Current Events > Trump: The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
ledbowman 07/09/18 1:49:34 PM #1:	The failing NY Times Fake News story today about breast feeding must be called out. The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding but we dont believe women should be denied access to formula. Many women need this option because of malnutrition and poverty. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1016367395294908421?s=19 --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:904764919] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><quote>The failing NY Times Fake News story today about breast feeding must be called out. The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding but we dont believe women should be denied access to formula. Many women need this option because of malnutrition and poverty.</quote> https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1016367395294908421?s=19</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/09/18 1:50:39 PM #2:	Actions speak louder than words. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904764973] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Actions speak louder than words.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rexdragon125 07/09/18 1:50:58 PM #3:	https://imgur.com/lsxd4r8 <cite>Rexdragon125 posted [p:904764987] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>https://imgur.com/lsxd4r8</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 07/09/18 1:51:15 PM #4:	Pfizer & others should be ashamed that they have raised drug prices for no reason. They are merely taking advantage of the poor & others unable to defend themselves, while at the same time giving bargain basement prices to other countries in Europe & elsewhere. We will respond! https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1016368503723577344?s=19 --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:904765009] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><quote>Pfizer & others should be ashamed that they have raised drug prices for no reason. They are merely taking advantage of the poor & others unable to defend themselves, while at the same time giving bargain basement prices to other countries in Europe & elsewhere. We will respond!</quote> https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1016368503723577344?s=19</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bluebomber182 07/09/18 1:51:48 PM #5:	pence hates breast feeding cause sucking on a tit makes him feel all tingly down there --- Everyday is Rusev Day! <cite>Bluebomber182 posted [p:904765032] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>pence hates breast feeding cause sucking on a tit makes him feel all tingly down there</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NinjaWarrior455 07/09/18 1:52:01 PM #6:	Does this confirm Trump loves sucking titties? --- Super Bowl 52 Champions!!!! http://myanimelist.net/animelist/NinjaWarrior457 <cite>NinjaWarrior455 posted [p:904765046] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Does this confirm Trump loves sucking titties?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 07/09/18 1:53:19 PM #7:	https://gifer.com/en/74P2 --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:904765123] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>https://gifer.com/en/74P2</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gguirao 07/09/18 3:11:27 PM #8:	I have no problem with breastfeeding in public, but if I ran a business, I would advise women do it in a discreet area if they could. --- Donald J. Trump--proof against government intelligence. <cite>gguirao posted [p:904769527] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>I have no problem with breastfeeding in public, but if I ran a business, I would advise women do it in a discreet area if they could.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#9	Post #9 was unavailable or deleted.
slimfizzle2 07/09/18 3:13:44 PM #10:	If I ran a business I would be like show me dem titties --- Solomon Grundy wants Pants Too! <cite>slimfizzle2 posted [p:904769659] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>If I ran a business I would be like show me dem titties</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 07/09/18 3:13:59 PM #11:	M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:904769677] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote>What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Patty_Fleur 07/09/18 3:14:13 PM #12:	I wasn't breast fed. It's no big deal. --- Three can keep a secret, if two of them are dead. <cite>Patty_Fleur posted [p:904769689] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>I wasn't breast fed. It's no big deal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/09/18 3:14:27 PM #13:	M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904769711] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote>What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HypnoCoosh 07/09/18 3:15:54 PM #14:	Also some women can't produce milk. Hence why wet nurses were a thing back in the day. --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:904769796] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Also some women can't produce milk. Hence why wet nurses were a thing back in the day.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
slimfizzle2 07/09/18 3:15:57 PM #15:	Patty_Fleur posted... I wasn't breast fed. It's no big deal. And look how you turned out. PSA: mothers please breast feed --- Solomon Grundy wants Pants Too! <cite>slimfizzle2 posted [p:904769800] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Patty_Fleur posted...</cite> <quote>I wasn't breast fed. It's no big deal.</quote> And look how you turned out. PSA: mothers please breast feed</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rexdragon125 07/09/18 3:16:32 PM #16:	M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html This I think. Basically capitalist parasites trying to force people to buy formula instead of using breast milk. Nestle has tried crap like this before. <cite>Rexdragon125 posted [p:904769832] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote>What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html This I think. Basically capitalist parasites trying to force people to buy formula instead of using breast milk. Nestle has tried crap like this before.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 07/09/18 3:17:03 PM #17:	BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Howl posted [p:904769874] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations.</quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bacon_Pancakes 07/09/18 3:19:16 PM #18:	Big titty goth gfs for every good boy when???!? <cite>Bacon_Pancakes posted [p:904769973] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Big titty goth gfs for every good boy when???!?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 07/09/18 3:19:52 PM #19:	BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. Of course they did. Gotta appease his fellow corporate overlords <cite>Axiom posted [p:904770003] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote>What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations.</quote> Of course they did. Gotta appease his fellow corporate overlords</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/09/18 3:20:01 PM #20:	Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. Nope .Then the United States delegation, embracing the interests of infant formula manufacturers, upended the deliberations. American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to protect, promote and support breast-feeding and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children. When that failed, they turned to threats, according to diplomats and government officials who took part in the discussions. Ecuador, which had planned to introduce the measure, was the first to find itself in the cross hairs. The Americans were blunt: If Ecuador refused to drop the resolution, Washington would unleash punishing trade measures and withdraw crucial military aid. The Ecuadorean government quickly acquiesced. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904770011] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations.</quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN.</quote> Nope <quote>.Then the United States delegation, embracing the interests of infant formula manufacturers, upended the deliberations. American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to protect, promote and support breast-feeding and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children. When that failed, they turned to threats, according to diplomats and government officials who took part in the discussions. Ecuador, which had planned to introduce the measure, was the first to find itself in the cross hairs. The Americans were blunt: If Ecuador refused to drop the resolution, Washington would unleash punishing trade measures and withdraw crucial military aid. The Ecuadorean government quickly acquiesced.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
slimfizzle2 07/09/18 3:20:55 PM #21:	Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way --- Solomon Grundy wants Pants Too! <cite>slimfizzle2 posted [p:904770065] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly?</quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations.</quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN.</quote> So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 07/09/18 3:21:40 PM #22:	Please await with bated breath while Howl imagines his response --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:904770104] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Please await with bated breath while Howl imagines his response</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ledbowman 07/09/18 3:27:34 PM #23:	I thought GOP wants what's best for babies because they care a lot. --- I wish we all waved <cite>ledbowman posted [p:904770385] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>I thought GOP wants what's best for babies because they care a lot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 07/09/18 3:30:05 PM #24:	ledbowman posted... I thought GOP wants what's best for babies because they care a lot. No, because only babies that have already been born can even consume milk or formula; so fuck em. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:904770518] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>ledbowman posted...</cite> <quote>I thought GOP wants what's best for babies because they care a lot.</quote> No, because only babies that have already been born can even consume milk or formula; so fuck em.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 07/09/18 3:30:18 PM #25:	Rexdragon125 posted... Basically capitalist parasites trying to force people to buy formula instead of using breast milk. How, exactly? <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:904770540] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Rexdragon125 posted...</cite> <quote>Basically capitalist parasites trying to force people to buy formula instead of using breast milk.</quote> How, exactly?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TES_Nut 07/09/18 3:33:05 PM #26:	Anyone in the Republican party has some fucking nerve blaming things on poverty and malnutrition when they've been doing their damndest for the last 30 years to increase it. --- The ending of the word is ALMSIVI <cite>TES_Nut posted [p:904770680] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Anyone in the Republican party has some fucking nerve blaming things on poverty and malnutrition when they've been doing their damndest for the last 30 years to increase it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Shuto-uke 07/09/18 3:34:06 PM #27:	Patty_Fleur posted... I wasn't breast fed. It's no big deal. You weren't breast fed. And you say shit like this: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/76791476/904770616 Yeaaahhhhh you're not helping your case lol <cite>Shuto-uke posted [p:904770730] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Patty_Fleur posted...</cite> <quote>I wasn't breast fed. It's no big deal.</quote> You weren't breast fed. And you say shit like this: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/76791476/904770616 Yeaaahhhhh you're not helping your case lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Perascamin 07/09/18 3:35:00 PM #28:	I'm so confused...Trump just said he was in favor of breastfeeding, but we're saying he isn't? --- I've grown. <cite>Perascamin posted [p:904770783] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>I'm so confused...Trump just said he was in favor of breastfeeding, but we're saying he isn't?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/09/18 3:35:48 PM #29:	Perascamin posted... I'm so confused...Trump just said he was in favor of breastfeeding, but we're saying he isn't? His administrations actions favor corporations in this case. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904770834] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Perascamin posted...</cite> <quote>I'm so confused...Trump just said he was in favor of breastfeeding, but we're saying he isn't?</quote> His administrations actions favor corporations in this case.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 07/09/18 3:38:35 PM #30:	BWLurker posted... Perascamin posted... I'm so confused...Trump just said he was in favor of breastfeeding, but we're saying he isn't? His administrations actions favor corporations in this case. Yeah his tweet was simply meant to placate people after sucking on the bottle of baby formula corporations <cite>Axiom posted [p:904770984] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Perascamin posted...</cite> <quote>I'm so confused...Trump just said he was in favor of breastfeeding, but we're saying he isn't?</quote> His administrations actions favor corporations in this case.</quote> Yeah his tweet was simply meant to placate people after sucking on the bottle of baby formula corporations</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 07/09/18 3:51:59 PM #31:	slimfizzle2 posted... Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way The reason is because the wording of the resolution implies that babies cannot be healthy without being breast fed. The DHS took issue with that wording because it demonizes all women who are not able to breast feed or simply choose not to. For people who are so concerned about women's rights, you would assume they would care about the free choice women have in such an issue. Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Howl posted [p:904771694] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>slimfizzle2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly? </quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. </quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN.</quote> So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way</quote> The reason is because the wording of the resolution implies that babies cannot be healthy without being breast fed. The DHS took issue with that wording because it demonizes all women who are not able to breast feed or simply choose not to. For people who are so concerned about women's rights, you would assume they would care about the free choice women have in such an issue. Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#32	Post #32 was unavailable or deleted.
Howl 07/09/18 4:07:32 PM #33:	shockthemonkey posted... Howl posted... slimfizzle2 posted... Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way The reason is because the wording of the resolution implies that babies cannot be healthy without being breast fed. The DHS took issue with that wording because it demonizes all women who are not able to breast feed or simply choose not to. For people who are so concerned about women's rights, you would assume they would care about the free choice women have in such an issue. Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related. Damn, Hoth, why are you always lying? I'm not Hoth, but what did I lie about? The article directly stated as much. "The Department of Health and Human Services, the lead agency in the effort to modify the resolution, explained the decision to contest the resolutions wording" The resolution as originally drafted placed unnecessary hurdles for mothers seeking to provide nutrition to their children, an H.H.S. spokesman said in an email. We recognize not all women are able to breast-feed for a variety of reasons. These women should have the choice and access to alternatives for the health of their babies, and not be stigmatized for the ways in which they are able to do so. Keep trying to lie about what actually happened though it's easier to prove you wrong when you do so. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Howl posted [p:904772544] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>slimfizzle2 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly? </quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. </quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. </quote> So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way </quote> The reason is because the wording of the resolution implies that babies cannot be healthy without being breast fed. The DHS took issue with that wording because it demonizes all women who are not able to breast feed or simply choose not to. For people who are so concerned about women's rights, you would assume they would care about the free choice women have in such an issue. Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related.</quote> Damn, Hoth, why are you always lying?</quote> I'm not Hoth, but what did I lie about? The article directly stated as much. "The Department of Health and Human Services, the lead agency in the effort to modify the resolution, explained the decision to contest the resolutions wording" The resolution as originally drafted placed unnecessary hurdles for mothers seeking to provide nutrition to their children, an H.H.S. spokesman said in an email. We recognize not all women are able to breast-feed for a variety of reasons. These women should have the choice and access to alternatives for the health of their babies, and not be stigmatized for the ways in which they are able to do so. Keep trying to lie about what actually happened though it's easier to prove you wrong when you do so.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 07/09/18 4:08:34 PM #34:	What are those hurdles exactly? --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:904772601] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>What are those hurdles exactly?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#35	Post #35 was unavailable or deleted.
BWLurker 07/09/18 4:09:19 PM #36:	American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to protect, promote and support breast-feeding and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children. Yeah, that doesn't jive with the claims from HHS. Looks like they've taken to their leader's strategy of alternative facts. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904772646] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><quote>American officials sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to protect, promote and support breast-feeding and another passage that called on policymakers to restrict the promotion of food products that many experts say can have deleterious effects on young children.</quote> Yeah, that doesn't jive with the claims from HHS. Looks like they've taken to their leader's strategy of alternative facts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 07/09/18 4:10:13 PM #37:	CyricZ posted... What are those hurdles exactly? From some half-assed research, it seems like a 1981 resolution wanted to clamp down on advertising, almost on par with cigarettes. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:904772701] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>CyricZ posted...</cite> <quote>What are those hurdles exactly?</quote> From some half-assed research, it seems like a 1981 resolution wanted to clamp down on advertising, almost on par with cigarettes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 07/09/18 4:16:45 PM #38:	CyricZ posted... What are those hurdles exactly? http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/breastmilk-substitutes-FAQ2017/en/ This is what the issue is almost entirely. This whole "international code" cites data that is not at all scientific to make outrageous claims about breastfeeding and how life saving it is. There's been no double blind studies about the efficacy of breastfeeding versus formula fed infants because its been deemed unethical by the scientific community, yet that does not stop them from claiming that breastfeeding can save the lives of 800,000 infants per year. This is literally scientifically unfounded. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Howl posted [p:904773084] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>CyricZ posted...</cite> <quote>What are those hurdles exactly?</quote> http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/breastmilk-substitutes-FAQ2017/en/ This is what the issue is almost entirely. This whole "international code" cites data that is not at all scientific to make outrageous claims about breastfeeding and how life saving it is. There's been no double blind studies about the efficacy of breastfeeding versus formula fed infants because its been deemed unethical by the scientific community, yet that does not stop them from claiming that breastfeeding can save the lives of 800,000 infants per year. This is literally scientifically unfounded.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/09/18 4:19:09 PM #39:	Trump probably tried to breast feed Ivanka back in the day tbh --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904773202] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Trump probably tried to breast feed Ivanka back in the day tbh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/09/18 4:22:53 PM #40:	Howl posted... slimfizzle2 posted... Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related. Wat --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904773405] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slimfizzle2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly? </quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. </quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN.</quote> So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way</quote> Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related.</quote> Wat</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BWLurker 07/09/18 4:24:38 PM #41:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Howl posted... slimfizzle2 posted... Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related. Wat Howl is just trolling. He's jumped on the "defend everything Trump does and says" gimmick that's oh so common here. <cite>BWLurker posted [p:904773494] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>slimfizzle2 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly? </quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. </quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN.</quote> So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way</quote> Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related.</quote> Wat</quote> Howl is just trolling. He's jumped on the "defend everything Trump does and says" gimmick that's oh so common here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 07/09/18 4:28:22 PM #42:	BWLurker posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Howl posted... slimfizzle2 posted... Howl posted... BWLurker posted... M_Live posted... What is this in reference to, exactly? His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related. Wat Howl is just trolling. He's jumped on the "defend everything Trump does and says" gimmick that's oh so common here. The irony of liberals here jumping on the side of Russia is delicious though. Especially when defending a resolution that's based entirely on conjecture that has literally has zero scientific evidence to support it. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Howl posted [p:904773680] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>slimfizzle2 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>BWLurker posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>M_Live posted...</cite> <quote> What is this in reference to, exactly? </quote> His administration just tried to shut down pro breast feeding information in favor of corporations. </quote> This is so utterly far from the truth that it could be a headline on CNN. </quote> So what in your cheeto addled brain is the reason for trying to block it. And can you answer that in a non Trump trolling way </quote> Liberals as it is are not actually concerned about a woman's right to choose in any issue that isn't abortion related. </quote> Wat</quote> Howl is just trolling. He's jumped on the "defend everything Trump does and says" gimmick that's oh so common here.</quote> The irony of liberals here jumping on the side of Russia is delicious though. Especially when defending a resolution that's based entirely on conjecture that has literally has zero scientific evidence to support it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius 07/09/18 4:31:58 PM #43:	http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254911/WHO-NMH-NHD-17.1-eng.pdf Furthermore, donations of free or subsidized supplies of breast-milk substitutes or other products, as well as gifts or personal samples to health workers, are not allowed in any part of the health care system. Even for medical institutions dealing with infants who have a medical indication not to breastfeed , they sh ould not accept free or low - cost supplies or give out samples of those products. WHA Resolution 39.28 clearly stated that infant formula needed for infants with medical reasons for its use should be obtained through normal procurement channels. o...kay. Philanthropy is a "bad" thing now, apparently. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:904773900] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254911/WHO-NMH-NHD-17.1-eng.pdf</cite> <quote>Furthermore, donations of free or subsidized supplies of breast-milk substitutes or other products, as well as gifts or personal samples to health workers, are not allowed in any part of the health care system. Even for medical institutions dealing with infants who have a medical indication not to breastfeed , they sh ould not accept free or low - cost supplies or give out samples of those products. WHA Resolution 39.28 clearly stated that infant formula needed for infants with medical reasons for its use should be obtained through normal procurement channels.</quote> o...kay. Philanthropy is a "bad" thing now, apparently.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/09/18 4:41:30 PM #44:	Howl wtf are you talking about lol --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904774509] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Howl wtf are you talking about lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#45	Post #45 was unavailable or deleted.
Howl 07/09/18 4:53:35 PM #46:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Howl wtf are you talking about lol In the most serious and non-partisan way possible to explain what my position is on this issue and why I'm against this purely from a logical standpoint... The WHO put out this measure in an attempt to spread propaganda about the efficacy of breastfeeding versus formula with 0 evidence to back up wild claims that they made like breastfeeding can save the lives of 800,000 babies per year. Because of this they created this international code of adevertising rules that is to be applied to several countries that limits the ways that infant formula can be advertised. This entire plan is faulty because it's based entirely on myths and misconceptions about formula and has 0 scientific research backing it because scientific research about this issue has been deemed to be unethical to conduct. This fact did not stop the WHO from creating these rules though and this is an attempt from them to further enforce them. This is not only illogical, but it's unquestionably an assault on the right of free choice for women to choose whether or not to feed their babies with formula. Aside from all that which was the reason for my forming my opinion, the fact that Russia strong armed this resolution and liberals are now defending an action taken by them against the will of the Trump Administration is just too ironic to ignore. Trump is being demonized because of the stance that the Department of Health and Human Services took on this issue that the wording of this resolution unfairly demonized women who choose to feed their infants with formula. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5.1 <cite>Howl posted [p:904775198] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote>Howl wtf are you talking about lol</quote> In the most serious and non-partisan way possible to explain what my position is on this issue and why I'm against this purely from a logical standpoint... The WHO put out this measure in an attempt to spread propaganda about the efficacy of breastfeeding versus formula with 0 evidence to back up wild claims that they made like breastfeeding can save the lives of 800,000 babies per year. Because of this they created this international code of adevertising rules that is to be applied to several countries that limits the ways that infant formula can be advertised. This entire plan is faulty because it's based entirely on myths and misconceptions about formula and has 0 scientific research backing it because scientific research about this issue has been deemed to be unethical to conduct. This fact did not stop the WHO from creating these rules though and this is an attempt from them to further enforce them. This is not only illogical, but it's unquestionably an assault on the right of free choice for women to choose whether or not to feed their babies with formula. Aside from all that which was the reason for my forming my opinion, the fact that Russia strong armed this resolution and liberals are now defending an action taken by them against the will of the Trump Administration is just too ironic to ignore. Trump is being demonized because of the stance that the Department of Health and Human Services took on this issue that the wording of this resolution unfairly demonized women who choose to feed their infants with formula.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
slimfizzle2 07/09/18 4:55:11 PM #47:	Jesus wept It's breastfeeding propaganda now --- Solomon Grundy wants Pants Too! <cite>slimfizzle2 posted [p:904775260] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>Jesus wept It's breastfeeding propaganda now</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Romes187 07/09/18 5:02:35 PM #48:	we were at a restaurant over the weekend and we went into the corner so my wife could breastfeed and someone came up to us and said we had to stop because the manager has a no breastfeeding rule was interesting <cite>Romes187 posted [p:904775614] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote>we were at a restaurant over the weekend and we went into the corner so my wife could breastfeed and someone came up to us and said we had to stop because the manager has a no breastfeeding rule was interesting</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 07/09/18 5:27:51 PM #49:	Howl posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Howl wtf are you talking about lol In the most serious and non-partisan way possible to explain what my position is on this issue and why I'm against this purely from a logical standpoint... The WHO put out this measure in an attempt to spread propaganda about the efficacy of breastfeeding versus formula with 0 evidence to back up wild claims that they made like breastfeeding can save the lives of 800,000 babies per year. Because of this they created this international code of adevertising rules that is to be applied to several countries that limits the ways that infant formula can be advertised. This entire plan is faulty because it's based entirely on myths and misconceptions about formula and has 0 scientific research backing it because scientific research about this issue has been deemed to be unethical to conduct. This fact did not stop the WHO from creating these rules though and this is an attempt from them to further enforce them. This is not only illogical, but it's unquestionably an assault on the right of free choice for women to choose whether or not to feed their babies with formula. Aside from all that which was the reason for my forming my opinion, the fact that Russia strong armed this resolution and liberals are now defending an action taken by them against the will of the Trump Administration is just too ironic to ignore. Trump is being demonized because of the stance that the Department of Health and Human Services took on this issue that the wording of this resolution unfairly demonized women who choose to feed their infants with formula. I don't know why liberals would give a fuck one way or another. Use breast milk or formula. I don't care. Knock yourself out. I don't care about Russia's opinion or trump's opinion. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:904776990] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote>Howl wtf are you talking about lol</quote> In the most serious and non-partisan way possible to explain what my position is on this issue and why I'm against this purely from a logical standpoint... The WHO put out this measure in an attempt to spread propaganda about the efficacy of breastfeeding versus formula with 0 evidence to back up wild claims that they made like breastfeeding can save the lives of 800,000 babies per year. Because of this they created this international code of adevertising rules that is to be applied to several countries that limits the ways that infant formula can be advertised. This entire plan is faulty because it's based entirely on myths and misconceptions about formula and has 0 scientific research backing it because scientific research about this issue has been deemed to be unethical to conduct. This fact did not stop the WHO from creating these rules though and this is an attempt from them to further enforce them. This is not only illogical, but it's unquestionably an assault on the right of free choice for women to choose whether or not to feed their babies with formula. Aside from all that which was the reason for my forming my opinion, the fact that Russia strong armed this resolution and liberals are now defending an action taken by them against the will of the Trump Administration is just too ironic to ignore. Trump is being demonized because of the stance that the Department of Health and Human Services took on this issue that the wording of this resolution unfairly demonized women who choose to feed their infants with formula.</quote> I don't know why liberals would give a fuck one way or another. Use breast milk or formula. I don't care. Knock yourself out. I don't care about Russia's opinion or trump's opinion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
googs19 07/09/18 5:30:49 PM #50:	Romes187 posted... we were at a restaurant over the weekend and we went into the corner so my wife could breastfeed and someone came up to us and said we had to stop because the manager has a no breastfeeding rule was interesting You should just institute a no tipping rule for restaurants where you can't breastfeed. <cite>googs19 posted [p:904777139] in Trump: The... [t:76791198]...</cite> <quote><cite>Romes187 posted...</cite> <quote>we were at a restaurant over the weekend and we went into the corner so my wife could breastfeed and someone came up to us and said we had to stop because the manager has a no breastfeeding rule was interesting</quote> You should just institute a no tipping rule for restaurants where you can't breastfeed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Trump: The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Trump: The U.S. strongly supports breast feeding