Current Events > 16 states pushing to be able to fire people for being LGBT

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
FightingGames 08/26/18 3:07:37 PM #152:	based --- https://my.mixtape.moe/whapui.webm <cite>FightingGames posted [p:907582698] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote>based</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 08/26/18 3:12:40 PM #153:	KamenRiderBlade posted... He'll be back! .. You sound defeated lol. --- Long live The Fam! They hate us 'cuz they ain't us! <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:907582929] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote>He'll be back!</quote> .. You sound defeated lol.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 08/26/18 3:13:55 PM #154:	BJ-blazkowics posted... .. You sound defeated lol. The Admiral was defeated, temporarily! But he always comes back! --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:907582975] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>.. You sound defeated lol.</quote>The Admiral was defeated, temporarily! But he always comes back!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 08/26/18 3:14:11 PM #155:	shockthemonkey posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... The Admiral posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... BWing posted... The Admiral posted... Not really. Closing a business, which puts innocent people out of work and denies that service to the community, is not a better situation in this case. It's not like the views of religious people are going to be changed by this. You're just rooting for others to be harmed because they have views you don't like. Their customer base isn't ALL shitbags who don't realize we live in 2018 though. Don't act like the boycott by a few bigots is going to shut down a business. Hell, the way that crowd "boycotts", they'd probably increase business. The admiral supports LGBTQ people getting fired for their sexual orientation? SHOCKER! I found this line especially hypocritical: "You're just rooting for others to be harmed because they have views you don't like." So he wants people to be harmed for things they can't help (sexual orientation, race), but gets mad if people want to boycott or even call out the people doing such harming? Talk about a perpetual victim complex! I like how he is pushing the typical white supremacist line " you oppose/you call out/you dislike people because they have views you don't like", when such "views they don't like" are... the harming, banning, firing or ethnically cleansing of people whose race/ethnicity/religion/sexual orientation they don't like Thanks, ROD. No one cares about your opinion. My sides XD You do realize that: 1) No one will believe I am rod because you say so 2) you look real bad resorting to that gimmick without addressing the actual point 3) Even fewer people in CE like you than people who "don't care about my opinion" Now try addressing the actual post for a change. Or not, feel free to to go full REEEEEE and get suspended again Followed by this, 10 hours later: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/community/the_admiral `Suspended The_Admiral is no longer an active member.` Can't say we didn't warn him LMAO Good chaps, can you do me a favor? We need a screenshot of this. It will be marvelous to check his delusions of grandeur when/if he is back, just like his S Y M B O L I C Manafort screenshot. --- Long live The Fam! They hate us 'cuz they ain't us! <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:907582987] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWing posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> Not really. Closing a business, which puts innocent people out of work and denies that service to the community, is not a better situation in this case. It's not like the views of religious people are going to be changed by this. You're just rooting for others to be harmed because they have views you don't like.</quote> Their customer base isn't ALL shitbags who don't realize we live in 2018 though. Don't act like the boycott by a few bigots is going to shut down a business. Hell, the way that crowd "boycotts", they'd probably increase business.</quote> The admiral supports LGBTQ people getting fired for their sexual orientation? SHOCKER! I found this line especially hypocritical: "You're just rooting for others to be harmed because they have views you don't like." So he wants people to be harmed for things they can't help (sexual orientation, race), but gets mad if people want to boycott or even call out the people doing such harming? Talk about a perpetual victim complex! I like how he is pushing the typical white supremacist line " you oppose/you call out/you dislike people because they have views you don't like", when such "views they don't like" are... the harming, banning, firing or ethnically cleansing of people whose race/ethnicity/religion/sexual orientation they don't like</quote> Thanks, ROD. No one cares about your opinion.</quote> My sides XD You do realize that: 1) No one will believe I am rod because you say so 2) you look real bad resorting to that gimmick without addressing the actual point 3) Even fewer people in CE like you than people who "don't care about my opinion" Now try addressing the actual post for a change. Or not, feel free to to go full REEEEEE and get suspended again</quote> Followed by this, 10 hours later: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/community/the_admiral Suspended The_Admiral is no longer an active member. Can't say we didn't warn him LMAO</quote> </quote> Good chaps, can you do me a favor? We need a screenshot of this. It will be marvelous to check his delusions of grandeur when/if he is back, just like his S Y M B O L I C Manafort screenshot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 08/26/18 3:15:18 PM #156:	KamenRiderBlade posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... .. You sound defeated lol. The Admiral was defeated, temporarily! But he always comes back! Thus proving the definition of insanity. Posting derp stuff again, only to get suspended again. --- Long live The Fam! They hate us 'cuz they ain't us! <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:907583046] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>.. You sound defeated lol.</quote>The Admiral was defeated, temporarily! But he always comes back!</quote> Thus proving the definition of insanity. Posting derp stuff again, only to get suspended again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KamenRiderBlade 08/26/18 3:18:57 PM #157:	BJ-blazkowics posted... Thus proving the definition of insanity. Posting derp stuff again, only to get suspended again. Tell that to The_Admiral --- Are you a MexiCAN or a MexiCAN'T - Johnny Depp '*Once Upon A Time in Mexico*' <cite>KamenRiderBlade posted [p:907583247] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>Thus proving the definition of insanity. Posting derp stuff again, only to get suspended again.</quote>Tell that to The_Admiral</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BJ-blazkowics 08/26/18 3:23:11 PM #158:	KamenRiderBlade posted... BJ-blazkowics posted... Thus proving the definition of insanity. Posting derp stuff again, only to get suspended again. Tell that to The_Admiral I will, when he is inevitably back. And I will enjoy it. --- Long live The Fam! They hate us 'cuz they ain't us! <cite>BJ-blazkowics posted [p:907583469] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>KamenRiderBlade posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BJ-blazkowics posted...</cite> <quote>Thus proving the definition of insanity. Posting derp stuff again, only to get suspended again.</quote>Tell that to The_Admiral</quote> I will, when he is inevitably back. And I will enjoy it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 08/26/18 6:00:57 PM #159:	philsov posted... For the record, this is only 16 states pushing for the ability to discriminate against the trans* population. The scope does not address sexual orientation (LBG). QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the word sex in Title VIIs prohibition on discrimination because of . . . sex, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1) meant gender identity and included transgender status when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964. 2. Whether Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), prohibits employers from applying sexspecific policies according to their employees sex rather than gender ~ https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/RG__GR_Harris_Funeral_Homes_Inc_Petitioner_vs_Equal_Employment_Op?1535214932 Their argument is essentially that gender identity is a choice and therefore should not be a protected class. Which is both incorrect and fucked up. ~ The good news is that the courts (so far) have said that she was wrongfully discriminated against. The funeral home's argument for firing her was a moral one (ie, ew, this goes against God's will and makes me uncomfortable!) rather that a business decision like Admiral is falsely claiming. Their argument had nothing to do with business loss or revenue -- it was a matter of "sincerely held religious beliefs" on behalf of management. https://www.aclu.org/cases/eeoc-v-rg-gr-harris-funeral-homes https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/eeoc-v-rg-gr-harris-funeral-homes-ruling I feel like everyone is overlooking this post --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:907592130] in 16 states ... [t:76935570]...</cite> <quote><cite>philsov posted...</cite> <quote>For the record, this is only 16 states pushing for the ability to discriminate against the trans* population. The scope does not address sexual orientation (LBG). QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the word sex in Title VIIs prohibition on discrimination because of . . . sex, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(a)(1) meant gender identity and included transgender status when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964. 2. Whether Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), prohibits employers from applying sexspecific policies according to their employees sex rather than gender ~ https://www.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/RG__GR_Harris_Funeral_Homes_Inc_Petitioner_vs_Equal_Employment_Op?1535214932 Their argument is essentially that gender identity is a choice and therefore should not be a protected class. Which is both incorrect and fucked up. ~ The good news is that the courts (so far) have said that she was wrongfully discriminated against. The funeral home's argument for firing her was a moral one (ie, ew, this goes against God's will and makes me uncomfortable!) rather that a business decision like Admiral is falsely claiming. Their argument had nothing to do with business loss or revenue -- it was a matter of "sincerely held religious beliefs" on behalf of management. https://www.aclu.org/cases/eeoc-v-rg-gr-harris-funeral-homes https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/eeoc-v-rg-gr-harris-funeral-homes-ruling</quote> I feel like everyone is overlooking this post</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#160	Post #160 was unavailable or deleted.
#161	Post #161 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > 16 states pushing to be able to fire people for being LGBT (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > 16 states pushing to be able to fire people for being LGBT