Current Events > The Red Hen closed till July 5th due to protestors.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
darkjedilink 06/27/18 1:49:43 PM #151:	cjsdowg posted... DoubleDare posted... Well, what did the gay couple want on their cake? I imagine a religous bakery wouldn't have a doll set of 2 girls. It sounds reasonable a religious bakery wouldn't want to decorate a cake for a gay wedding, and it sounds like they were trying to still be accomodating. If the couple really liked that bakery they could have gotten blank wedding cake there and had it decorated elsewhere. The do divorce cakes.. what does the Bible say about divorce? You have proof that the baker in question makes divorce cakes? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904064600] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>cjsdowg posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DoubleDare posted...</cite> <quote>Well, what did the gay couple want on their cake? I imagine a religous bakery wouldn't have a doll set of 2 girls. It sounds reasonable a religious bakery wouldn't want to decorate a cake for a gay wedding, and it sounds like they were trying to still be accomodating. If the couple really liked that bakery they could have gotten blank wedding cake there and had it decorated elsewhere.</quote> The do divorce cakes.. what does the Bible say about divorce?</quote> You have proof that the baker in question makes divorce cakes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 06/27/18 1:52:54 PM #152:	darkjedilink posted... That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that. If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:904064833] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that.</quote> If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/27/18 1:54:09 PM #153:	TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that. If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered. No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904064923] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that.</quote> If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered.</quote> No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 06/27/18 2:06:13 PM #154:	darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that. If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered. No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding. The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:904065659] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that.</quote> If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered.</quote> No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding.</quote> The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Uncle Choad 06/27/18 2:14:17 PM #155:	ITT: Soy --- Oden ska fa sin hamnd. Jag ska doda er alla, sen ska jag dricka mjod med honom. <cite>Uncle Choad posted [p:904066092] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>ITT: Soy</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/27/18 2:15:20 PM #156:	TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that. If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered. No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding. The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts. No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904066147] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that.</quote> If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered.</quote> No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding.</quote> The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts.</quote> No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/27/18 2:17:39 PM #157:	Patty_Fleur posted... hockeybub89 posted... hockeybub89 posted... Got to love that certain conservatives care more about press secretaries than they do LGBT people or black people. And that they are okay with a President actively taking part in targeting a small business over disagreeing with his administration. "Refusing to serve gay people is freedom of speech and you shouldn't get fired for saying racist things, but refusing one of the President's people is unacceptable!" LGBT people and black people have the same rights as everyone else now. They can shut the fuck up. I'm saying this as a black guy. So do press secretaries. What the hell does that have to do with my post? --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:904066286] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>Patty_Fleur posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>Got to love that certain conservatives care more about press secretaries than they do LGBT people or black people. And that they are okay with a President actively taking part in targeting a small business over disagreeing with his administration. "Refusing to serve gay people is freedom of speech and you shouldn't get fired for saying racist things, but refusing one of the President's people is unacceptable!"</quote></quote> LGBT people and black people have the same rights as everyone else now. They can shut the fuck up. I'm saying this as a black guy.</quote> So do press secretaries. What the hell does that have to do with my post?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 06/27/18 2:23:14 PM #158:	darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that. If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered. No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding. The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts. No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. I'm intrigued to learn what the hell you're trying to prove here. I've already posted the court record, it's a matter of legal fact that the baker refused to make a cake for a same-sex marriage. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:904066639] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that.</quote> If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered.</quote> No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding.</quote> The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts.</quote> No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> I'm intrigued to learn what the hell you're trying to prove here. I've already posted the court record, it's a matter of legal fact that the baker refused to make a cake for a same-sex marriage.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 06/27/18 2:23:31 PM #159:	darkjedilink posted... No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:904066659] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 06/27/18 2:23:34 PM #160:	Maybe theyre going on vacation for the 4th? --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:904066663] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>Maybe theyre going on vacation for the 4th?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
P4wn4g3 06/27/18 2:26:31 PM #161:	thronedfire2 posted... Maybe theyre going on vacation for the 4th? May as well with all this free advertising. --- Hive Mind of Dark Aether, the unofficial Metroid Social Private board. https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/851-dark-aether <cite>P4wn4g3 posted [p:904066874] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote>Maybe theyre going on vacation for the 4th?</quote> May as well with all this free advertising.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GreatEvilEmpire 06/27/18 2:28:15 PM #162:	Actions have consequences. Just like how that Starbucks manager called the cops on 2 black men. You have the freedom to do certain things, but that doesn't mean you're free from consequences. --- Sig under construction! <cite>GreatEvilEmpire posted [p:904066983] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>Actions have consequences. Just like how that Starbucks manager called the cops on 2 black men. You have the freedom to do certain things, but that doesn't mean you're free from consequences.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mister_Spyker 06/27/18 2:32:46 PM #163:	HypnoCoosh posted... Patty_Fleur posted... AlI had they had to do was let the woman pay and eat her food. Now they are suffering. Yeah, Fuck em. The Dems don't even care about kids. They are just using them as pawns to spread in their hate. Y am i getting thanos and gamora vibes from this pic? --- Dear lord, Spyker just ripped his entire life apart in nothing more than a few paragraphs. Ouch... - RexSilver <cite>Mister_Spyker posted [p:904067251] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>HypnoCoosh posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Patty_Fleur posted...</cite> <quote>AlI had they had to do was let the woman pay and eat her food. Now they are suffering. Yeah, Fuck em. The Dems don't even care about kids. They are just using them as pawns to spread in their hate.</quote> </quote> Y am i getting thanos and gamora vibes from this pic?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HypnoCoosh 06/27/18 2:38:33 PM #164:	cjsdowg posted... what does the Bible say about divorce? Why then," they asked, "did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?" Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery." --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:904067649] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>cjsdowg posted...</cite> <quote>what does the Bible say about divorce?</quote> Why then," they asked, "did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?" Jesus replied, "Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HypnoCoosh 06/27/18 2:40:42 PM #165:	GreatEvilEmpire posted... Actions have consequences. Just like how that Starbucks manager called the cops on 2 men refusing to purchase anything, loitering, using the facilities and refusing to leave. FTFY --- We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. - C.S. Lewis <cite>HypnoCoosh posted [p:904067802] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>GreatEvilEmpire posted...</cite> <quote>Actions have consequences. Just like how that Starbucks manager called the cops on 2 men refusing to purchase anything, loitering, using the facilities and refusing to leave.</quote> FTFY</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DoubleDare 06/27/18 2:53:35 PM #166:	I am pretty sure I read around the time that the bakery refused to do divorce cakes too. --- On Your Mark...Get Set........GO!!!!!! <cite>DoubleDare posted [p:904068646] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>I am pretty sure I read around the time that the bakery refused to do divorce cakes too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/27/18 3:03:47 PM #167:	TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. He would have provided a cake for a gay wedding to a straight couple? Are you sure about that? Got a source? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904069334] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> He would have provided a cake for a gay wedding to a straight couple? Are you sure about that? Got a source?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 06/27/18 3:18:36 PM #168:	darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. He would have provided a cake for a gay wedding to a straight couple? Are you sure about that? Got a source? I'm not going to entertain you playing the fool. Respond to the post seriously. ~~We all know you can't.~~ You should also respond to post 158. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:904070269] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> He would have provided a cake for a gay wedding to a straight couple? Are you sure about that? Got a source?</quote> I'm not going to entertain you playing the fool. Respond to the post seriously. We all know you can't. You should also respond to post 158.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Kineth 06/27/18 3:20:41 PM #169:	It's no surprise that djl gaslights people. He has a pretty abusive personality, which might be reason why he's had issues with his love life. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:904070397] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>It's no surprise that djl gaslights people. He has a pretty abusive personality, which might be reason why he's had issues with his love life.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/27/18 3:23:31 PM #170:	CyricZ posted... darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that. If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered. No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding. The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts. No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. I'm intrigued to learn what the hell you're trying to prove here. I've already posted the court record, it's a matter of legal fact that the baker refused to make a cake for a same-sex marriage. That's what I'm saying. The argument from the left is they refused the cake on the sole idea that the purchaser was gay. That is a lie. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904070596] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>CyricZ posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>That's why he offered the gay couple any other cake - if it was about them being gay, as you posit, he wouldn't have done that.</quote> If it wasn't about them being gay, as you posit, he would have made the cake they ordered.</quote> No, he wouldn't have made the cake if they were straight, because it still would be a cake for a gay wedding.</quote> The wedding couple in question was gay, so he refused to bake the cake. He indisputably refused a service to the wedding couple because they were gay. You can mince words all you like, but these are the facts.</quote> No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> I'm intrigued to learn what the hell you're trying to prove here. I've already posted the court record, it's a matter of legal fact that the baker refused to make a cake for a same-sex marriage.</quote> That's what I'm saying. The argument from the left is they refused the cake on the sole idea that the purchaser was gay. That is a lie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
A_Good_Boy 06/27/18 3:24:40 PM #171:	Kineth posted... It's no surprise that djl gaslights people. He has a pretty abusive personality, which might be reason why he's had issues with his love life. No, that was cause of Obama. --- Who is? I am! <cite>A_Good_Boy posted [p:904070670] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>It's no surprise that djl gaslights people. He has a pretty abusive personality, which might be reason why he's had issues with his love life.</quote> No, that was cause of Obama.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/27/18 3:25:04 PM #172:	TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake. One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. He would have provided a cake for a gay wedding to a straight couple? Are you sure about that? Got a source? I'm not going to entertain you playing the fool. Respond to the post seriously. ~~We all know you can't.~~ You should also respond to post 158. I did respond to the post seriously. You assert that he would have made the cake if the purchaser was straight, meaning your argument is that he'd ave made a cake for a gay wedding if the buyer was straight. That is a lie. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904070695] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>No, YOU are mincing words. He did not deny them service, only one type of cake.</quote> One type of cake which he would have provided to a straight couple. This is the denial of a service. Work on your reading comprehension, check the post you quoted again, and make note of the fact that I specifically said "a service." However you cut it, he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> He would have provided a cake for a gay wedding to a straight couple? Are you sure about that? Got a source?</quote> I'm not going to entertain you playing the fool. Respond to the post seriously. We all know you can't. You should also respond to post 158.</quote> I did respond to the post seriously. You assert that he would have made the cake if the purchaser was straight, meaning your argument is that he'd ave made a cake for a gay wedding if the buyer was straight. That is a lie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 06/27/18 3:27:41 PM #173:	This administration really brings out the fucking stupidity of everyone. --- Clean Butt Crew <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:904070846] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>This administration really brings out the fucking stupidity of everyone.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 06/27/18 3:30:06 PM #174:	A_Good_Boy posted... Kineth posted... It's no surprise that djl gaslights people. He has a pretty abusive personality, which might be reason why he's had issues with his love life. No, that was cause of Obama. Oh that'll never get old. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:904071005] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>A_Good_Boy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Kineth posted...</cite> <quote>It's no surprise that djl gaslights people. He has a pretty abusive personality, which might be reason why he's had issues with his love life.</quote> No, that was cause of Obama.</quote> Oh that'll never get old.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 06/27/18 3:50:23 PM #175:	VectorChaos posted... Everyone flailing in impotent rage against Trump and these protesters right now needs to remember who wholeheartedly embraced, pushed for, and normalized "freedom of speech not freedom from consequences! Summon the angry mob against them!" It's fucking hilarious that some of you really thought only your side was allowed to wield it like a cudgel. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:904072344] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>Everyone flailing in impotent rage against Trump and these protesters right now needs to remember who wholeheartedly embraced, pushed for, and normalized "freedom of speech not freedom from consequences! Summon the angry mob against them!" It's fucking hilarious that some of you really thought only your side was allowed to wield it like a cudgel.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/27/18 3:52:43 PM #176:	Funbazooka posted... VectorChaos posted... Everyone flailing in impotent rage against Trump and these protesters right now needs to remember who wholeheartedly embraced, pushed for, and normalized "freedom of speech not freedom from consequences! Summon the angry mob against them!" It's fucking hilarious that some of you really thought only your side was allowed to wield it like a cudgel. Yeah, but those same conservatives hated it then. What changed? Why do White House press secretaries get more defense that sexual and racial minorities? --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:904072484] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote><cite>VectorChaos posted...</cite> <quote>Everyone flailing in impotent rage against Trump and these protesters right now needs to remember who wholeheartedly embraced, pushed for, and normalized "freedom of speech not freedom from consequences! Summon the angry mob against them!" It's fucking hilarious that some of you really thought only your side was allowed to wield it like a cudgel.</quote></quote> Yeah, but those same conservatives hated it then. What changed? Why do White House press secretaries get more defense that sexual and racial minorities?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 06/27/18 4:00:55 PM #177:	I don't remember conservatives or Trump supporters ever saying that all protest is bad or that the act in itself is bad. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:904073044] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>I don't remember conservatives or Trump supporters ever saying that all protest is bad or that the act in itself is bad.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ColdOne666 06/27/18 4:03:25 PM #178:	Fair Next. --- FFX is the best game of all time. The only good Nintendo franchises are Pokemon and Fire Emblem. Comics are for kids. https://imgur.com/LJ3WSyB Reylo Ship <cite>ColdOne666 posted [p:904073184] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote>Fair Next.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 06/27/18 4:04:51 PM #179:	darkjedilink posted... You assert that he would have made the cake if the purchaser was straight, No, I never said this. I said he would have made the cake if the wedding couple was straight. Again, however you hash it out, the fact is that he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:904073283] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>You assert that he would have made the cake if the purchaser was straight, </quote> No, I never said this. I said he would have made the cake if the wedding couple was straight. Again, however you hash it out, the fact is that he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
darkjedilink 06/27/18 4:10:51 PM #180:	TrevorBlack79 posted... darkjedilink posted... You assert that he would have made the cake if the purchaser was straight, No, I never said this. I said he would have made the cake if the wedding couple was straight. Again, however you hash it out, the fact is that he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. But not because the PURCHASER was gay, which means he wasn't discriminating his purchaser. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:904073654] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>You assert that he would have made the cake if the purchaser was straight, </quote> No, I never said this. I said he would have made the cake if the wedding couple was straight. Again, however you hash it out, the fact is that he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> But not because the PURCHASER was gay, which means he wasn't discriminating his purchaser.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 06/27/18 4:14:41 PM #181:	TrevorBlack79 posted... Again, however you hash it out, the fact is that he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay. Because of his freedom of religion, which is a protected class too. Of course there are limits to religious freedom, just as there are limits to how much one thinks they're entitled to because of their sexual orientation. --- "Don't trade your authenticity for approval." -Kanye West <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:904073926] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote>Again, however you hash it out, the fact is that he refused this specific service to this specific couple exclusively because they were gay.</quote> Because of his freedom of religion, which is a protected class too. Of course there are limits to religious freedom, just as there are limits to how much one thinks they're entitled to because of their sexual orientation.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrevorBlack79 06/27/18 4:30:06 PM #182:	darkjedilink posted... But not because the PURCHASER was gay, which means he wasn't discriminating his purchaser. This has literally nothing to do with anything being discussed. Funbazooka posted... Because of his freedom of religion, which is a protected class too. Of course there are limits to religious freedom Indeed. Limits like "businesses can't discriminate against protected classes." --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:904074933] in The Red He... [t:76754717]...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote>But not because the PURCHASER was gay, which means he wasn't discriminating his purchaser.</quote> This has literally nothing to do with anything being discussed. <cite>Funbazooka posted...</cite> <quote>Because of his freedom of religion, which is a protected class too. Of course there are limits to religious freedom</quote> Indeed. Limits like "businesses can't discriminate against protected classes."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > The Red Hen closed till July 5th due to protestors. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > The Red Hen closed till July 5th due to protestors.