Current Events > Kemp: Ridiculous To Suggest I Step Down For Stalling 53K Voter Registrations

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
DarkTransient 10/16/18 4:46:44 PM #103:	ThanksUglyGod posted... Funbazooka posted... Antifar posted... Funbazooka posted... This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. Do you have a reason, or just a meme video? Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black. I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race? No, they still mention race. They just disguise it as being for the race's benefit, rather than to disadvantage them, while having a very noticable detrimental effect once you look past the law themself. ~~And it's the same party passing those laws now that it was back then.~~ --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910637956] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThanksUglyGod posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. </quote> Do you have a reason, or just a meme video?</quote> Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black.</quote> I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race?</quote> No, they still mention race. They just disguise it as being for the race's benefit, rather than to disadvantage them, while having a very noticable detrimental effect once you look past the law themself. And it's the same party passing those laws now that it was back then.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 10/16/18 4:50:55 PM #104:	DarkTransient posted... ThanksUglyGod posted... Funbazooka posted... Antifar posted... Funbazooka posted... This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. Do you have a reason, or just a meme video? Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black. I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race? No, they still mention race. They just disguise it as being for the race's benefit, rather than to disadvantage them, while having a very noticable detrimental effect once you look past the law themself. ~~And it's the same party passing those laws now that it was back then.~~ Oh look, every alt right racists favorite the Dems are the real racists argument --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:910638218] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThanksUglyGod posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. </quote> Do you have a reason, or just a meme video?</quote> Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black.</quote> I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race?</quote> No, they still mention race. They just disguise it as being for the race's benefit, rather than to disadvantage them, while having a very noticable detrimental effect once you look past the law themself. And it's the same party passing those laws now that it was back then.</quote> Oh look, every alt right racists favorite the Dems are the real racists argument</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 4:53:01 PM #105:	ThanksUglyGod posted... Funbazooka posted... Antifar posted... Funbazooka posted... This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. Do you have a reason, or just a meme video? Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black. I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race? Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910638341] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThanksUglyGod posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. </quote> Do you have a reason, or just a meme video?</quote> Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black.</quote> I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race?</quote> Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 10/16/18 4:55:22 PM #106:	Funbazooka posted... Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 And racism never happened again --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:910638464] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 </quote> And racism never happened again</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 4:56:51 PM #107:	CyricZ posted... Funbazooka posted... Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 And racism never happened again Didn't say that. Didn't suggest that either. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910638527] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>CyricZ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 </quote> And racism never happened again</quote> Didn't say that. Didn't suggest that either.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 4:58:49 PM #108:	Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... I think it's weird you have no problem with preventing people Funbazooka posted... I'd be fine with challenging the policy on the basis that it's too far-reaching and restrictive (if that's actually the case). Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. Maybe don't deflect away from the problem of preventing people from voting and people would believe your statement. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910638606] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>I think it's weird you have no problem with preventing people</quote> <cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>I'd be fine with challenging the policy on the basis that it's too far-reaching and restrictive (if that's actually the case).</quote></quote> Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. Maybe don't deflect away from the problem of preventing people from voting and people would believe your statement.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 10/16/18 5:01:40 PM #109:	the bigger the need for validation, the harder it is for them to accept that they don't have an argument. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:910638769] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>the bigger the need for validation, the harder it is for them to accept that they don't have an argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:01:59 PM #110:	Tmaster148 posted... Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910638788] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism.</quote> You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:03:23 PM #111:	Tmaster148 posted... Maybe don't deflect away from the problem of preventing people from voting and people would believe your statement. I didn't deflect. I addressed it: "I'd be fine with challenging the policy on the basis that it's too far-reaching and restrictive (if that's actually the case)." --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910638860] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote> Maybe don't deflect away from the problem of preventing people from voting and people would believe your statement.</quote> I didn't deflect. I addressed it: "I'd be fine with challenging the policy on the basis that it's too far-reaching and restrictive (if that's actually the case)."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 5:03:24 PM #112:	Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue. I like how I said that I have a problem with preventing people from voting. Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910638861] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism.</quote> You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue.</quote> I like how I said that I have a problem with preventing people from voting. Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:05:56 PM #113:	Tmaster148 posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue. Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are. Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?" --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910638996] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism.</quote> You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue.</quote> Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are.</quote> Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 10/16/18 5:05:56 PM #114:	I also have a problem with felons not being able to vote., --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:910638997] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>I also have a problem with felons not being able to vote.,</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 5:06:46 PM #115:	Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue. Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are. Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?" I was answering a question you asked. Not my problem you asked a question involving race. I don't know who you are trying to fool here. You clearly have an issue with race. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910639037] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism.</quote> You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue.</quote> Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are.</quote> Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?"</quote> I was answering a question you asked. Not my problem you asked a question involving race. I don't know who you are trying to fool here. You clearly have an issue with race.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:10:25 PM #116:	Tmaster148 posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue. Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are. Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?" I was answering a question you asked. Not my problem you asked a question involving race. I don't know who you are trying to fool here. You clearly have an issue with race. You're being hypocritical. Clearly you're attacking my character to deflect away from the points I've made that so clearly irk you. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910639263] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism.</quote> You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue.</quote> Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are.</quote> Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?"</quote> I was answering a question you asked. Not my problem you asked a question involving race. I don't know who you are trying to fool here. You clearly have an issue with race.</quote> You're being hypocritical. Clearly you're attacking my character to deflect away from the points I've made that so clearly irk you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 5:12:49 PM #117:	Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism. You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue. Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are. Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?" I was answering a question you asked. Not my problem you asked a question involving race. I don't know who you are trying to fool here. You clearly have an issue with race. You're being hypocritical. Am I? I answered your race-based question which you conveniently left out. Funbazooka posted... You'd have to demonstrate how this policy unfairly targets black people. Idk what to tell you bud. But the article does say 70% of the people affected were black. Which was the first thing you posted about. It seems to me that you have a problem with black people and are just trying to project now. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910639384] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>Yet you spent the topic making the discussion about racism.</quote> You've essentially admitted that you believe this is a racist issue.</quote> Not everyone is obsessed with race like you are.</quote> Your words: "You mean like the 70% of black people being affected?"</quote> I was answering a question you asked. Not my problem you asked a question involving race. I don't know who you are trying to fool here. You clearly have an issue with race.</quote> You're being hypocritical.</quote> Am I? I answered your race-based question which you conveniently left out. <cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>You'd have to demonstrate how this policy unfairly targets black people.</quote> Idk what to tell you bud. But the article does say 70% of the people affected were black. Which was the first thing you posted about. It seems to me that you have a problem with black people and are just trying to project now.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:14:20 PM #118:	You're attacking my character to deflect away from the points I've made that so clearly irk you. Like so many here do on the regular. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910639470] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>You're attacking my character to deflect away from the points I've made that so clearly irk you. Like so many here do on the regular.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 5:15:16 PM #119:	What points did you make? You've brought up Jim Crow laws for most of it and deflected away because how dare the article mention black people. --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910639515] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>What points did you make? You've brought up Jim Crow laws for most of it and deflected away because how dare the article mention black people.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 10/16/18 5:16:34 PM #120:	ad hominem --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:910639584] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>ad hominem</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 10/16/18 5:17:27 PM #121:	Funbazooka posted... You're attacking my character to deflect away from the points I've made that so clearly irk you. Like so many here do on the regular. You have no points --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:910639624] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>You're attacking my character to deflect away from the points I've made that so clearly irk you. Like so many here do on the regular.</quote> You have no points</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:17:34 PM #122:	Tmaster148 posted... You've brought up Jim Crow laws Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910639630] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>You've brought up Jim Crow laws</quote> Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 10/16/18 5:18:02 PM #123:	Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... You've brought up Jim Crow laws Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything. He brought it up then demonstrated how this is similar. Then you ignored it. --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:910639658] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>You've brought up Jim Crow laws</quote> Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything.</quote> He brought it up then demonstrated how this is similar. Then you ignored it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 10/16/18 5:18:31 PM #124:	King_Hellebuyck posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... You've brought up Jim Crow laws Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything. He brought it up then demonstrated how this is similar. Then you ignored it. I quite clearly addressed it. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:910639676] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>You've brought up Jim Crow laws</quote> Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything.</quote> He brought it up then demonstrated how this is similar. Then you ignored it.</quote> I quite clearly addressed it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrToothHasYou 10/16/18 5:21:09 PM #125:	soylentgreen posted... so if it was 30% black instead of 70% would you guys care? I mean, to be fair, if it was 30% black instead of 70% it wouldn't look nearly as suspicious. --- http://weareontherun.bandcamp.com ^^^^^ HEY! ^^^ LISTEN! ^^^^^ <cite>MrToothHasYou posted [p:910639806] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>soylentgreen posted...</cite> <quote>so if it was 30% black instead of 70% would you guys care?</quote> I mean, to be fair, if it was 30% black instead of 70% it wouldn't look nearly as suspicious.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
soylentgreen 10/16/18 5:21:51 PM #126:	classic alt-left ITT --- u lookin at the real lib now, wat u gonna do about it, u used to think u owned the street, bring it on, victory is sweet, heres ur receipt, wat u gonna do <cite>soylentgreen posted [p:910639848] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>classic alt-left ITT</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkTransient 10/16/18 5:22:45 PM #127:	King_Hellebuyck posted... DarkTransient posted... ThanksUglyGod posted... Funbazooka posted... Antifar posted... Funbazooka posted... This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. Do you have a reason, or just a meme video? Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black. I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race? No, they still mention race. They just disguise it as being for the race's benefit, rather than to disadvantage them, while having a very noticable detrimental effect once you look past the law themself. ~~And it's the same party passing those laws now that it was back then.~~ Oh look, every alt right racists favorite the Dems are the real racists argument Not alt-right, but I'm pretty damn sure the Republicans aren't the ones saying "blacks have no hope of getting an education or a job without affirmative action and special scholarships just for them". --- Proud to be part of the 1% of society that's smart enough to realise Australia is not real. <cite>DarkTransient posted [p:910639891] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ThanksUglyGod posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>This isn't the Jim Crow law of the modern era. Period. </quote> Do you have a reason, or just a meme video?</quote> Jim Crow laws were state and local laws enforcing racial segregation in the Southern United States. Jim Crow laws mandated racial segregation in all public facilities. As a body of law, Jim Crow institutionalized economic, educational, and social disadvantages for African Americans. This shitty policy (that I'm not sure I even agree with) wasn't put in place to enforce racial segregation. It isn't a policy that disadvantages someone because they are black.</quote> I may have asked you this before (or some other people on this board), but what do you think happened to all the racist politicians after 1968? Do you think they just vanished into thin air, or do you think they were clever enough to come up with racist policies that didn't outwardly mention race?</quote> No, they still mention race. They just disguise it as being for the race's benefit, rather than to disadvantage them, while having a very noticable detrimental effect once you look past the law themself. And it's the same party passing those laws now that it was back then.</quote> Oh look, every alt right racists favorite the Dems are the real racists argument</quote> Not alt-right, but I'm pretty damn sure the Republicans aren't the ones saying "blacks have no hope of getting an education or a job without affirmative action and special scholarships just for them".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tmaster148 10/16/18 5:22:50 PM #128:	MrToothHasYou posted... soylentgreen posted... so if it was 30% black instead of 70% would you guys care? I mean, to be fair, if it was 30% black instead of 70% it wouldn't look nearly as suspicious. You don't think a guy in charge of the rules for the election who is also running in that election and his rules are preventing 53K voters from voting is suspicious? --- https://imgur.com/BBcZDLJ <cite>Tmaster148 posted [p:910639895] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>MrToothHasYou posted...</cite> <quote><cite>soylentgreen posted...</cite> <quote>so if it was 30% black instead of 70% would you guys care?</quote> I mean, to be fair, if it was 30% black instead of 70% it wouldn't look nearly as suspicious.</quote> You don't think a guy in charge of the rules for the election who is also running in that election and his rules are preventing 53K voters from voting is suspicious?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
booboy 10/16/18 5:24:13 PM #129:	If he has done this during an off-year, I wouldn't raise as much of an eyebrow. But the timing on this smacks of full blown suppression. --- There is no problem that can't be solved by applying more yuri to it. In Torque We Trust <cite>booboy posted [p:910639961] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>If he has done this during an off-year, I wouldn't raise as much of an eyebrow. But the timing on this smacks of full blown suppression.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
King_Hellebuyck 10/16/18 5:25:04 PM #130:	Funbazooka posted... King_Hellebuyck posted... Funbazooka posted... Tmaster148 posted... You've brought up Jim Crow laws Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything. He brought it up then demonstrated how this is similar. Then you ignored it. I quite clearly addressed it. Hand waving it away isnt addressing it, its ignoring it --- All Hail King Connor! Official Connor Hellebuyck fanboy <cite>King_Hellebuyck posted [p:910640012] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>King_Hellebuyck posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>You've brought up Jim Crow laws</quote> Anitfar brought up Jim Crow laws as a false equivalence. I haven't deflected anything.</quote> He brought it up then demonstrated how this is similar. Then you ignored it.</quote> I quite clearly addressed it.</quote> Hand waving it away isnt addressing it, its ignoring it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ThanksUglyGod 10/16/18 6:03:21 PM #131:	Funbazooka posted... CyricZ posted... Funbazooka posted... Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 And racism never happened again Didn't say that. Didn't suggest that either. So what happened to all the racist politicians after 1965? <cite>ThanksUglyGod posted [p:910641951] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CyricZ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Jim Crow laws were repealed (outlawed) in 1964. And in 1965: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 </quote> And racism never happened again</quote> Didn't say that. Didn't suggest that either.</quote> So what happened to all the racist politicians after 1965?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MrToothHasYou 10/16/18 6:09:15 PM #132:	Tmaster148 posted... You don't think a guy in charge of the rules for the election who is also running in that election and his rules are preventing 53K voters from voting is suspicious? I didn't say that, I just said it's less suspicious than that exact same circumstance, PLUS it also disproportionately affecting black voters. --- http://weareontherun.bandcamp.com ^^^^^ HEY! ^^^ LISTEN! ^^^^^ <cite>MrToothHasYou posted [p:910642252] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tmaster148 posted...</cite> <quote>You don't think a guy in charge of the rules for the election who is also running in that election and his rules are preventing 53K voters from voting is suspicious? </quote> I didn't say that, I just said it's less suspicious than that exact same circumstance, PLUS it also disproportionately affecting black voters.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bishop9800 10/16/18 6:38:10 PM #133:	DarkTransient posted... Not alt-right, but I'm pretty damn sure the Republicans aren't the ones saying "blacks have no hope of getting an education or a job without affirmative action and special scholarships just for them". The only people i see saying this is the right/Republicans. "If it wasn't for AF, they wouldn't have this job", or "The only reason why she's in Harvard is because of AF". Case in point....... you. --- Seriously. I don't care what side of the fence someone is on, if they are a piece of crap, they are a piece of crap. <cite>Bishop9800 posted [p:910643739] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkTransient posted...</cite> <quote>Not alt-right, but I'm pretty damn sure the Republicans aren't the ones saying "blacks have no hope of getting an education or a job without affirmative action and special scholarships just for them". </quote> The only people i see saying this is the right/Republicans. "If it wasn't for AF, they wouldn't have this job", or "The only reason why she's in Harvard is because of AF". Case in point....... you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Delirious_Beard 10/16/18 6:51:33 PM #134:	people if you're still responding to funbazooka at this point i dunno what to tell you --- https://i.imgtc.com/hB9W4JK.gif "Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine? Is this darkness in you, too?" <cite>Delirious_Beard posted [p:910644472] in Kemp: Ridi... [t:77100450]...</cite> <quote>people if you're still responding to funbazooka at this point i dunno what to tell you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Kemp: Ridiculous To Suggest I Step Down For Stalling 53K Voter Registrations (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Kemp: Ridiculous To Suggest I Step Down For Stalling 53K Voter Registrations