Current Events > Let's say that Kavanaugh is nominated.

Topic List	Page List: 1
frozenshock 10/03/18 1:14:04 PM #1:	And let's say that Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies and Trump replaces her with another Kavanaugh/Gorsuch. What's the worse that can happen? I mean, after that Citizens United decision, can it really get any worse? --- I don't hate people, people hate me. <cite>frozenshock posted [p:909889291] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>And let's say that Ruth Bader Ginsburg dies and Trump replaces her with another Kavanaugh/Gorsuch. What's the worse that can happen? I mean, after that Citizens United decision, can it really get any worse?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ElatedVenusaur 10/03/18 1:27:28 PM #2:	Well, they could finish off the VRA, overturn Roe v. Wade, continue their assault on unions, government regulation of all kind, etc. etc. Basically with impunity. <cite>ElatedVenusaur posted [p:909889949] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>Well, they could finish off the VRA, overturn Roe v. Wade, continue their assault on unions, government regulation of all kind, etc. etc. Basically with impunity.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 10/03/18 1:27:55 PM #3:	Hes already been nominated bro --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:909889971] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>Hes already been nominated bro</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
theAteam 10/03/18 1:33:23 PM #4:	Essentially you'll have one party owning an entire branch of our government with no real way to change it until they retire/die which could be decades from now. At least with Congress/President they can be voted out periodically. --- Buffalo Bills 2018-19 Season Prediction: 5-11 Season Record: 1-3 Next Up: Tennessee Titans (3-1) <cite>theAteam posted [p:909890282] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>Essentially you'll have one party owning an entire branch of our government with no real way to change it until they retire/die which could be decades from now. At least with Congress/President they can be voted out periodically.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/03/18 1:35:46 PM #5:	frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:909890412] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 10/03/18 1:39:27 PM #6:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:909890631] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nomadic View 10/03/18 1:43:24 PM #7:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. Gerrymandering has been legal for a long time. Political gerrymandering of voting districts does not violate the Equal Protection Clause unless there is discriminatory vote dilution evidenced by the continued frustration of the will of a majority of voters, or effective denial to a minority of voters of a fair chance to influence the political process. Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986) --- {}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{} {}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;> <cite>Nomadic View posted [p:909890824] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> Gerrymandering has been legal for a long time. Political gerrymandering of voting districts does not violate the Equal Protection Clause unless there is discriminatory vote dilution evidenced by the continued frustration of the will of a majority of voters, or effective denial to a minority of voters of a fair chance to influence the political process. Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 10/03/18 1:45:43 PM #8:	gunplagirl posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please. Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909890954] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please.</quote> Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/03/18 1:47:16 PM #9:	Nomadic View posted... unless there is Now imagine there weren't conditions. Like I said, gerrymandering down to the specific address. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:909891059] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Nomadic View posted...</cite> <quote> unless there is </quote> Now imagine there weren't conditions. Like I said, gerrymandering down to the specific address.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/03/18 1:48:14 PM #10:	darkjedilink posted... Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term Why do you think this? --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:909891113] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term</quote> Why do you think this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Heineken14 10/03/18 1:49:44 PM #11:	darkjedilink posted... gunplagirl posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please. Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution. This was so on the nose stupid that I thought it was a DE post at first. lol --- Rage is a hell of an anesthetic. <cite>Heineken14 posted [p:909891201] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please.</quote> Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution.</quote> This was so on the nose stupid that I thought it was a DE post at first. lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 10/03/18 1:54:08 PM #12:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... darkjedilink posted... Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term Why do you think this? 'It's a living document...' Liberals generally believe that, regardless of what the Constitution actually says, its meaning changes. Conservatives, as a general rule, do not. Ergo, conservative justices are far, FAR less likely to give the office of President a lifetime term. I don't think liberal justices would, either, but if anyone did, they'd be liberals. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909891428] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term</quote> Why do you think this?</quote> 'It's a living document...' Liberals generally believe that, regardless of what the Constitution actually says, its meaning changes. Conservatives, as a general rule, do not. Ergo, conservative justices are far, FAR less likely to give the office of President a lifetime term. I don't think liberal justices would, either, but if anyone did, they'd be liberals.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/03/18 1:58:44 PM #13:	darkjedilink posted... Liberals generally believe Stop putting words in people's mouths. --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:909891668] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Liberals generally believe</quote> Stop putting words in people's mouths.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 10/03/18 2:01:26 PM #15:	What should happen is Dems have enough bodies in Congress to flat out refuse to hold any nomination votes, 2020 kicks Trump out, and Dems get their pick. --- To err is human To arr is pirate <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:909891842] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>What should happen is Dems have enough bodies in Congress to flat out refuse to hold any nomination votes, 2020 kicks Trump out, and Dems get their pick.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Frostshock 10/03/18 2:03:43 PM #16:	I feel like most liberals think that judges are partisan. They are not. Trump could replace the entire court if they all suddenly retired, and they still wouldn't dare overturn previous rulings. --- Got questions about schoolwork? Want to share answers, or discuss your studies? Come to Homework Helpers! http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/1060-homework-helpers <cite>Frostshock posted [p:909891985] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>I feel like most liberals think that judges are partisan. They are not. Trump could replace the entire court if they all suddenly retired, and they still wouldn't dare overturn previous rulings.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 10/03/18 2:03:58 PM #17:	Anarchy_Juiblex posted... darkjedilink posted... Liberals generally believe Stop putting words in people's mouths. Are you really suggesting that liberals haven't repeatedly called the Constitution a 'living document?' --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909892004] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Liberals generally believe</quote> Stop putting words in people's mouths.</quote> Are you really suggesting that liberals haven't repeatedly called the Constitution a 'living document?'</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Anarchy_Juiblex 10/03/18 2:08:10 PM #18:	I'm just going to skip to the end and mock, "it's only judicial activism when the left does it" lol --- "Tolerance of intolerance is cowardice." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali <cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted [p:909892223] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote>I'm just going to skip to the end and mock, "it's only judicial activism when the left does it" lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darkman124 10/03/18 2:10:27 PM #19:	Frostshock posted... I feel like most liberals think that judges are partisan. They are not. Trump could replace the entire court if they all suddenly retired, and they still wouldn't dare overturn previous rulings. literally the point of the supreme court is they have the power to overturn previous rulings of the supreme court --- And when the hourglass has run out, eternity asks you about only one thing: whether you have lived in despair or not. <cite>Darkman124 posted [p:909892334] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Frostshock posted...</cite> <quote>I feel like most liberals think that judges are partisan. They are not. Trump could replace the entire court if they all suddenly retired, and they still wouldn't dare overturn previous rulings.</quote> literally the point of the supreme court is they have the power to overturn previous rulings of the supreme court</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#20	Post #20 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 10/03/18 2:14:44 PM #21:	Darkman124 posted... Frostshock posted... I feel like most liberals think that judges are partisan. They are not. Trump could replace the entire court if they all suddenly retired, and they still wouldn't dare overturn previous rulings. literally the point of the supreme court is they have the power to overturn previous rulings of the supreme court No. Literally the point of the Supreme Court is to determine if laws are Constitutional. Yes, that includes previous rulings, but, for the most part, previous rulings are treated as part of the Constitution. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909892564] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darkman124 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Frostshock posted...</cite> <quote>I feel like most liberals think that judges are partisan. They are not. Trump could replace the entire court if they all suddenly retired, and they still wouldn't dare overturn previous rulings.</quote> literally the point of the supreme court is they have the power to overturn previous rulings of the supreme court</quote> No. Literally the point of the Supreme Court is to determine if laws are Constitutional. Yes, that includes previous rulings, but, for the most part, previous rulings are treated as part of the Constitution.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Heineken14 10/03/18 2:36:42 PM #22:	darkjedilink posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... darkjedilink posted... Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term Why do you think this? 'It's a living document...' Liberals generally believe that, regardless of what the Constitution actually says, its meaning changes. Conservatives, as a general rule, do not. Ergo, conservative justices are far, FAR less likely to give the office of President a lifetime term. I don't think liberal justices would, either, but if anyone did, they'd be liberals. Conservatives generally believe in supreme authority and the ends justify the means. They would be FAR more likely to enact one of their presidents as ruler for life. --- Rage is a hell of an anesthetic. <cite>Heineken14 posted [p:909893980] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term</quote> Why do you think this?</quote> 'It's a living document...' Liberals generally believe that, regardless of what the Constitution actually says, its meaning changes. Conservatives, as a general rule, do not. Ergo, conservative justices are far, FAR less likely to give the office of President a lifetime term. I don't think liberal justices would, either, but if anyone did, they'd be liberals.</quote> Conservatives generally believe in supreme authority and the ends justify the means. They would be FAR more likely to enact one of their presidents as ruler for life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 10/03/18 2:43:58 PM #23:	Heineken14 posted... darkjedilink posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... darkjedilink posted... Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term Why do you think this? 'It's a living document...' Liberals generally believe that, regardless of what the Constitution actually says, its meaning changes. Conservatives, as a general rule, do not. Ergo, conservative justices are far, FAR less likely to give the office of President a lifetime term. I don't think liberal justices would, either, but if anyone did, they'd be liberals. Conservatives generally believe in supreme authority and the ends justify the means. They would be FAR more likely to enact one of their presidents as ruler for life. And you have actual policy as it relates to the Supreme Court to justify this? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909894411] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>Heineken14 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term</quote> Why do you think this?</quote> 'It's a living document...' Liberals generally believe that, regardless of what the Constitution actually says, its meaning changes. Conservatives, as a general rule, do not. Ergo, conservative justices are far, FAR less likely to give the office of President a lifetime term. I don't think liberal justices would, either, but if anyone did, they'd be liberals.</quote> Conservatives generally believe in supreme authority and the ends justify the means. They would be FAR more likely to enact one of their presidents as ruler for life.</quote> And you have actual policy as it relates to the Supreme Court to justify this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 10/03/18 6:22:27 PM #24:	darkjedilink posted... gunplagirl posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please. Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution. I know you're a gimmick account but at least put some effort into your bs --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:909906022] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please.</quote> Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution.</quote> I know you're a gimmick account but at least put some effort into your bs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 10/03/18 6:50:39 PM #25:	gunplagirl posted... darkjedilink posted... gunplagirl posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please. Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution. I know you're a gimmick account but at least put some effort into your bs Name a liberal Supreme Court Justice who actually abides by the Constitution as it is written. Name a single liberal-authored position that follows the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Hell, their opinions on the Second Amendment ALONE prove my point perfectly. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909907591] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please.</quote> Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution.</quote> I know you're a gimmick account but at least put some effort into your bs</quote> Name a liberal Supreme Court Justice who actually abides by the Constitution as it is written. Name a single liberal-authored position that follows the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Hell, their opinions on the Second Amendment ALONE prove my point perfectly.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 10/03/18 9:30:02 PM #26:	darkjedilink posted... gunplagirl posted... darkjedilink posted... gunplagirl posted... Anarchy_Juiblex posted... frozenshock posted... can it really get any worse? A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse. This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please. Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution. I know you're a gimmick account but at least put some effort into your bs Name a liberal Supreme Court Justice who actually abides by the Constitution as it is written. Name a single liberal-authored position that follows the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Hell, their opinions on the Second Amendment ALONE prove my point perfectly. You mean the Constitution, that as it was written only applied to white Christian men? Golly, you sure do seem to fundamentally misunderstand that it's a living document and was written so we CAN change it as the nation and society evolves. --- Pew pew! <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:909916197] in Let's say ... [t:77063771]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anarchy_Juiblex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>frozenshock posted...</cite> <quote>can it really get any worse?</quote> A President given complete criminal immunity from SCOTUS. Gerrymandering down to the house. etc Yes, it can always get worse.</quote> This. Heck, the president could probably declare himself King for life and have political opponents, even elected ones, removed and then deny other parties from running a candidate for the newly opened position. With the majority of the seats they'd ultimately win in appeals and be able to freely rewrite the laws and Constitution as they please.</quote> Only liberal justices would allow the President a lifetime term - conservative justices actually try to follow the Constitution.</quote> I know you're a gimmick account but at least put some effort into your bs</quote> Name a liberal Supreme Court Justice who actually abides by the Constitution as it is written. Name a single liberal-authored position that follows the letter and spirit of the Constitution. Hell, their opinions on the Second Amendment ALONE prove my point perfectly.</quote> You mean the Constitution, that as it was written only applied to white Christian men? Golly, you sure do seem to fundamentally misunderstand that it's a living document and was written so we CAN change it as the nation and society evolves.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Let's say that Kavanaugh is nominated. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Let's say that Kavanaugh is nominated.