I've read the Bible. That is not evidence. A book treating something as if it exists does not prove it exists. We have no tangible evidence of the existence of a God, past or present. If the Bible proves God exists, then all holy texts prove all gods exists.
Like I said, I simply cannot believe in things. I am open to literally anything existing, but things basically don't exist before evidence
The safe bet is to not believe in things with 0 evidence. It's weird how different we treat believing in God compared to believing in Bigfoot. I guess I just find believing to be pointless as a concept.
maybe because God and Bigfoot are dramatically different things
Yet neither has observable evidence as we speak, which currently makes them as equally plausible as anything else. Their actual functions are meaningless until they prove to exist.
hockeybub89 posted...
EpicKingdom_ posted...
hockeybub89 posted...
Until I have reason to believe otherwise, no.
The bible is a pretty good place to start.
inb4NotReadingFairyTales.
I've read the Bible. That is not evidence. A book treating something as if it exists does not prove it exists. We have no tangible evidence of the existence of a God, past or present. If the Bible proves God exists, then all holy texts prove all gods exists.
Like I said, I simply cannot believe in things. I am open to literally anything existing, but things basically don't exist before evidence
