Current Events > SCOTUS won't hear Trump Admin challenge to California sanctuary law

Topic List	Page List: 1
Bio1590 06/15/20 2:06:50 PM #1:	https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/15/supreme-court-wont-hear-trump-challenge-to-california-sanctuary-law.html The Supreme Court on Monday said it will not hear a challenge brought by the Trump administration to a so-called sanctuary law in California that was passed to limit the impact of the presidents immigration agenda in the state. The case concerned a California law passed in 2017 that limits how state and local law enforcement can assist the federal government in immigration enforcement. With certain exceptions, the law bars state and local law enforcement agencies from informing the federal government of an individuals home address, work address or date of release from custody for the purpose of immigration enforcement. It also prevents state and local officials from transferring someone into the custody of immigration officials without a warrant. The Trump administration sued California over the measure, alleging that it was invalid under federal law. Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued in court papers that the laws conceded purpose to obstruct and effect of obstructing federal law through its own regulatory scheme makes the state law unenforceable. A federal district court ruled in Californias favor and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. President Donald Trump, who is facing reelection in November, was elected on a promise to make the nations immigration laws more restrictive. The case is United States v. California, No. 19-532. Dude's taking nothing but Ls today holy fuck --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https:/i.imgur.com/S1m3po4.jpg https://imgur.com/A0BErSV https://imgur.com/7fCcfko <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:940710652] in SCOTUS won... [t:78773957]...</cite> <quote>https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/15/supreme-court-wont-hear-trump-challenge-to-california-sanctuary-law.html <quote>The Supreme Court on Monday said it will not hear a challenge brought by the Trump administration to a so-called sanctuary law in California that was passed to limit the impact of the presidents immigration agenda in the state. The case concerned a California law passed in 2017 that limits how state and local law enforcement can assist the federal government in immigration enforcement. With certain exceptions, the law bars state and local law enforcement agencies from informing the federal government of an individuals home address, work address or date of release from custody for the purpose of immigration enforcement. It also prevents state and local officials from transferring someone into the custody of immigration officials without a warrant. The Trump administration sued California over the measure, alleging that it was invalid under federal law. Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued in court papers that the laws conceded purpose to obstruct and effect of obstructing federal law through its own regulatory scheme makes the state law unenforceable. A federal district court ruled in Californias favor and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision. President Donald Trump, who is facing reelection in November, was elected on a promise to make the nations immigration laws more restrictive. The case is United States v. California, No. 19-532.</quote> Dude's taking nothing but Ls today holy fuck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blue_Inigo 06/15/20 2:07:17 PM #2:	State rights, bitch --- "This is your last dance." <cite>Blue_Inigo posted [p:940710678] in SCOTUS won... [t:78773957]...</cite> <quote>State rights, bitch </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VipaGTS 06/15/20 2:08:14 PM #3:	Blue_Inigo posted... State rights, bitch Except when it benefits rich conservatives, then as much government as possible! --- "I devour urine just like my Portland Trailblazers, with piss poor defense." <cite>VipaGTS posted [p:940710713] in SCOTUS won... [t:78773957]...</cite> <quote>Blue_Inigo posted... </cite> <quote>State rights, bitch</quote>Except when it benefits rich conservatives, then as much government as possible! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlCalavicci 06/15/20 2:13:45 PM #4:	So much winning --- http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111123223446/simpsons/images/9/99/K.png I didn't even give you my coat! <cite>AlCalavicci posted [p:940710958] in SCOTUS won... [t:78773957]...</cite> <quote>So much winning </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EnterTheTekken 06/15/20 2:13:45 PM #5:	Even if this went to the SC, it would go 9-0 or 8-1 (Kavanaugh). As much conservative as Gorusch, Alito, Roberts, and Thomas are, even they are big proponents of states rights. --- https://imgur.com/2KslScv <cite>EnterTheTekken posted [p:940710959] in SCOTUS won... [t:78773957]...</cite> <quote>Even if this went to the SC, it would go 9-0 or 8-1 (Kavanaugh). As much conservative as Gorusch, Alito, Roberts, and Thomas are, even they are big proponents of states rights. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Odoylerules 06/15/20 2:14:12 PM #6:	VipaGTS posted... Except when it benefits rich conservatives, then as much government as possible! This. Republican hypocrites <cite>Odoylerules posted [p:940710972] in SCOTUS won... [t:78773957]...</cite> <quote>VipaGTS posted... </cite> <quote>Except when it benefits rich conservatives, then as much government as possible!</quote>This. Republican hypocrites </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > SCOTUS won't hear Trump Admin challenge to California sanctuary law (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > SCOTUS won't hear Trump Admin challenge to California sanctuary law