Poll of the Day > Do you agree that eating nothing at all is usually better than eating a little..

(+) Yeah! (+)

I'm not talking about when you haven't eaten in a really long time and when you're extremely hungry, but more moderate hungry to little to not hungry at all really. Imo eating a little that is not enough for you to be full is much worse than eating nothing at all. Do you agree?
---

That's called an eating disorder.
You should eat food. Seriously.

No, but than eating a little will usually make me feel full for awhile.
---

I agree. Like the other day I hadn't eaten much before dek hockey, so I decide to eat something small. I was fine before eating. After I was legit hangry cause I needed more
---

BADoglick posted...

I agree. Like the other day I hadn't eaten much before dek hockey, so I decide to eat something small. I was fine before eating. After I was legit hangry cause I needed more

yeah this dude knows what he's talking about, i agree
---

PMarth2002 posted...

No, but than eating a little will usually make me feel full for awhile.

This and I thought waiting too long in between meals might make the body go into "starvation mode". I'm sure someone can explain it better than me but between eating two or three solid meals a day versus one big meal a day, I thought the latter is overall worse.
---

In my opinion, eating food provides nourishment and should be done to remain alive
---

I do agree

there are times where I can go most of the day without eating anything, i'll usually eat something around dinner time or a bit later. in these cases, i'm fine and not feeling sick or anything, I just choose not to eat
---

Mead posted...

In my opinion, eating food provides nourishment and should be done to remain alive

Pssshh...pseudoscience, hippie, liberal nonsense.
---