Current Events > Why do conservatives expect the left to tolerate their intolerance?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
Wry-Guy 05/23/18 12:09:07 PM #51:	KingCrabCake posted... Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... I never met anyone who makes decent money who hated capitalism. Well Stalin was such a man. Your point is irrelevant. Never met Stalin Again, irrelevant. Yes your posts are. Wow you sure showed me. And here I thought when you said you were going to put me on ignore you were actually ignoring me, but clearly you wanted to take me off ignore just so you could show me here in this topic. --- Not just another Shy-Guy <cite>Wry-Guy posted [p:901848303] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I never met anyone who makes decent money who hated capitalism.</quote> Well Stalin was such a man. Your point is irrelevant.</quote> Never met Stalin</quote> Again, irrelevant.</quote> Yes your posts are. </quote> Wow you sure showed me. And here I thought when you said you were going to put me on ignore you were actually ignoring me, but clearly you wanted to take me off ignore just so you could show me here in this topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
tennisdude818 05/23/18 12:11:50 PM #52:	The left is tolerant of anyone who votes for the left. --- "I have never understood why it is greed to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money." Thomas Sowell <cite>tennisdude818 posted [p:901848429] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote>The left is tolerant of anyone who votes for the left.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wry-Guy 05/23/18 12:13:22 PM #53:	Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... I never met anyone who makes decent money who hated capitalism. Well Stalin was such a man. Your point is irrelevant. Never met Stalin Again, irrelevant. Yes your posts are. Wow you sure showed me. And here I thought when you said you were going to put me on ignore you were actually ignoring me, but clearly you wanted to take me off ignore just so you could show me here in this topic. Funny: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/573081-hellhole/76629452/901848398 --- Not just another Shy-Guy <cite>Wry-Guy posted [p:901848508] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I never met anyone who makes decent money who hated capitalism.</quote> Well Stalin was such a man. Your point is irrelevant.</quote> Never met Stalin</quote> Again, irrelevant.</quote> Yes your posts are. </quote> Wow you sure showed me. And here I thought when you said you were going to put me on ignore you were actually ignoring me, but clearly you wanted to take me off ignore just so you could show me here in this topic.</quote> Funny: https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/573081-hellhole/76629452/901848398</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 05/23/18 12:29:20 PM #54:	Wry-Guy posted... averagejoel posted... Wry-Guy posted... But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs. capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution. Empires are not capitalist. Feudalism is not capitalist either. and capitalism is not necessary for resources or for accomplishment >_> Capitalism is work for pay, specifically material pay. Typically it revolves around the idea of a central currency, but the idea is essentially that you earn your material possessions. that's called trade, or exchange. it existed long before capitalism. currency and work also existed before capitalism. capitalism is more specific than that, though those things are certainly part of it. read some history --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:901849278] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs.</quote> capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution. Empires are not capitalist. Feudalism is not capitalist either. and capitalism is not necessary for resources or for accomplishment</quote> >_> Capitalism is work for pay, specifically material pay. Typically it revolves around the idea of a central currency, but the idea is essentially that you earn your material possessions.</quote> that's called trade, or exchange. it existed long before capitalism. currency and work also existed before capitalism. capitalism is more specific than that, though those things are certainly part of it. read some history</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Bloodychess 05/23/18 12:32:48 PM #55:	Probably because the left has no problem tolerating intolerance within their own voting block --- To err is human To arr is pirate <cite>Bloodychess posted [p:901849466] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote>Probably because the left has no problem tolerating intolerance within their own voting block</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wry-Guy 05/23/18 12:42:32 PM #56:	averagejoel posted... Wry-Guy posted... averagejoel posted... Wry-Guy posted... But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs. capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution. Empires are not capitalist. Feudalism is not capitalist either. and capitalism is not necessary for resources or for accomplishment >_> Capitalism is work for pay, specifically material pay. Typically it revolves around the idea of a central currency, but the idea is essentially that you earn your material possessions. that's called trade, or exchange. it existed long before capitalism. currency and work also existed before capitalism. capitalism is more specific than that, though those things are certainly part of it. read some history capitalism [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth. Literally anything that isn't communism, pure socialism, or extreme state controlled authoritarianism is a form of capitalism. Barter / trade, monetary based, anything. Splitting hairs and calling an empire uncapitalistic is like saying America isn't capitalistic because it's actually an oligarchy. --- Not just another Shy-Guy <cite>Wry-Guy posted [p:901849954] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs.</quote> capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution. Empires are not capitalist. Feudalism is not capitalist either. and capitalism is not necessary for resources or for accomplishment</quote> >_> Capitalism is work for pay, specifically material pay. Typically it revolves around the idea of a central currency, but the idea is essentially that you earn your material possessions.</quote> that's called trade, or exchange. it existed long before capitalism. currency and work also existed before capitalism. capitalism is more specific than that, though those things are certainly part of it. read some history</quote> capitalism [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth. Literally anything that isn't communism, pure socialism, or extreme state controlled authoritarianism is a form of capitalism. Barter / trade, monetary based, anything. Splitting hairs and calling an empire uncapitalistic is like saying America isn't capitalistic because it's actually an oligarchy.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 05/23/18 1:01:52 PM #57:	Wry-Guy posted... Literally anything that isn't communism, pure socialism, or extreme state controlled authoritarianism is a form of capitalism. Barter / trade, monetary based, anything. Splitting hairs and calling an empire uncapitalistic is like saying America isn't capitalistic because it's actually an oligarchy. feudalism fyoodlizm/ nounhistorical the dominant social system in medieval Europe, in which the nobility held lands from the Crown in exchange for military service, and vassals were in turn tenants of the nobles, while the peasants (villeins or serfs) were obliged to live on their lord's land and give him homage, labor, and a share of the produce, notionally in exchange for military protection. feudalism is not capitalism. it existed before capitalism. --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:901850995] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>Literally anything that isn't communism, pure socialism, or extreme state controlled authoritarianism is a form of capitalism. Barter / trade, monetary based, anything. Splitting hairs and calling an empire uncapitalistic is like saying America isn't capitalistic because it's actually an oligarchy.</quote> feudalism fyoodlizm/ nounhistorical the dominant social system in medieval Europe, in which the nobility held lands from the Crown in exchange for military service, and vassals were in turn tenants of the nobles, while the peasants (villeins or serfs) were obliged to live on their lord's land and give him homage, labor, and a share of the produce, notionally in exchange for military protection. feudalism is not capitalism. it existed before capitalism.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wry-Guy 05/23/18 1:05:01 PM #58:	Wry-Guy posted... capitalism [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun an economic system averagejoel posted... feudalism fyoodlizm/ nounhistorical the dominant social system --- Not just another Shy-Guy <cite>Wry-Guy posted [p:901851163] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>capitalism [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun an economic system </quote> <cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>feudalism fyoodlizm/ nounhistorical the dominant social system </quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 05/23/18 1:09:13 PM #59:	Wry-Guy posted... Wry-Guy posted... capitalism [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun an economic system averagejoel posted... feudalism fyoodlizm/ nounhistorical the dominant social system are you suggesting that feudalism is not also an economic system? because it 100% is --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:901851418] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>capitalism [kap-i-tl-iz-uh m] noun an economic system </quote> <cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>feudalism fyoodlizm/ nounhistorical the dominant social system </quote></quote> are you suggesting that feudalism is not also an economic system? because it 100% is</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wry-Guy 05/23/18 1:11:16 PM #60:	I'm suggesting you pay more attention to the definitions. Economic and social systems can exist in tandem with one another and can have aspects of one another. --- Not just another Shy-Guy <cite>Wry-Guy posted [p:901851539] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote>I'm suggesting you pay more attention to the definitions. Economic and social systems can exist in tandem with one another and can have aspects of one another.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ultimate reaver 05/23/18 1:16:18 PM #61:	because mommy and daddy do --- butts <cite>ultimate reaver posted [p:901851830] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote>because mommy and daddy do</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
averagejoel 05/23/18 1:22:24 PM #62:	Wry-Guy posted... I'm suggesting you pay more attention to the definitions. Economic and social systems can exist in tandem with one another and can have aspects of one another. this does not negate anything i said. feudalism had some qualities of capitalism, so depending on how you're defining the term, it might be "capitalistic", but they're still two distinct economic systems. capitalism came after feudalism. --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:901852136] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>I'm suggesting you pay more attention to the definitions. Economic and social systems can exist in tandem with one another and can have aspects of one another.</quote> this does not negate anything i said. feudalism had some qualities of capitalism, so depending on how you're defining the term, it might be "capitalistic", but they're still two distinct economic systems. capitalism came after feudalism.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Wry-Guy 05/23/18 1:30:44 PM #63:	Capitalism specifically describes that there exists a system within a society promoting private trade and profit. This can exist in almost any type of government including ancient governments and isn't new. I'm not sure why you think it's a recent invention, it's as old as humanity. --- Not just another Shy-Guy <cite>Wry-Guy posted [p:901852563] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote>Capitalism specifically describes that there exists a system within a society promoting private trade and profit. This can exist in almost any type of government including ancient governments and isn't new. I'm not sure why you think it's a recent invention, it's as old as humanity.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MedzXVIII 05/23/18 1:31:42 PM #64:	Forgettable posted... You make a good point. The left can't tolerate the intolerance from conservatives if the left can't even tolerate their own intolerance. --- Hi <cite>MedzXVIII posted [p:901852611] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Forgettable posted...</cite> <quote>You make a good point. The left can't tolerate the intolerance from conservatives if the left can't even tolerate their own intolerance.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
KingCrabCake 05/23/18 2:19:25 PM #65:	Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... Wry-Guy posted... KingCrabCake posted... I never met anyone who makes decent money who hated capitalism. Well Stalin was such a man. Your point is irrelevant. Never met Stalin Again, irrelevant. Yes your posts are. Wow you sure showed me. And here I thought when you said you were going to put me on ignore you were actually ignoring me, but clearly you wanted to take me off ignore just so you could show me here in this topic. hands u attention --- I have a gamefaqs following. Watch them flock to my posts. <cite>KingCrabCake posted [p:901855272] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KingCrabCake posted...</cite> <quote>I never met anyone who makes decent money who hated capitalism.</quote> Well Stalin was such a man. Your point is irrelevant.</quote> Never met Stalin</quote> Again, irrelevant.</quote> Yes your posts are. </quote> Wow you sure showed me. And here I thought when you said you were going to put me on ignore you were actually ignoring me, but clearly you wanted to take me off ignore just so you could show me here in this topic.</quote> hands u attention</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#66	Post #66 was unavailable or deleted.
averagejoel 05/23/18 2:34:07 PM #67:	CrimsonRage posted... southcoast09 posted... Wry-Guy posted... averagejoel posted... Wry-Guy posted... Capitalism specifically is pretty key to humanity. no it isn't - humans existed and thrived pre-capitalism and you also didn't address my other points Not really sure what other points you are talking about. But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs. But look where that got them. Wearing loin cloths from whatever they hunt, living in tents, no modern medicine, no architecture, no anything. Oh, and they fight each other non stop. TIL southcoast09 knows absolutely nothing about the Mayans and Aztecs those two subjects are... not the exception --- peanut butter and dick <cite>averagejoel posted [p:901856089] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>Capitalism specifically is pretty key to humanity. </quote> no it isn't - humans existed and thrived pre-capitalism and you also didn't address my other points</quote> Not really sure what other points you are talking about. But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs.</quote> But look where that got them. Wearing loin cloths from whatever they hunt, living in tents, no modern medicine, no architecture, no anything. Oh, and they fight each other non stop.</quote> TIL southcoast09 knows absolutely nothing about the Mayans and Aztecs</quote> those two subjects are... not the exception</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 05/23/18 2:34:29 PM #68:	averagejoel posted... capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution. averagelol spouting nonsense once again. --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:901856111] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution.</quote> averagelol spouting nonsense once again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar 05/23/18 2:35:43 PM #69:	thelovefist posted... averagejoel posted... capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution. averagelol spouting nonsense once again. You can quibble with the timing a bit: some might place it earlier in the 1700s, but he's about right. Capitalism is not just "all trade or commerce." --- kin to all that throbs <cite>Antifar posted [p:901856187] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>thelovefist posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote>capitalism is an economic system that has specific characteristics. it didn't really exist until the French Revolution.</quote> averagelol spouting nonsense once again.</quote> You can quibble with the timing a bit: some might place it earlier in the 1700s, but he's about right. Capitalism is not just "all trade or commerce."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
southcoast09 05/23/18 4:08:30 PM #70:	CrimsonRage posted... southcoast09 posted... Wry-Guy posted... averagejoel posted... Wry-Guy posted... Capitalism specifically is pretty key to humanity. no it isn't - humans existed and thrived pre-capitalism and you also didn't address my other points Not really sure what other points you are talking about. But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs. But look where that got them. Wearing loin cloths from whatever they hunt, living in tents, no modern medicine, no architecture, no anything. Oh, and they fight each other non stop. TIL @southcoast09 knows absolutely nothing about the Mayans and Aztecs What point are you trying to make? Survival is their main goal. Their dont trade with foreign countries. Their medical facilities are something from a cartoon. How could you even begin to put a tribe on the same level as a first world country? --- Stand for the anthem or sit for the game! <cite>southcoast09 posted [p:901860990] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>Capitalism specifically is pretty key to humanity. </quote> no it isn't - humans existed and thrived pre-capitalism and you also didn't address my other points</quote> Not really sure what other points you are talking about. But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs.</quote> But look where that got them. Wearing loin cloths from whatever they hunt, living in tents, no modern medicine, no architecture, no anything. Oh, and they fight each other non stop.</quote> TIL @southcoast09 knows absolutely nothing about the Mayans and Aztecs</quote> What point are you trying to make? Survival is their main goal. Their dont trade with foreign countries. Their medical facilities are something from a cartoon. How could you even begin to put a tribe on the same level as a first world country?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thelovefist 05/23/18 5:24:27 PM #71:	southcoast09 posted... CrimsonRage posted... southcoast09 posted... Wry-Guy posted... averagejoel posted... Wry-Guy posted... Capitalism specifically is pretty key to humanity. no it isn't - humans existed and thrived pre-capitalism and you also didn't address my other points Not really sure what other points you are talking about. But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs. But look where that got them. Wearing loin cloths from whatever they hunt, living in tents, no modern medicine, no architecture, no anything. Oh, and they fight each other non stop. TIL @southcoast09 knows absolutely nothing about the Mayans and Aztecs What point are you trying to make? Survival is their main goal. Their dont trade with foreign countries. Their medical facilities are something from a cartoon. How could you even begin to put a tribe on the same level as a first world country? You really need to do a little reading about the Mayan civilization lolcoast. --- N/A <cite>thelovefist posted [p:901865343] in Why do con... [t:76635604]...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CrimsonRage posted...</cite> <quote><cite>southcoast09 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>averagejoel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Wry-Guy posted...</cite> <quote>Capitalism specifically is pretty key to humanity. </quote> no it isn't - humans existed and thrived pre-capitalism and you also didn't address my other points</quote> Not really sure what other points you are talking about. But humanity has never "thrived" without capitalism. In tribal economies the hierarchy was always determined by who was strongest, most accomplished, smartest, or had the most. More successful models of this were empires like the Mayas and Aztecs. There have been some small tribes here and there that mostly stuck to themselves and were a bit less capitalistic, but I can't think of any that weren't capitalistic. For one thing proper resources are necessary for survival. For another accomplishment and the gain of power are human needs.</quote> But look where that got them. Wearing loin cloths from whatever they hunt, living in tents, no modern medicine, no architecture, no anything. Oh, and they fight each other non stop.</quote> TIL @southcoast09 knows absolutely nothing about the Mayans and Aztecs</quote> What point are you trying to make? Survival is their main goal. Their dont trade with foreign countries. Their medical facilities are something from a cartoon. How could you even begin to put a tribe on the same level as a first world country?</quote> You really need to do a little reading about the Mayan civilization lolcoast.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#72	Post #72 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Why do conservatives expect the left to tolerate their intolerance? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Why do conservatives expect the left to tolerate their intolerance?