Current Events > ''I'm innocent!! I did nothing wrong! She's lying!!!''

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Hulkasaurusrex 09/28/18 10:36:17 AM #51:	Why cant bernie be on the supreme court <cite>Hulkasaurusrex posted [p:909598369] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>Why cant bernie be on the supreme court</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/28/18 10:50:10 AM #52:	Paragon21XX posted... The vast majority of convictions that were made on witness testimony alone have been overturned Fucking bullshit. Prove it. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909599027] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>The vast majority of convictions that were made on witness testimony alone have been overturned </quote> Fucking bullshit. Prove it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 09/28/18 10:52:18 AM #53:	Kineth posted... DJL defending an alleged rapist. Hard to imagine why his wife left him. You defended Clinton for years... --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:909599123] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>DJL defending an alleged rapist. Hard to imagine why his wife left him.</quote> You defended Clinton for years...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SageHarpuia 09/28/18 10:52:55 AM #54:	...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! --- "You will pay dearly for your futile resistance!" <cite>SageHarpuia posted [p:909599158] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Caution999 09/28/18 10:54:05 AM #55:	SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us. --- The best posts, believe me. <cite>Caution999 posted [p:909599213] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 09/28/18 10:55:33 AM #56:	Caution999 posted... SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us. No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLH8skGXKw4 WHOOP WHOOP <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:909599287] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us.</quote> No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/28/18 10:57:44 AM #57:	SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! You don't convict anyone. A jury does. If a jury decides testimony is enough, then that's all they need. And people get convicted on testimony alone all the time. Or more accurately, testimony is given in defense, and the testimony is false, and the prosecution can prove something in the testimony is false, and that casts a huge shadow of doubt over the remainder of the defense's arguments. "Devil's Triangle is a drinking game" is literally the kind of shit that gets people convicted IRL all the fucking time. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909599392] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> You don't convict anyone. A jury does. If a jury decides testimony is enough, then that's all they need. And people get convicted on testimony alone all the time. Or more accurately, testimony is given in defense, and the testimony is false, and the prosecution can prove something in the testimony is false, and that casts a huge shadow of doubt over the remainder of the defense's arguments. "Devil's Triangle is a drinking game" is literally the kind of shit that gets people convicted IRL all the fucking time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 09/28/18 10:58:54 AM #58:	Tyranthraxus posted... "Devil's Triangle is a drinking game" is literally the kind of shit that gets people convicted IRL all the fucking time. That was such a blatant lie and I'm pissed he wasn't pressed harder on it --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLH8skGXKw4 WHOOP WHOOP <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:909599456] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>"Devil's Triangle is a drinking game" is literally the kind of shit that gets people convicted IRL all the fucking time.</quote> That was such a blatant lie and I'm pissed he wasn't pressed harder on it</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 09/28/18 11:00:52 AM #59:	The Great Muta 22 posted... Caution999 posted... SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us. No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time Right, it's more of a "we're just making shit up as we go to stall for time" kind of thing. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:909599551] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us.</quote> No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time</quote> Right, it's more of a "we're just making shit up as we go to stall for time" kind of thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 09/28/18 11:02:04 AM #60:	Coffeebeanz posted... The Great Muta 22 posted... Caution999 posted... SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us. No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time Right, it's more of a "we're just making shit up as we go to stall for time" kind of thing. Sure, it's all a Democratic conspiracy and these women are being paid to say these things and risking jail time. Sure thing Alex Jones --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLH8skGXKw4 WHOOP WHOOP <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:909599610] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us.</quote> No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time</quote> Right, it's more of a "we're just making shit up as we go to stall for time" kind of thing.</quote> Sure, it's all a Democratic conspiracy and these women are being paid to say these things and risking jail time. Sure thing Alex Jones</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paragon21XX 09/28/18 11:12:45 AM #61:	Tyranthraxus posted... Paragon21XX posted... The vast majority of convictions that were made on witness testimony alone have been overturned Fucking bullshit. Prove it. I worded that wrong. I meant to say that the vast majority of overturned convictions were from cases where either all they had or their biggest piece of evidence was eye-witness testimony that was later contradicted by future discovered evidence such as DNA tests. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/12/the_exoneration_of_kash_register_and_the _problem_of_false_eyewitness_testimony.html And yet, according to Brandon Garrett, a law professor at the University of Virginia and the author of Convicting the Innocent, eyewitness misidentifications have played a leading role in nearly 75 percent of 250 convictions overturned by DNA evidence between 1989 and 2010. If that's not enough to make you question the practice of using only testimony to convict someone in lieu of hard evidence, you should reconsider the meaning of justice. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:909600194] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote> The vast majority of convictions that were made on witness testimony alone have been overturned </quote> Fucking bullshit. Prove it.</quote> I worded that wrong. I meant to say that the vast majority of overturned convictions were from cases where either all they had or their biggest piece of evidence was eye-witness testimony that was later contradicted by future discovered evidence such as DNA tests. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/12/the_exoneration_of_kash_register_and_the _problem_of_false_eyewitness_testimony.html <quote>And yet, according to Brandon Garrett, a law professor at the University of Virginia and the author of Convicting the Innocent, eyewitness misidentifications have played a leading role in nearly 75 percent of 250 convictions overturned by DNA evidence between 1989 and 2010.</quote> If that's not enough to make you question the practice of using only testimony to convict someone in lieu of hard evidence, you should reconsider the meaning of justice.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/28/18 11:19:45 AM #62:	Paragon21XX posted... I worded that wrong. I meant to say that the vast majority of overturned convictions were from cases where either all they had or their biggest piece of evidence was eye-witness testimony that was later contradicted by future discovered evidence such as DNA tests. Lately DNA tests are proving to be super inaccurate because of mixed samples. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180924/18174740705/study-buried-four-years-shows-crime-lab-dna-testing-is-severely-flawed.shtml I mean if you're going to hold up all evidence to word of god standards, lets be honest. The reason it takes so fucking long to execute someone on death row is because most of them are convicted on things like fingerprints, dna, hair, and so on, and that shit actually isn't reliable at all. Paragon21XX posted... If that's not enough to make you question the practice of using only testimony to convict someone in lieu of hard evidence, you should reconsider the meaning of justice. I don't want to convict him on the sole basis of Ford's testimony, or the testimony of the other 3 accusers. I just want an investigation. The DoJ can decide what to do after they've collected all evidence and testimony. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909600612] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>I worded that wrong. I meant to say that the vast majority of overturned convictions were from cases where either all they had or their biggest piece of evidence was eye-witness testimony that was later contradicted by future discovered evidence such as DNA tests.</quote> Lately DNA tests are proving to be super inaccurate because of mixed samples. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180924/18174740705/study-buried-four-years-shows-crime-lab-dna-testing-is-severely-flawed.shtml I mean if you're going to hold up all evidence to word of god standards, lets be honest. The reason it takes so fucking long to execute someone on death row is because most of them are convicted on things like fingerprints, dna, hair, and so on, and that shit actually isn't reliable at all. <cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>If that's not enough to make you question the practice of using only testimony to convict someone in lieu of hard evidence, you should reconsider the meaning of justice.</quote> I don't want to convict him on the sole basis of Ford's testimony, or the testimony of the other 3 accusers. I just want an investigation. The DoJ can decide what to do after they've collected all evidence and testimony.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 09/28/18 11:21:18 AM #63:	Coffeebeanz posted... The Great Muta 22 posted... Caution999 posted... SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us. No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time Right, it's more of a "we're just making shit up as we go to stall for time" kind of thing. You're the one making shit up. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:909600677] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Caution999 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> We're definitely the generation of "muh feelings" Emotions drive us.</quote> No one is being convicted of anything, this isn't a fucking trial. You guys really need to stop being so disingenuous all the fucking time</quote> Right, it's more of a "we're just making shit up as we go to stall for time" kind of thing.</quote> You're the one making shit up.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Paragon21XX 09/28/18 11:37:16 AM #64:	The DNA test with the high false positive rate is the one that tests only the Y-chromosome rather than the autosomal test which uses the whole genome which has only a one-in-a-billion chance of returning a false result. --- Hmm... <cite>Paragon21XX posted [p:909601519] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>The DNA test with the high false positive rate is the one that tests only the Y-chromosome rather than the autosomal test which uses the whole genome which has only a one-in-a-billion chance of returning a false result.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 09/28/18 11:40:26 AM #65:	tommy: i did not hit her. its not true. i did not hit her. i did not. oh hi mark mark: welcome to the supreme court of the united states --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:909601692] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>tommy: i did not hit her. its not true. i did not hit her. i did not. oh hi mark mark: welcome to the supreme court of the united states</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/28/18 11:42:25 AM #66:	Paragon21XX posted... The DNA test with the high false positive rate is the one that tests only the Y-chromosome rather than the autosomal test which uses the whole genome which has only a one-in-a-billion chance of returning a false result. It's not necessarily that the test is wrong, it's that the sample is wrong. I walk into mcdonalds and lean on the counter. Then I leave. 10 minutes later a guy comes in and shoots the cashier. And for whatever reason the cameras just weren't working that day. Police later come and arrest me claiming they have the murder weapon--a stolen gun--with my DNA on it, and they're not lying. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909601806] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>The DNA test with the high false positive rate is the one that tests only the Y-chromosome rather than the autosomal test which uses the whole genome which has only a one-in-a-billion chance of returning a false result.</quote> It's not necessarily that the test is wrong, it's that the sample is wrong. I walk into mcdonalds and lean on the counter. Then I leave. 10 minutes later a guy comes in and shoots the cashier. And for whatever reason the cameras just weren't working that day. Police later come and arrest me claiming they have the murder weapon--a stolen gun--with my DNA on it, and they're not lying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ScazarMeltex 09/28/18 12:19:58 PM #67:	The Great Muta 22 posted... ScazarMeltex posted... Kineth posted... Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee. True, but maybe the dems should have had the fucking sack to fight over it, instead they did what the dems always do and roll over like spineless fucking worms. All it would have taken is for the dems to leave D.C. saying "we will do nothing until Merrick Garland is given a vote" Without a quorom nothing gets done and the government shuts down. Public opinion was already against the GOP over the issue so the dems could have won the fight if they weren't cowards. Bullshit. There was quite literally nothing they could have done. What your proposing they should have done wouldn't have accomplished anything. So once again Democrats are being blamed for Republicans being complete scumbags. What a fucking joke No, I agree the republicans are scum. The democrats are also cowards. One does not negate the other. --- "If you wish to converse with me define your terms" Voltaire <cite>ScazarMeltex posted [p:909603827] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ScazarMeltex posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee.</quote> True, but maybe the dems should have had the fucking sack to fight over it, instead they did what the dems always do and roll over like spineless fucking worms. All it would have taken is for the dems to leave D.C. saying "we will do nothing until Merrick Garland is given a vote" Without a quorom nothing gets done and the government shuts down. Public opinion was already against the GOP over the issue so the dems could have won the fight if they weren't cowards.</quote> Bullshit. There was quite literally nothing they could have done. What your proposing they should have done wouldn't have accomplished anything. So once again Democrats are being blamed for Republicans being complete scumbags. What a fucking joke</quote> No, I agree the republicans are scum. The democrats are also cowards. One does not negate the other.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
theAteam 09/28/18 12:31:38 PM #68:	SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! Bill Cosby is sitting in a jail cell on witness testimony alone. --- Buffalo Bills 2018-19 Season Prediction: 5-11 Season Record: 1-2 Next Up: Green Bay (1-1-1) <cite>theAteam posted [p:909604503] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> Bill Cosby is sitting in a jail cell on witness testimony alone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 09/28/18 1:31:31 PM #69:	darkjedilink posted... Kineth posted... DJL defending an alleged rapist. Hard to imagine why his wife left him. You defended Clinton for years... While this has nothing to do with what I said, I'll entertain this because I'm not sure what you're talking about. Which Clinton are you referring to? I assume Bill since he'd be slightly relevant to the discussion but then that'd be bullshit since I haven't done much defending of him here or anywhere in years. If it's Hillary, I'm still not sure what you're talking about as it'd be irrelevant and I haven't defended her much ever. --- "I don't think anyone seriously thinks that Trump supporters orgasm when they see racism in the news." - Me, reassuring Ammonitida <cite>Kineth posted [p:909607996] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>DJL defending an alleged rapist. Hard to imagine why his wife left him.</quote> You defended Clinton for years...</quote> While this has nothing to do with what I said, I'll entertain this because I'm not sure what you're talking about. Which Clinton are you referring to? I assume Bill since he'd be slightly relevant to the discussion but then that'd be bullshit since I haven't done much defending of him here or anywhere in years. If it's Hillary, I'm still not sure what you're talking about as it'd be irrelevant and I haven't defended her much ever.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tupacrulez 09/28/18 1:37:08 PM #70:	theAteam posted... SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! Bill Cosby is sitting in a jail cell on witness testimony alone. Bill Cosby admitted to giving them Quaaludes. You don't get to just fuck someone after you fucking drugged them you nimnod. --- Suck less, Rock Moar Have I licked butt hole before? All the time. --r4xor <cite>Tupacrulez posted [p:909608322] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>theAteam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> Bill Cosby is sitting in a jail cell on witness testimony alone.</quote> Bill Cosby admitted to giving them Quaaludes. You don't get to just fuck someone after you fucking drugged them you nimnod.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/28/18 3:25:45 PM #71:	Tupacrulez posted... theAteam posted... SageHarpuia posted... ...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought! Bill Cosby is sitting in a jail cell on witness testimony alone. Bill Cosby admitted to giving them Quaaludes. You don't get to just fuck someone after you fucking drugged them you nimnod. What Bill Cosby admitted to is meaningless. Donald Trump admitted to just going up to women and grabbing them by the pussy. The fact remains is that Bill Cosby was convicted on just witness testimony, including his own testimony (he is still a witness to himself although he's not legally required to be) and Donald Trump, who admitted to THE SAME CRIME was convicted of nothing. R. Kelly, with actual hard video evidence was found not guilty because of contradictory witness testimony. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909614528] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tupacrulez posted...</cite> <quote><cite>theAteam posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SageHarpuia posted...</cite> <quote>...you can't even convict someone without testimony, evidence, and (sometimes) a motive, are people seriously suggesting witness testimony alone is enough? This board is even more ridiculous than I thought!</quote> Bill Cosby is sitting in a jail cell on witness testimony alone.</quote> Bill Cosby admitted to giving them Quaaludes. You don't get to just fuck someone after you fucking drugged them you nimnod.</quote> What Bill Cosby admitted to is meaningless. Donald Trump admitted to just going up to women and grabbing them by the pussy. The fact remains is that Bill Cosby was convicted on just witness testimony, including his own testimony (he is still a witness to himself although he's not legally required to be) and Donald Trump, who admitted to THE SAME CRIME was convicted of nothing. R. Kelly, with actual hard video evidence was found not guilty because of contradictory witness testimony.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rebel_Patriot 09/28/18 7:02:20 PM #72:	Kineth posted... Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee. Its literally called the Biden rule. Since top dog democrat JOE BIDEN made an impassioned speech on how an outgoing president should not be allowed to pick a nominee. As usual democrats selfishly poor thought out notions eventually return to bite them in the ass. Just like the going nuclear simple vote majority option thats been sticking in the crawl of the left since Trump came in. --- Horses?! We can't afford t'lose no horses! <cite>Rebel_Patriot posted [p:909626589] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee.</quote> Its literally called the Biden rule. Since top dog democrat JOE BIDEN made an impassioned speech on how an outgoing president should not be allowed to pick a nominee. As usual democrats selfishly poor thought out notions eventually return to bite them in the ass. Just like the going nuclear simple vote majority option thats been sticking in the crawl of the left since Trump came in.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkmaian23 09/28/18 7:07:09 PM #73:	ultimate reaver posted... tommy: i did not hit her. its not true. i did not hit her. i did not. oh hi mark mark: welcome to the supreme court of the united states Your post wins the internet. <cite>darkmaian23 posted [p:909626859] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>ultimate reaver posted...</cite> <quote>tommy: i did not hit her. its not true. i did not hit her. i did not. oh hi mark mark: welcome to the supreme court of the united states</quote> Your post wins the internet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EdgeMaster 09/28/18 7:07:14 PM #74:	Tyranthraxus posted... Paragon21XX posted... The DNA test with the high false positive rate is the one that tests only the Y-chromosome rather than the autosomal test which uses the whole genome which has only a one-in-a-billion chance of returning a false result. It's not necessarily that the test is wrong, it's that the sample is wrong. I walk into mcdonalds and lean on the counter. Then I leave. 10 minutes later a guy comes in and shoots the cashier. And for whatever reason the cameras just weren't working that day. Police later come and arrest me claiming they have the murder weapon--a stolen gun--with my DNA on it, and they're not lying. LOOOOOOL what a piss poor attempt to suggest dna evidence is inaccurate. So many things wrong with this post. --- If you don't have anything nice to say, say it on the internet. ****poster Extraordinaire <cite>EdgeMaster posted [p:909626866] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Paragon21XX posted...</cite> <quote>The DNA test with the high false positive rate is the one that tests only the Y-chromosome rather than the autosomal test which uses the whole genome which has only a one-in-a-billion chance of returning a false result.</quote> It's not necessarily that the test is wrong, it's that the sample is wrong. I walk into mcdonalds and lean on the counter. Then I leave. 10 minutes later a guy comes in and shoots the cashier. And for whatever reason the cameras just weren't working that day. Police later come and arrest me claiming they have the murder weapon--a stolen gun--with my DNA on it, and they're not lying.</quote> LOOOOOOL what a piss poor attempt to suggest dna evidence is inaccurate. So many things wrong with this post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ZMythos 09/28/18 7:11:33 PM #75:	Kav is gonna get fucked Then Donny's gonna get jailed by Mueller Then the Blue Tsunami obliterates the competition and flushes the swamp with a complete Trump Presidency annulment Then we replace all of his cronies, crooks, colluders, criminals, and rapists with real progressives. --- Rainbow Dashing: "it's just star wars" AutumnEspirit: kissu <cite>ZMythos posted [p:909627119] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>Kav is gonna get fucked Then Donny's gonna get jailed by Mueller Then the Blue Tsunami obliterates the competition and flushes the swamp with a complete Trump Presidency annulment Then we replace all of his cronies, crooks, colluders, criminals, and rapists with real progressives.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
loafy013 09/28/18 7:21:09 PM #76:	Rebel_Patriot posted... Kineth posted... Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee. Its literally called the Biden rule. Since top dog democrat JOE BIDEN made an impassioned speech on how an outgoing president should not be allowed to pick a nominee. As usual democrats selfishly poor thought out notions eventually return to bite them in the ass. Just like the going nuclear simple vote majority option thats been sticking in the crawl of the left since Trump came in. No, he said they should wait until after elections so it doesn't distract from them. It is pointless in any case, since it never happened until McConnell refused to even hold a hearing. --- The ball is round, the game lasts 90 minutes. That's fact. Everything else, is theory. <cite>loafy013 posted [p:909627651] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rebel_Patriot posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee.</quote> Its literally called the Biden rule. Since top dog democrat JOE BIDEN made an impassioned speech on how an outgoing president should not be allowed to pick a nominee. As usual democrats selfishly poor thought out notions eventually return to bite them in the ass. Just like the going nuclear simple vote majority option thats been sticking in the crawl of the left since Trump came in.</quote> No, he said they should wait until after elections so it doesn't distract from them. It is pointless in any case, since it never happened until McConnell refused to even hold a hearing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eggcorn 09/28/18 7:21:57 PM #77:	--- Warning: This post may contain triggering or distressing content. <cite>eggcorn posted [p:909627697] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 09/28/18 7:23:32 PM #78:	This is a bad topic --- I have a gamefaqs following. Watch them flock to my posts. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:909627787] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>This is a bad topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Great Muta 22 09/28/18 7:25:43 PM #79:	eggcorn posted... You follow something called "/pol/ news network"? Lmao --- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLH8skGXKw4 WHOOP WHOOP <cite>The Great Muta 22 posted [p:909627905] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote></quote> You follow something called "/pol/ news network"? Lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eggcorn 09/28/18 7:26:49 PM #80:	The Great Muta 22 posted... eggcorn posted... You follow something called "/pol/ news network"? Lmao I don't follow anything LMAO --- Warning: This post may contain triggering or distressing content. <cite>eggcorn posted [p:909627964] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote></quote> You follow something called "/pol/ news network"? Lmao</quote> I don't follow anything LMAO</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BLAKUboy 09/28/18 7:31:40 PM #81:	https://old.reddit.com/r/RussiaLago/comments/8mkwnf/whowhat_is_wired_sources/ --- Aeris dies if she takes more damage than her current HP - Panthera https://signavatar.com/26999_s.png <cite>BLAKUboy posted [p:909628241] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote>https://old.reddit.com/r/RussiaLago/comments/8mkwnf/whowhat_is_wired_sources/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alpha218 09/28/18 7:38:47 PM #82:	The Great Muta 22 posted... eggcorn posted... You follow something called "/pol/ news network"? Lmao I thought anonymous news was bad?!? --- I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite user on the Citadel. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1349-mario Now Playing: nothing :( <cite>Alpha218 posted [p:909628624] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Great Muta 22 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>eggcorn posted...</cite> <quote></quote> You follow something called "/pol/ news network"? Lmao</quote> I thought anonymous news was bad?!?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/29/18 1:28:48 AM #83:	EdgeMaster posted... what a piss poor attempt to suggest dna evidence is inaccurate. So many things wrong with this post. like what --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909643669] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>EdgeMaster posted...</cite> <quote>what a piss poor attempt to suggest dna evidence is inaccurate. So many things wrong with this post. </quote> like what</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DragonMaster525 09/29/18 1:37:28 AM #84:	Kineth posted... Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee. --- "Impossible is just a word people use to make themselves feel better when they quit" - SoA <cite>DragonMaster525 posted [p:909643961] in ''I'm inno... [t:77045845]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>Maybe Republicans should have let Obama select his judicial nominee.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > ''I'm innocent!! I did nothing wrong! She's lying!!!'' (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > ''I'm innocent!! I did nothing wrong! She's lying!!!''