Current Events > Is there a logical fallacy that describes reassigning burden of proof?

Topic List	Page List: 1
Solid Sonic 02/08/18 10:17:48 AM #1:	That you negate your argument by implying your adversary is the one who has to provide proof for their point or the argument is lost for them when really it has always been on you? --- The only game reviewers who can be trusted are those who publish in Latin or Swahili. <cite>Solid Sonic posted [p:895696811] in Is there a... [t:76296988]...</cite> <quote>That you negate your argument by implying your adversary is the one who has to provide proof for their point or the argument is lost for them when really it has always been on you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mD_atheist 02/08/18 10:19:30 AM #2:	Shifting the burden of proof --- ASUS XONAR DG - FiiO D3 (D03K) - JDS Labs OBJECTIVE2 Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO, 250 ohms - Audioengine A5+/Polk Audio PSW10 <cite>mD_atheist posted [p:895696889] in Is there a... [t:76296988]...</cite> <quote>Shifting the burden of proof</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Solid Sonic 02/08/18 10:21:16 AM #3:	Simple enough. Shrug. --- The only game reviewers who can be trusted are those who publish in Latin or Swahili. <cite>Solid Sonic posted [p:895696944] in Is there a... [t:76296988]...</cite> <quote>Simple enough. Shrug.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
COVxy 02/08/18 10:22:04 AM #4:	Burden of proof is a silly concept. In reality, everyone has the burden of proof, people just like to get out of putting effort toward and argument. --- =E[(x-E[x])(y-E[y])] <cite>COVxy posted [p:895696981] in Is there a... [t:76296988]...</cite> <quote>Burden of proof is a silly concept. In reality, everyone has the burden of proof, people just like to get out of putting effort toward and argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hollow_shrine 02/08/18 10:24:40 AM #5:	Isn't this basically circular reasoning? Where the speaker presumes the internal logic of their argument and then stacks further justification upon that conclusion? Point out that each these conclusions are contingent upon other conclusions within the argument. --- Whatever happened to standards? Whatever happened to bare minimums? https://i.imgtc.com/7UnK3hx.jpg <cite>hollow_shrine posted [p:895697113] in Is there a... [t:76296988]...</cite> <quote>Isn't this basically circular reasoning? Where the speaker presumes the internal logic of their argument and then stacks further justification upon that conclusion? Point out that each these conclusions are contingent upon other conclusions within the argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1