cite>Star_FAQs posted [p:953772801] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>I've always liked Ms. Pac-man better, I dunno what it is. Maybe it's because she has actual character? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pojr 05/10/21 9:14:17 PM #9:	Star_FAQs posted... I've always liked Ms. Pac-man better, I dunno what it is. Maybe it's because she has actual character? More colors, more than one stage, she's actually a face and not just a yellow pizza missing a slice --- pojr I summon it. You spell it. <cite>pojr posted [p:953772889] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>Star_FAQs posted...</cite> <quote>I've always liked Ms. Pac-man better, I dunno what it is. Maybe it's because she has actual character?</quote> More colors, more than one stage, she's actually a face and not just a yellow pizza missing a slice</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 05/10/21 9:14:24 PM #10:	pojr posted... so it sounds like namco could make a ms pac man game, but if they do they must pay royalties to atgames. Probably not if they only sold it in Japan but it wouldn't be worth the money to do that. Pac-Man isn't really the money maker it used to be. Star_FAQs posted... I've always liked Ms. Pac-man better, I dunno what it is. Maybe it's because she has actual character? If you only played the Atari 2600 versions Pac-Man was a barely functioning Trainwreck and Ms Pac-Man was the same quality as the arcade. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:953772893] in Why doesn'... [t:79452522]...</cite> <quote>pojr posted... </cite> <quote>so it sounds like namco could make a ms pac man game, but if they do they must pay royalties to atgames.</quote> Probably not if they only sold it in Japan but it wouldn't be worth the money to do that. Pac-Man isn't really the money maker it used to be. Star_FAQs posted... </cite> <quote>I've always liked Ms. Pac-man better, I dunno what it is. Maybe it's because she has actual character?</quote>If you only played the Atari 2600 versions Pac-Man was a barely functioning Trainwreck and Ms Pac-Man was the same quality as the arcade. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Why doesn't Bandai-Namco acknowledge Ms Pac-Man? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Why doesn't Bandai-Namco acknowledge Ms Pac-Man?