Topic List |
Page List:
1, 2 |
---|---|
#51 | Post #51 was unavailable or deleted. |
Darmik 11/15/19 2:24:04 AM #52: |
metallica846 posted...
She wanted her originals back and they were totally going to give them back, but they asked for too much and she declined, fucking knew it. No they weren't. The deal sucked. She'd be several albums behind. She could have signed up and the company could still be sold to Scooter. Which is significantly worse. --- Kind Regards, Darmik ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
#53 | Post #53 was unavailable or deleted. |
Darmik 11/15/19 2:52:12 AM #54: |
metallica846 posted...
Darmik posted...No they weren't. The deal sucked. She'd be several albums behind. They wouldn't have agreed to that. Because as you said the company is worthless without her. --- Kind Regards, Darmik ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Funkydog 11/15/19 11:14:58 AM #55: |
"Oh, one of the most successful women in music is still struggling to get through and be accepted, but she has money and can finally move on now so whatever"
Like... if Taylor fucking Swift is at this much mercy of the record labels, how the fuck is anyone else meant to cope/deal with them? --- ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
BB mofo 11/15/19 3:23:42 PM #56: |
metallica846 posted...
Paul McCartney doesnt own a lot of his music either and hes rich, powerful and respected by everyone. Paul McCartney had first crack at purchasing his catalogue, but he listened to Yoko's advice about turning it down so that they would approach him later with a lower price. In truth, she wanted to cheat McCartney and buy the whole catalogue from underneath him. What she didn't expect was that Michael Jackson swooped in and bought the catalogue. As far as Jackson knew, McCartney had passed up a great deal. --- "But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most?" -Mark Twain ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
WrkHrdPlayHrdr 11/15/19 3:47:37 PM #57: |
I don't really know wtf is going on in all of this...
She, or someone with legal authority on her behalf, signed paperwork somewhere that says X company has rights to your songs. That company sold those rights to a new buyer or something? How is any of this the record companies fault? Want to be able to do whatever you want with your music? Own the rights. --- "I also advised their executives through e-mail that further behavior could result in a cyber attack[...]" https://imgur.com/cSxy3Od ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Veggeta X 11/15/19 4:07:16 PM #58: |
Let my wife play her songs please
--- Don't like it? Don't watch it. It's that simple Dictator of Nice Guys ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Gheb 11/15/19 4:15:54 PM #59: |
WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...
I don't really know wtf is going on in all of this... The problem is that it is surprisingly hard to own your own music. Taylor Swift starter her career when she was 15. She signed a fairly standard record deal, which almost always include the company owning the rights to the songs. New musicians have functionally no leverage so they kind of have to sign these deals. Years later, Taylor Swift is one of the biggest names in music. She wants to move from her old record label and expressed desire to own her music. The deal they offered her was that she could her records back one album at a time, with her getting an album for each new album she makes (which the record company would own). This is obviously an insane deal of perpetual servitude. So she says no. Then Scooter Braun, someone with a vendetta against Taylor Swift buys up the company and now owns all of Taylor's songs. Taylor wants permission to use these songs for her AMA performance. Scooter makes her an impossible deal, despite the fact that as the owner of these songs, Taylor performing them on a major stage after winning a major award would only make him more money. Taylor decides to take it to the court of public opinion. A smart move given that people are always going to side with the artists over a record company, especially when company is represented by Scooter Braun, a known dirtbag. --- S*** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again. - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
andel 11/15/19 5:32:52 PM #60: |
metallica846 posted...
Paul McCartney doesnt own a lot of his music either and hes rich, powerful and respected by everyone. mccartney is actually the richest musician in the world. he is worth over a billion dollars --- I am thinking about just walking into the river now that Megaupload is gone and condoms are in porn.-Fubonis ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Makeveli_lives 11/15/19 5:43:47 PM #61: |
Compsognathus posted...
[LFAQs-redacted-quote] Just like Kanye years ago --- Switch FC: SW-3917-4425-6106 PSN: PiKappaPhi769 ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
butthole666 11/16/19 1:40:34 PM #62: |
Darmik posted...
The whole Michael Jackson/Beatles ownership dispute is famous too. This is why it pays to make unprofitable art. The less money your shit makes, the mire likely a label is to release the rights back to you. --- "Kenan & Kel is what made me realize I wasn't racist." ~ NewportBox100s ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Sayoria 11/17/19 10:38:22 PM #64: |
Taylor has been fighting this guy for ages. Didn't he claim rights to her music sometime back or something?
--- Japanese Crack: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5pzggr ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Jerry_Hellyeah 11/18/19 12:12:29 PM #65: |
Poor ridiculously rich white woman. She got SO screwed by the industry, yeah. Got where she did on uh.....talent, yeah!
--- This is a cool sig ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
#66 | Post #66 was unavailable or deleted. |
Lorenzo_2003 11/19/19 10:23:23 PM #67: |
Somehow, whether its through her songs or her real life, Taylor Swift always manages to dupe guys into thinking she is the victim in every situation. How in the fuck she is still able to do that is beyond me. No, never mind. I do know how shes able to perform this mind magic on the public.
--- ... ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
CruelBuffalo 11/19/19 10:25:19 PM #68: |
Lorenzo_2003 posted...
Somehow, whether its through her songs or her real life, Taylor Swift always manages to dupe guys into thinking she is the victim in every situation. How in the fuck she is still able to do that is beyond me. No, never mind. I do know how shes able to perform this mind magic on the public. Word vomit and didnt refute anything. Lol I cant imagine being so low information ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Lorenzo_2003 11/20/19 12:55:16 AM #69: |
CruelBuffalo posted...
Word vomit and didnt refute anything. Lol I cant imagine being so low information I did not even attempt to refute anything, so I dont know what the fuck youre talking about. If I wanted to refute, I would have repeated what others have already reminded you- that Taylor Swift is upset because she doesnt own the rights to property she clearly intended to use and that threw a proverbial wrench into her plans. That is the legality of it, despite whatever you feel like crying tears about on her behalf. If contracts and ownership laws change in the future, then thats fine by me and good for future artists. But by all means, keep crying until then. --- ... ... Copied to Clipboard!
|
Topic List |
Page List:
1, 2 |