Current Events > James Woods (Videodrome, Hercules) suspended from twitter over months old tweet.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 9:27:44 AM #1:	Do you think this is a bad precedent for free speech? - Results (14 votes) Yes and I am liberal 7.14% (1 vote) 1 Yes and I am not liberal 42.86% (6 votes) 6 No and I am liberal 28.57% (4 votes) 4 No! And I am not liberal. 21.43% (3 votes) 3 Actor James Woods has been locked out of his Twitter account over a two-month-old tweet that was found to be in violation of the tech companys rules. The tweet, posted July 20, included a hoax meme that said it came from Democrats and encouraged men not to vote in the midterm elections. Woods said he received an email from Twitter on Thursday saying the tweet "has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election." The email said Woods can use his account again if he deletes the tweet, but would be suspended from the social media platform permanently if there are repeated abuses. Woods told The Associated Press Sunday he interpreted the message to mean hell be allowed back on Twitter only if he decides to do what Twitter says. "Free speech is free speech it's not Jack Dorsey's version of free speech," Woods said, referring to Twitter Chief Executive Jack Dorsey. "The irony is, Twitter accused me of affecting the political process, when in fact, their banning of me is the truly egregious interference, Because now, having your voice smothered is much more disturbing than having your vocal chords slit. If you want to kill my free speech, man up and slit my throat with a knife, don't smother me with a pillow." Twitter told the AP that it doesn't comment on individual accounts for privacy and security reasons. A spokesman for the social media platform said by email that he had nothing more to share when asked if Dorsey would respond directly to Wood's comments. His Twitter page is still online, though he can't access it. Many of his recent tweets include his views of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her decades ago. Woods, who has more than 1.7 million Twitter followers and is outspoken in his conservative views, believes he was singled out. He said the original tweet was reposted by his girlfriend Friday and had been retweeted thousands of times by Sunday. His girlfriend's account wasn't locked, which he said proves his claim. The meme, posted in July, said #LetWomenDecide and #NoMenMidterm. It claimed to be from a Democratic group, but it was determined to be a hoax campaign to encourage liberal men not to vote in November, according to the website knowyourmeme.com. Woods called it a parody. Woods acknowledged the meme likely wasn't real in the original tweet, saying: "Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible ..." Social media companies like Twitter have come under pressure to flag hate speech and posts that could influence elections offline. Numerous conservative and right-wing groups have protested that the tech companies disproportionately target them over liberal-leaning groups. Dorsey testified before the GOP-led House Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this month, as the committee examined whether Twitter has censored conservatives. Woods said he wants open discourse, and called the situation a dangerous precedent for free speech. "I wish this were about an unknown Twitter user so that I could be even more passionate about it," Woods said. "This is not about a celebrity being muzzled. This is about an American being silenced one tweet at a time." Full Article: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/09/24/james-woods-refuses-to-delete-meme-that-says-got-him-locked-out-twitter.html Woods' performance in Cat's Eye is underrated --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909349654] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote> Do you think this is a bad precedent for free speech? - Results (14 votes) Yes and I am liberal 7.14% (1 vote) 1 Yes and I am not liberal 42.86% (6 votes) 6 No and I am liberal 28.57% (4 votes) 4 No! And I am not liberal. 21.43% (3 votes) 3 Actor James Woods has been locked out of his Twitter account over a two-month-old tweet that was found to be in violation of the tech companys rules. The tweet, posted July 20, included a hoax meme that said it came from Democrats and encouraged men not to vote in the midterm elections. Woods said he received an email from Twitter on Thursday saying the tweet "has the potential to be misleading in a way that could impact an election." The email said Woods can use his account again if he deletes the tweet, but would be suspended from the social media platform permanently if there are repeated abuses. Woods told The Associated Press Sunday he interpreted the message to mean hell be allowed back on Twitter only if he decides to do what Twitter says. "Free speech is free speech it's not Jack Dorsey's version of free speech," Woods said, referring to Twitter Chief Executive Jack Dorsey. "The irony is, Twitter accused me of affecting the political process, when in fact, their banning of me is the truly egregious interference, Because now, having your voice smothered is much more disturbing than having your vocal chords slit. If you want to kill my free speech, man up and slit my throat with a knife, don't smother me with a pillow." Twitter told the AP that it doesn't comment on individual accounts for privacy and security reasons. A spokesman for the social media platform said by email that he had nothing more to share when asked if Dorsey would respond directly to Wood's comments. His Twitter page is still online, though he can't access it. Many of his recent tweets include his views of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her decades ago. Woods, who has more than 1.7 million Twitter followers and is outspoken in his conservative views, believes he was singled out. He said the original tweet was reposted by his girlfriend Friday and had been retweeted thousands of times by Sunday. His girlfriend's account wasn't locked, which he said proves his claim. The meme, posted in July, said #LetWomenDecide and #NoMenMidterm. It claimed to be from a Democratic group, but it was determined to be a hoax campaign to encourage liberal men not to vote in November, according to the website knowyourmeme.com. Woods called it a parody. Woods acknowledged the meme likely wasn't real in the original tweet, saying: "Pretty scary that there is a distinct possibility this could be real. Not likely, but in this day and age of absolute liberal insanity, it is at least possible ..." Social media companies like Twitter have come under pressure to flag hate speech and posts that could influence elections offline. Numerous conservative and right-wing groups have protested that the tech companies disproportionately target them over liberal-leaning groups. Dorsey testified before the GOP-led House Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this month, as the committee examined whether Twitter has censored conservatives. Woods said he wants open discourse, and called the situation a dangerous precedent for free speech. "I wish this were about an unknown Twitter user so that I could be even more passionate about it," Woods said. "This is not about a celebrity being muzzled. This is about an American being silenced one tweet at a time." Full Article: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/09/24/james-woods-refuses-to-delete-meme-that-says-got-him-locked-out-twitter.html Woods' performance in Cat's Eye is underrated </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
sleepysausage 09/24/18 9:30:10 AM #2:	Free speech isn't a thing on the internet, people need to accept that. You're using someone's service and they have the right to censor what you say and suspend the service if you go against their rules. <cite>sleepysausage posted [p:909349756] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Free speech isn't a thing on the internet, people need to accept that. You're using someone's service and they have the right to censor what you say and suspend the service if you go against their rules.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 09/24/18 9:32:35 AM #3:	James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:909349837] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MakoReizei 09/24/18 9:33:51 AM #4:	Based James Woods --- https://i.imgtc.com/3owskMW.png <cite>MakoReizei posted [p:909349872] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Based James Woods</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Heineken14 09/24/18 9:36:19 AM #5:	Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Womp womp. --- Rage is a hell of an anesthetic. <cite>Heineken14 posted [p:909349959] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Womp womp.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 09/24/18 9:36:41 AM #6:	"Free speech is free speech it's not Jack Dorsey's version of free speech," Woods said, referring to Twitter Chief Executive Jack Dorsey. LOUD SIGH --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg https://imgur.com/8kjZU <cite>eston posted [p:909349977] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><quote>"Free speech is free speech it's not Jack Dorsey's version of free speech," Woods said, referring to Twitter Chief Executive Jack Dorsey.</quote> LOUD SIGH</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 9:36:48 AM #7:	Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909349979] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 09/24/18 9:39:34 AM #8:	What a shit topic --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:909350089] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>What a shit topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 09/24/18 9:42:08 AM #9:	UnfairRepresent posted... Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? "Free Speech is not Jack Dorsey's version of Free Speech, it is James Woods version of Free Speech" --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:909350188] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> "Free Speech is not Jack Dorsey's version of Free Speech, it is James Woods version of Free Speech"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SaithSayer 09/24/18 9:43:42 AM #10:	"Oh no! I can't post on a social media site!" lol <cite>SaithSayer posted [p:909350238] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>"Oh no! I can't post on a social media site!" lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
davyheinz 09/24/18 9:43:51 AM #11:	James Woods is a chucklefuck. --- Currently playing: Psychonauts, DKC: Tropical Freeze In limbo: Strider, Jet Force Gemini <cite>davyheinz posted [p:909350243] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>James Woods is a chucklefuck.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hawaiian_punch 09/24/18 9:45:44 AM #12:	He did the soyboy smile lmao <cite>Hawaiian_punch posted [p:909350321] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>He did the soyboy smile lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#13	Post #13 was unavailable or deleted.
QwelzaarKane 09/24/18 9:49:35 AM #14:	UnfairRepresent posted... Woods told The Associated Press Sunday he interpreted the message to mean hell be allowed back on Twitter only if he decides to do what Twitter says. If he wants to use Twitter he has to follow Twitter's rules. What an insane, unprecedented idea! --- Ain't no love shown but to those who down til we die <cite>QwelzaarKane posted [p:909350467] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Woods told The Associated Press Sunday he interpreted the message to mean hell be allowed back on Twitter only if he decides to do what Twitter says. </quote> If he wants to use Twitter he has to follow Twitter's rules. What an insane, unprecedented idea!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DepreceV2 09/24/18 9:51:41 AM #15:	TC... we are on GFaqs. This isn't new to us. People can report a message 4 months old in a topic that is somehow still going and we will get moderated. --- Yes... I'm a Hanzo main <cite>DepreceV2 posted [p:909350540] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>TC... we are on GFaqs. This isn't new to us. People can report a message 4 months old in a topic that is somehow still going and we will get moderated.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 09/24/18 9:53:01 AM #16:	I'm surprised they used an old tweet. Isn't he known for saying very insensitive stuff that's worth being suspended for if he wasn't famous. --- Sarcasm is my basic function. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:909350599] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>I'm surprised they used an old tweet. Isn't he known for saying very insensitive stuff that's worth being suspended for if he wasn't famous.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 9:57:00 AM #17:	DepreceV2 posted... TC... we are on GFaqs. This isn't new to us. People can report a message 4 months old in a topic that is somehow still going and we will get moderated. Ok? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909350751] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>DepreceV2 posted...</cite> <quote>TC... we are on GFaqs. This isn't new to us. People can report a message 4 months old in a topic that is somehow still going and we will get moderated.</quote> Ok?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DepreceV2 09/24/18 9:58:21 AM #18:	UnfairRepresent posted... DepreceV2 posted... TC... we are on GFaqs. This isn't new to us. People can report a message 4 months old in a topic that is somehow still going and we will get moderated. Ok? This isn't a story bro. It's nothing new on the internet and it's expected. --- Yes... I'm a Hanzo main <cite>DepreceV2 posted [p:909350804] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DepreceV2 posted...</cite> <quote>TC... we are on GFaqs. This isn't new to us. People can report a message 4 months old in a topic that is somehow still going and we will get moderated.</quote> Ok?</quote> This isn't a story bro. It's nothing new on the internet and it's expected.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Oatcakes 09/24/18 9:59:09 AM #19:	Has he been punished by the government? No? Then it's not an attack on his free speech. --- F.C. Stokalona https://imgur.com/CJ0dPBq <cite>Oatcakes posted [p:909350836] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Has he been punished by the government? No? Then it's not an attack on his free speech.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 9:59:25 AM #20:	DepreceV2 posted... This isn't a story bro. It's global news --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909350850] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>DepreceV2 posted...</cite> <quote> This isn't a story bro. </quote> It's global news</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheBiggerWiggle 09/24/18 9:59:39 AM #21:	Freedom of speech does not apply to Twitter, therefore no precedent has been set. --- I have trouble concentrating because I have 80HD. <cite>TheBiggerWiggle posted [p:909350859] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Freedom of speech does not apply to Twitter, therefore no precedent has been set.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pogo_Marimo 09/24/18 10:02:07 AM #22:	UnfairRepresent posted... Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior. --- // BEAUTY IS NOT LOVE - LOVE IS NOT MUSIC - MUSIC IS THE BEST - WISDOM IS THE DOMAIN OF THE WIZ--WHICH IS EXTINCT // http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:909350953] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 10:03:32 AM #23:	Pogo_Marimo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior. When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909351006] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior.</quote> When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Alpha218 09/24/18 10:05:17 AM #24:	Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 Professional victim --- I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite user on the Citadel. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1349-mario Now Playing: nothing :( <cite>Alpha218 posted [p:909351063] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> Professional victim</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pogo_Marimo 09/24/18 10:11:58 AM #25:	UnfairRepresent posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior. When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts? You realise there are other ways to lie about people than calling them cocaine addicts, right...? --- // BEAUTY IS NOT LOVE - LOVE IS NOT MUSIC - MUSIC IS THE BEST - WISDOM IS THE DOMAIN OF THE WIZ--WHICH IS EXTINCT // http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:909351279] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior.</quote> When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts?</quote> You realise there are other ways to lie about people than calling them cocaine addicts, right...?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 10:14:18 AM #26:	Pogo_Marimo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior. When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts? You realise there are other ways to lie about people than calling them cocaine addicts, right...? We're talking about slander and libel. Posting a meme and not being sure whether or not it is real is not comparable to directly falisifable dishonest claim about someone. According to you me posting a doge meme about blowing up North Koera would be equal in dishonesty to me accusing someone of being a child molester. That's ironically dishonest as fuck --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909351373] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior.</quote> When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts?</quote> You realise there are other ways to lie about people than calling them cocaine addicts, right...?</quote> We're talking about slander and libel. Posting a meme and not being sure whether or not it is real is not comparable to directly falisifable dishonest claim about someone. According to you me posting a doge meme about blowing up North Koera would be equal in dishonesty to me accusing someone of being a child molester. That's ironically dishonest as fuck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Oatcakes 09/24/18 10:15:09 AM #27:	As is equating free speech laws and being banned on a social media site. --- F.C. Stokalona https://imgur.com/CJ0dPBq <cite>Oatcakes posted [p:909351419] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>As is equating free speech laws and being banned on a social media site.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 09/24/18 10:16:15 AM #28:	James Woods is a prick and being banned from Twitter is not a violation of free speech --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:909351480] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>James Woods is a prick and being banned from Twitter is not a violation of free speech</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperMedz3 09/24/18 10:48:06 AM #29:	soy face --- Fallout 4 <cite>SuperMedz3 posted [p:909352954] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>soy face</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pogo_Marimo 09/24/18 11:41:30 AM #30:	UnfairRepresent posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Pogo_Marimo posted... UnfairRepresent posted... Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws? I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior. When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts? You realise there are other ways to lie about people than calling them cocaine addicts, right...? We're talking about slander and libel. Posting a meme and not being sure whether or not it is real is not comparable to directly falisifable dishonest claim about someone. According to you me posting a doge meme about blowing up North Koera would be equal in dishonesty to me accusing someone of being a child molester. That's ironically dishonest as fuck Positing intentional disinformation, especially that aimed at disrupting a public process like the elections, as possibly real, and lying about an individual are directly equatable, ethically speaking. Both are using known disinformation or unproven allegations to damage a person or people's reputation. The major difference is in U.S. law, one could prove damages in a case of accusation against an individual, but one could not prove damages nor standing in a case against a vague group even if such damages are present. Both, however, are unethical. One is just untenable to enforce in law by practicality, but that does not make it more ethical or excusable, just less punishable. Hence, James Woods criticisms of the platform are hypocritical and despicable in context --- // BEAUTY IS NOT LOVE - LOVE IS NOT MUSIC - MUSIC IS THE BEST - WISDOM IS THE DOMAIN OF THE WIZ--WHICH IS EXTINCT // http://www.last.fm/user/Pogo92 <cite>Pogo_Marimo posted [p:909355638] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> I'm not sure what your point here is. Free Speech means you have to be against libel and slander laws?</quote> I mean, technically yes. True Free Speech would have no restrictions on speech, including libel and slander. But regardless, it shows James Woods is perfectly complacent to spread lies about things he dislikes but not when others do it about him. There is no ethical difference between lying about the behavior of a group of people, such as "Liberals", and lying about an individual's behavior.</quote> When did James Woods claim random people are cocaine addicts?</quote> You realise there are other ways to lie about people than calling them cocaine addicts, right...?</quote> We're talking about slander and libel. Posting a meme and not being sure whether or not it is real is not comparable to directly falisifable dishonest claim about someone. According to you me posting a doge meme about blowing up North Koera would be equal in dishonesty to me accusing someone of being a child molester. That's ironically dishonest as fuck</quote> Positing intentional disinformation, especially that aimed at disrupting a public process like the elections, as possibly real, and lying about an individual are directly equatable, ethically speaking. Both are using known disinformation or unproven allegations to damage a person or people's reputation. The major difference is in U.S. law, one could prove damages in a case of accusation against an individual, but one could not prove damages nor standing in a case against a vague group even if such damages are present. Both, however, are unethical. One is just untenable to enforce in law by practicality, but that does not make it more ethical or excusable, just less punishable. Hence, James Woods criticisms of the platform are hypocritical and despicable in context</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tappor 09/24/18 11:43:11 AM #31:	UnfairRepresent posted... "Free speech is free speech it's not Jack Dorsey's version of free speech," On Twitter, it is --- All of my gamefaqs.gamespot.com posts are 100% serious. Make sure you take everything I post at face value. <cite>Tappor posted [p:909355724] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote> "Free speech is free speech it's not Jack Dorsey's version of free speech," </quote> On Twitter, it is</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Sunhawk 09/24/18 11:44:15 AM #32:	Long live the new flesh. --- It has been 0 days since something interesting happened. A three hour tour, a three hour tour... <cite>Sunhawk posted [p:909355782] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Long live the new flesh.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vyrulisse 09/24/18 11:44:49 AM #33:	Love how people defend this shit when it's someone they don't agree with. --- https://imgur.com/6VeX04D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7Gkh_9hyi8 <cite>Vyrulisse posted [p:909355802] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Love how people defend this shit when it's someone they don't agree with.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 11:45:40 AM #34:	Pogo_Marimo posted... Positing intentional disinformation, especially that aimed at disrupting a public process like the elections, as possibly real, and lying about an individual are directly equatable, No. Posting a meme and not openly not knowing if it's legit or not is not equatable to directly accusing someone of molesting children You're being ridiclous --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909355838] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>Pogo_Marimo posted...</cite> <quote> Positing intentional disinformation, especially that aimed at disrupting a public process like the elections, as possibly real, and lying about an individual are directly equatable, </quote> No. Posting a meme and not openly not knowing if it's legit or not is not equatable to directly accusing someone of molesting children You're being ridiclous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JacquesArc 09/24/18 11:45:43 AM #35:	Goddamn, conservatives are becoming more irrelevant with every passing day. --- MHGenU & MHW IGN: Jacques Arc "and now I know how Joan of Arc felt.." <cite>JacquesArc posted [p:909355843] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Goddamn, conservatives are becoming more irrelevant with every passing day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
creativerealms 09/24/18 11:45:43 AM #36:	Freedom of speech does not garentee you a platform. It doesnt mean that a web site is not allowed to suspend or warn you for what you say. --- Sarcasm is my basic function. <cite>creativerealms posted [p:909355844] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Freedom of speech does not garentee you a platform. It doesnt mean that a web site is not allowed to suspend or warn you for what you say.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 11:47:14 AM #37:	JacquesArc posted... Goddamn, conservatives are becoming more irrelevant with every passing day. Wut, They run the world. They have the president, congress, senate and Europe is getting more and more right wing with every passing day. The next decade or so is going to be right wing all over the west --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909355940] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote>Goddamn, conservatives are becoming more irrelevant with every passing day.</quote> Wut, They run the world. They have the president, congress, senate and Europe is getting more and more right wing with every passing day. The next decade or so is going to be right wing all over the west</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JacquesArc 09/24/18 11:49:50 AM #38:	UnfairRepresent posted... JacquesArc posted... Goddamn, conservatives are becoming more irrelevant with every passing day. Wut, They run the world. They have the president, congress, senate and Europe is getting more and more right wing with every passing day. The next decade or so is going to be right wing all over the west You would believe that. Anyways, how is November expected to go for them? How is Trump's presidency going? How is his supreme court pick faring? Literally becoming irrelevant by the day. --- MHGenU & MHW IGN: Jacques Arc "and now I know how Joan of Arc felt.." <cite>JacquesArc posted [p:909356085] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote>Goddamn, conservatives are becoming more irrelevant with every passing day.</quote> Wut, They run the world. They have the president, congress, senate and Europe is getting more and more right wing with every passing day. The next decade or so is going to be right wing all over the west</quote> You would believe that. Anyways, how is November expected to go for them? How is Trump's presidency going? How is his supreme court pick faring? Literally becoming irrelevant by the day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 09/24/18 11:57:15 AM #39:	James Waaaaaaaahds --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:909356498] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>James Waaaaaaaahds</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
unpleasant_milk 09/24/18 12:05:28 PM #40:	Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber. --- GT unpleasant milk #I want a poacher skin rug ~ http://imgur.com/a/V10yv <cite>unpleasant_milk posted [p:909356944] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote>Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JacquesArc 09/24/18 12:06:20 PM #41:	unpleasant_milk posted... Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber. Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter. --- MHGenU & MHW IGN: Jacques Arc "and now I know how Joan of Arc felt.." <cite>JacquesArc posted [p:909356996] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote>Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber.</quote> Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 12:08:52 PM #42:	JacquesArc posted... Anyways, how is November expected to go for them? Pretty well How is Trump's presidency going? Awful How is his supreme court pick faring? Depends on if they succeed in rushing him through but it's not loss to the conservatives if he fails --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909357139] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote> Anyways, how is November expected to go for them?</quote> Pretty well<quote> How is Trump's presidency going?</quote> Awful <quote>How is his supreme court pick faring? </quote> Depends on if they succeed in rushing him through but it's not loss to the conservatives if he fails</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
unpleasant_milk 09/24/18 12:10:35 PM #43:	JacquesArc posted... unpleasant_milk posted... Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber. Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter. Im not looking to get banned --- GT unpleasant milk #I want a poacher skin rug ~ http://imgur.com/a/V10yv <cite>unpleasant_milk posted [p:909357245] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote>Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber.</quote> Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter.</quote> Im not looking to get banned</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Muffinz0rz 09/24/18 12:10:41 PM #44:	SuperMedz3 posted... soy face --- Not removing this until Pat Benatar is in Super Smash Bros. (Started 8/31/2010) 2018 NFLB Autumnsim (0-2): https://imgur.com/c164HwF <cite>Muffinz0rz posted [p:909357256] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>SuperMedz3 posted...</cite> <quote>soy face</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JacquesArc 09/24/18 12:11:13 PM #45:	UnfairRepresent posted... JacquesArc posted... Anyways, how is November expected to go for them? Pretty well How is Trump's presidency going? Awful How is his supreme court pick faring? Depends on if they succeed in rushing him through but it's not loss to the conservatives if he fails Pretty well? That isn't true at all. Just because Trump is president doesn't make republican/conservatives relevant; in fact, i think his appointment (since he wasn't elected) to the presidency is speeding up the irrelevancy of this fringe group of Americans. --- MHGenU & MHW IGN: Jacques Arc "and now I know how Joan of Arc felt.." <cite>JacquesArc posted [p:909357282] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote> Anyways, how is November expected to go for them?</quote> Pretty well<quote> How is Trump's presidency going?</quote> Awful <quote>How is his supreme court pick faring? </quote> Depends on if they succeed in rushing him through but it's not loss to the conservatives if he fails</quote> Pretty well? That isn't true at all. Just because Trump is president doesn't make republican/conservatives relevant; in fact, i think his appointment (since he wasn't elected) to the presidency is speeding up the irrelevancy of this fringe group of Americans.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SolidSonicEX 09/24/18 12:11:57 PM #46:	Antifar posted... James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107 Maybe he shouldn't be so testy if he attaches his name to playing a complete nutjob version of himself on Family Guy. --- Solid Sonic + 2 punch buttons <cite>SolidSonicEX posted [p:909357333] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>Antifar posted...</cite> <quote>James Woods' belief in free speech on Twitter is so robust that he sued a guy for $10 million for calling him a cocaine addict https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/james-woods-sues-twitter-user-812107</quote> Maybe he shouldn't be so testy if he attaches his name to playing a complete nutjob version of himself on Family Guy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JacquesArc 09/24/18 12:12:21 PM #47:	unpleasant_milk posted... JacquesArc posted... unpleasant_milk posted... Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber. Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter. Im not looking to get banned No, the truth is you don't have one. Name a progressive who has posted a racist tweet and I will look it up myself. --- MHGenU & MHW IGN: Jacques Arc "and now I know how Joan of Arc felt.." <cite>JacquesArc posted [p:909357354] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote>Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber.</quote> Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter.</quote> Im not looking to get banned</quote> No, the truth is you don't have one. Name a progressive who has posted a racist tweet and I will look it up myself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 12:13:52 PM #48:	JacquesArc posted... Just because Trump is president doesn't make republican/conservatives relevant WTF Yes it does. They also have the senate and congress and the world is shifting right,... What more do you need to be relevant? A kicker viral youtube video? --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909357446] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote> Just because Trump is president doesn't make republican/conservatives relevant</quote> WTF Yes it does. They also have the senate and congress and the world is shifting right,... What more do you need to be relevant? A kicker viral youtube video?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 09/24/18 12:15:47 PM #49:	JacquesArc posted... unpleasant_milk posted... JacquesArc posted... unpleasant_milk posted... Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber. Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter. Im not looking to get banned No, the truth is you don't have one. Name a progressive who has posted a racist tweet and I will look it up myself. I'm not sure if it was tweet but I thought it was pretty sick when "Progressive" Trevor Noah was claiming that Africa won the world cup because black French people are African and not Frenh. Also not a tweet but when Destiny said that black are so stupid that they are literally incapable of doing anything other than commit crimes. Both of those comments got widespread defense and they are on par with any alt-right rhetoric I have ever heard. Not picking sides, I'm just saying --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:909357537] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote>Seems to me that twitter allow all sorts of tweets with barely disguised racism from so called progressives. Yet a conservative tweets something rather inane and its all of a sudden ban/suspend/etc Twitter is, or rather has become, a left wing echo chamber.</quote> Please post an example of racism from a progressive that was on twitter.</quote> Im not looking to get banned</quote> No, the truth is you don't have one. Name a progressive who has posted a racist tweet and I will look it up myself.</quote> I'm not sure if it was tweet but I thought it was pretty sick when "Progressive" Trevor Noah was claiming that Africa won the world cup because black French people are African and not Frenh. Also not a tweet but when Destiny said that black are so stupid that they are literally incapable of doing anything other than commit crimes. Both of those comments got widespread defense and they are on par with any alt-right rhetoric I have ever heard. Not picking sides, I'm just saying</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JacquesArc 09/24/18 12:20:11 PM #50:	UnfairRepresent posted... JacquesArc posted... Just because Trump is president doesn't make republican/conservatives relevant WTF Yes it does. They also have the senate and congress and the world is shifting right,... What more do you need to be relevant? A kicker viral youtube video? Popularity maybe? The American public hates him. He is literally irrelevant. Nothing in this country is shifting right. --- MHGenU & MHW IGN: Jacques Arc "and now I know how Joan of Arc felt.." <cite>JacquesArc posted [p:909357795] in James Wood... [t:77035075]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote><cite>JacquesArc posted...</cite> <quote> Just because Trump is president doesn't make republican/conservatives relevant</quote> WTF Yes it does. They also have the senate and congress and the world is shifting right,... What more do you need to be relevant? A kicker viral youtube video?</quote> Popularity maybe? The American public hates him. He is literally irrelevant. Nothing in this country is shifting right.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > James Woods (Videodrome, Hercules) suspended from twitter over months old tweet. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > James Woods (Videodrome, Hercules) suspended from twitter over months old tweet.