Current Events > debate for legalization of rec. marijuana in NJ is going on now

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:11:00 PM #51:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913080963] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:14:57 PM #52:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913081198] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/26/18 5:19:14 PM #53:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. Huh? --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:913081429] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate.</quote> Huh?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:22:59 PM #54:	A_Good_Boy posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. Huh? If you are pro marijuana, the argument was always that its their body, their right. That means you cant be against meth and pro marijuana <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913081646] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate.</quote> Huh?</quote> If you are pro marijuana, the argument was always that its their body, their right. That means you cant be against meth and pro marijuana</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:26:38 PM #55:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913081837] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 11/26/18 5:27:46 PM #56:	Why are you guys responding to the laziest trolling? --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:913081907] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote>Why are you guys responding to the laziest trolling?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:29:21 PM #57:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated. No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913081985] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated.</quote> No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:31:36 PM #58:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated. No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913082112] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated.</quote> No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail</quote> "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:33:33 PM #59:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated. No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned. Who cares? Everybody has a right to their own body, right? <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913082207] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated.</quote> No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail</quote> "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned.</quote> Who cares? Everybody has a right to their own body, right?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:34:33 PM #60:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated. No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned. Who cares? Everybody has a right to their own body, right? Lazy strawman. I never said anything even remotely like that. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913082262] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated.</quote> No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail</quote> "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned.</quote> Who cares? Everybody has a right to their own body, right?</quote> Lazy strawman. I never said anything even remotely like that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 11/26/18 5:35:22 PM #61:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable. It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated. No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned. Who cares? Everybody has a right to their own body, right? Forget which stance you were supposed to be arguing for? --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:913082306] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote> Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> But caffeine isn't harmless. It can cause harm when over-used. The point is that saying that all drugs are the same is ridiculous. We have a ton of legal drugs that have adverse effects when abused, but we let those ones pass because they are socially acceptable.</quote> It was never about how harmful the drug was, at least on your side of the debate. It was always about personal freedoms and responsibility. You cant be for marijuana and not meth outsidr of bias and addictions</quote> Yes you can. They are radically different drugs with radically different effects. That being said, Portugal has decriminalized all drugs, with a resoundingly positive effect, so there is a precedent for complete decriminalization. Also, you are assuming I'm on a specific 'side', which I don't believe I've stated.</quote> No you cant unless you are addicted to weed and not meth and just want to get high without being scared of jail</quote> "No you" is not a response. We treat drugs differently depending on their effects. In fact, they are even legally distinct. So feeling one should be re-categorized does not mean that you have to believe that all categories must be abandoned.</quote> Who cares? Everybody has a right to their own body, right?</quote> Forget which stance you were supposed to be arguing for?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
voldothegr8 11/26/18 5:37:18 PM #62:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt. For adults it pretty much is harmless, minus smoke damage which isn't a problem in 2018 --- Oda break tracker 2018- 8 (3) \| THE Ohio State: 11-1 \| Oakland Raiders: 2-8 Super Mario Maker Profile: 1237-0000-0073-02FE <cite>voldothegr8 posted [p:913082402] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Caffeine is harmless. Marijuana isnt.</quote> For adults it pretty much is harmless, minus smoke damage which isn't a problem in 2018</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:37:34 PM #63:	No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913082412] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote>No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:39:04 PM #64:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite. All drugs are not the same. Legally, all drugs are not even remotely treated the same. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913082487] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite.</quote> All drugs are not the same. Legally, all drugs are not even remotely treated the same.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:40:24 PM #65:	And again, who cares? You want to control what people put in their bodies? <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913082552] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote>And again, who cares? You want to control what people put in their bodies?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:41:49 PM #66:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... And again, who cares? You want to control what people put in their bodies? I never stated my point, I pointed out that your assertion that all drugs are the same is wrong both from a societal and a legal perspective. However, if you are saying you are against controlling what people put into their bodies, but also anti-drug, it sounds like you are the hypocrite. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913082615] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>And again, who cares? You want to control what people put in their bodies?</quote> I never stated my point, I pointed out that your assertion that all drugs are the same is wrong both from a societal and a legal perspective. However, if you are saying you are against controlling what people put into their bodies, but also anti-drug, it sounds like you are the hypocrite.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:45:03 PM #67:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... And again, who cares? You want to control what people put in their bodies? I never stated my point, I pointed out that your assertion that all drugs are the same is wrong both from a societal and a legal perspective. However, if you are saying you are against controlling what people put into their bodies, but also anti-drug, it sounds like you are the hypocrite. Im not a hypocrite. Ive no issue telling people whats ok and not ok to put in their bodies. Drugs are bad. Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. At the end of the day, you cant say its ok to do pot and other people who might enjoy meth can go fuck themselves. Thats not logically consistent. The whole argument for pot is that its your body, your right. Every argument for pot can be used for meth. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913082816] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>And again, who cares? You want to control what people put in their bodies?</quote> I never stated my point, I pointed out that your assertion that all drugs are the same is wrong both from a societal and a legal perspective. However, if you are saying you are against controlling what people put into their bodies, but also anti-drug, it sounds like you are the hypocrite.</quote> Im not a hypocrite. Ive no issue telling people whats ok and not ok to put in their bodies. Drugs are bad. Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. At the end of the day, you cant say its ok to do pot and other people who might enjoy meth can go fuck themselves. Thats not logically consistent. The whole argument for pot is that its your body, your right. Every argument for pot can be used for meth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RiderofHogs 11/26/18 5:45:17 PM #68:	AvantgardeAClue posted... Let us pump our own gas while we're at it You would be surprised at the panic that would happen with that. --- I'll be riding shotgun, underneath the hot sun, Feeling like a someone. <cite>RiderofHogs posted [p:913082831] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>AvantgardeAClue posted...</cite> <quote>Let us pump our own gas while we're at it</quote> You would be surprised at the panic that would happen with that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trickfinger 11/26/18 5:45:29 PM #69:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite. guess we're hypocrites then. thumbs up for weed and fuck heroin. --- I survived reading guys like you <cite>Trickfinger posted [p:913082844] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite.</quote> guess we're hypocrites then. thumbs up for weed and fuck heroin.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:46:56 PM #70:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... You either legalise all or none of them. It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913082910] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:47:11 PM #71:	Trickfinger posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite. guess we're hypocrites then. thumbs up for weed and fuck heroin. Well at least you admit you are just a pot head. Thats actually a positive step believe it or not. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913082920] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Trickfinger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite.</quote> guess we're hypocrites then. thumbs up for weed and fuck heroin.</quote> Well at least you admit you are just a pot head. Thats actually a positive step believe it or not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:48:22 PM #72:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... You either legalise all or none of them. It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently. It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913082984] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently.</quote> It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:49:24 PM #73:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... You either legalise all or none of them. It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently. It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical. So you believe caffeine should be made illegal. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913083033] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently.</quote> It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical.</quote> So you believe caffeine should be made illegal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:51:08 PM #74:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... You either legalise all or none of them. It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently. It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical. So you believe caffeine should be made illegal. No. But im not a hypocrite. Im perfectly ok with saying whats fine and not. Its your side thats hypocritical. At least the above poster admits they just want to get high. Why cany you admit it. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913083110] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently.</quote> It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical.</quote> So you believe caffeine should be made illegal.</quote> No. But im not a hypocrite. Im perfectly ok with saying whats fine and not. Its your side thats hypocritical. At least the above poster admits they just want to get high. Why cany you admit it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Trickfinger 11/26/18 5:51:27 PM #75:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Trickfinger posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite. guess we're hypocrites then. thumbs up for weed and fuck heroin. Well at least you admit you are just a pot head. Thats actually a positive step believe it or not. blah blah blah. --- I survived reading guys like you <cite>Trickfinger posted [p:913083122] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Trickfinger posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>No. Im anti drugs. But even if i dont mind what other people do with their own bodies, nobody should be able to pick and choose which drugs are ok. You cant be pro weed and anti meth without being a huge monumental hypocrite.</quote> guess we're hypocrites then. thumbs up for weed and fuck heroin.</quote> Well at least you admit you are just a pot head. Thats actually a positive step believe it or not.</quote> blah blah blah.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:52:24 PM #76:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... You either legalise all or none of them. It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently. It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical. So you believe caffeine should be made illegal. No. But im not a hypocrite. Im perfectly ok with saying whats fine and not. Its your side thats hypocritical. At least the above poster admits they just want to get high. Why cany you admit it. Caffeine is a drug. You told me you either have to have all drugs legal or none. So therefore, you are for a prohibition against caffeine. Unless ... of course ... you're a hypocrite? <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913083170] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently.</quote> It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical.</quote> So you believe caffeine should be made illegal.</quote> No. But im not a hypocrite. Im perfectly ok with saying whats fine and not. Its your side thats hypocritical. At least the above poster admits they just want to get high. Why cany you admit it.</quote> Caffeine is a drug. You told me you either have to have all drugs legal or none. So therefore, you are for a prohibition against caffeine. Unless ... of course ... you're a hypocrite?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 5:55:23 PM #77:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them. So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... You either legalise all or none of them. It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently. It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical. So you believe caffeine should be made illegal. No. But im not a hypocrite. Im perfectly ok with saying whats fine and not. Its your side thats hypocritical. At least the above poster admits they just want to get high. Why cany you admit it. Caffeine is a drug. You told me you either have to have all drugs legal or none. So therefore, you are for a prohibition against caffeine. Unless ... of course ... you're a hypocrite? I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913083312] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Im also saying i dont care about drug classes. You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> So you want caffeine to be made illegal, gotcha. <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>You either legalise all or none of them.</quote> It's not hypocritical to treat each situation independently.</quote> It is hypocritical because its not your right to treat other peoples personal choices at all. Get off your high horse. Its legalize all or legalize none. Any other opinion is hypocritical.</quote> So you believe caffeine should be made illegal.</quote> No. But im not a hypocrite. Im perfectly ok with saying whats fine and not. Its your side thats hypocritical. At least the above poster admits they just want to get high. Why cany you admit it.</quote> Caffeine is a drug. You told me you either have to have all drugs legal or none. So therefore, you are for a prohibition against caffeine. Unless ... of course ... you're a hypocrite?</quote> I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 5:56:47 PM #78:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913083389] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
justaguy3492 11/26/18 5:57:05 PM #79:	As someone who lives in Philly this makes me hyped. One short bridge ride away the good legal stuff. --- Gt: justaguy3492 <cite>justaguy3492 posted [p:913083403] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote>As someone who lives in Philly this makes me hyped. One short bridge ride away the good legal stuff.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 6:00:19 PM #80:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes. But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913083553] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes.</quote> But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 6:01:01 PM #81:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes. But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913083597] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes.</quote> But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care</quote> No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 6:02:35 PM #82:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes. But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument. Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913083691] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes.</quote> But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care</quote> No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument.</quote> Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 11/26/18 6:03:50 PM #83:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes. But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument. Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" Each drug should be evaluated and treated on a case-by-case basis. If you don't understand my point yet, I'm not sure how to dumb it down any further. <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:913083765] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes.</quote> But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care</quote> No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument.</quote> Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!"</quote> Each drug should be evaluated and treated on a case-by-case basis. If you don't understand my point yet, I'm not sure how to dumb it down any further.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 6:06:18 PM #84:	Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Dash_Harber posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them. But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes. But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument. Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" Each drug should be evaluated and treated on a case-by-case basis. If you don't understand my point yet, I'm not sure how to dumb it down any further. You havent even expanded on your point. Youve just said "bbbbut they are different!!!!". Your logic sucks. What else can i do? Ive given you a chance and you come uo short every time. My logic is flawless. Just admit you just want to get high and dont care if meth heads dont get high <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913083893] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dash_Harber posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>I say that with your sides logic. Not mine. I know caffeine is a drug and im ok with it. Pot? Not so much. Your side is the hypocrotical side until you just admit that you dont give a shit about other drug users. You are one of them and wont even distinguish yourself from them.</quote> But no one said the reason for legalization is that all drugs are the same. You made that up. You also said you didn't believe in drug classes.</quote> But it is the same. People want to use the drug of their choice and get high and mighty about others. Hence you are pro weed and anti meth. And no, i didnt say i didnt believe in drug classes. I said i dont care</quote> No, I never said any of that. You are making up shit because you don't actually have an argument.</quote> Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!"</quote> Each drug should be evaluated and treated on a case-by-case basis. If you don't understand my point yet, I'm not sure how to dumb it down any further.</quote> You havent even expanded on your point. Youve just said "bbbbut they are different!!!!". Your logic sucks. What else can i do? Ive given you a chance and you come uo short every time. My logic is flawless. Just admit you just want to get high and dont care if meth heads dont get high</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
justaguy3492 11/26/18 6:06:52 PM #85:	___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" Lmao if you can't see why someone would think differently about meth than they do about weed then you need to put the keyboard down and experience life. The real world isn't A/B logic. --- Gt: justaguy3492 <cite>justaguy3492 posted [p:913083924] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" </quote> Lmao if you can't see why someone would think differently about meth than they do about weed then you need to put the keyboard down and experience life. The real world isn't A/B logic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vamp_Aubrey 11/26/18 6:07:30 PM #86:	If we are gonna legalize marijuana, we might as well legalize heroin --- http://giant.gfycat.com/DefensiveSnappyHartebeest.gif https://imgur.com/65rUq1c https://imgur.com/7SNyDjv <cite>Vamp_Aubrey posted [p:913083950] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote>If we are gonna legalize marijuana, we might as well legalize heroin</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
___b0xxY2J0sHBK 11/26/18 6:09:28 PM #87:	justaguy3492 posted... ___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted... Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" Lmao if you can't see why someone would think differently about meth than they do about weed then you need to put the keyboard down and experience life. The real world isn't A/B logic. Again, who cares? Its not your body or right to tell someone what to with their own body. This is why pot heads arguments always fail unless they either take a legakize all mentality which i respect <cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted [p:913084038] in debate for... [t:77241414]...</cite> <quote><cite>justaguy3492 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>___b0xxY2J0sHBK posted...</cite> <quote>Nope. Its fair to say you havent made a point of your own. But you also havent given a reason to legalize weed and not meth outside of "their different! !!!" </quote> Lmao if you can't see why someone would think differently about meth than they do about weed then you need to put the keyboard down and experience life. The real world isn't A/B logic.</quote> Again, who cares? Its not your body or right to tell someone what to with their own body. This is why pot heads arguments always fail unless they either take a legakize all mentality which i respect</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > debate for legalization of rec. marijuana in NJ is going on now (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > debate for legalization of rec. marijuana in NJ is going on now