Poll of the Day > Imagine not allowing evidence or witnesses in a trial.

(+) Yeah! (+)

DirtBasedSoap posted...

lmao do you really need this explained to you? population matters

Ya know he understands but prays no ones gonna call him out.

---

darkknight109 posted...

Contempt of Congress is the act of obstructing the work of the United States Congress or one of its committees. Historically, the bribery of a U.S. Senator or U.S. Representative was considered contempt of Congress. In modern times, contempt of Congress has generally applied to the refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommitteeusually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of requested documents.

Yes. Except theyd have to prove that legally, which means a trial that they refused to commit to because they were not confident that they could succeed on the basis that Executive Privilege didnt apply for whatever reason. Hence making up Obstruction of Congress in place of Contempt of Congress because obstruction is simply one part of contempt.

---

Mead posted...

why should someone living a rural area have disproportionate voting power compared to people living in populated areas? If there are more people in liberal areas that vote in favor of more progressive issues, then that should be reflected in government. Thats fucking democracy.

Then there is no point in even having a republic and each State should be its own individual country.

---

aDirtyShisno posted...

Then there is no point in even having a republic and each State should be its own individual country.

Once again, being a republic has fuck all to do with the electoral college.
---

aDirtyShisno posted...

Then there is no point in even having a republic and each State should be its own individual country.

lol I wonder how long it would take for some of the very red states to realize they had no real economy to speak of

---

Republican senators say he is guilty of impeachable offence however the motive is impossible to prove definitely that Trump did it to hurt a political rival since Trump has said hundreds of times he wanted to drain the swamp. As result Trump will be acquitted based on that and having more republicans in senate.

---

LOUDDOG777 posted...

Republican senators say he is guilty of impeachable offence however the motive is impossible to prove definitely that Trump did it to hurt a political rival since Trump has said hundreds of times he wanted to drain the swamp.

no one is actually this naive

---

aDirtyShisno posted...

Yes. Except theyd have to prove that legally

They don't, actually.

As you so adroitly observed earlier in the topic, impeachment is a political process, not a legal one.

---