Current Events > Ford wont pursue the sexual assault allegations any further

(+) Yeah! (+)

---

What else is there to pursue? She has no evidence so she can't go after him criminally. He's about to be confirmed so stopping that failed. She destroyed his reputation though, so I guess she'll take that W into the sunset.

That and all the crowdfunding donations.
---

And what's your take on it, TC?
---

CyricZ posted...

And what's your take on it, TC?

We already know
---

CyricZ posted...

And what's your take on it, TC?

Cant give one properly on this site.
---

It's not worth the trouble. She'll just get more exposure and be open to harrassment and death threats from man babies.
---

Lol

Of course not
---

Just abandoning all those women seeking justice, smh.
---

a sexual predator going unpunished. Par for the course.
---

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

Emotion

FrisbeeDude posted...

a sexual predator going unpunished. Par for the course.

Nah Cosby went to jail
---

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

Democrats have been grooming to left to be a bunch of zombies. The easiest people to brainwash are the people who will believe anything without evidence.
---

Why would she? Its kinda like shooting at baskets after the buzzer.
---

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

Democrats have been grooming to left to be a bunch of zombies. The easiest people to brainwash are the people who will believe anything without evidence.

...so basically the entire Republican base?
---

ThePrinceFish posted...

She destroyed his reputation though, so I guess she'll take that W into the sunset.

That and all the crowdfunding donations.

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld... Plus all the other ones that were withheld outright that we knew about. His reputation was crappy well before this to those who actually cared.

And the crowdfunding doesn't even compare to how much Kavanaugh's have earned. But unlike him, Ford and her entire family have had to move given the credible death threats they've all received. She is also a professional who earned hundreds of thousands for years, so this isn't much to recompense her having to literally pack up and start somewhere else.
---

Didn't her lawyers claim, just yesterday, that they were going to release "definitive evidence"?
---

well this was really only an attempt to block his nomination so of course
---

Nomadic View posted...

Why would she? Its kinda like shooting at baskets after the buzzer.

Because him being confirmed doesn't make her unraped.

Giving up now immediately after she failed to stop the confirmation only makes it looks more like she had been lying the entire time. If she wasn't, she would still be looking for justice.

Did she really get a bunch of GoFundMe money? For what?

I am curious since I do not know.

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

Democrats have been grooming to left to be a bunch of zombies. The easiest people to brainwash are the people who will believe anything without evidence.

And you're saying that a party whose base is heavily founded in religious beliefs doesn't fit that description?
---

Rick-C137 posted...

well this was really only an attempt to block his nomination so of course

I would not be surprised.

I don't know why people don't question the timing of certain things.

WitcherGeralt posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Why would she? Its kinda like shooting at baskets after the buzzer.

Because him being confirmed doesn't make her unraped.

Giving up now immediately after she failed to stop the confirmation only makes it looks more like she had been lying the entire time. If she wasn't, she would still be looking for justice.

She couldn't get a confirmation stopped, where is she going to find the evidence to win a criminal trial? That's quite higher a standard of proof you need to meet. She is smart enough to know how futile and expensive that would be.
---

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

People don't want him punished, they want an investigation into the accusations.

Which is not and never was an unreasonable request.
---

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld

Those documents were related to his judicial findings, not the accusation.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

People don't want him punished, they want an investigation into the accusations.

Which is not and never was an unreasonable request.

They also want people who knew him to actually be interviewed. Like all the ones who posted op-eds about how yes, he drank heavily and was constantly drunk to excess and therefore he perjured himself which should not just disqualify him from the SCOTUS but is worthy of having him disbarred and removed from all judge positions.
---

Who's she going to take it to, Brett Kavanaugh? Or maybe Donald "Pussy Grabber" Trump?

Of course she can't pursue it any further. The idea was she was doing everyone a civic service.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld

Those documents were related to his judicial findings, not the accusation.

And you don't see how that's relevant to painting a whole picture of him and where he's getting money from?
---

gunplagirl posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld

Those documents were related to his judicial findings, not the accusation.

And you don't see how that's relevant to painting a whole picture of him and where he's getting money from?

I don't see how it's relevant to his assault accusation
---

MarqueeSeries posted...

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

nemu posted...

I'm so confused why people think he should be punished when there is literally not a shred of corroborative evidence. You're certainly welcome to believe he's an attempted rapist, but he shouldn't be punished without actual proof that he is one.

Democrats have been grooming to left to be a bunch of zombies. The easiest people to brainwash are the people who will believe anything without evidence.

And you're saying that a party whose base is heavily founded in religious beliefs doesn't fit that description?

Religion is also a from of control, but the left love to support Islam for some reason. SJWism is not that different from religion.
---

how awfully suspicious

Coffeebeanz posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld

Those documents were related to his judicial findings, not the accusation.

And you don't see how that's relevant to painting a whole picture of him and where he's getting money from?

I don't see how it's relevant to his assault accusation

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?
---

gunplagirl posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld

Those documents were related to his judicial findings, not the accusation.

And you don't see how that's relevant to painting a whole picture of him and where he's getting money from?

I don't see how it's relevant to his assault accusation

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

If this is actually how you think, you should never make fun of Alex Jones lol
---

gunplagirl posted...

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

None of her witnesses, including her best friend was able to corroborate the events. There's no conspiracy, just basic common sense.
---

silentwing26x posted...

how awfully suspicious

Look who's posting on another alt again
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Coffeebeanz posted...

Republicans and most white women don't think he did it and they don't care about the dozens of documents that just this week we found out were being withheld

Those documents were related to his judicial findings, not the accusation.

And you don't see how that's relevant to painting a whole picture of him and where he's getting money from?

I don't see how it's relevant to his assault accusation

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

If this is actually how you think, you should never make fun of Alex Jones lol

So you refuse to answer or acknowledge that the investigation was a farce because it couldn't actually investigate anything related to whether he perjured himself (and he did) or if there was any corroborating evidence?

The fact that he's getting money from sources that are being blocked from the Senate itself is highly suspicious.

Basically, that you don't think to consider that there is anything worth investigating says everything about you.
---

There's not a lot she can really go by unfortunately. I think she should focus on coping with what happened to her, whoever did it, and try to continue on with her life.
---

silentwing26x posted...

how awfully suspicious

I don't even get this point. The whole reason she came forward was because he was being nominated to be the most grand judge of morality in the country.

Seems completely reasonable for her to put her story forth to let the full view of Kavanaugh enter public eye. Seems like if I knew someone was an immoral asshole, I wouldn't want them to be the grand judge of morality. It's not like the case is very strong, legally. Or even possible. So why would you ever expect her to pursue it?
---

I don't think like that because I'm not a brainwashed pawn for a political party that needs unthinking voters chanting slogans.
---

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

None of her witnesses, including her best friend was able to corroborate the events. There's no conspiracy, just basic common sense.

That is not a good thing for her, when none of your witnesses can corroborate it makes her look like a woman who is either lying or just trying to ruin the mans reputation.
---

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

None of her witnesses, including her best friend was able to corroborate the events. There's no conspiracy, just basic common sense.

If that's the case then why blockade an investigation to the extent they could not even interview the two it directly involves?
---

Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth. - Marcus Aurelius
---

gunplagirl posted...

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

None of her witnesses, including her best friend was able to corroborate the events. There's no conspiracy, just basic common sense.

If that's the case then why blockade an investigation to the extent they could not even interview the two it directly involves?

did they not just testify? why would they need to be interviewed again?
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth. - Marcus Aurelius

Rofl.

This was a post in this topic.
---

RiKuToTheMiGhtY posted...

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

None of her witnesses, including her best friend was able to corroborate the events. There's no conspiracy, just basic common sense.

That is not a good thing for her, when none of your witnesses can corroborate it makes her look like a woman who is either lying or just trying to ruin the mans reputation.

Ah yes, one day ten years ago she just decided to speak to her therapist about some guy who had never wronged her because she wanted to destroy his reputation when he got on the fast track to his judge position in DC. I guess she's in for the long con since it took her a decade and still failed.
---

Rick-C137 posted...

gunplagirl posted...

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Why do you think the "investigation" was given such strict time limits, such a narrow scope and that neither of the two could even be interviewed by the FBI?

None of her witnesses, including her best friend was able to corroborate the events. There's no conspiracy, just basic common sense.

If that's the case then why blockade an investigation to the extent they could not even interview the two it directly involves?

did they not just testify? why would they need to be interviewed again?

You really think there aren't new questions that could be raised to help determine persons of interest that weren't otherwise brought up by name during the hearing?
---

gunplagirl posted...

If that's the case then why blockade an investigation to the extent they could not even interview the two it directly involves?

Give it a rest. The left was never going to be satisfied unless Kavanaugh was found guilty of it. You never cared about the facts or evidence.

You know exactly why they don't want to keep the investigation stretched out. Don't pretend you don't know the politics behind it. The FBI did their best and you just don't like the facts that even her witnesses can't back her up.
---

You really think there aren't new questions that could be raised to help determine persons of interest that weren't otherwise brought up by name during the hearing

They interviewed literally every person she claimed was at the party. Nobody could corroborate it.

She said herself she never spoke of the event publicly after it occurred.

It's a dead end. Get over it.
---

Coffeebeanz posted...

I don't think like that because I'm not a brainwashed pawn for a political party that needs unthinking voters chanting slogans.

"I don't think it's suspicious that massive amounts of records were withheld despite the fact they are both directly related to whether or not a SCOTUS nominee is actually ethical or going to be able to treat both sides in a case with due consideration. But I assure you, YOU'RE the brainwashed one for actually questioning what's in the records."
---

@gunplagirl

When none of her witnesses can remember a horrible incident like that, she never talked about it to her best friend, and only her therapist then yes it is suspect.

People do not forget when something like sexual assault happens to their best friend, and when none of her witnesses can recall then it means something fishy is going on.
---

GreatEvilEmpire posted...

gunplagirl posted...

If that's the case then why blockade an investigation to the extent they could not even interview the two it directly involves?

Give it a rest. The left was never going to be satisfied unless Kavanaugh was found guilty of it. You never cared about the facts or evidence.

You know exactly why they don't want to keep the investigation stretched out. Don't pretend you don't know the politics behind it. The FBI did their best and you just don't like the facts that even her witnesses can't back her up.

Ah so now the FBI does its best. I thought the FBI was terrible for wasting all their resources on investigating Trump.
---