Current Events > Under the new rules, calling someone a "remarkable bastard" is flaming

Topic List	Page List: 1
YOUHAVENOHOPE 02/06/18 3:00:12 AM #1:	Please refrain from such posts in the future. Notified without deletion. --- http://i.imgur.com/kpXTakw.gif http://i.imgur.com/Pto3yPa.jpg http://media.giphy.com/media/NBVBnHv8bV13q/giphy.gif <cite>YOUHAVENOHOPE posted [p:895554850] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>Please refrain from such posts in the future. Notified without deletion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darkrobotisback 02/06/18 3:01:38 AM #2:	Wut if I say "unremarkable bastard"? --- https://imgur.com/SmAKegF I likkkeee to DrAw <cite>Darkrobotisback posted [p:895554872] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>Wut if I say "unremarkable bastard"?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Turbam 02/06/18 3:01:46 AM #3:	You're a remarkable bastard in a good way, and I'm sure that your parents were married before they had you There, don't say I never helped you --- ~snip (V)_(;,;)_(V) snip~ I'm just one man! Whoa! Well, I'm a one man band! http://i.imgur.com/p9Xvjvs.gif <cite>Turbam posted [p:895554876] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>You're a remarkable bastard in a good way, and I'm sure that your parents were married before they had you There, don't say I never helped you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tezlok 02/06/18 3:03:46 AM #4:	that's stupid because thats actually a compliment. I think it's a british saying but the mod must not have realized what it means <cite>Tezlok posted [p:895554941] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>that's stupid because thats actually a compliment. I think it's a british saying but the mod must not have realized what it means</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
0AbsoluteZero0 02/06/18 3:03:54 AM #5:	Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way. --- -The Admirable <cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted [p:895554943] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MI4 REAL 02/06/18 3:09:52 AM #6:	Posting the truth is a moddable offense. Sorry. Hell you think I haven't taken licks before? --- "Er...well, y'know. You can't make an omelette without um...destroying a forest.....or something" -Black Mage <cite>MI4 REAL posted [p:895555085] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>Posting the truth is a moddable offense. Sorry. Hell you think I haven't taken licks before?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SiO4 02/06/18 3:18:06 AM #7:	https://youtu.be/Ql61L4TgQg8?t=1008 --- "Whatever the reason you're on Mars, I'm glad you're there, and I wish I was with you." ~Carl Sagan. Currently playing: Flight Simulator X.~PC <cite>SiO4 posted [p:895555292] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>https://youtu.be/Ql61L4TgQg8?t=1008</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrojanPony 02/06/18 3:55:50 AM #8:	0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way. I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history? --- "GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site." - CJayC <cite>TrojanPony posted [p:895556222] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote>Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way.</quote> I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MI4 REAL 02/06/18 3:57:37 AM #9:	I'm sorry, I've failed. --- "Er...well, y'know. You can't make an omelette without um...destroying a forest.....or something" -Black Mage <cite>MI4 REAL posted [p:895556268] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>I'm sorry, I've failed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 02/06/18 4:01:16 AM #10:	What if you call them a magnificent bastard and inform them youve read their book? <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:895556344] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>What if you call them a magnificent bastard and inform them youve read their book?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GODTIER 02/06/18 4:01:53 AM #11:	TrojanPony posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way. I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history? It's not libel if it's anonymous --- #freesquader <cite>GODTIER posted [p:895556354] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrojanPony posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote>Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way.</quote> I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history?</quote> It's not libel if it's anonymous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrojanPony 02/06/18 4:07:33 AM #12:	GODTIER posted... TrojanPony posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way. I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history? It's not libel if it's anonymous https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/digital-journalists-legal-guide/anonymous-speech-online-when-must-identit False. The only defense against libel is truth. --- "GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site." - CJayC <cite>TrojanPony posted [p:895556480] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrojanPony posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote>Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way.</quote> I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history?</quote> It's not libel if it's anonymous</quote> https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/digital-journalists-legal-guide/anonymous-speech-online-when-must-identit False. The only defense against libel is truth.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
butthole666 02/06/18 4:07:58 AM #13:	New mods fucking suck at their jobs --- "Kenan & Kel is what made me realize I wasn't racist." ~ NewportBox100s <cite>butthole666 posted [p:895556489] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>New mods fucking suck at their jobs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GODTIER 02/06/18 4:09:40 AM #14:	TrojanPony posted... GODTIER posted... TrojanPony posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way. I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history? It's not libel if it's anonymous https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/digital-journalists-legal-guide/anonymous-speech-online-when-must-identit False. The only defense against libel is truth. Oh sorry I meant to say not published --- #freesquader <cite>GODTIER posted [p:895556517] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrojanPony posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrojanPony posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote>Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way.</quote> I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history?</quote> It's not libel if it's anonymous</quote> https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/digital-journalists-legal-guide/anonymous-speech-online-when-must-identit False. The only defense against libel is truth.</quote> Oh sorry I meant to say not published</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NibeIungsnarf 02/06/18 4:10:02 AM #15:	Except you know that time Larry Flynt won a libel case at the SCOTUS by claiming satire <cite>NibeIungsnarf posted [p:895556531] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote>Except you know that time Larry Flynt won a libel case at the SCOTUS by claiming satire</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TrojanPony 02/06/18 4:11:04 AM #16:	GODTIER posted... TrojanPony posted... GODTIER posted... TrojanPony posted... 0AbsoluteZero0 posted... Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way. I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history? It's not libel if it's anonymous https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/digital-journalists-legal-guide/anonymous-speech-online-when-must-identit False. The only defense against libel is truth. Oh sorry I meant to say not published Then it becomes slander which is the same thing. --- "GameFAQs isn't going to be merged in with GameSpot or any other site. We're not going to strip out the soul of the site." - CJayC <cite>TrojanPony posted [p:895556558] in Under the ... [t:76288595]...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrojanPony posted...</cite> <quote><cite>GODTIER posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrojanPony posted...</cite> <quote><cite>0AbsoluteZero0 posted...</cite> <quote>Context has absolutely no bearing in the minds of the mods under the new rules. If you use a term like bastard, thats a flame, regardless of how obvious it is that you werent saying it in a disparaging way.</quote> I got a NWD for "misgendering" Manning the fucking liar, yet someone who called me a basement-dwelling sycophant remains completely unmoderated. People who feign their minority status are more protected than actual users. "No soft flames" my ass. I demand free-will tests for the entire mod team. Meanwhile calling the POTUS a pedophile, a nazi, a rapist, and a terrorist is perfectly fine, despite that legally being considered libel. Remember when GameFAQs would tell you that comparing anyone to Hitler only showed you had no grasp of history?</quote> It's not libel if it's anonymous</quote> https://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/digital-journalists-legal-guide/anonymous-speech-online-when-must-identit False. The only defense against libel is truth.</quote> Oh sorry I meant to say not published</quote> Then it becomes slander which is the same thing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Current Events > Under the new rules, calling someone a "remarkable bastard" is flaming (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Under the new rules, calling someone a "remarkable bastard" is flaming