Current Events > The Pokemon Sword board is angry because IGN's score is too HIGH.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
PatrickMahomes 11/13/19 2:42:21 PM #103:	CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... Blue_Inigo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... She just referred to missing half the pokedex as "nitpicking" (at 6:12 is when it begins) "I'd still like better cutscenes, companion pokemon, complete pokedex, and a more visually interesting wild area, but nitpicks are just not very effective when everything else was such a complete joy to play" The way she totally buries it in there is such a damage control attempt. Like it's "oh just another nitpick" It's half the fucking pokedex. That alone would drop it off two full points of any review, and that's assuming everything else is completely 10/10. No, it's nitpicking Less than half the pokedex is not a nitpick A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters. Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster. How many pokemon are in this game Let me answer your question with another question Why is the game better with fewer? Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree Did they, though? https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dv438w/complete_list_of_all_problems_known_so_far_in/ --- My knee feels better <cite>PatrickMahomes posted [p:930085194] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>Blue_Inigo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>She just referred to missing half the pokedex as "nitpicking" (at 6:12 is when it begins) "I'd still like better cutscenes, companion pokemon, complete pokedex, and a more visually interesting wild area, but nitpicks are just not very effective when everything else was such a complete joy to play" The way she totally buries it in there is such a damage control attempt. Like it's "oh just another nitpick" It's half the fucking pokedex. That alone would drop it off two full points of any review, and that's assuming everything else is completely 10/10.</quote> No, it's nitpicking</quote> Less than half the pokedex is not a nitpick</quote> A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters. Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster. How many pokemon are in this game</quote> Let me answer your question with another question Why is the game better with fewer?</quote> Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree</quote> Did they, though? https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dv438w/complete_list_of_all_problems_known_so_far_in/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#104	Post #104 was unavailable or deleted.
LostForest 11/13/19 3:07:29 PM #105:	CruelBuffalo posted... Foppe posted... CruelBuffalo posted... How many pokemon are in this game Seems to be 400. Foppe posted... CruelBuffalo posted... How many pokemon are in this game Seems to be 400. Foppe posted... CruelBuffalo posted... How many pokemon are in this game Seems to be 400. So enough for diversity and fun So, less than previous games offered on a 14 year old handheld system. --- http://poorcouplesfoodguide.com <cite>LostForest posted [p:930086352] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>How many pokemon are in this game</quote>Seems to be 400. </quote> Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>How many pokemon are in this game</quote>Seems to be 400. </quote> Foppe posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>How many pokemon are in this game</quote>Seems to be 400. </quote> So enough for diversity and fun</quote> So, less than previous games offered on a 14 year old handheld system.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ViewtifulGrave 11/13/19 3:10:06 PM #106:	NeverOffended posted... At some point you have to grow up and realize it's not about you anymore, it's about attracting new players So you believe that its ok for Game Freak to lie to the fans? --- You enjoy teaching high schoolers, and I'll enjoy creating my crappy manga. Let's see where we both are in a year. TheDoorMouse Update https://imgur.com/vz0c9xf <cite>ViewtifulGrave posted [p:930086469] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>NeverOffended posted...</cite> <quote>At some point you have to grow up and realize it's not about you anymore, it's about attracting new players</quote> So you believe that its ok for Game Freak to lie to the fans?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 11/13/19 3:26:43 PM #107:	ViewtifulGrave posted... NeverOffended posted... At some point you have to grow up and realize it's not about you anymore, it's about attracting new players So you believe that its ok for Game Freak to lie to the fans? Lmao good lord <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:930087235] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>ViewtifulGrave posted...</cite> <quote>NeverOffended posted...</cite> <quote>At some point you have to grow up and realize it's not about you anymore, it's about attracting new players</quote> So you believe that its ok for Game Freak to lie to the fans?</quote> Lmao good lord</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CruelBuffalo 11/13/19 3:27:19 PM #108:	PatrickMahomes posted... CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... Blue_Inigo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... She just referred to missing half the pokedex as "nitpicking" (at 6:12 is when it begins) "I'd still like better cutscenes, companion pokemon, complete pokedex, and a more visually interesting wild area, but nitpicks are just not very effective when everything else was such a complete joy to play" The way she totally buries it in there is such a damage control attempt. Like it's "oh just another nitpick" It's half the fucking pokedex. That alone would drop it off two full points of any review, and that's assuming everything else is completely 10/10. No, it's nitpicking Less than half the pokedex is not a nitpick A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters. Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster. How many pokemon are in this game Let me answer your question with another question Why is the game better with fewer? Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree Did they, though? https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dv438w/complete_list_of_all_problems_known_so_far_in/ According to reviewers they did. <cite>CruelBuffalo posted [p:930087271] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>Blue_Inigo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>She just referred to missing half the pokedex as "nitpicking" (at 6:12 is when it begins) "I'd still like better cutscenes, companion pokemon, complete pokedex, and a more visually interesting wild area, but nitpicks are just not very effective when everything else was such a complete joy to play" The way she totally buries it in there is such a damage control attempt. Like it's "oh just another nitpick" It's half the fucking pokedex. That alone would drop it off two full points of any review, and that's assuming everything else is completely 10/10.</quote> No, it's nitpicking</quote> Less than half the pokedex is not a nitpick</quote> A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters. Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster. How many pokemon are in this game</quote> Let me answer your question with another question Why is the game better with fewer?</quote> Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree</quote> Did they, though? https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dv438w/complete_list_of_all_problems_known_so_far_in/</quote> According to reviewers they did.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CM_Ponch 11/13/19 3:27:49 PM #109:	CruelBuffalo posted... Lmao good lord They literally lied... --- SW-8316-3213-4720 <cite>CM_Ponch posted [p:930087297] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted... </cite> <quote>Lmao good lord</quote>They literally lied... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#110	Post #110 was unavailable or deleted.
PatrickMahomes 11/13/19 4:20:34 PM #111:	CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... CruelBuffalo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... Blue_Inigo posted... PatrickMahomes posted... No, it's nitpicking Less than half the pokedex is not a nitpick A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters. Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster. How many pokemon are in this game Let me answer your question with another question Why is the game better with fewer? Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree Did they, though? https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dv438w/complete_list_of_all_problems_known_so_far_in/ According to reviewers they did. So even though the unbiased "leakers" with no agenda have literally showcased gameplay and substantiated all of the issues broken down in the link above, the hill you want to die on is reviewers with agendas (sell more games) are saying it's good? Weird hill to die on. --- My knee feels better <cite>PatrickMahomes posted [p:930089631] in The Pokemo... [t:78156957]...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>CruelBuffalo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> <quote>Blue_Inigo posted...</cite> <quote>PatrickMahomes posted...</cite> No, it's nitpicking</quote> Less than half the pokedex is not a nitpick</quote> A game being good or bad has nothing to do about the over abundance of monsters. Street Fighter removing characters is not worth removing points from a review unless there is an extremely slim roster. How many pokemon are in this game</quote> Let me answer your question with another question Why is the game better with fewer?</quote> Because they spent time building a new world and the reviewers agree</quote> Did they, though? https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dv438w/complete_list_of_all_problems_known_so_far_in/</quote> According to reviewers they did.</quote> So even though the unbiased "leakers" with no agenda have literally showcased gameplay and substantiated all of the issues broken down in the link above, the hill you want to die on is reviewers with agendas (sell more games) are saying it's good? Weird hill to die on.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > The Pokemon Sword board is angry because IGN's score is too HIGH. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > The Pokemon Sword board is angry because IGN's score is too HIGH.