Current Events > Times cover story proven fake by daughters father.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
pegusus123456 06/23/18 7:35:30 AM #51:	I just assumed that the kid was a model anyway. --- https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT https://imgur.com/Er6TT So? I deeded to some gay porn. It doesn't mean anything. - Patty_Fleur <cite>pegusus123456 posted [p:903808604] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>I just assumed that the kid was a model anyway.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 06/23/18 7:45:23 AM #52:	masterpug53 posted... Uh huh. Next you're going to tell me that the room they posed that photo in wasn't really that red. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:903808826] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>masterpug53 posted...</cite> <quote>Uh huh. Next you're going to tell me that the room they posed that photo in wasn't really that red.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AcFan87 06/23/18 7:47:41 AM #53:	AlephZero posted... fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left? <cite>AcFan87 posted [p:903808877] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with</quote> Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Coffeebeanz 06/23/18 7:49:07 AM #54:	I keep hoping that journalism standards have hit bedrock, but I guess there's plenty more to go. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:903808902] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>I keep hoping that journalism standards have hit bedrock, but I guess there's plenty more to go.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 06/23/18 7:49:32 AM #55:	AcFan87 posted... AlephZero posted... fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left? They're making the frogs gay! --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:903808915] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with</quote> Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left?</quote> They're making the frogs gay!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RoboLaserGandhi 06/23/18 7:49:54 AM #56:	It's amazing the lengths people will go to write fake news about a president with a goldmine of real stuff to criticize. <cite>RoboLaserGandhi posted [p:903808929] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>It's amazing the lengths people will go to write fake news about a president with a goldmine of real stuff to criticize.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
AcFan87 06/23/18 7:53:05 AM #57:	Webmaster4531 posted... AcFan87 posted... AlephZero posted... fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left? They're making the frogs gay! How the fuck do you make a frog gay? <cite>AcFan87 posted [p:903809009] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with</quote> Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left?</quote> They're making the frogs gay!</quote> How the fuck do you make a frog gay?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 06/23/18 7:54:03 AM #58:	AcFan87 posted... Webmaster4531 posted... AcFan87 posted... AlephZero posted... fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left? They're making the frogs gay! How the fuck do you make a frog gay? They're putting chemicals in the water. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:903809031] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with</quote> Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left?</quote> They're making the frogs gay!</quote> How the fuck do you make a frog gay?</quote> They're putting chemicals in the water.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#59	Post #59 was unavailable or deleted.
DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 06/23/18 9:29:25 AM #60:	Yeah, I never thought she was seperated. Because I read the orignal story on Twitter where it was very clear that the picture was taken while her mother was being searched and said they weren't seperated afterward. --- "Shut your filthy whore mouth."- AB "But if I shut my filthy whore mouth, I can't use it to be a filthy whore. Does not compute." - TashaMK <cite>DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC posted [p:903811592] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>Yeah, I never thought she was seperated. Because I read the orignal story on Twitter where it was very clear that the picture was taken while her mother was being searched and said they weren't seperated afterward.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
iPhone_7 06/23/18 9:40:36 AM #61:	So in this case, the child was not separated from her mother. Theyre just both being held indefinitely at an internment ca- I mean temporary make-shift detention facility. Sanchez and her daughter had left Puerto Cortes, a major Honduran port north of the capital city, Tegucigalpa, without telling Valera or the couple's three other children, he said. He said he imagined that Sanchez left with the little girl for the United States, where she has family, in search of better economic opportunities. "If they are deported, that is OK as long as they do not leave the child without her mother," Valera said. "I am waiting to see what happens with them." Theres more to this story that is sorely missing. Why only bring one child? Are the other 3 grown up already? Are they even hers or from the fathers past relationship (if he had one)? Is this a he said/she said case of alleged abuse? --- Sig User Logic https://imgur.com/lA5fm7w <cite>iPhone_7 posted [p:903811920] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>So in this case, the child was not separated from her mother. Theyre just both being held indefinitely at an internment ca- I mean temporary make-shift detention facility. <quote>Sanchez and her daughter had left Puerto Cortes, a major Honduran port north of the capital city, Tegucigalpa, without telling Valera or the couple's three other children, he said. He said he imagined that Sanchez left with the little girl for the United States, where she has family, in search of better economic opportunities. "If they are deported, that is OK as long as they do not leave the child without her mother," Valera said. "I am waiting to see what happens with them."</quote> Theres more to this story that is sorely missing. Why only bring one child? Are the other 3 grown up already? Are they even hers or from the fathers past relationship (if he had one)? Is this a he said/she said case of alleged abuse?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#62	Post #62 was unavailable or deleted.
Y2J0_sHBK_Blue 06/23/18 10:51:01 AM #63:	Asherlee10 posted... AcFan87 posted... AlephZero posted... fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left? Don't act like this shit doesn't happy across the board. We shouldn't give a shit what side of the fence it falls on, combat it without bias. One side has a channel with the moniker: the no spin zone <cite>Y2J0_sHBK_Blue posted [p:903814361] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with</quote> Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left?</quote> Don't act like this shit doesn't happy across the board. We shouldn't give a shit what side of the fence it falls on, combat it without bias.</quote> One side has a channel with the moniker: the no spin zone</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 06/23/18 10:51:13 AM #64:	Asherlee10 posted... Bishop9800 posted... WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted... I'm confused. Where on the cover does it say this kid was taken from it's parents? I think it is implied because of the current state of the immigration practices. The child is depicted alone in front of Trump. This is suggesting that her parents are not here and she is "Welcomed" to America alone and crying. They should have used a photo of an actual child that was separated from their parents. It delivered a larger statement. If they did that the cages would have messed up the shot though --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:903814371] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Bishop9800 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WrkHrdPlayHrdr posted...</cite> <quote>I'm confused. Where on the cover does it say this kid was taken from it's parents?</quote></quote> I think it is implied because of the current state of the immigration practices. The child is depicted alone in front of Trump. This is suggesting that her parents are not here and she is "Welcomed" to America alone and crying. They should have used a photo of an actual child that was separated from their parents. It delivered a larger statement.</quote> If they did that the cages would have messed up the shot though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#65	Post #65 was unavailable or deleted.
#66	Post #66 was unavailable or deleted.
Webmaster4531 06/23/18 10:56:36 AM #68:	Asherlee10 posted... Y2J0_sHBK_Blue posted... Asherlee10 posted... AcFan87 posted... AlephZero posted... fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left? Don't act like this shit doesn't happy across the board. We shouldn't give a shit what side of the fence it falls on, combat it without bias. One side has a channel with the moniker: the no spin zone I don't understand your sentence. He's trolling. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:903814577] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Y2J0_sHBK_Blue posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AcFan87 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>AlephZero posted...</cite> <quote>fake news is ok if it pushes a narrative i agree with</quote> Shouldn't this be the motto/mission statement of the left?</quote> Don't act like this shit doesn't happy across the board. We shouldn't give a shit what side of the fence it falls on, combat it without bias.</quote> One side has a channel with the moniker: the no spin zone</quote> I don't understand your sentence.</quote> He's trolling.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 06/23/18 11:03:40 AM #69:	I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:903814845] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#70	Post #70 was unavailable or deleted.
#71	Post #71 was unavailable or deleted.
Tyranthraxus 06/23/18 11:08:48 AM #72:	Asherlee10 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman. This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo. The message of the cover doesn't change just because of that. Had it instead been an original piece of art such as a painting with completely fictitious children the message is still unchanged. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:903815044] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman.</quote> This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo.</quote> The message of the cover doesn't change just because of that. Had it instead been an original piece of art such as a painting with completely fictitious children the message is still unchanged.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 06/23/18 11:14:44 AM #73:	But now people have cause to willfully ignore the message. They can change the conversation all they want now because they have the ammunition. At that point, you're not fighting for the message. You're defending the publication, and that's not gonna be a hill to die on. I suggest moving on, let the anti-s have this one, because it won't go away. Stay on message, but not through this avenue. There are plenty of others. --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:903815288] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>But now people have cause to willfully ignore the message. They can change the conversation all they want now because they have the ammunition. At that point, you're not fighting for the message. You're defending the publication, and that's not gonna be a hill to die on. I suggest moving on, let the anti-s have this one, because it won't go away. Stay on message, but not through this avenue. There are plenty of others.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 06/23/18 11:16:18 AM #74:	The people who use this as an excuse to ignore the covers message were always going to ignore it anyway --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:903815358] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>The people who use this as an excuse to ignore the covers message were always going to ignore it anyway</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
masterpug53 06/23/18 11:21:07 AM #75:	Asherlee10 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman. This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo. People can't conveniently take this image half-literally and expect it to be seen as a sincere viewpoint. Either they realize that this is a composite image portraying a message more important than the sum of its parts, or they honestly believe this was a staged photo of Trump making a face at a sobbing toddler in a great big red room, and Trump happened to be nice enough to let Time print it. --- Simple questions deserve long-winded answers that no one will bother to read. <cite>masterpug53 posted [p:903815545] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman.</quote> This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo.</quote> People can't conveniently take this image half-literally and expect it to be seen as a sincere viewpoint. Either they realize that this is a composite image portraying a message more important than the sum of its parts, or they honestly believe this was a staged photo of Trump making a face at a sobbing toddler in a great big red room, and Trump happened to be nice enough to let Time print it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#76	Post #76 was unavailable or deleted.
Tyranthraxus 06/23/18 12:36:56 PM #77:	--- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:903819034] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Polycosm 06/23/18 10:20:37 PM #78:	thronedfire2 posted... The people who use this as an excuse to ignore the covers message were always going to ignore it anyway. True enough. For evidence, look no further than the propaganda campaign Fox News is running against Mueller. Mueller has run an air-tight operation and has been completely silent, but that hasn't stopped Trumpists from trying to smear him anyway. Mueller's given them no ammunition, only subpoenas, indictments and other official court filings. It doesn't matter. Trump's base-- the unshakable 30-something percent-- are absolutely immune to fact and reason. Attempting to cater to them is a worthless endeavor. --- BKSheikah owned me so thoroughly in the 2017 guru contest, I'd swear he used the Lens of Truth to pick his bracket. (thengamer.com/guru) <cite>Polycosm posted [p:903847286] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote>The people who use this as an excuse to ignore the covers message were always going to ignore it anyway.</quote> True enough. For evidence, look no further than the propaganda campaign Fox News is running against Mueller. Mueller has run an air-tight operation and has been completely silent, but that hasn't stopped Trumpists from trying to smear him anyway. Mueller's given them no ammunition, only subpoenas, indictments and other official court filings. It doesn't matter. Trump's base-- the unshakable 30-something percent-- are absolutely immune to fact and reason. Attempting to cater to them is a worthless endeavor.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Damn_Underscore 06/23/18 10:26:47 PM #79:	Trying to defend Time Magazine is literally no different from Trump supporters defending Fox News --- Shenmue II = best game of all time Shenmue = 2nd best game of all time <cite>Damn_Underscore posted [p:903847582] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>Trying to defend Time Magazine is literally no different from Trump supporters defending Fox News</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#80	Post #80 was unavailable or deleted.
#81	Post #81 was unavailable or deleted.
#82	Post #82 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 06/25/18 9:30:04 AM #83:	shockthemonkey posted... Asherlee10 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman. This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo. It doesnt. Its not a real shot. What its depicting is really happening. And has been happening for decades, so why is it only a problem now? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:903922870] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman.</quote> This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo.</quote> It doesnt. Its not a real shot. What its depicting is really happening.</quote> And has been happening for decades, so why is it only a problem now?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#84	Post #84 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 06/25/18 9:49:29 AM #85:	Asherlee10 posted... darkjedilink posted... shockthemonkey posted... Asherlee10 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman. This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo. It doesnt. Its not a real shot. What its depicting is really happening. And has been happening for decades, so why is it only a problem now? Because investigative research is a lot easier to do in today's world than it was previously. Is that why there's outrage against Trump caused by pictures of this happening under Obama's tenure? We just didn't have the research ability two years ago? --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:903923652] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman.</quote> This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo.</quote> It doesnt. Its not a real shot. What its depicting is really happening.</quote> And has been happening for decades, so why is it only a problem now?</quote> Because investigative research is a lot easier to do in today's world than it was previously.</quote> Is that why there's outrage against Trump caused by pictures of this happening under Obama's tenure? We just didn't have the research ability two years ago?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#86	Post #86 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 06/25/18 10:01:43 AM #87:	Asherlee10 posted... darkjedilink posted... Asherlee10 posted... darkjedilink posted... shockthemonkey posted... Asherlee10 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman. This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo. It doesnt. Its not a real shot. What its depicting is really happening. And has been happening for decades, so why is it only a problem now? Because investigative research is a lot easier to do in today's world than it was previously. Is that why there's outrage against Trump caused by pictures of this happening under Obama's tenure? We just didn't have the research ability two years ago? I'm not even sure what you are referencing. I'm talking about the little girl in the photo. Obama's press secretary tweeted a photo of children taken at the border, blaming Trump. That photo was taken during Obama's administration. This was happening under Obama's Presidency, but nary a word was said. Now that it's happening under Trump, by the letter of US law, and NOW it's a human rights issue. It's literally only a problem because Trump. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:903924109] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>darkjedilink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote>I heard something very disturbing. Apparently the cover is a total Photoshop and Trump never actually looked down at that crying girl while stoically welcoming her to America in Times New Roman.</quote> This really hasn't been the topic of discussion nor is it relevant. Everyone knows that Trump and the girl are photoshopped in. The issue is that this girl was not, in fact, ever separated from her parents. This devalues the message of the cover photo.</quote> It doesnt. Its not a real shot. What its depicting is really happening.</quote> And has been happening for decades, so why is it only a problem now?</quote> Because investigative research is a lot easier to do in today's world than it was previously.</quote> Is that why there's outrage against Trump caused by pictures of this happening under Obama's tenure? We just didn't have the research ability two years ago?</quote> I'm not even sure what you are referencing. I'm talking about the little girl in the photo.</quote> Obama's press secretary tweeted a photo of children taken at the border, blaming Trump. That photo was taken during Obama's administration. This was happening under Obama's Presidency, but nary a word was said. Now that it's happening under Trump, by the letter of US law, and NOW it's a human rights issue. It's literally only a problem because Trump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#88	Post #88 was unavailable or deleted.
darkjedilink 06/25/18 11:16:38 AM #89:	Asherlee10 posted... So the little girl in the Time cover was from Obama's presidency? I'm not following what you are saying relative to the discussion I was having. I'm calling you a hypocrite for blaming this on Trump. --- 'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen <cite>darkjedilink posted [p:903927421] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote>So the little girl in the Time cover was from Obama's presidency? I'm not following what you are saying relative to the discussion I was having.</quote> I'm calling you a hypocrite for blaming this on Trump.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#90	Post #90 was unavailable or deleted.
scar the 1 06/25/18 11:19:50 AM #91:	So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake? --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:903927594] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote>So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#92	Post #92 was unavailable or deleted.
scar the 1 06/25/18 12:00:36 PM #93:	Asherlee10 posted... scar the 1 posted... So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake? The deal is that the little girl was never separated from her family, but is, in fact, an immigrant. Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. The photo was take when the mother was frisked, which was never concealed information. Did the cover story say the girl was separated? --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:903929612] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake?</quote> The deal is that the little girl was never separated from her family, but is, in fact, an immigrant.</quote> Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. The photo was take when the mother was frisked, which was never concealed information. Did the cover story say the girl was separated?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#94	Post #94 was unavailable or deleted.
Wolf_J_Flywheel 06/25/18 12:38:07 PM #95:	hockeybub89 posted... They could have used an anime girl and gotten the point across. Would that have made it fake news because Trump isn't actually putting 2D anime girls in cages at the border? The pics of kids in cages are from Obamas reign of terror --- My therapist says Im lousy in bed https://imgur.com/n1L1yBu <cite>Wolf_J_Flywheel posted [p:903931593] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>hockeybub89 posted...</cite> <quote>They could have used an anime girl and gotten the point across. Would that have made it fake news because Trump isn't actually putting 2D anime girls in cages at the border?</quote> The pics of kids in cages are from Obamas reign of terror</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#96	Post #96 was unavailable or deleted.
FLUFFYGERM 06/25/18 12:59:20 PM #97:	scar the 1 posted... Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. no it was not. this is all post hoc. --- Do good. Eat communists. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:903932799] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly.</quote> no it was not. this is all post hoc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#98	Post #98 was unavailable or deleted.
#99	Post #99 was unavailable or deleted.
scar the 1 06/25/18 1:31:53 PM #100:	Asherlee10 posted... shockthemonkey posted... Asherlee10 posted... scar the 1 posted... Asherlee10 posted... scar the 1 posted... So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake? The deal is that the little girl was never separated from her family, but is, in fact, an immigrant. Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. The photo was take when the mother was frisked, which was never concealed information. Did the cover story say the girl was separated? The cover story relies on obvious implication given the context of when it came out. The context was children being separated from their parents in different detention centers and/or being deported. All TIME had to do was get a photo of an actual child that was separated and this entire scenario would have never come about. The message is still plain as day and still holds weight, but it is somewhat devalued because of the child they chose to use. Do you feel like children being separated at the border is less important or less of a story because of this cover? No, and that is not the point being conveyed. The point being discussed is the value of the message from the TIME cover and the specific child they used to convey a certain message. This isn't about the value of the immigration situation, it's about the value of the message in this particular magazine cover. Is there a written story somewhere that I'm missing, because to me the image implies that Trump is being cruel to children. Is it any better that she was crying because her mother was frisked by agents? Unless of course the image wasn't taken at the border at all. I was under the impression that it was. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:903934718] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake?</quote> The deal is that the little girl was never separated from her family, but is, in fact, an immigrant.</quote> Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. The photo was take when the mother was frisked, which was never concealed information. Did the cover story say the girl was separated?</quote> The cover story relies on obvious implication given the context of when it came out. The context was children being separated from their parents in different detention centers and/or being deported. All TIME had to do was get a photo of an actual child that was separated and this entire scenario would have never come about. The message is still plain as day and still holds weight, but it is somewhat devalued because of the child they chose to use.</quote> Do you feel like children being separated at the border is less important or less of a story because of this cover?</quote> No, and that is not the point being conveyed. The point being discussed is the value of the message from the TIME cover and the specific child they used to convey a certain message. This isn't about the value of the immigration situation, it's about the value of the message in this particular magazine cover.</quote> Is there a written story somewhere that I'm missing, because to me the image implies that Trump is being cruel to children. Is it any better that she was crying because her mother was frisked by agents? Unless of course the image wasn't taken at the border at all. I was under the impression that it was.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 06/25/18 1:35:15 PM #101:	Asherlee10 posted... shockthemonkey posted... Asherlee10 posted... scar the 1 posted... Asherlee10 posted... scar the 1 posted... So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake? The deal is that the little girl was never separated from her family, but is, in fact, an immigrant. Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. The photo was take when the mother was frisked, which was never concealed information. Did the cover story say the girl was separated? The cover story relies on obvious implication given the context of when it came out. The context was children being separated from their parents in different detention centers and/or being deported. All TIME had to do was get a photo of an actual child that was separated and this entire scenario would have never come about. The message is still plain as day and still holds weight, but it is somewhat devalued because of the child they chose to use. Do you feel like children being separated at the border is less important or less of a story because of this cover? No, and that is not the point being conveyed. The point being discussed is the value of the message from the TIME cover and the specific child they used to convey a certain message. This isn't about the value of the immigration situation, it's about the value of the message in this particular magazine cover. And only deliberately obtuse jackasses would willfully miss the point of the message here. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png http://www.last.fm/user/hockeybub89/ <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:903934925] in Times cove... [t:76739698]...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>shockthemonkey posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Asherlee10 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>So did anyone ever explain what part of the cover story was fake?</quote> The deal is that the little girl was never separated from her family, but is, in fact, an immigrant.</quote> Yeah, and like I noted earlier, when the image first showed up, it was captioned accordingly. The photo was take when the mother was frisked, which was never concealed information. Did the cover story say the girl was separated?</quote> The cover story relies on obvious implication given the context of when it came out. The context was children being separated from their parents in different detention centers and/or being deported. All TIME had to do was get a photo of an actual child that was separated and this entire scenario would have never come about. The message is still plain as day and still holds weight, but it is somewhat devalued because of the child they chose to use.</quote> Do you feel like children being separated at the border is less important or less of a story because of this cover?</quote> No, and that is not the point being conveyed. The point being discussed is the value of the message from the TIME cover and the specific child they used to convey a certain message. This isn't about the value of the immigration situation, it's about the value of the message in this particular magazine cover.</quote> And only deliberately obtuse jackasses would willfully miss the point of the message here.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Times cover story proven fake by daughters father. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Times cover story proven fake by daughters father.