Current Events > I'm pro 2nd ammendmant but one argument that I find hilarious is

Topic List	Page List: 1
Spiderman23JII 11/09/19 5:32:09 PM #1:	do you really think if the government wanted to do some shady tyranical shit your little machine guns would be able to stop the army --- Dan's so unique he gets his own move name variation, also he disconnected because when you get perfected by Dan your PSN is deleted - Shadow Geno <cite>Spiderman23JII posted [p:929901742] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>do you really think if the government wanted to do some shady tyranical shit your little machine guns would be able to stop the army </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medzzz 11/09/19 5:33:07 PM #2:	Spiderman23JII posted... do you really think if the government wanted to do some shady tyranical shit your little machine guns would be able to stop the army Ask the VC --- Feelin' fine <cite>Medzzz posted [p:929901773] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Spiderman23JII posted...</cite> <quote>do you really think if the government wanted to do some shady tyranical shit your little machine guns would be able to stop the army </quote> Ask the VC</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
justaguy3492 11/09/19 5:34:34 PM #3:	Medzzz posted... Spiderman23JII posted... do you really think if the government wanted to do some shady tyranical shit your little machine guns would be able to stop the army Ask the VC Military tech certainly hasn't improved since Vietnam, you're totally right. --- Gt: justaguy3492 <cite>justaguy3492 posted [p:929901827] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Medzzz posted...</cite> <quote>Spiderman23JII posted...</cite> <quote>do you really think if the government wanted to do some shady tyranical shit your little machine guns would be able to stop the army </quote> Ask the VC</quote> Military tech certainly hasn't improved since Vietnam, you're totally right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DespondentDeity 11/09/19 5:35:55 PM #4:	I mean, as evidenced by the fact that the government constantly does shady tyrannical shit, no. Any rational person would see that most people aren't subjugated by force, but guns do contribute significantly to our economy so I say let em stockpile. I do think background checks need to be more robust, but I also don't delude myself into believing that that will really change anything. --- https://imgur.com/8DBAEJJ \| https://imgur.com/U2ZWTrH Tell karma I love her, been a real good motherf***er <cite>DespondentDeity posted [p:929901878] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>I mean, as evidenced by the fact that the government constantly does shady tyrannical shit, no. Any rational person would see that most people aren't subjugated by force, but guns do contribute significantly to our economy so I say let em stockpile. I do think background checks need to be more robust, but I also don't delude myself into believing that that will really change anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Malcrasternus 11/09/19 5:37:02 PM #5:	US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. --- https://imgur.com/lRdlvMt 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 "But not forgotten." <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:929901917] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lilJoe457 11/09/19 5:38:26 PM #6:	So we should just make it easier for them? Even if we can't stop them we shouldn't just make it easy and roll over. What kind of stupid reasoning is that? Vietnam did ok as civilians with guns. --- What about me? What about my sig? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsszagC0GdI Total Package. <cite>lilJoe457 posted [p:929901977] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>So we should just make it easier for them? Even if we can't stop them we shouldn't just make it easy and roll over. What kind of stupid reasoning is that? Vietnam did ok as civilians with guns.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 11/09/19 5:38:31 PM #7:	Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Highly doubtful. --- https://imgur.com/MS5SvzN Take better care of your teeth and f***, a lot more. <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:929901982] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. </quote> Highly doubtful.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
pegusus123456 11/09/19 5:40:56 PM #8:	The current leader of the government is blatantly, consistently doing shady, tyrannical shit and the Second Amendment crowd is talking about using the Second Amendment to protect him. --- https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:929902067] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>The current leader of the government is blatantly, consistently doing shady, tyrannical shit and the Second Amendment crowd is talking about using the Second Amendment to protect him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KlownArt 11/09/19 5:44:04 PM #9:	RebelElite791 posted... Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Highly doubtful. There is nothing doubtful about it. History shows. When people rebel, portions of the military tend to switch sides. Doesn't matter if the people match fire power. They just need enough strategy to take back the government. The whole "do the people really stand a chance" argument is so silly and proven wrong constantly in history. <cite>KlownArt posted [p:929902183] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. </quote> Highly doubtful.</quote> There is nothing doubtful about it. History shows. When people rebel, portions of the military tend to switch sides. Doesn't matter if the people match fire power. They just need enough strategy to take back the government. The whole "do the people really stand a chance" argument is so silly and proven wrong constantly in history.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AlephZero 11/09/19 5:44:34 PM #10:	assault weapons are only useful for murdering large crowds of people as quickly as possible, and that's why only cops should have them --- "life is overrated" - Seiichi Omori 01001100 01010101 01000101 00100000 00110100 00110000 00110010 <cite>AlephZero posted [p:929902201] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>assault weapons are only useful for murdering large crowds of people as quickly as possible, and that's why only cops should have them</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 11/09/19 5:45:38 PM #11:	KlownArt posted... RebelElite791 posted... Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Highly doubtful. There is nothing doubtful about it. History shows. When people rebel, portions of the military tend to switch sides. Doesn't matter if the people match fire power. They just need enough strategy to take back the government. The whole "do the people really stand a chance" argument is so silly and proven wrong constantly in history. Portions, maybe. The military as a whole, doubtful. Look at Nazi Germany, soviet states, China, etc. --- https://imgur.com/MS5SvzN Take better care of your teeth and f***, a lot more. <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:929902242] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>KlownArt posted...</cite> <quote>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. </quote> Highly doubtful.</quote> There is nothing doubtful about it. History shows. When people rebel, portions of the military tend to switch sides. Doesn't matter if the people match fire power. They just need enough strategy to take back the government. The whole "do the people really stand a chance" argument is so silly and proven wrong constantly in history.</quote> Portions, maybe. The military as a whole, doubtful. Look at Nazi Germany, soviet states, China, etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pepys Monster 11/09/19 5:45:44 PM #12:	lilJoe457 posted... So we should just make it easier for them? Even if we can't stop them we shouldn't just make it easy and roll over. What kind of stupid reasoning is that? Vietnam did ok as civilians with guns. This. "The government would be more powerful in a war. Therefore, it makes perfect sense to make ourselves even less powerful in comparison." --- GOML <cite>Pepys Monster posted [p:929902244] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>lilJoe457 posted...</cite> <quote>So we should just make it easier for them? Even if we can't stop them we shouldn't just make it easy and roll over. What kind of stupid reasoning is that? Vietnam did ok as civilians with guns.</quote> This. "The government would be more powerful in a war. Therefore, it makes perfect sense to make ourselves even less powerful in comparison."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medzzz 11/09/19 5:47:05 PM #13:	RebelElite791 posted... KlownArt posted... RebelElite791 posted... Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Highly doubtful. There is nothing doubtful about it. History shows. When people rebel, portions of the military tend to switch sides. Doesn't matter if the people match fire power. They just need enough strategy to take back the government. The whole "do the people really stand a chance" argument is so silly and proven wrong constantly in history. Portions, maybe. The military as a whole, doubtful. Look at Nazi Germany, soviet states, China, etc. They banned citizens from gun ownership before taking power --- Feelin' fine <cite>Medzzz posted [p:929902297] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>KlownArt posted...</cite> <quote>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. </quote> Highly doubtful.</quote> There is nothing doubtful about it. History shows. When people rebel, portions of the military tend to switch sides. Doesn't matter if the people match fire power. They just need enough strategy to take back the government. The whole "do the people really stand a chance" argument is so silly and proven wrong constantly in history.</quote> Portions, maybe. The military as a whole, doubtful. Look at Nazi Germany, soviet states, China, etc.</quote> They banned citizens from gun ownership before taking power</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Cheater87 11/09/19 5:49:22 PM #14:	Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Doesn't the military take away your ability to think for yourself and you are trained to do what they tell you to? --- Doom, the game with unlimited ways to play. <cite>Cheater87 posted [p:929902379] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted... </cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own.</quote> Doesn't the military take away your ability to think for yourself and you are trained to do what they tell you to? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Medzzz 11/09/19 5:51:44 PM #15:	Cheater87 posted... Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Doesn't the military take away your ability to think for yourself and you are trained to do what they tell you to? They are trained to protect their fellow man --- Feelin' fine <cite>Medzzz posted [p:929902457] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Cheater87 posted...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted... </cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own.</quote> Doesn't the military take away your ability to think for yourself and you are trained to do what they tell you to? </quote> They are trained to protect their fellow man</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Catgirl Fondler 11/09/19 5:52:00 PM #16:	Malcrasternus posted... US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. Yeah, soldiers would have the backs of the civilians, I don't doubt that. It's the cops that would gun us down without a second thought, and lord knows they have plenty of practice already. --- N/A <cite>The Catgirl Fondler posted [p:929902468] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Malcrasternus posted...</cite> <quote>US soldiers would mutiny in droves if given the order to fire upon their own. </quote> Yeah, soldiers would have the backs of the civilians, I don't doubt that. It's the cops that would gun us down without a second thought, and lord knows they have plenty of practice already.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blue_Dream87 11/09/19 5:53:55 PM #17:	The US military has proven time and time again it fucking sucks at guerilla warfare. Plus soldiers aren't going to kill their own families and friends. --- <cite>Blue_Dream87 posted [p:929902542] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>The US military has proven time and time again it fucking sucks at guerilla warfare. Plus soldiers aren't going to kill their own families and friends. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paragon21XX 11/09/19 5:57:49 PM #18:	Cheater87 posted... Doesn't the military take away your ability to think for yourself and you are trained to do what they tell you to? Not since Nuremberg. Disciplined, yes, Mindless, no. A soldier is expected to disobey orders if it leads to committing a war crime. Medzzz posted... They banned citizens from gun ownership before taking power Correction: Nazis banned political dissidents and groups they wished to subjugate such as Jews from owning guns. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:929902685] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Cheater87 posted... </cite> <quote>Doesn't the military take away your ability to think for yourself and you are trained to do what they tell you to?</quote>Not since Nuremberg. Disciplined, yes, Mindless, no. A soldier is expected to disobey orders if it leads to committing a war crime. Medzzz posted... </cite> <quote>They banned citizens from gun ownership before taking power</quote>Correction: Nazis banned political dissidents and groups they wished to subjugate such as Jews from owning guns. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 11/09/19 6:01:47 PM #19:	If the US decided to go to war on its citizens, so much shit would happen and it wouldn't be worth doing in the first place. If you want to take over the country because of how rich and powerful it is but have to carpet bomb the entire country to do it, suddenly the country won't be so rich and powerful anymore. And every time they did it, more people would turn against the government, like how Americans turned against the Vietnam War but on a much larger scale. And add all the soldiers who would refuse to go to war with Americans. --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:929902811] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>If the US decided to go to war on its citizens, so much shit would happen and it wouldn't be worth doing in the first place. If you want to take over the country because of how rich and powerful it is but have to carpet bomb the entire country to do it, suddenly the country won't be so rich and powerful anymore. And every time they did it, more people would turn against the government, like how Americans turned against the Vietnam War but on a much larger scale. And add all the soldiers who would refuse to go to war with Americans.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 11/09/19 6:03:11 PM #20:	If you want to own guns, good for you. But the chance of even using one in self-defense is slim to none, let alone in self-defense against a tyrannical government. The people who actually have those things in the front of their mind worry me. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:929902875] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>If you want to own guns, good for you. But the chance of even using one in self-defense is slim to none, let alone in self-defense against a tyrannical government. The people who actually have those things in the front of their mind worry me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 11/09/19 6:04:24 PM #21:	Paragon21XX posted... Not since Nuremberg. Disciplined, yes, Mindless, no. A soldier is expected to disobey orders if it leads to committing a war crime. Except right now, when our President actually prefers soldiers that commit war crimes. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:929902926] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>Not since Nuremberg. Disciplined, yes, Mindless, no. A soldier is expected to disobey orders if it leads to committing a war crime.</quote> Except right now, when our President actually prefers soldiers that commit war crimes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ssjevot 11/09/19 6:05:58 PM #22:	We all know the US military has been extremely successful at fighting small groups of underarmed, undertrained fighters in Vietnam and Afghanistan. That's why they crushed the resistance there with ease and didn't spend decades trying to stop some irregulars only to eventually give up and leave. --- Favorite Games: BlazBlue: Central Fiction, Street Fighter III: Third Strike, Bayonetta, Bloodborne thats a username you habe - chuckyhacksss <cite>ssjevot posted [p:929902990] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>We all know the US military has been extremely successful at fighting small groups of underarmed, undertrained fighters in Vietnam and Afghanistan. That's why they crushed the resistance there with ease and didn't spend decades trying to stop some irregulars only to eventually give up and leave. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
deupd_u 11/09/19 6:06:22 PM #23:	AlephZero posted... assault weapons are only useful for murdering large crowds of people as quickly as possible, and that's why only cops should have them lol --- Snipers don't shoot at paper, they shoot watermelons. https://imgur.com/jo511lG <cite>deupd_u posted [p:929903007] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>assault weapons are only useful for murdering large crowds of people as quickly as possible, and that's why only cops should have them</quote> lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#24	Post #24 was unavailable or deleted.
Malcrasternus 11/09/19 6:32:41 PM #25:	Also logistically, it's not just about killing your own people they'd have to contend with, but occupying that land afterwards from people that know the region by heart. Iirc that's what made Vietnam and Afghanistan extremely difficult. --- https://imgur.com/lRdlvMt 4/15/1951 - 3/18/2014 "But not forgotten." <cite>Malcrasternus posted [p:929903910] in I'm pro 2n... [t:78147833]...</cite> <quote>Also logistically, it's not just about killing your own people they'd have to contend with, but occupying that land afterwards from people that know the region by heart. Iirc that's what made Vietnam and Afghanistan extremely difficult. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > I'm pro 2nd ammendmant but one argument that I find hilarious is (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > I'm pro 2nd ammendmant but one argument that I find hilarious is