Current Events > The Justice Department has effectively shuttered an Obama-era office

(+) Yeah! (+)

dedicated to making legal aid accessible to all citizens.

https://t.co/cTc0Rn9yrF

WASHINGTON The Justice Department has effectively shuttered an Obama-era office dedicated to making legal aid accessible to all citizens, according to two people familiar with the situation.

The division, the Office for Access to Justice, began as an initiative in 2010 under former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to increase and improve legal resources for indigent litigants in civil, criminal and tribal courts. Though the head of the office reports directly to the associate attorney general, it never gained much visibility within the Justice Department because it did not oversee a large staff of prosecutors.

While Attorney General Jeff Sessions cannot close the office without notifying the Congress, he can sideline it by moving its resources elsewhere. Its offices now sit dark on the third floor of the Justice Department building. The staff of a dozen or so has dwindled and left the department over the past few months, the people said. Maha Jweied, the acting director of the department, left this month to start a consulting business, according to her LinkedIn profile.

The Justice Department did not respond to repeated requests for comment, and Ms. Jweied did not respond to an emailed request for comment. Career prosecutors emphasized that new administrations reshuffle the Justice Departments priorities, de-emphasizing or shuttering projects that previous administrations had supported to devote resources to their own agendas.

The offices stated mission was to deliver outcomes that are fair and accessible to all, irrespective of wealth and status. It worked with other federal, state and local entities in the justice system to increase access to counsel and legal assistance for people who could not afford lawyers.

Civil rights groups objected to its effective closure.

Sessions shutting down the Access to Justice Initiative sadly speaks for itself, said Vanita Gupta, the chief executive of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the former head of the civil rights division of the Justice Department under former President Barack Obama.

Justice Dept. Presses Civil Rights Agenda in Local Courts AUG. 19, 2015
Added Sharon McGowan, director of strategy at Lambda Legal and a former official in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department in the Obama administration: Ever since he became attorney general, Sessions has advanced positions that are irreconcilable with where we are as a country.

Mr. Holder oversaw the creation of the office as part of a broader civil rights and criminal justice reform push, trying to draw attention to what he deemed a national crisis of substandard legal aid for the poor. The office gained prominence when the Harvard Law professor Laurence H. Tribe became a senior counselor, a position created by the Obama administration. It was eventually led by Lisa Foster, a former California Superior Court Judge and attorney who specialized in public interest law.

---

Under Mr. Holder, the Justice Department filed so-called statements of interest in dozens of local lawsuits around the country alleging that poor citizens had received substandard legal services. He also supported a class-action lawsuit against Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and the State of New York for violating the rights of people who could not afford to hire lawyers.

Access to Justice was a recognition that the Justice Departments job was not just to prosecute cases, but to ensure justice in the system overall, Ms. Gupta said.

Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Holders successor under Mr. Obama, continued to support the office after she became attorney general, including support for the Office of Access to Justice. Civil rights groups called their work a game changer.

As of Thursday, the website for the Office of Access to Justice was still online; Ms. Jweieds profile had been deleted.

---

Now why do you think they would do such a thing?
---

Wait... don't people already have a right to an attorney, to be provided by the state if they can't afford one? What did this office actually do?

EDIT: Also the entire staff was a dozen people, which means it probably only served, what... 6 or 7 lawyers? How many cases could they possible have helped?
---

s0nicfan posted...

Wait... don't people already have a right to an attorney, to be provided by the state if they can't afford one? What did this office actually do?

The offices stated mission was to deliver outcomes that are fair and accessible to all, irrespective of wealth and status. It worked with other federal, state and local entities in the justice system to increase access to counsel and legal assistance for people who could not afford lawyers.

s0nicfan posted...

EDIT: Also the entire staff was a dozen people, which means it probably only served, what... 6 or 7 lawyers? How many cases could they possible have helped?

Y'all try way too hard.
---

Making America great!
---

s0nicfan posted...

Wait... don't people already have a right to an attorney, to be provided by the state if they can't afford one?

On paper, yes. In practice...
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/07/513903493/la-governor-sued-over-states-alleged-failure-to-provide-lawyers-to-poor-defendan

https://knpr.org/knpr/2017-11/aclu-says-nevada-isnt-defending-states-rural-poor
---

Antifar posted...

s0nicfan posted...

Wait... don't people already have a right to an attorney, to be provided by the state if they can't afford one?

On paper, yes. In practice...
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/02/07/513903493/la-governor-sued-over-states-alleged-failure-to-provide-lawyers-to-poor-defendan

https://knpr.org/knpr/2017-11/aclu-says-nevada-isnt-defending-states-rural-poor

Honestly I'd much rather people take states to task for failing to provide constitutional rights to their citizens than to create extra agencies for the sole purpose of filling in the cracks.

It's like California creating a legal loophole to let you donate your taxes to avoid the write off cap because otherwise their taxes are too high when they could just, you know, lower their taxes.
---