Current Events > 'Inflammatory' remarks from Trump re: Canada and NAFTA leak

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Bio1590 08/31/18 4:49:31 PM #51:	s0nicfan posted... Sir Will posted... What? That doesn't.... No, not engaging. What do you think it's called when 2 people are trying to come to an agreement and one person offers terms and the other party declines or makes a counter-offer? Depends, how is this being coordinated? Is it on friendly terms or is one party attempting to hold the other party over a pit of lava and threatening to let go? --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:907885415] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sir Will posted...</cite> <quote>What? That doesn't.... No, not engaging.</quote> What do you think it's called when 2 people are trying to come to an agreement and one person offers terms and the other party declines or makes a counter-offer?</quote> Depends, how is this being coordinated? Is it on friendly terms or is one party attempting to hold the other party over a pit of lava and threatening to let go?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hawaiian_punch 08/31/18 5:01:04 PM #52:	Hawaiian_punch posted... Call me crazy but I think he is up to something here. > NAFTA is a 3 party deal > 45 hates Mexico but not Canada > 45 is ok trading with Canada but not mexico So he tells Mexico he is doing a deal with them, makes it look like he is kicking Canada out and signs a shit and draconian deal for the Mexicans. Then he will sign a far less draconian (for Canada) deal with Canada later on. Really? No comments? <cite>Hawaiian_punch posted [p:907886005] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>Hawaiian_punch posted...</cite> <quote>Call me crazy but I think he is up to something here. > NAFTA is a 3 party deal > 45 hates Mexico but not Canada > 45 is ok trading with Canada but not mexico So he tells Mexico he is doing a deal with them, makes it look like he is kicking Canada out and signs a shit and draconian deal for the Mexicans. Then he will sign a far less draconian (for Canada) deal with Canada later on.</quote> Really? No comments?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWing 08/31/18 5:02:07 PM #53:	Hawaiian_punch posted... Hawaiian_punch posted... Call me crazy but I think he is up to something here. > NAFTA is a 3 party deal > 45 hates Mexico but not Canada > 45 is ok trading with Canada but not mexico So he tells Mexico he is doing a deal with them, makes it look like he is kicking Canada out and signs a shit and draconian deal for the Mexicans. Then he will sign a far less draconian (for Canada) deal with Canada later on. Really? No comments? Giving him way too much credit imo <cite>BWing posted [p:907886046] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>Hawaiian_punch posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Hawaiian_punch posted...</cite> <quote>Call me crazy but I think he is up to something here. > NAFTA is a 3 party deal > 45 hates Mexico but not Canada > 45 is ok trading with Canada but not mexico So he tells Mexico he is doing a deal with them, makes it look like he is kicking Canada out and signs a shit and draconian deal for the Mexicans. Then he will sign a far less draconian (for Canada) deal with Canada later on.</quote> Really? No comments?</quote> Giving him way too much credit imo</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
s0nicfan 08/31/18 5:12:13 PM #54:	Bio1590 posted... s0nicfan posted... Sir Will posted... What? That doesn't.... No, not engaging. What do you think it's called when 2 people are trying to come to an agreement and one person offers terms and the other party declines or makes a counter-offer? Depends, how is this being coordinated? Is it on friendly terms or is one party attempting to hold the other party over a pit of lava and threatening to let go? So it's not a negotiation because it isn't friendly enough? Jesus that's the most Canadian thing I've ever heard. --- "History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz <cite>s0nicfan posted [p:907886581] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sir Will posted...</cite> <quote>What? That doesn't.... No, not engaging.</quote> What do you think it's called when 2 people are trying to come to an agreement and one person offers terms and the other party declines or makes a counter-offer?</quote> Depends, how is this being coordinated? Is it on friendly terms or is one party attempting to hold the other party over a pit of lava and threatening to let go?</quote> So it's not a negotiation because it isn't friendly enough? Jesus that's the most Canadian thing I've ever heard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 08/31/18 5:15:21 PM #55:	s0nicfan posted... Bio1590 posted... s0nicfan posted... Sir Will posted... What? That doesn't.... No, not engaging. What do you think it's called when 2 people are trying to come to an agreement and one person offers terms and the other party declines or makes a counter-offer? Depends, how is this being coordinated? Is it on friendly terms or is one party attempting to hold the other party over a pit of lava and threatening to let go? So it's not a negotiation because it isn't friendly enough? Jesus that's the most Canadian thing I've ever heard. The argument is that it's not a negotiation because one party isn't attempting to negotiate. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:907886745] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sir Will posted...</cite> <quote>What? That doesn't.... No, not engaging.</quote> What do you think it's called when 2 people are trying to come to an agreement and one person offers terms and the other party declines or makes a counter-offer?</quote> Depends, how is this being coordinated? Is it on friendly terms or is one party attempting to hold the other party over a pit of lava and threatening to let go?</quote> So it's not a negotiation because it isn't friendly enough? Jesus that's the most Canadian thing I've ever heard.</quote> The argument is that it's not a negotiation because one party isn't attempting to negotiate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mustachedmystic 08/31/18 5:24:17 PM #56:	DifferentialEquation posted... I'm going to side with President Trump on this one. B. . .b . . .ut, you never side with Trump! --- Guns; freedom you can hold in your hand. Sampson, Terrordactyl <cite>mustachedmystic posted [p:907887170] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>I'm going to side with President Trump on this one.</quote> B. . .b . . .ut, you never side with Trump!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kim Kusanagi 08/31/18 5:27:11 PM #57:	DifferentialEquation posted... I'm going to side with President Trump on this one. Because you have no personality --- Live to train. Train to fight. Fight to live. When you retire, think only on fighting. Take me away, I don't mind, but you better promise I'll be back in time! <cite>Kim Kusanagi posted [p:907887300] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>DifferentialEquation posted...</cite> <quote>I'm going to side with President Trump on this one.</quote> Because you have no personality</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hawaiian_punch 08/31/18 5:51:39 PM #58:	BWing posted... Hawaiian_punch posted... Hawaiian_punch posted... Call me crazy but I think he is up to something here. > NAFTA is a 3 party deal > 45 hates Mexico but not Canada > 45 is ok trading with Canada but not mexico So he tells Mexico he is doing a deal with them, makes it look like he is kicking Canada out and signs a shit and draconian deal for the Mexicans. Then he will sign a far less draconian (for Canada) deal with Canada later on. Really? No comments? Giving him way too much credit imo Fair enough lol <cite>Hawaiian_punch posted [p:907888577] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Hawaiian_punch posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Hawaiian_punch posted...</cite> <quote>Call me crazy but I think he is up to something here. > NAFTA is a 3 party deal > 45 hates Mexico but not Canada > 45 is ok trading with Canada but not mexico So he tells Mexico he is doing a deal with them, makes it look like he is kicking Canada out and signs a shit and draconian deal for the Mexicans. Then he will sign a far less draconian (for Canada) deal with Canada later on.</quote> Really? No comments?</quote> Giving him way too much credit imo</quote> Fair enough lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bio1590 08/31/18 5:56:15 PM #59:	They can't even do that anyways because they told Congress it was going to be a 3-party agreement so it legally has to be a 3-party agreement. If they want to change it to a 2-party agreement they have to tell that to Congress and then wait 6 months. --- https://imgur.com/bbRWLI8 https://imgur.com/A0BErSV <cite>Bio1590 posted [p:907888875] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote>They can't even do that anyways because they told Congress it was going to be a 3-party agreement so it legally has to be a 3-party agreement. If they want to change it to a 2-party agreement they have to tell that to Congress and then wait 6 months.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hawaiian_punch 09/01/18 7:55:51 AM #60:	Bio1590 posted... They can't even do that anyways because they told Congress it was going to be a 3-party agreement so it legally has to be a 3-party agreement. If they want to change it to a 2-party agreement they have to tell that to Congress and then wait 6 months. Thats what I heard <cite>Hawaiian_punch posted [p:907916333] in 'Inflammat... [t:76954319]...</cite> <quote><cite>Bio1590 posted...</cite> <quote>They can't even do that anyways because they told Congress it was going to be a 3-party agreement so it legally has to be a 3-party agreement. If they want to change it to a 2-party agreement they have to tell that to Congress and then wait 6 months.</quote> Thats what I heard</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > 'Inflammatory' remarks from Trump re: Canada and NAFTA leak (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > 'Inflammatory' remarks from Trump re: Canada and NAFTA leak