Current Events > Neo-nazi hospitalized after fight with antifa.

(+) Yeah! (+)

What good has SJWism ever done for the world? Why should I feel sorry that people that further their ideology get what they deserve?
---

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

It's tehdud

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

Lmfao sjws are one of the most hate filled violent groups around
---

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

65 year old vs 5 young men.

Doesn't matter what their opinions are, the 5 young men in that scenario are pussies unless the man is waving his gun at them or something
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

65 year old vs 5 young men.

Doesn't matter what their opinions are, the 5 young men in that scenario are pussies unless the man is waving his gun at them or something

Like the both sides kind of people like to say, lets wait for ALL the facts.

They were charged with disorderly conduct, not assault. Something tells me they didnt even touch the other guy, he simply got too worked up and his old feeble body couldnt take it.

Hairistotle posted...

guys, im p sure SchoolForAnts is rod

I was about to ask this. His crazy is rather unique and that's saying something in this place.
---

SchoolForAnts posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

65 year old vs 5 young men.

Doesn't matter what their opinions are, the 5 young men in that scenario are pussies unless the man is waving his gun at them or something

Like the both sides kind of people like to say, lets wait for ALL the facts.

They were charged with disorderly conduct, not assault. Something tells me they didnt even touch the other guy, he simply got too worked up and his old feeble body couldnt take it.

Wait wut

"How is a group beating up a Nazi being pussies?"
"Because it was 5 young men vs 1 old man."
"WAIT FOR THE FACTS!"

Then why ask the question if you want to wait for the facts......
---

Hairistotle posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Hairistotle posted...

guys, im p sure SchoolForAnts is rod

I was about to ask this. His crazy is rather unique and that's saying something in this place.

i mean he posted like 5 or 6 times in a row on the last page, and he just responds to literally everyone

Yeah. I was just worried for a moment that there might be someone here who sees rod post and goes "mmhm that's totally normal behavior."
---

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Hairistotle posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Hairistotle posted...

guys, im p sure SchoolForAnts is rod

I was about to ask this. His crazy is rather unique and that's saying something in this place.

i mean he posted like 5 or 6 times in a row on the last page, and he just responds to literally everyone

Yeah. I was just worried for a moment that there might be someone here who sees rod post and goes "mmhm that's totally normal behavior."

oh yeah, it's clearly rod
---

Hairistotle posted...

Completion posted...

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

It's tehdud

who's that

hes one of those ppl that argues by starting his post with "lmfao" and just stating the same thing as earlier so he seems arrogant and/or rude at the very least

You know who tehdud is

Always bitches about Capcom, tipping, and for a little while now went on this crusade against people who don't like or tolerate racists

shockthemonkey posted...

Its staggering the amount of people who are only interested in talking about morality when it comes to kicking the shit out of Neo Nazis.

Strawman.

If your ideology supports genocide, fuck you.

If the idealogy is so easy to debunk and so vile, why do you refuse to challenge it and instead condone violence?

Hell your condoning of violence is little different to the Nazis you oppose. Except theirs in this case is hypothetical while theirs is literal.

Ever heard the term "You can't win a war fighting with your brother?"

You don't respond to differing opinions with violence. That's irrational religious lunacy.

Going "but these guys REALLY disagree with me, so it's okay to physically attack them." is something a a naughty 4 year old would say
---

More like LoserRepresent am I right
---

Hairistotle posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Hairistotle posted...

guys, im p sure SchoolForAnts is rod

I was about to ask this. His crazy is rather unique and that's saying something in this place.

i mean he posted like 5 or 6 times in a row on the last page, and he just responds to literally everyone

Youd be wrong, my guys, but why are you going into that instead of uniting with me calling out the alt right mod? Priorities fellas, priorities

shockthemonkey posted...

SchoolForAnts posted...

Hairistotle posted...

SmidgeIsntBack posted...

Hairistotle posted...

guys, im p sure SchoolForAnts is rod

I was about to ask this. His crazy is rather unique and that's saying something in this place.

i mean he posted like 5 or 6 times in a row on the last page, and he just responds to literally everyone

Youd be wrong, my guys, but why are you going into that instead of uniting with me calling out the alt right mod? Priorities fellas, priorities

Shut up, ROD. Youre clearly not fooling anyone.

Hmm. Now the thread will be about bashing me. Good to know you mind ROD more than the Nazis

shockthemonkey posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

shockthemonkey posted...

Its staggering the amount of people who are only interested in talking about morality when it comes to kicking the shit out of Neo Nazis.

Strawman.

If your ideology supports genocide, fuck you.

If the idealogy is so easy to debunk and so vile, why do you refuse to challenge it and instead condone violence?

Hell your condoning of violence is little different to the Nazis you oppose. Except theirs in this case is hypothetical while theirs is literal.

Ever heard the term "You can't win a war fighting with your brother?"

You don't respond to differing opinions with violence. That's irrational religious lunacy.

Going "but these guys REALLY disagree with me, so it's okay to physically attack them." is something a a naughty 4 year old would say

This post is dumb as fuck.

How so?
---

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

Well they did need a group of 5 to take on a senior citizen
---

AssaultTank and RaptorLC should really lay down the law on the people in this topic. So much trolling and shitposting.
---

FLUFFYGERM posted...

AssaultTank and RaptorLC should really lay down the law on the people in this topic. So much trolling and shitposting.

I thought you hated authoritarianism?
---

while violence just for speaking an idea shouldn't be condoned (civil discussion or even just throwing insults would be a better option), it's hard to sympathize with this guy's situation
---

mehmeh1 posted...

while violence just for speaking an idea shouldn't be condoned (civil discussion or even just throwing insults would be a better option), it's hard to sympathize with this guy's situation

I think that when the guy youre arguing against believes in the genoicde of several races civil discussions kind of goes out the window lol.
---

VipaGTS posted...

mehmeh1 posted...

while violence just for speaking an idea shouldn't be condoned (civil discussion or even just throwing insults would be a better option), it's hard to sympathize with this guy's situation

I think that when the guy youre arguing against believes in the genoicde of several races civil discussions kind of goes out the window lol.

that's why I said "even just throwing insults"
---

shockthemonkey posted...

mehmeh1 posted...

while violence just for speaking an idea shouldn't be condoned (civil discussion or even just throwing insults would be a better option), it's hard to sympathize with this guy's situation

If the idea is we should murder people whos immutable characteristics are different from mine then that shit should be shut down before it escalates beyond rhetoric.

true, that's why I can't sympathize with that guy, I'm just saying that there can be better ways to deal with this without making yourself look like the aggressor, thus making people side with the ""victim"", even if his ideology is horrible, the opposite of shutting him down
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Hairistotle posted...

assulttank please stop like wtf are you doing man u know this cant be a good look

He's defended worse in the past.

Completely defended Admiral when he made his infamous posts I would be modded if I posted.

However that doesn't mean attacking people for disagreeing with you is acceptable.

This is a stupidly myopic post and no one should be taken seriously they use "jUsT fOr DiSsAgReEiNg WiTh YoU" rhetoric without applying context as if it ever a simple disagreement about what could be anything. What's next? "If punching a Nazi is okay, how long will it be until all violence is okay for any reason? sLiPpErY sLoPe!!"
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Hairistotle posted...

how is beating up nazis sjw-ism i thought sjws were pussies

65 year old vs 5 young men.

Doesn't matter what their opinions are, the 5 young men in that scenario are pussies unless the man is waving his gun at them or something

You didn't read the whole article, did you? One of them was 64.
---

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Hairistotle posted...

assulttank please stop like wtf are you doing man u know this cant be a good look

He's defended worse in the past.

Completely defended Admiral when he made his infamous posts I would be modded if I posted.

However that doesn't mean attacking people for disagreeing with you is acceptable.

This is a stupidly myopic post and no one should be taken seriously they use "jUsT fOr DiSsAgReEiNg WiTh YoU" rhetoric without applying context as if it ever a simple disagreement about what could be anything. What's next? "If punching a Nazi is okay, how long will it be until all violence is okay for any reason? sLiPpErY sLoPe!!"

while yes, it's not just a disagreement, it still makes the nazi look like a victim instead of the instigator
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

shockthemonkey posted...

It?s staggering the amount of people who are only interested in talking about morality when it comes to kicking the shit out of Neo Nazis.

Strawman.

If your ideology supports genocide, fuck you.

If the idealogy is so easy to debunk and so vile, why do you refuse to challenge it and instead condone violence?

Hell your condoning of violence is little different to the Nazis you oppose. Except theirs in this case is hypothetical while theirs is literal.

Ever heard the term "You can't win a war fighting with your brother?"

You don't respond to differing opinions with violence. That's irrational religious lunacy.

Going "but these guys REALLY disagree with me, so it's okay to physically attack them." is something a a naughty 4 year old would say

Jesus fucking christ. You won't let it go, will you? "I punch you because you think one thing and I think other thing" is not the mindset that triggers these kinds of incident. That's such a one dimensional perspective to have.
---

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

This is a stupidly myopic post and no one should be taken seriously they use "jUsT fOr DiSsAgReEiNg WiTh YoU" rhetoric without applying context as if it ever a simple disagreement about what could be anything. What's next? "If punching a Nazi is okay, how long will it be until all violence is okay for any reason? sLiPpErY sLoPe!!"

I disagree entirely.

Going "I agree that it's wrong to attack people who disagree with you.... unless they disagree with you!" is just nonsense.

If the premise goes "Well this isn't a "simple" disagreement therefore it's okay to be violent!" is a complete lapse of logic and I think that you know this. WTF does "Simple" mean?

Never respond to someone who disagrees with you with physical violence. That way lunacy lies. Again 3 year olds are taught this.

shockthemonkey posted...

Right? No one is condoning violence on the sole basis of disagreement. People are condoning violence because someone believes that genocide should be carried out.

"No one is condoning violence SOLEY on disagreement, they just condone violence because someone disagreed with them." is literally doublethink.

Which is doubleplus bad.

I'm reminded of something Penn once said about why he and Teller were such a successful double act. It's because they thought their shows together were better than there shows alone, so when they pissed each other off, they just shrugged it off.

His comparison was saying imagine you were a 7-11 clerk when the surplee machine breaks down and someone comes in to fix it, then says something dumb while fixing the machine.

So what? He's the dude who fixes the surplee machine? Who cares.

You're literally advocating that if you think the wrong opinion, you deserve to be physically attacked. That's lunacy
---

shockthemonkey posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

This is a stupidly myopic post and no one should be taken seriously they use "jUsT fOr DiSsAgReEiNg WiTh YoU" rhetoric without applying context as if it ever a simple disagreement about what could be anything. What's next? "If punching a Nazi is okay, how long will it be until all violence is okay for any reason? sLiPpErY sLoPe!!"

I disagree entirely.

Going "I agree that it's wrong to attack people who disagree with you.... unless they disagree with you!" is just nonsense.

If the premise goes "Well this isn't a "simple" disagreement therefore it's okay to be violent!" is a complete lapse of logic and I think that you know this. WTF does "Simple" mean?

Never respond to someone who disagrees with you with physical violence. That way lunacy lies. Again 3 year olds are taught this.

shockthemonkey posted...

Right? No one is condoning violence on the sole basis of disagreement. People are condoning violence because someone believes that genocide should be carried out.

"No one is condoning violence SOLEY on disagreement, they just condone violence because someone disagreed with them." is literally doublethink.

Which is doubleplus bad.

I'm reminded of something Penn once said about why he and Teller were such a successful double act. It's because they thought their shows together were better than there shows alone, so when they pissed each other off, they just shrugged it off.

His comparison was saying imagine you were a 7-11 clerk when the surplee machine breaks down and someone comes in to fix it, then says something dumb while fixing the machine.

So what? He's the dude who fixes the surplee machine? Who cares.

You're literally advocating that if you think the wrong opinion, you deserve to be physically attacked. That's lunacy

I got nothing

Tootles.

---

shockthemonkey posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

This is a stupidly myopic post and no one should be taken seriously they use "jUsT fOr DiSsAgReEiNg WiTh YoU" rhetoric without applying context as if it ever a simple disagreement about what could be anything. What's next? "If punching a Nazi is okay, how long will it be until all violence is okay for any reason? sLiPpErY sLoPe!!"

I disagree entirely.

Going "I agree that it's wrong to attack people who disagree with you.... unless they disagree with you!" is just nonsense.

If the premise goes "Well this isn't a "simple" disagreement therefore it's okay to be violent!" is a complete lapse of logic and I think that you know this. WTF does "Simple" mean?

Never respond to someone who disagrees with you with physical violence. That way lunacy lies. Again 3 year olds are taught this.

shockthemonkey posted...

Right? No one is condoning violence on the sole basis of disagreement. People are condoning violence because someone believes that genocide should be carried out.

"No one is condoning violence SOLEY on disagreement, they just condone violence because someone disagreed with them." is literally doublethink.

Which is doubleplus bad.

I'm reminded of something Penn once said about why he and Teller were such a successful double act. It's because they thought their shows together were better than there shows alone, so when they pissed each other off, they just shrugged it off.

His comparison was saying imagine you were a 7-11 clerk when the surplee machine breaks down and someone comes in to fix it, then says something dumb while fixing the machine.

So what? He's the dude who fixes the surplee machine? Who cares.

You're literally advocating that if you think the wrong opinion, you deserve to be physically attacked. That's lunacy

This post is dumb as fuck.

How?

You haven't made an argument. You've just said it's okay to attack people you disagree with and then insult people who talk to you.

How is anything anyone is saying wrong?
---

If only people would realize that antifa is just as bqd as the neo nazi they beat up, they are a hate group but they get better PR by being left leaning.
---

shockthemonkey posted...

Offworlder1 posted...

If only people would realize that antifa is just as bqd as the neo nazi they beat up, they are a hate group but they get better PR by being left leaning.

Antifas goal isnt genocide. Theyre better than Nazis.

And that makes violence okay because.....?

Rapists are better than Mass child murderers.

Your posts are not justifying being violent to people who disagree with you.
---

You clearly dont know how antifa really is then if you say that, they are no different then the neo nazis, they do want genocide. Stop believing the lie that antifa is better cause that is only propoganda your buying into.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

shockthemonkey posted...

Its staggering the amount of people who are only interested in talking about morality when it comes to kicking the shit out of Neo Nazis.

Strawman.

If your ideology supports genocide, fuck you.

If the idealogy is so easy to debunk and so vile, why do you refuse to challenge it and instead condone violence?

Hell your condoning of violence is little different to the Nazis you oppose. Except theirs in this case is hypothetical while theirs is literal.

Ever heard the term "You can't win a war fighting with your brother?"

You don't respond to differing opinions with violence. That's irrational religious lunacy.

Going "but these guys REALLY disagree with me, so it's okay to physically attack them." is something a a naughty 4 year old would say

4 year old is also smarter than any sjw can ever hope to be
---

why do people keep deliberately misinterpreting what others are saying? stop pretending like you're trying to understand.

enemies of America should not dwell in America. Nazis are enemies of America, and those who threaten America while on American soil should be treated as if they made a death threat against the President. not made to feel like a welcomed addition. that also goes for their sympathizers.

too many died for this country for these degenerates to be allowed to spit on their graves.
---

RickyTheBAWSE posted...

why do people keep deliberately misinterpreting what others are saying? stop pretending like you're trying to understand.

enemies of America should not dwell in America.

Okay and who gets to decide who is and isn't an "enemy" of America?

Nazis are enemies of America, and those who threaten America while on American soil should be treated as if they made a death threat against the President.

People should not be kicked out of the country for their opinions.

Also how far does that slide. Both Trump and Obama have been called Nazis, so I guess they should be beaten and deported?

not made to feel like a welcomed addition. that also goes for their sympathizers.

too many died for this country for these degenerates to be allowed to spit on their graves.

People died for the country to be free and a market place of ideas. Not for people to beaten and threatened for their views and opinions.

Quite the opposite, people KILLED to stop people from having the right to think and to talk.

You're advocating theocracy and dictatorship, the violation of rights and the removal of free thought and free speech, just to "punish" people you disagree with.

Again, that's lunacy. You don't make the world a better place with your fist in the faces of guys who disagree with you.
---

Cool topic
---