Current Events > SCOTUS rules against Trump administration. DACA program stays!!!

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
pauIie 06/18/20 12:37:55 PM #51:	CruelBuffalo posted... Get fucked racists!! Wooo! --- https://imgur.com/O5APL http://www.last.fm/user/jaeganja <cite>pauIie posted [p:940862973] in SCOTUS rul... [t:78781522]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>Get fucked racists!! Wooo!</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 06/18/20 12:37:59 PM #52:	Ruvan22 posted... Iirc MConnall actually said as much - that he saw no reason NOT to appoint a judge in the last months of Trump's presidency. I for one am shocked that McConnell wants to be hypocritical when it comes to a Democrat vs. Republican in appointing people in their last year. Just shocked that he flips his position because it helps his "team." Either hear all appointments or don't in the last year; don't fucking change it just because it might help you. --- https://imgur.com/jWVrg9U https://imgur.com/g2efUtT https://imgur.com/5dOwhaP https://imgur.com/LVdqu8J Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:940862975] in SCOTUS rul... [t:78781522]...</cite> <quote>Ruvan22 posted...</cite> <quote> Iirc MConnall actually said as much - that he saw no reason NOT to appoint a judge in the last months of Trump's presidency. </quote> I for one am shocked that McConnell wants to be hypocritical when it comes to a Democrat vs. Republican in appointing people in their last year. Just shocked that he flips his position because it helps his "team." Either hear all appointments or don't in the last year; don't fucking change it just because it might help you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 06/18/20 12:59:23 PM #53:	Remember when you couldn't appoint an SCJ simply by having 50+1 of the vote? They need to bring that back, somehow. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https:/i.imgur.com/S1m3po4.jpg https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:940864044] in SCOTUS rul... [t:78781522]...</cite> <quote>Remember when you couldn't appoint an SCJ simply by having 50+1 of the vote? They need to bring that back, somehow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sktgamer_13dude 06/18/20 1:42:52 PM #54:	Bio1590 posted... Remember when you couldn't appoint an SCJ simply by having 50+1 of the vote? They need to bring that back, somehow. Only when Democrats have the majority though. Gotta make sure the rules are rigged for conservatives only else they'll complain about liberal hoaxes. --- https://imgur.com/jWVrg9U https://imgur.com/g2efUtT https://imgur.com/5dOwhaP https://imgur.com/LVdqu8J Go Cougs and M's #DI4B <cite>sktgamer_13dude posted [p:940866408] in SCOTUS rul... [t:78781522]...</cite> <quote>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>Remember when you couldn't appoint an SCJ simply by having 50+1 of the vote? They need to bring that back, somehow.</quote> Only when Democrats have the majority though. Gotta make sure the rules are rigged for conservatives only else they'll complain about liberal hoaxes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2