Current Events > Friendly reminder that Jimmy Kimmel dressed in black face and works for ABC.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
ImTheMacheteGuy 05/30/18 5:24:34 PM #52:	Dustin1280 posted... butter biscuits posted... This was a skit from a non conforming station from over 10 years ago it was closer to 20 years ago actually It really is the Karl Malone thing isn't it? Lmao if so. I didn't click the link because I had a feeling howl was reaching that hard. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:902265457] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote>This was a skit from a non conforming station from over 10 years ago</quote> it was closer to 20 years ago actually</quote> It really is the Karl Malone thing isn't it? Lmao if so. I didn't click the link because I had a feeling howl was reaching that hard.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 05/30/18 5:24:39 PM #53:	Piersons_Fox posted... TheVipaGTS posted... This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? Tell me joke with racist humor about any race except white people. Racial humor, not racist humor. Using racial observations to make a joke in a non-hateful way. For example, the Family Guy joke where peter had an asian kid and said "come on...do math!"...Insensitive and possibly offensive? Yes, but does Seth McFarlane hate Asian people? Probably not. Rosaeanne said an African American woman was a cross between a Muslim and Planet Of the Apes...When questioned about the latter part, she doubled down TWICE by saying "MUSLIM IS NOT A RACE" before crying crocodile tears and saying it was a "joke". She was not making about race like Louis CK, Dave Chappelle, and many other GOOD comedians have...She was trying to be offensive for laughs much more like Rush Limbaugh. I guess you could technically call it a joke, but its her true feelings that stem for real hate she holds. that is racist. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:902265462] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Piersons_Fox posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with?</quote> Tell me joke with racist humor about any race except white people. </quote> Racial humor, not racist humor. Using racial observations to make a joke in a non-hateful way. For example, the Family Guy joke where peter had an asian kid and said "come on...do math!"...Insensitive and possibly offensive? Yes, but does Seth McFarlane hate Asian people? Probably not. Rosaeanne said an African American woman was a cross between a Muslim and Planet Of the Apes...When questioned about the latter part, she doubled down TWICE by saying "MUSLIM IS NOT A RACE" before crying crocodile tears and saying it was a "joke". She was not making about race like Louis CK, Dave Chappelle, and many other GOOD comedians have...She was trying to be offensive for laughs much more like Rush Limbaugh. I guess you could technically call it a joke, but its her true feelings that stem for real hate she holds. that is racist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CyricZ 05/30/18 5:24:40 PM #54:	Howl posted... CrimsonRage posted... yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about? You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans? This just in: Man Deflects In Own Damn Topic --- CyricZ <cite>CyricZ posted [p:902265464] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote>yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about?</quote> You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans?</quote> This just in: Man Deflects In Own Damn Topic</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheUsualSuspect 05/30/18 5:24:58 PM #55:	Howl posted... CrimsonRage posted... yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about? You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans? I remember when you admitted you think Trump is a moron, but you defend him and pretend to support him to troll the liberals --- Bravo Whiskey <cite>TheUsualSuspect posted [p:902265486] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote>yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about?</quote> You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans?</quote> I remember when you admitted you think Trump is a moron, but you defend him and pretend to support him to troll the liberals</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
butter biscuits 05/30/18 5:25:01 PM #56:	Howl posted... CrimsonRage posted... yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about? You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans? oh right, that was a skit also...just like this one CyricZ posted... This just in: Man Deflects In Own Damn Topic lmao --- you can butter my biscuits anytime <cite>butter biscuits posted [p:902265488] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote>yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about?</quote> You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans?</quote> oh right, that was a skit also...just like this one <cite>CyricZ posted...</cite> <quote>This just in: Man Deflects In Own Damn Topic</quote> lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SuperShake666 05/30/18 5:26:44 PM #57:	Wait, which side is filled with snowflakes? I can't tell any more. --- "Look, if I was good at math, I wouldn't be on CE at 2:00 the morning clicking on topics about porn stars ****ing horses." - May 2017, Dash_Harber <cite>SuperShake666 posted [p:902265589] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>Wait, which side is filled with snowflakes? I can't tell any more.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EndOfDiscOne 05/30/18 5:28:24 PM #58:	butter biscuits posted... KingCrabCake posted... You're allowed to say and do what you want in liberalwood. You just can't make fun of liberals or democrats if you're a conservative This is was not a recent event. This was a skit on a brash COMEDY TV show on cable television around 20 years ago But granted progressives love to judge people in the past by today's standards. --- I am the Cheese! I am the best character on the show! I am better than both the salami and the bologna *COMBINED!* <cite>EndOfDiscOne posted [p:902265676] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>You're allowed to say and do what you want in liberalwood. You just can't make fun of liberals or democrats if you're a conservative</quote> This is was not a recent event. This was a skit on a brash COMEDY TV show on cable television around 20 years ago</quote> But granted progressives love to judge people in the past by today's standards.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 5:28:40 PM #59:	TheUsualSuspect posted... Howl posted... CrimsonRage posted... yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about? You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans? I remember when you admitted you think Trump is a moron, but you defend him and pretend to support him to troll the liberals I dislike Trump for entirely different reasons than liberals. Their criticisms of him aren't only illogical, but utterly hypocritical and laughable. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902265689] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheUsualSuspect posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote> yawn is this the fake outrage you guys are always talking about? </quote> You mean like the fake outrage of Trump calling MS-13 gang members animals and then MSM news stations saying he said that about all immigrants and Mexicans?</quote> I remember when you admitted you think Trump is a moron, but you defend him and pretend to support him to troll the liberals</quote> I dislike Trump for entirely different reasons than liberals. Their criticisms of him aren't only illogical, but utterly hypocritical and laughable.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 05/30/18 5:28:41 PM #60:	So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:902265693] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mech dragon 05/30/18 5:28:48 PM #61:	thanks for the friendly reminder. The left would also like to see male privilege be a thing of the past, but unforch, it's not, yet. --- https://imgur.com/ZCcEmHO https://imgur.com/OHcGZ4e <cite>mech dragon posted [p:902265700] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>thanks for the friendly reminder. The left would also like to see male privilege be a thing of the past, but unforch, it's not, yet.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 05/30/18 5:29:40 PM #62:	butter biscuits posted... KingCrabCake posted... You're allowed to say and do what you want in liberalwood. You just can't make fun of liberals or democrats if you're a conservative This is was not a recent event. This was a skit on a brash COMEDY TV show on cable television around 20 years ago Im not even talking about the skit. Im talking about in general --- I have a gamefaqs following. Watch them flock to my posts. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:902265741] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>You're allowed to say and do what you want in liberalwood. You just can't make fun of liberals or democrats if you're a conservative</quote> This is was not a recent event. This was a skit on a brash COMEDY TV show on cable television around 20 years ago</quote> Im not even talking about the skit. Im talking about in general</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 05/30/18 5:29:59 PM #63:	Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. --- RIP: Canuklehead, Karma: 1369 // RIP: Gen_Lee_Enfield, Karma: 1731 // RIP: Orlando of the Axe, Karma: 1642 // RIP nayr626 Karma: 4395 --They delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:902265767] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Complete_Idi0t 05/30/18 5:30:30 PM #64:	Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? What'd he say in 2005 again? <cite>Complete_Idi0t posted [p:902265802] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> What'd he say in 2005 again?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
spudger 05/30/18 5:31:16 PM #65:	Damn trump slurpers are thirsty --- -Only dead fish swim with the current http://error1355.com/ce/spudger.html <cite>spudger posted [p:902265849] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>Damn trump slurpers are thirsty</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 05/30/18 5:31:58 PM #66:	TheVipaGTS posted... This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no --- I have a gamefaqs following. Watch them flock to my posts. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:902265873] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with?</quote> So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 05/30/18 5:33:26 PM #67:	@KingCrabCake posted... TheVipaGTS posted... This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously.. --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:902265956] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>@KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with?</quote> So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no</quote> i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously..</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 05/30/18 5:34:14 PM #68:	Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!" --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:902265992] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant.</quote> The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 05/30/18 5:34:18 PM #69:	If Roseanne's only issue with racists bullshit was 20 years ago, I can assure you, the show wouldn't be canceled. The fact that this is definitely not her first rodeo is the problem. She has doing this stuff for awhile. She either doesn't learn or just doesn't care. --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:902265997] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>If Roseanne's only issue with racists bullshit was 20 years ago, I can assure you, the show wouldn't be canceled. The fact that this is definitely not her first rodeo is the problem. She has doing this stuff for awhile. She either doesn't learn or just doesn't care.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 05/30/18 5:35:53 PM #70:	Capn Circus posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!" You are deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid because he is the POTUS. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets. --- RIP: Canuklehead, Karma: 1369 // RIP: Gen_Lee_Enfield, Karma: 1731 // RIP: Orlando of the Axe, Karma: 1642 // RIP nayr626 Karma: 4395 --They delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:902266077] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant.</quote> The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!"</quote> You are deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid because he is the POTUS. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 5:37:53 PM #71:	Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!" Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets. No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902266179] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote> So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? </quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. </quote> The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!"</quote> Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets.</quote> No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Capn Circus 05/30/18 5:40:38 PM #72:	Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!" Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid because he is the POTUS. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets. Many of the things Kimmel supports and preaches about are in contradiction to his behavior in the past on those shows. It doesn't matter if Trump was running for president. You either care about what was done in the past or you don't---to pretend to care because someone running may win the election and you want him to look bad is disingenuous --- "I think that man will be president right about the time when spaceships come down filled with dinosaurs in red capes" - Tom Hanks <cite>Capn Circus posted [p:902266335] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant.</quote> The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!"</quote> Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid because he is the POTUS. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets.</quote> Many of the things Kimmel supports and preaches about are in contradiction to his behavior in the past on those shows. It doesn't matter if Trump was running for president. You either care about what was done in the past or you don't---to pretend to care because someone running may win the election and you want him to look bad is disingenuous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dustin1280 05/30/18 5:41:25 PM #73:	Capn Circus posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!" Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid because he is the POTUS. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets. Many of the things Kimmel supporters and preaches about are in contradiction to his behavior in the past on those shows. It doesn't matter if Trump was running for president. You either care about what was done in the past or you don't---to pretend to care because someone running may win the election and you want him to look bad is disingenuous I wouldn't vote for kimmel for POTUS because of the exact contradictions you say. Same reason trump shouldn't be POTUS. If trump were a comedian that did something on the edge 20 years ago, I wouldn't hold that against him. You are trying to compare a comedian/late night tv host to the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES... Guess what? I hold the president to a higher standard than I do random comedians... --- RIP: Canuklehead, Karma: 1369 // RIP: Gen_Lee_Enfield, Karma: 1731 // RIP: Orlando of the Axe, Karma: 1642 // RIP nayr626 Karma: 4395 --They delivered! <cite>Dustin1280 posted [p:902266379] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's?</quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant.</quote> The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!"</quote> Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid because he is the POTUS. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets.</quote> Many of the things Kimmel supporters and preaches about are in contradiction to his behavior in the past on those shows. It doesn't matter if Trump was running for president. You either care about what was done in the past or you don't---to pretend to care because someone running may win the election and you want him to look bad is disingenuous</quote> I wouldn't vote for kimmel for POTUS because of the exact contradictions you say. Same reason trump shouldn't be POTUS. If trump were a comedian that did something on the edge 20 years ago, I wouldn't hold that against him. You are trying to compare a comedian/late night tv host to the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES... Guess what? I hold the president to a higher standard than I do random comedians...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_Biscuit 05/30/18 5:41:47 PM #74:	butter biscuits posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying. lmao lol --- https://www.bigplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/img_6703.jpg <cite>Mr_Biscuit posted [p:902266398] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying.</quote> lmao</quote> lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mr_Biscuit 05/30/18 5:43:25 PM #75:	What I'm getting from the right-wingers in this topic is that Jimmy Kimmel can't grow, mature, and learn over the last two decades, so we should regard him as a hypocrite, BUT we should also forget about the Trump "grab 'em by the pussy" comment and all the shit he's said on Howard Stern because it was a long time ago and he has grown, matured, and learned. Also that we should hold late-night TV hosts to the same standard as the President, but then again, they elected a TV star to the oval office so that part makes sense --- https://www.bigplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/img_6703.jpg <cite>Mr_Biscuit posted [p:902266491] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>What I'm getting from the right-wingers in this topic is that Jimmy Kimmel can't grow, mature, and learn over the last two decades, so we should regard him as a hypocrite, BUT we should also forget about the Trump "grab 'em by the pussy" comment and all the shit he's said on Howard Stern because it was a long time ago and he has grown, matured, and learned. Also that we should hold late-night TV hosts to the same standard as the President, but then again, they elected a TV star to the oval office so that part makes sense</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/30/18 5:43:55 PM #76:	Howl posted... No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902266522] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself.</quote> There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 05/30/18 5:44:02 PM #77:	Mr_Biscuit posted... butter biscuits posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying. lmao lol Seriously, he's admitted to being a gimmick on here before just to "get the Liberals". Stop responding to him. Dude is basically Hoth that people take seriously... --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:902266527] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr_Biscuit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying.</quote> lmao</quote> lol</quote> Seriously, he's admitted to being a gimmick on here before just to "get the Liberals". Stop responding to him. Dude is basically Hoth that people take seriously...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Gheb 05/30/18 5:45:16 PM #78:	Howl posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... Dustin1280 posted... Capn Circus posted... So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!" Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets. No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. Objectifying women, particularly women who are consenting to being objectified, while not particularly classy really isn't harassment. Now if you can show that Kimmel was actively harassing the women and using his position of authority to make them perform actions they didn't want to, then by all means do so. But as it stands now, models jumping around was certainly not the cause the #metoo movement. --- S** I have to stop doing that," Gheb said, as he lay back down and died again.* - Forgotten Love Chiefs are going to win the Super Bowl <cite>Gheb posted [p:902266604] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Dustin1280 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote> So I guess we can forget about Trump's comments from 2005 since we can forget about Kimmel's? </quote> Well Kimmel isn't the president of the united states... And that skit was on a comedy show 20 years ago that was trying to push the limit. And if stuff the POTUS said in 2005 directly conflicts or makes him a hypocrite for things he is saying/doing currently then they are still relevant. </quote> The passage of time either absolves someone of their actions or not. I don't want to hear people say "that was so long ago who cares" for Kimmel but then with Trump's comments go, "oh no it doesn't matter how long it was! That was very bad!"</quote> Deflecting... Trump is the POTUS, if what he said in 2005 directly conflicts with his statements/actions today and make him a hypocrite then they remain 100% valid. Jimmy Kimmel was on a comedy show meant to push the limit 20 years ago, isn't the president, and isn't making hypocritical tweets.</quote> No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself.</quote> Objectifying women, particularly women who are consenting to being objectified, while not particularly classy really isn't harassment. Now if you can show that Kimmel was actively harassing the women and using his position of authority to make them perform actions they didn't want to, then by all means do so. But as it stands now, models jumping around was certainly not the cause the #metoo movement.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 5:47:11 PM #79:	Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show. You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902266713] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself.</quote> There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show.</quote> You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
davyheinz 05/30/18 5:48:33 PM #80:	Howl posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show. You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school. I bought a Playboy for my wife to read the Kevin Smith interview. Rekt --- Currently playing: Strider, Resident Evil 6, Jet Force Gemini, Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons, Psychonauts <cite>davyheinz posted [p:902266791] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself.</quote> There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show.</quote> You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school.</quote> I bought a Playboy for my wife to read the Kevin Smith interview. Rekt</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
EvoTech 05/30/18 5:49:49 PM #81:	That was years ago. Were supposed to forget about the sins of the past... --- Now Playing: Monster Hunter World / FFXII Remaster / FFXIV: Stormblood <cite>EvoTech posted [p:902266854] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>That was years ago. Were supposed to forget about the sins of the past...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Pillowpantz 05/30/18 5:50:59 PM #82:	TC knows the way... --- https://imgur.com/b3gLOdA https://youtu.be/TO45esybdYg https://youtu.be/hcrjb5dzhvw http://archive.is/Zp6HT <cite>Pillowpantz posted [p:902266931] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>TC knows the way...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Agnostic420 05/30/18 5:51:49 PM #83:	butter biscuits posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying. lmao Baha hahahaha Bahahahahahahahah. Dayummmmm <cite>Agnostic420 posted [p:902266971] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying.</quote> lmao</quote> Baha hahahaha Bahahahahahahahah. Dayummmmm</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/30/18 5:54:03 PM #84:	Howl posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show. You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school. Objectification is a meaningless word. The action of degrading someone to the status of a mere object. Pictures are objects so everyone in a picture is an object? No. Only literal sex slavery is actually objectification. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902267083] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself.</quote> There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show.</quote> You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school.</quote> Objectification is a meaningless word. The action of degrading someone to the status of a mere object. Pictures are objects so everyone in a picture is an object? No. Only literal sex slavery is actually objectification.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheUsualSuspect 05/30/18 5:55:05 PM #85:	Mr_Biscuit posted... butter biscuits posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying. lmao lol --- Bravo Whiskey <cite>TheUsualSuspect posted [p:902267146] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr_Biscuit posted...</cite> <quote><cite>butter biscuits posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, you're gimmick is Howl because you're constantly crying.</quote> lmao</quote> lol</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 5:58:38 PM #86:	Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show. You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school. Objectification is a meaningless word. The action of degrading someone to the status of a mere object. Pictures are objects so everyone in a picture is an object? No. Only literal sex slavery is actually objectification. Objectification isn't meant to be thought of literally. It's the thought process that men have about women that makes them think of them less as whole people with their own ambitions, thoughts, and feelings and more of something that has a use like a tool. In this particular usage it refers to men thinking of women as only something to be used to gain sexual satisfaction. But you already knew this and your post was just utterly stupid and nonsensical anyways. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902267358] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> No, but he's making statements in support of #metoo at the Oscar's while he's very much a cause of women being harrassed and objectified himself. </quote> There's no proof media causes harassment and objectification. Harvey Weinstein was in a position of power so he felt invincible. He didn't do any of it because of The Man Show. </quote> You're right media publications like Playboy don't cause objectification of women at all. People read them because they like the articles and they want to know what Miss October's favorite stuffed animal was when she was in high school. </quote> Objectification is a meaningless word. The action of degrading someone to the status of a mere object. Pictures are objects so everyone in a picture is an object? No. Only literal sex slavery is actually objectification.</quote> Objectification isn't meant to be thought of literally. It's the thought process that men have about women that makes them think of them less as whole people with their own ambitions, thoughts, and feelings and more of something that has a use like a tool. In this particular usage it refers to men thinking of women as only something to be used to gain sexual satisfaction. But you already knew this and your post was just utterly stupid and nonsensical anyways.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/30/18 6:01:28 PM #87:	Howl posted... It's the thought process that men have about women that makes them think of them less as whole people with their own ambitions, thoughts, and feelings and more of something tht has a use like a tool. In this particular usage it refers to men thinking of women as only something to be used to gain sexual satisfaction. Like I said that "process" has no proof it exists. Howl posted... But you already knew this nd your post was just utterly stupid and nonsensical anyways. Irony thy name is Howl. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902267550] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>It's the thought process that men have about women that makes them think of them less as whole people with their own ambitions, thoughts, and feelings and more of something tht has a use like a tool. In this particular usage it refers to men thinking of women as only something to be used to gain sexual satisfaction.</quote> Like I said that "process" has no proof it exists. <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>But you already knew this nd your post was just utterly stupid and nonsensical anyways.</quote> Irony thy name is Howl.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 05/30/18 6:02:03 PM #88:	TheVipaGTS posted... @KingCrabCake posted... TheVipaGTS posted... This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously.. Never said orange was a race. Learn to read or stop lying. Which i know is hard for you apparently --- I have a gamefaqs following. Watch them flock to my posts. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:902267593] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with?</quote> So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no</quote> i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously..</quote> Never said orange was a race. Learn to read or stop lying. Which i know is hard for you apparently</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 6:05:50 PM #89:	Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... It's the thought process that men have about women that makes them think of them less as whole people with their own ambitions, thoughts, and feelings and more of something tht has a use like a tool. In this particular usage it refers to men thinking of women as only something to be used to gain sexual satisfaction. Like I said that "process" has no proof it exists. Howl posted... But you already knew this nd your post was just utterly stupid and nonsensical anyways. Irony thy name is Howl. If you want to get down to the philosophical idea that an idea can't be proven to exist, nothing really "exists" or can be proven to exist. This argument is just nonsense. I don't like to use the logical fallacy of you know it in an argument as I did in my last post, but I don't believe you actually believe what you said in your last two posts for a minute. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902267789] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> It's the thought process that men have about women that makes them think of them less as whole people with their own ambitions, thoughts, and feelings and more of something tht has a use like a tool. In this particular usage it refers to men thinking of women as only something to be used to gain sexual satisfaction. </quote> Like I said that "process" has no proof it exists. <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> But you already knew this nd your post was just utterly stupid and nonsensical anyways. </quote> Irony thy name is Howl.</quote> If you want to get down to the philosophical idea that an idea can't be proven to exist, nothing really "exists" or can be proven to exist. This argument is just nonsense. I don't like to use the logical fallacy of you know it in an argument as I did in my last post, but I don't believe you actually believe what you said in your last two posts for a minute.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheVipaGTS 05/30/18 6:06:28 PM #90:	KingCrabCake posted... TheVipaGTS posted... @KingCrabCake posted... TheVipaGTS posted... This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously.. Never said orange was a race. Learn to read or stop lying. Which i know is hard for you apparently Then why do you keep bringing up "Then why can you call Trump an Orangutan!"...People have explained it to you. Its because he has a Spray Tan. Nothing about his race. you keep insisting its also racist...My only takeaway is you think people with Orange skin are a separate race, or you think "Orangutan" is an insult to all white people. Wait...HOLY SHIT Krab is from Jersey and probably has a Spray tan, no wonder he's so upset about this lmao... --- Dallas Cowboys: 1 - 1 <cite>TheVipaGTS posted [p:902267832] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>@KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote>This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with?</quote> So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no</quote> i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously..</quote> Never said orange was a race. Learn to read or stop lying. Which i know is hard for you apparently</quote> Then why do you keep bringing up "Then why can you call Trump an Orangutan!"...People have explained it to you. Its because he has a Spray Tan. Nothing about his race. you keep insisting its also racist...My only takeaway is you think people with Orange skin are a separate race, or you think "Orangutan" is an insult to all white people. Wait...HOLY SHIT Krab is from Jersey and probably has a Spray tan, no wonder he's so upset about this lmao...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 6:10:41 PM #91:	TheVipaGTS posted... KingCrabCake posted... TheVipaGTS posted... @KingCrabCake posted... TheVipaGTS posted... This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously.. Never said orange was a race. Learn to read or stop lying. Which i know is hard for you apparently Then why do you keep bringing up "Then why can you call Trump an Orangutan!"...People have explained it to you. Its because he has a Spray Tan. Nothing about his race. you keep insisting its also racist...My only takeaway is you think people with Orange skin are a separate race, or you think "Orangutan" is an insult to all white people. Wait...HOLY SHIT Krab is from Jersey and probably has a Spray tan, no wonder he's so upset about this lmao... I have never used that argument about the oragutan statement because it's obviously different. However, given the left's insistence last week that people should never dehumanize anyone, even violent gang members, it was just kind of ironic to see so many people on the left calling Trump an orangutan. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902268074] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>@KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>TheVipaGTS posted...</cite> <quote> This week on CE, Conservatives: Don't understand the difference between racial humor and flat out racist tweets Think being "Orange" is now a race What else have they fallen off the deep end with? </quote> So you're okay with making fun of someone and calling them a monkey based on the color of their skin and appearance? Yes or No @TheVipaGTS Spoiler Alert...Vipa wont be able to answer Yes or no </quote> i didn't say i was ok with. I think Jimmy should have definitely known better than to do that. I just understand that comparing a skit to Roseanne's very real hate that she has expressed more than just this one time is idiotic...But then again, you've said more than once that orange is a race so I know not to take what you say very seriously.. </quote> Never said orange was a race. Learn to read or stop lying. Which i know is hard for you apparently</quote> Then why do you keep bringing up "Then why can you call Trump an Orangutan!"...People have explained it to you. Its because he has a Spray Tan. Nothing about his race. you keep insisting its also racist...My only takeaway is you think people with Orange skin are a separate race, or you think "Orangutan" is an insult to all white people. Wait...HOLY SHIT Krab is from Jersey and probably has a Spray tan, no wonder he's so upset about this lmao...</quote> I have never used that argument about the oragutan statement because it's obviously different. However, given the left's insistence last week that people should never dehumanize anyone, even violent gang members, it was just kind of ironic to see so many people on the left calling Trump an orangutan.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrisbeeDude 05/30/18 6:11:49 PM #92:	The alt-right is saltier about this than I thought lmao --- If you're not voting like a black woman, your opinion doesn't matter to me <cite>FrisbeeDude posted [p:902268141] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>The alt-right is saltier about this than I thought lmao</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/30/18 6:12:20 PM #93:	Howl posted... If you want to get down to the philosophical idea that an idea can't be proven to exist, nothing really "exists" or can be proven to exist. Let's go with things that are attributed to Objectification. Rape and Sexual Harassment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Rate_of_victimization Both are way down as porn viewing rises. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902268176] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>If you want to get down to the philosophical idea that an idea can't be proven to exist, nothing really "exists" or can be proven to exist.</quote> Let's go with things that are attributed to Objectification. Rape and Sexual Harassment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Rate_of_victimization Both are way down as porn viewing rises.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 6:18:20 PM #94:	Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... If you want to get down to the philosophical idea that an idea can't be proven to exist, nothing really "exists" or can be proven to exist. Let's go with things that are attributed to Objectification. Rape and Sexual Harassment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Rate_of_victimization Both are way down as porn viewing rises. You say let's go with things attributed to objectification as if they are the be all end all of what objectification leads to. The correlation between porn viewing and rape statistics cannot be proven to be a causal relationship. Furthermore there can be no proven causal relationship between objectification and any effect of objectification anyway because it's not possible to eliminate variables that can affect the outcomes of said effects. Nothing you have said has disproven the existence of objectification. Furthermore it's impossible to prove its existsence as you have already stated and for the same reason it's impossible to disprove. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902268517] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> If you want to get down to the philosophical idea that an idea can't be proven to exist, nothing really "exists" or can be proven to exist. </quote> Let's go with things that are attributed to Objectification. Rape and Sexual Harassment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_the_United_States#Rate_of_victimization Both are way down as porn viewing rises.</quote> You say let's go with things attributed to objectification as if they are the be all end all of what objectification leads to. The correlation between porn viewing and rape statistics cannot be proven to be a causal relationship. Furthermore there can be no proven causal relationship between objectification and any effect of objectification anyway because it's not possible to eliminate variables that can affect the outcomes of said effects. Nothing you have said has disproven the existence of objectification. Furthermore it's impossible to prove its existsence as you have already stated and for the same reason it's impossible to disprove.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Webmaster4531 05/30/18 6:22:27 PM #95:	Howl posted... Nothing you have said has disproven the existence of objectification. That was never my goal. --- Ad Hominem. <cite>Webmaster4531 posted [p:902268757] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote>Nothing you have said has disproven the existence of objectification. </quote> That was never my goal.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 6:28:17 PM #96:	Webmaster4531 posted... Howl posted... Nothing you have said has disproven the existence of objectification. That was never my goal. Your first post on the issue was objectification is a meaningless word. What was your intention of posting that if it wasn't an attempt to discredit the idea of the existence of objectification? --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902269056] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>Webmaster4531 posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Howl posted...</cite> <quote> Nothing you have said has disproven the existence of objectification. </quote> That was never my goal.</quote> Your first post on the issue was objectification is a meaningless word. What was your intention of posting that if it wasn't an attempt to discredit the idea of the existence of objectification?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BrapEnthusiast 05/30/18 6:31:09 PM #97:	why are liberals literally defending black face? mind boggling. just because Kimmel is such a diehard anti-Trumpist? --- it's party time excellent <cite>BrapEnthusiast posted [p:902269215] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>why are liberals literally defending black face? mind boggling. just because Kimmel is such a diehard anti-Trumpist?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gnomefromnome 05/30/18 6:36:08 PM #98:	No one is defending black face It was a skit on a politically incorrect cable channel Edit, from 18-20 years ago --- Oh my God... That was the dumbest collection of dumbosity I've ever seen! - Famine https://youtu.be/pOtTxMC1ZZQ <cite>gnomefromnome posted [p:902269464] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>No one is defending black face It was a skit on a politically incorrect cable channel Edit, from 18-20 years ago</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 05/30/18 6:47:35 PM #99:	its almost like things that were acceptable in the past are no longer acceptable today but of course that concept is lost on the right --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:902270068] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>its almost like things that were acceptable in the past are no longer acceptable today but of course that concept is lost on the right</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BrapEnthusiast 05/30/18 6:51:27 PM #100:	but left wingers constantly reference the past to justify their modern day crusades. everyone knows this. Kimmel doesn't get a pass just because this happened a while ago. this is blatant hypocritical double standards --- it's party time excellent <cite>BrapEnthusiast posted [p:902270300] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote>but left wingers constantly reference the past to justify their modern day crusades. everyone knows this. Kimmel doesn't get a pass just because this happened a while ago. this is blatant hypocritical double standards</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Howl 05/30/18 6:52:16 PM #101:	mario2000 posted... its almost like things that were acceptable in the past are no longer acceptable today but of course that concept is lost on the right The point is that ABC as a company should hold Kimmel to the same standard today because people on the left are all about holding people's past remarks to the standards of today. Or only when it's convenient for them to do so at least. --- Posted with GameRaven 3.5 <cite>Howl posted [p:902270343] in Friendly r... [t:76659021]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>its almost like things that were acceptable in the past are no longer acceptable today but of course that concept is lost on the right</quote> The point is that ABC as a company should hold Kimmel to the same standard today because people on the left are all about holding people's past remarks to the standards of today. Or only when it's convenient for them to do so at least.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Friendly reminder that Jimmy Kimmel dressed in black face and works for ABC. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Friendly reminder that Jimmy Kimmel dressed in black face and works for ABC.