Current Events > News: Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn't occur at all

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur-at-all-study-of-10-million-finds


---

Interesting if true, but dat source lol.

---

Real trustworthy source there

---

LostForest posted...

Interesting if true, but dat source lol.

Look at the studies then

---

Keep your garbage in the trashcan.

---

Jx1010 posted...

Look at the studies then

Who the hell did you quote?

---

SaltyWet posted...

Real trustworthy source there

Whats better? CNN or Fox news?

---

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/life-site-news/

---

Eliza3 posted...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/life-site-news/

Which is better?
CNN or Fox News?

---

Jx1010 posted...

Which is better?
CNN or Fox News?

that website literally tells you lol

oh, and the studies are put out by China and in the first paragraph the author starts the these lockdowns were bogus! parade?

toke jopic

---

Jx1010 posted...

Which is better?
CNN or Fox News?

CNN.

Jx1010 posted...

Which is better?
CNN or Fox News?

You closing your account is better tbh. Think about it?

---

Pretty sure in the most biological sense, implying that Covid19 asymptomatic transmission "not occurring" is impossible, because so long as the viruses remains in a person's body/system (whatever you wanna call it)... transmission to other people will always remain possible.

---

Jx1010 posted...

Which is better?
CNN or Fox News?

Do you think that's some kind of clever comeback?

You posted a source about as legitimate as a tapeworm poking out an illiterate man's asshole, deal with it.

---

DrizztLink posted...

Do you think that's some kind of clever comeback?

You posted a source about as legitimate as a tapeworm poking out an illiterate man's asshole, deal with it.

Im just asking so I can go to a more reliable source next time. I wanna be better informed.
So CNN or Fox News?

---

I feel like this kind of thing should be instant ban worthy considering how gullible some people are on this site

Article with some commentary from the one of the professors involved in this study, clarifying some things that have been misinterpreted:

https://www.uea.ac.uk/news/-/article/wuhan-mass-screening-identifies-hundreds-of-asymptomatic-cases

But the research team warn that their findings do not show that the virus cant be passed on by asymptomatic carriers.
...
Prof Song said: The asymptomatic cases identified in the screening programme in Wuhan were truly asymptomatic, as none of them showed clinical symptoms before or during their follow-up isolation.

But there is plenty of evidence elsewhere showing that people infected with Covid-19 may be temporarily asymptomatic and infectious before going on to develop symptoms.

Its also very important to say that these asymptomatic cases were identified shortly after the relaxation of a very stringent lockdown in Wuhan that lasted more than 70 days. By then, the epidemic in Wuhan had been effectively brought under control.

The virulence of Covid-19 may be weakening over time. And it is likely that the viral load of Wuhans asymptomatic cases may be low, compared with cases in locations with a high level of virus transmission.

Antibody testing showed that almost two thirds of the asymptomatic cases had previously had Covid-19.

Because the risk of residents being infected in the community was greatly reduced, when susceptible residents are exposed to a low dose of virus, they may tend to be asymptomatic as a result of their own immunity.

So, it would be problematic to apply the results of our research to countries where Covid-19 outbreaks have not been successfully brought under control.

Actually, the existence of asymptomatic cases remains a concern even in Wuhan. It is too early to be complacent, because of the existence of asymptomatic positive cases and high level of susceptibility in residents in Wuhan.

---

Isn't it funny how the "FAKE NEWS" crowd that screams fake news at anything and everything that doesn't spout pure far right propaganda into their ears....is the same crowd that literally spreads this fake ****?

Stop it already. Trump lost. Time to return to reality.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

The screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of 0.303 (95% CI 0.2700.339)/10,000. The median age-stratified Ct-values of the asymptomatic cases were shown in Supplementary Table 1. Of the 300 asymptomatic positive cases, two cases came from one family and another two were from another family. There were no previously confirmed COVID-19 patients in these two families. A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the COVID-19. There were 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 cases who participated in the screening. Of the 34,424 participants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again, giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.4230.574%).

No asymptomatic transmission occurred among this sampling of 300 people + 1174 close contacts.

Other studies have shown evidence that the transmission rate is significantly lower than with symptomatic people but still enough to be a problem. This also still doesn't address the issue of pre-symptomatic people; the incubation period can be as long as 2 weeks and people are contagious during that time.

---