Current Events > NOT being attracted to people of another race is NOT RACIST.

Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3
Zodd3224
08/25/18 1:54:14 PM
#51:


Still havent heard a valid reason for saying "no blacks."

The TC said he is attracted to pale skinned people, which is fine. But there are pale skinned black people out there as well, and even though the odds are low, even he admitted its not impossible.

What is a valid reason to say "no blacks?" What is the reasoning behind it? We have given reasons for why people are attracted to certain genders, now I want to hear the reasons for why someone would say "no blacks" or "no Asians" or "no whites."
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi
08/25/18 1:59:19 PM
#52:


Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.
---
I have nothing else to say
... Copied to Clipboard!
gna647
08/25/18 2:02:02 PM
#53:


Racist? No

prejudice? Yes

here's why:

Race and ethnicity labels are completely social inventions.
Saying you won't date (insert race here) men or women is saying you have a perceived standard of what ALL those kind of people will look like. When its false.

Here's the thing, genetics are fucking wild. People look different regardless if they're the same race or not.

You can't say "Oh I don't date black guys" and turn around and say "Oh but (insert popular attractive black guy here) is an exception!"

You have standards. You think its race. But it definitely isn't.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:02:39 PM
#54:


Maybe you don't like the skin contrast?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 2:03:48 PM
#55:


Zodd3224 posted...
Still havent heard a valid reason for saying "no blacks."

The TC said he is attracted to pale skinned people, which is fine. But there are pale skinned black people out there as well, and even though the odds are low, even he admitted its not impossible.

What is a valid reason to say "no blacks?" What is the reasoning behind it? We have given reasons for why people are attracted to certain genders, now I want to hear the reasons for why someone would say "no blacks" or "no Asians" or "no whites."

You need to ask the individuals themselves why. Because that's what preference is. It's individual.

What matters is that the individuals' experiences with attraction lead them to believe that they aren't attracted to a certain race. Which means they've somehow identified members of a certain race and recognized that they consistently weren't attracted to them. They may not even know specifically what traits they're identifying.

And it's similar with gender. We decide whether we're attracted or not long before we see a dick or a pussy. We use other physical traits, and yet it may take a while to isolate exactly what traits we're picking out.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 2:05:40 PM
#56:


RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.

And my point is you don't automatically know which the person means for sure just because they listed "no blacks" on a dating site.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zodd3224
08/25/18 2:07:39 PM
#57:


Dragonblade01 posted...
Zodd3224 posted...
Still havent heard a valid reason for saying "no blacks."

The TC said he is attracted to pale skinned people, which is fine. But there are pale skinned black people out there as well, and even though the odds are low, even he admitted its not impossible.

What is a valid reason to say "no blacks?" What is the reasoning behind it? We have given reasons for why people are attracted to certain genders, now I want to hear the reasons for why someone would say "no blacks" or "no Asians" or "no whites."

You need to ask the individuals themselves why. Because that's what preference is. It's individual.

What matters is that the individuals' experiences with attraction lead them to believe that they aren't attracted to a certain race. Which means they've somehow identified members of a certain race and recognized that they consistently weren't attracted to them. They may not even know specifically what traits they're identifying.

And it's similar with gender. We decide whether we're attracted or not long before we see a dick or a pussy. We use other physical traits, and yet it may take a while to isolate exactly what traits we're picking out.


By all means, would an individual pop in here and list a specific reason why they wouldnt date a single person from an entire race. I would love to hear it.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
gna647
08/25/18 2:13:20 PM
#58:


SpinKirby posted...
Maybe you don't like the skin contrast?


which is weird if you think about it

"oh shes got a gorgeous face, nice ass and tits but WHOA her skin is too dark!"

alright
im sure im hitting that regardless how dark/pale they are.

so its prejudice because they're associating the skin color to facial/body features. When they're usually not associated at all because there's plenty of beautiful people of different contrasts/
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:14:45 PM
#59:


gna647 posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Maybe you don't like the skin contrast?


which is weird if you think about it

"oh shes got a gorgeous face, nice ass and tits but WHOA her skin is too dark!"

alright
im sure im hitting that regardless how dark/pale they are.

so its prejudice because they're associating the skin color to facial/body features. When they're usually not associated at all because there's plenty of beautiful people of different contrasts/


You missed out.
This debate happened on the Tekken 7 boards.

Rip Master Raven
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi
08/25/18 2:19:28 PM
#60:


Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.

And my point is you don't automatically know which the person means for sure just because they listed "no blacks" on a dating site.


That's a pretty silly point to make considering dating profiles exist entirely to communicate to other people what they want.

I don't get how the phrase "No blacks" is open to interpretation.
---
I have nothing else to say
... Copied to Clipboard!
apocalyptic_4
08/25/18 2:21:22 PM
#61:


the premise of these topics:

"I have the right to Express that I dont find black people attractive and not he called a racist because that's not my preference and anyone offended by that is a SJW!"
---
PSN: Adrian396
XBL: Prime Legacy Nintendo ID: Apocalypse
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 2:25:07 PM
#62:


RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.

And my point is you don't automatically know which the person means for sure just because they listed "no blacks" on a dating site.


That's a pretty silly point to make considering dating profiles exist entirely to communicate to other people what they want.

I don't get how the phrase "No blacks" is open to interpretation.

The phrase itself is not really open to interpretation, but the motivation behind it is. Because they may just be a very blunt person who's saying that because they've never found a black person attractive before.
... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi
08/25/18 2:36:53 PM
#63:


Dragonblade01 posted...
Because they may just be a very blunt person who's saying that because they've never found a black person attractive before.


And once again, you are talking about two entirely different statements.

If I say "I will not eat fish," guess what? It means that I won't eat fish. Point blank period. There is no part of that that implies "I mean, I guess I would eat fish, but I just haven't found fish that I like," because those are two totally contradictory statements.

If you want to argue that someone might change their stance, so be it. But the statement "No blacks" literally means "I will not entertain the idea of dating a black person, so don't even message me."
---
I have nothing else to say
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:37:52 PM
#64:


Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.

And my point is you don't automatically know which the person means for sure just because they listed "no blacks" on a dating site.


That's a pretty silly point to make considering dating profiles exist entirely to communicate to other people what they want.

I don't get how the phrase "No blacks" is open to interpretation.

The phrase itself is not really open to interpretation, but the motivation behind it is. Because they may just be a very blunt person who's saying that because they've never found a black person attractive before.


You really can't get out of this one.
There's a difference between zero black people and "don't message me if you don't look like Drake" type of preference.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:40:16 PM
#65:


I mean, let's make a some progress here guys.

Even if it racist, why does it matter? It's still a preference, and I don't think you'd want to date someone that heavily dislikes you, if that's even possible.

Usually, if I get rejected for being "Black", it stings a little, but I get over cause that just means we were going to be a horrible match all together.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 2:40:26 PM
#66:


RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
Because they may just be a very blunt person who's saying that because they've never found a black person attractive before.


And once again, you are talking about two entirely different statements.

If I say "I will not eat fish," guess what? It means that I won't eat fish. Point blank period. There is no part of that that implies "I mean, I guess I would eat fish, but I just haven't found fish that I like," because those are two totally contradictory statements.

And yet both of those statements can be motivated by the single fact that they've never liked fish up until now, not necessarily because the person thinks fish are fundamentally inferior as a food.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 2:42:10 PM
#67:


SpinKirby posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.

And my point is you don't automatically know which the person means for sure just because they listed "no blacks" on a dating site.


That's a pretty silly point to make considering dating profiles exist entirely to communicate to other people what they want.

I don't get how the phrase "No blacks" is open to interpretation.

The phrase itself is not really open to interpretation, but the motivation behind it is. Because they may just be a very blunt person who's saying that because they've never found a black person attractive before.


You really can't get out of this one.
There's a difference between zero black people and "don't message me if you don't look like Drake" type of preference.

I don't need to get out of anything because they can both simply be preferences.
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:43:53 PM
#68:


Dragonblade01 posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
It could be, or it could be the same thing said by a very blunt person.


Except it's literally not lmao.

In one statement, you are stating "I've never found a black person that I thought was attractive."

In the other statement, you are presuming that an attractive black person doesn't exist, and even if they did, you still wouldn't date them because they're black, which throws the whole argument of sexual attraction out the window.

And my point is you don't automatically know which the person means for sure just because they listed "no blacks" on a dating site.


That's a pretty silly point to make considering dating profiles exist entirely to communicate to other people what they want.

I don't get how the phrase "No blacks" is open to interpretation.

The phrase itself is not really open to interpretation, but the motivation behind it is. Because they may just be a very blunt person who's saying that because they've never found a black person attractive before.


You really can't get out of this one.
There's a difference between zero black people and "don't message me if you don't look like Drake" type of preference.

I don't need to get out of anything because they can both simply be preferences.


Having preferences and being racist aren't mutually exclusive .
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 2:46:10 PM
#69:


SpinKirby posted...
Having preferences and being racist aren't mutually exclusive .

Correct, and I don't think what that person put on their profile is necessarily enough to make that call.
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:48:52 PM
#70:


Dragonblade01 posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Having preferences and being racist aren't mutually exclusive .

Correct, and I don't think what that person put on their profile is necessarily enough to make that call.


I don't see what else it could be though.
There's no difference between not liking an ugly person vs not liking an ugly black person, so why single someone out?

Like I'll give you a fun example.

I'm really good at being popular on "anonymous" social apps, to the point where "girls" will usually send me messages wanting to know more about me. We can have an hour long conversation, or even more, but when I'm tell them I'm black, they lose interest.

This is before they see a picture of me.

I'd said it's happened to me enough times to where I mentally prepare for it every once in awhile.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zodd3224
08/25/18 2:49:28 PM
#71:


Dragonblade01 posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Having preferences and being racist aren't mutually exclusive .

Correct, and I don't think what that person put on their profile is necessarily enough to make that call.


It is. But if you dont want to see it, thats fine.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
ess2thebee
08/25/18 2:50:23 PM
#72:


This is an acceptable discussion now? It wasn't a few years ago. Nice to see progress being made.
---
Signature.
... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi
08/25/18 2:51:32 PM
#73:


Dragonblade01 posted...
And yet both of those statements can be motivated by the single fact that they've never liked fish up until now


Not really relevant though.

not necessarily because the person thinks fish are fundamentally inferior as a food.


Excluding someone on the basis of race is inherently racist. Unless you think the similar phrase "No blacks allowed" is okay.
---
I have nothing else to say
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 2:53:15 PM
#74:


I kinda regret not keeping those logs, but honestly I get salty af. lol
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Paragon21XX
08/25/18 2:56:21 PM
#75:


Insert "no gingers," " no tall girls," "no short guys," etc in place of "no blacks." If that makes it become anywhere less offensive, then you have some contradictions in your ideology to iron out.
---
Hmm...
... Copied to Clipboard!
Jerry_Hellyeah
08/25/18 2:56:23 PM
#76:


SpinKirby posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Having preferences and being racist aren't mutually exclusive .

Correct, and I don't think what that person put on their profile is necessarily enough to make that call.


I don't see what else it could be though.
There's no difference between not liking an ugly person vs not liking an ugly black person, so why single someone out?

Like I'll give you a fun example.

I'm really good at being popular on "anonymous" social apps, to the point where "girls" will usually send me messages wanting to know more about me. We can have an hour long conversation, or even more, but when I'm tell them I'm black, they lose interest.

This is before they see a picture of me.

I'd said it's happened to me enough times to where I mentally prepare for it every once in awhile.


So what else do you want?

Women have to put out to guys they find unattractive or face being labeled a racist? Pretty disgusting stuff.
---
This is a cool sig
... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi
08/25/18 2:58:44 PM
#77:


Paragon21XX posted...
Insert "no gingers," " no tall girls," "no short guys," etc in place of "no blacks." If that makes it become anywhere less offensive, then you have some contradictions in your ideology to iron out.


"Offensiveness" has nothing to do with the topic.

The argument here is whether or not it's racist, and it is. What you said is totally irrelevant to the discussion.
---
I have nothing else to say
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 3:00:37 PM
#78:


Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
So what else do you want?

Women have to put out to guys they find unattractive or face being labeled a racist? Pretty disgusting stuff.


You totally missed my point. lmao

The judgment is happening before you see that person. How would you know they're unattractive without seeing them?

The only thing that's universally seen among black people is would be that their skin is darker on average, but I have unmixed family and friends that are tan as Italians. I literally had a family friend get sunburn at the beach a few days ago. l m a o

Would you then reject everyone from the Mediterranean?

If it's not the skin color, then it's the facial structure, but it's pretty easy to find someone with x traits on a different person. It's not like big booby Asian chicks dont exist, but I don't pretend like it's impossible.

See what I'm getting at?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 3:06:31 PM
#79:


And again, I don't really care like that.

Everyone is entitled to their own thoughts, ideas, and preferences in a non-business scenario.

It really is no big deal in this instance.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Jerry_Hellyeah
08/25/18 4:02:11 PM
#80:


SpinKirby posted...
Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
So what else do you want?

Women have to put out to guys they find unattractive or face being labeled a racist? Pretty disgusting stuff.


You totally missed my point. lmao

The judgment is happening before you see that person. How would you know they're unattractive without seeing them?

The only thing that's universally seen among black people is would be that their skin is darker on average, but I have unmixed family and friends that are tan as Italians. I literally had a family friend get sunburn at the beach a few days ago. l m a o

Would you then reject everyone from the Mediterranean?

If it's not the skin color, then it's the facial structure, but it's pretty easy to find someone with x traits on a different person. It's not like big booby Asian chicks dont exist, but I don't pretend like it's impossible.

See what I'm getting at?


Youre getting at nothing. People dont like a certain set of traits and thats okay. Im black and and Im not into black women. That doesnt make me a racist.

There is some HUGE overstepping going on with this interracial stuff, my hod.
---
This is a cool sig
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 4:05:58 PM
#81:


Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Jerry_Hellyeah posted...
So what else do you want?

Women have to put out to guys they find unattractive or face being labeled a racist? Pretty disgusting stuff.


You totally missed my point. lmao

The judgment is happening before you see that person. How would you know they're unattractive without seeing them?

The only thing that's universally seen among black people is would be that their skin is darker on average, but I have unmixed family and friends that are tan as Italians. I literally had a family friend get sunburn at the beach a few days ago. l m a o

Would you then reject everyone from the Mediterranean?

If it's not the skin color, then it's the facial structure, but it's pretty easy to find someone with x traits on a different person. It's not like big booby Asian chicks dont exist, but I don't pretend like it's impossible.

See what I'm getting at?


Youre getting at nothing. People dont like a certain set of traits and thats okay. Im black and and Im not into black women. That doesnt make me a racist.

There is some HUGE overstepping going on with this interracial stuff, my hod.


You can be racist against your own race. I would know.
It doesn't mean you're a full blow racist though, it just means you happen to have that opinion about a subject.

But that's off-topic. If you're comfortable with it, why don't you explain these traits that disqualify all black women for you.

That would end this argument/discussion in one swift blow.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
MalachiteXWater
08/25/18 4:48:58 PM
#82:


The mental gymnastics some users are performing in this thread is remarkable.
---
I like lasagna
... Copied to Clipboard!
CiIantro
08/25/18 4:52:06 PM
#83:


... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus
08/25/18 4:52:52 PM
#84:


It is racist, but that's fine because it's only your dick being racist. Your dick can be racist, sexist, transphobic, whatever. It's not a problem so long as you aren't bigoted on an intellectual level.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka
08/25/18 5:07:00 PM
#85:


Sexual preference on the basis of gender is more unwavering than sexual preferences based on race. Think of it this way, some males have really juicy curvy butts. You could isolate just the butt in a photograph and a straight guy could mistake it for a woman's butt and get aroused by it. It doesn't make him gay.

Similarly, isolated sexual characteristics of an individual from a particular race might on their own be attractive. But it's not the whole story.

If someone says, "hey I'm reasonably certain I'm not attracted to ____ race. I don't want to have sex with them." then you have to respect their preference. Calling them racist over their sexual preferences is extremely disrespectful and hateful. Their preferences don't even affect you. And intimidation will not change someone's sexual preference.
---
"Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West
... Copied to Clipboard!
LedZeppelin
08/25/18 5:54:56 PM
#86:


Funbazooka posted...
Sexual preference on the basis of gender is more unwavering than sexual preferences based on race. Think of it this way, some males have really juicy curvy butts. You could isolate just the butt in a photograph and a straight guy could mistake it for a woman's butt and get aroused by it. It doesn't make him gay.

Similarly, isolated sexual characteristics of an individual from a particular race might on their own be attractive. But it's not the whole story.

If someone says, "hey I'm reasonably certain I'm not attracted to ____ race. I don't want to have sex with them." then you have to respect their preference. Calling them racist over their sexual preferences is extremely disrespectful and hateful. Their preferences don't even affect you. And intimidation will not change someone's sexual preference.

well put brother. its absurd that many people will automatically call others racist simply because of their natural preferences.
---
I come from the land of the ice and snow
From the midnight sun where the hot springs flow
... Copied to Clipboard!
fuzzylittlbunny
08/25/18 6:05:59 PM
#87:


I think it's genetic. I'm full Japanese, which means that all of my ancestors have procreated with other Japanese people. I find other Asians much more attractive than black people, with Japanese people being my top priority. I don't think that blacks are inferior, but I just haven't found one that I'm attracted to yet.
---
( ^_^)/\(^_^ )
Maya high five!
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 6:11:36 PM
#88:


fuzzylittlbunny posted...
I think it's genetic. I'm full Japanese, which means that all of my ancestors have procreated with other Japanese people. I find other Asians much more attractive than black people, with Japanese people being my top priority. I don't think that blacks are inferior, but I just haven't found one that I'm attracted to yet.


It should be genetic, to some extent, but it generally shouldn't extend to sexual attraction.

I'm not calling you out or anything, but I'll put my vote on 99% cultural and 1% genetic.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
fuzzylittlbunny
08/25/18 6:32:47 PM
#89:


But I don't see how it's cultural. I just haven't seen a single black woman that I've been attracted to, be it a regular person walking down the street or a celebrity on tv/a magazine cover.
---
( ^_^)/\(^_^ )
Maya high five!
... Copied to Clipboard!
legendary_zell
08/25/18 6:54:45 PM
#90:


fuzzylittlbunny posted...
But I don't see how it's cultural. I just haven't seen a single black woman that I've been attracted to, be it a regular person walking down the street or a celebrity on tv/a magazine cover.


I've already explained this. It's because you've grown up in a culture where people are heavily encouraged to stick with their own and where black woman are specifically marked out as being unattractive. There's all types of baggage associated with black women and with Asians being more racially exclusive. You could have the same two parents, but if you grew up in Nigeria and never left and never saw an Asian person,were never exposed to cultural pressures that were pro Asian beauty and anti black, it's highly unlikely you'd feel the way you do.

What's the genetic basis you're positing here?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Barber102
08/25/18 6:57:28 PM
#91:


Attraction isn't a choice, you can't choose who you're attracted to, no one just up and decides hey I don't like black people because they're black, it doesn't work that way and people need to get over it and stop assuming someone is racist or prejudice just because someone isn't attracted to skin tones does not mean ones racist. it means chemicals in your brain do not trigger a reaction needed to cause attraction.

Stop arguing over stuff beyond peoples control no one picks and chooses who they're attracted too.
---
Fire and blood.
... Copied to Clipboard!
MalachiteXWater
08/25/18 7:02:24 PM
#92:


Barber102 posted...
Attraction isn't a choice, you can't choose who you're attracted to, no one just up and decides hey I don't like black people because they're black, it doesn't work that way and people need to get over it and stop assuming someone is racist or prejudice just because someone isn't attracted to skin tones does not mean ones racist. it means chemicals in your brain do not trigger a reaction needed to cause attraction.

Stop arguing over stuff beyond peoples control no one picks and chooses who they're attracted too.


Yes some people do and yes you could but it probably be awkward.
---
I like lasagna
... Copied to Clipboard!
fuzzylittlbunny
08/25/18 7:04:13 PM
#93:


legendary_zell posted...
fuzzylittlbunny posted...
But I don't see how it's cultural. I just haven't seen a single black woman that I've been attracted to, be it a regular person walking down the street or a celebrity on tv/a magazine cover.


I've already explained this. It's because you've grown up in a culture where people are heavily encouraged to stick with their own and where black woman are specifically marked out as being unattractive. There's all types of baggage associated with black women and with Asians being more racially exclusive. You could have the same two parents, but if you grew up in Nigeria and never left and never saw an Asian person,were never exposed to cultural pressures that were pro Asian beauty and anti black, it's highly unlikely you'd feel the way you do.

What's the genetic basis you're positing here?

My genetic basis is that nobody, and I repeat, NOBODY has ever pressured me into thinking that Asians are beautiful. It's just a natural, uncontrollable feeling I have. If anything, the media pressures me into thinking that celebrities with oversized asses like Nicki Minaj or Kim Kardashian are beautiful, and I still find them repulsive.
---
( ^_^)/\(^_^ )
Maya high five!
... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude
08/25/18 7:08:20 PM
#94:


Zodd3224 posted...
Imagine comparing race to gender

---
If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me
... Copied to Clipboard!
dreamvoid
08/25/18 7:12:29 PM
#95:


homosexuality and heterosexuality are biological. there is nothing biological that makes someone unable to be aroused by a person of another race. it is simply their opinion, which often comes from a place of conditioning and ignorance.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
HashtagTartarus
08/25/18 7:30:33 PM
#96:


dreamvoid posted...
homosexuality and heterosexuality are biological. there is nothing biological that makes someone unable to be aroused by a person of another race. it is simply their opinion, which often comes from a place of conditioning and ignorance.


Opinions don't change what gives you a boner. That's biology, buddy!
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver
08/25/18 7:36:57 PM
#97:


i think its a complex situation where it can stem from quite a few places

however, people that frequently talk about how they arent attracted to (race) and go on and on about it are usually racist. the more you talk about it the more suspicious and weird it is
---
butts
... Copied to Clipboard!
Dragonblade01
08/25/18 7:45:37 PM
#98:


Zodd3224 posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
SpinKirby posted...
Having preferences and being racist aren't mutually exclusive .

Correct, and I don't think what that person put on their profile is necessarily enough to make that call.


It is. But if you dont want to see it, thats fine.

It isn't. But if you don't want to see it, that's fine.

RchHomieQuanChi posted...
Dragonblade01 posted...
And yet both of those statements can be motivated by the single fact that they've never liked fish up until now


Not really relevant though.

not necessarily because the person thinks fish are fundamentally inferior as a food.


Excluding someone on the basis of race is inherently racist. Unless you think the similar phrase "No blacks allowed" is okay.

Of course it's relevant. You can't just remove context from the discussion when context is precisely the issue.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka
08/25/18 8:39:27 PM
#99:


dreamvoid posted...
homosexuality and heterosexuality are biological. there is nothing biological that makes someone unable to be aroused by a person of another race.

There is a biological basis to both sex and race. It's called genetics
---
"Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West
... Copied to Clipboard!
SpinKirby
08/25/18 8:48:10 PM
#100:


fuzzylittlbunny posted...
legendary_zell posted...
fuzzylittlbunny posted...
But I don't see how it's cultural. I just haven't seen a single black woman that I've been attracted to, be it a regular person walking down the street or a celebrity on tv/a magazine cover.


I've already explained this. It's because you've grown up in a culture where people are heavily encouraged to stick with their own and where black woman are specifically marked out as being unattractive. There's all types of baggage associated with black women and with Asians being more racially exclusive. You could have the same two parents, but if you grew up in Nigeria and never left and never saw an Asian person,were never exposed to cultural pressures that were pro Asian beauty and anti black, it's highly unlikely you'd feel the way you do.

What's the genetic basis you're positing here?

My genetic basis is that nobody, and I repeat, NOBODY has ever pressured me into thinking that Asians are beautiful. It's just a natural, uncontrollable feeling I have. If anything, the media pressures me into thinking that celebrities with oversized asses like Nicki Minaj or Kim Kardashian are beautiful, and I still find them repulsive.


Time to start sending some mixed gals your way.

ILL CRACK YOUR VALUES IN TWO.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1, 2, 3