Current Events > Where did Palpatine learn to use a lightsaber?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:05:16 PM #51:	If we include details from the novelizations of the NT and EU info related to his origin story... He preferred to use force powers. He was a talented duelist but his force powers far exceeded that. Him defeating the Jedi masters besides Windu was very much due to his skills, though obviously the novel made the fight slightly more detailed and over in what, 3 seconds? Once he defeated the Jedi, he wanted the symbol of hope they had destroyed. He even had all the kyber crystals in the empire's reach destroyed. That's why in RotJ, he (or was it Vader) comments that Luke built his own saber. That's a huge step in Jedi or sith growth, creating their own unique weapon. But Luke had to use a synthetic kyber crystal. The reason this is noteworthy is because naturalnatural ones create colors like blue and green. Yet synthetic ones create a red saber color. Luke had to painstakingly create a synthetic one himself and he managed to make it not red, something that symbolically mattered a lot to Luke. This takes place during the interlude from tesb and rotj. I'm pretty sure it was during the events of shadow of the empire. But yeah. Emperor hated sabers, felt they were beneath him and doubled down in his hatred of them after windu melted his face. --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894907874] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>If we include details from the novelizations of the NT and EU info related to his origin story... He preferred to use force powers. He was a talented duelist but his force powers far exceeded that. Him defeating the Jedi masters besides Windu was very much due to his skills, though obviously the novel made the fight slightly more detailed and over in what, 3 seconds? Once he defeated the Jedi, he wanted the symbol of hope they had destroyed. He even had all the kyber crystals in the empire's reach destroyed. That's why in RotJ, he (or was it Vader) comments that Luke built his own saber. That's a huge step in Jedi or sith growth, creating their own unique weapon. But Luke had to use a synthetic kyber crystal. The reason this is noteworthy is because naturalnatural ones create colors like blue and green. Yet synthetic ones create a red saber color. Luke had to painstakingly create a synthetic one himself and he managed to make it not red, something that symbolically mattered a lot to Luke. This takes place during the interlude from tesb and rotj. I'm pretty sure it was during the events of shadow of the empire. But yeah. Emperor hated sabers, felt they were beneath him and doubled down in his hatred of them after windu melted his face.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 01/27/18 1:17:50 PM #52:	Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant In fact much of that is the direct opposite of canon --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:894908498] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant In fact much of that is the direct opposite of canon</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:20:51 PM #53:	RebelElite791 posted... Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894908644] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant</quote> Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 01/27/18 1:22:59 PM #54:	gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:894908744] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant</quote> Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something</quote> Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:29:52 PM #55:	RebelElite791 posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth Novelizations help explain details that were originally intended by the director (Lucas), therefore taking note of it is extremely helpful. Especially since the blanket canon wipe of most everything destroys a LOT of details that helped make the universe make sense. If it isn't canon then most details (like the one this topic is about) become impossible to actually address because there's zero supplemental information with which to respond. Literally the answer is "Because." --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894909077] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant</quote> Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something</quote> Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth</quote> Novelizations help explain details that were originally intended by the director (Lucas), therefore taking note of it is extremely helpful. Especially since the blanket canon wipe of most everything destroys a LOT of details that helped make the universe make sense. If it isn't canon then most details (like the one this topic is about) become impossible to actually address because there's zero supplemental information with which to respond. Literally the answer is "Because."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 01/27/18 1:31:01 PM #56:	You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways. --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:894909122] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tyranthraxus 01/27/18 1:31:56 PM #57:	gunplagirl posted... Literally the answer is "Because." As of TPM that is the canon answer. There was actually a meaning to the colors until Samuel L Jackson threw a fit about wanting to have a purple lightsaber. --- https://puu.sh/tcLsT/24f4611235.png https://i.imgur.com/dQgC4kv.jpg <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:894909177] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>Literally the answer is "Because."</quote> As of TPM that is the canon answer. There was actually a meaning to the colors until Samuel L Jackson threw a fit about wanting to have a purple lightsaber.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 01/27/18 1:34:44 PM #58:	Tyranthraxus posted... gunplagirl posted... Literally the answer is "Because." As of TPM that is the canon answer. There was actually a meaning to the colors until Samuel L Jackson threw a fit about wanting to have a purple lightsaber. No there wasn't. Any meaning was just EU bs. They made Luke's saber green because it stood out better against a blue sky --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:894909334] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>Literally the answer is "Because."</quote> As of TPM that is the canon answer. There was actually a meaning to the colors until Samuel L Jackson threw a fit about wanting to have a purple lightsaber.</quote> No there wasn't. Any meaning was just EU bs. They made Luke's saber green because it stood out better against a blue sky</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 01/27/18 1:35:35 PM #59:	gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth Novelizations help explain details that were originally intended by the director (Lucas), therefore taking note of it is extremely helpful. Especially since the blanket canon wipe of most everything destroys a LOT of details that helped make the universe make sense. If it isn't canon then most details (like the one this topic is about) become impossible to actually address because there's zero supplemental information with which to respond. Literally the answer is "Because." That is blatantly untrue. Why would he have made a scene where Shaak Ti dies in RotS, when she dies differently in the novel? --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:894909382] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant</quote> Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something</quote> Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth</quote> Novelizations help explain details that were originally intended by the director (Lucas), therefore taking note of it is extremely helpful. Especially since the blanket canon wipe of most everything destroys a LOT of details that helped make the universe make sense. If it isn't canon then most details (like the one this topic is about) become impossible to actually address because there's zero supplemental information with which to respond. Literally the answer is "Because."</quote> That is blatantly untrue. Why would he have made a scene where Shaak Ti dies in RotS, when she dies differently in the novel?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:37:24 PM #60:	RebelElite791 posted... You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways. Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894909496] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways.</quote> Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:39:32 PM #61:	jumi posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth Novelizations help explain details that were originally intended by the director (Lucas), therefore taking note of it is extremely helpful. Especially since the blanket canon wipe of most everything destroys a LOT of details that helped make the universe make sense. If it isn't canon then most details (like the one this topic is about) become impossible to actually address because there's zero supplemental information with which to respond. Literally the answer is "Because." That is blatantly untrue. Why would he have made a scene where Shaak Ti dies in RotS, when she dies differently in the novel? Weren't there two scenes where she dies and both were deleted scenes? --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894909602] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Literally none of that is canon or remotely relevant</quote> Novelizations of the films themselves are canon, and given the context that they existed to fill in the blanks? It helps explain a lot. And it is totally relevant. Now if you said "it's not canon and therefore not relevant" you'd maybe have been onto something</quote> Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) are not canon. Synthetic crystals do not exist. There are plenty of kyber left in the galaxy. Kyber produce almost any color upon attuning to a Jedi. Sith bleed their crystals by forcing them to their will, hence the red, they are not synth</quote> Novelizations help explain details that were originally intended by the director (Lucas), therefore taking note of it is extremely helpful. Especially since the blanket canon wipe of most everything destroys a LOT of details that helped make the universe make sense. If it isn't canon then most details (like the one this topic is about) become impossible to actually address because there's zero supplemental information with which to respond. Literally the answer is "Because."</quote> That is blatantly untrue. Why would he have made a scene where Shaak Ti dies in RotS, when she dies differently in the novel?</quote> Weren't there two scenes where she dies and both were deleted scenes?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
jumi 01/27/18 1:44:23 PM #62:	The only scene I remember was ~~the deleted scene where Grievous kills her onboard that ship in the beginning.~~ In the novel ~~Anakin kills her at the Jedi Temple.~~ --- XBL Gamertag: Rob Thorsman Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/robertvsilvers <cite>jumi posted [p:894909852] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>The only scene I remember was the deleted scene where Grievous kills her onboard that ship in the beginning. In the novel Anakin kills her at the Jedi Temple.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:48:43 PM #63:	jumi posted... The only scene I remember was ~~the deleted scene where Grievous kills her onboard that ship in the beginning.~~ In the novel ~~Anakin kills her at the Jedi Temple.~~ Deleted scenes have never been canon, mismatches like that with the actual story happened with other instances Also ~~starkiller in TFU killed her~~ But current canon says wobbly wobbly order 69y --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894910076] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>jumi posted...</cite> <quote>The only scene I remember was the deleted scene where Grievous kills her onboard that ship in the beginning. In the novel Anakin kills her at the Jedi Temple.</quote> Deleted scenes have never been canon, mismatches like that with the actual story happened with other instances Also starkiller in TFU killed her But current canon says wobbly wobbly order 69y</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 01/27/18 1:49:22 PM #64:	gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways. Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact. --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:894910094] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways.</quote> Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much</quote> LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 1:55:35 PM #65:	RebelElite791 posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways. Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact. waits for proof that verifies this claim --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894910423] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways.</quote> Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much</quote> LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact.</quote> waits for proof that verifies this claim</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 01/27/18 1:56:24 PM #66:	RebelElite791 posted... Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie) Is there an official statement about this? I mean about how the TFA novelization is canon except for when it contradicts the movie. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:894910462] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>Novelizations pre TFA (and only then when it doesnt contradict the movie)</quote> Is there an official statement about this? I mean about how the TFA novelization is canon except for when it contradicts the movie.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hyperpsycho 01/27/18 2:02:43 PM #67:	I hope the Holiday Special is still canon. --- https://i.imgur.com/ZrnUI3A.jpg ~ drawn by United_World <cite>hyperpsycho posted [p:894910797] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>I hope the Holiday Special is still canon.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 2:04:28 PM #68:	hyperpsycho posted... I hope the Holiday Special is still canon. Or the ewok movie. <.< --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894910893] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>hyperpsycho posted...</cite> <quote>I hope the Holiday Special is still canon.</quote> Or the ewok movie. <.<</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RebelElite791 01/27/18 2:05:58 PM #69:	gunplagirl posted... waits for proof that verifies this claim Everything pre-2014 with the exceptions of the movies, Son of Dathomir, and the TCW movie and series were declared non-canon when Disney bought LFL http://www.starwars.com/news/the-legendary-star-wars-expanded-universe-turns-a-new-page http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon As of April 25, 2014, the only previously published materials that are considered canon are the six Star Wars films, the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series and film, and the stand-alone Dark Horse Comics arc Star Wars: Darth MaulSon of Dathomir. Meanwhile, the Expanded Universe is no longer considered canon and was re-termed as the "Legends" brand. Most Star Wars material released after April 25, 2014with some exceptionsis composed in collaboration with the Lucasfilm Story Group, making it part of the "new canon." This is a basic fucking fact of canon that literally everyone who knows anything about Star Wars is aware of. Stick to a topic that you know even the slightest bit about please. scar the 1 posted... Is there an official statement about this? I mean about how the TFA novelization is canon except for when it contradicts the movie. They were said to be canon(ish), but when people pointed out that Rey and Poe meet in the TFA novelization, and asked Pablo how that works when they meet in TLJ, he said defer to the movie, because the novelizations are written often before the movie comes out and the scene of them meeting was cut from TFA but made it to the book. --- http://i.imgur.com/MS5SvzN.gif https://i.imgur.com/ahQpG57.jpg <cite>RebelElite791 posted [p:894910975] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>waits for proof that verifies this claim</quote> Everything pre-2014 with the exceptions of the movies, Son of Dathomir, and the TCW movie and series were declared non-canon when Disney bought LFL http://www.starwars.com/news/the-legendary-star-wars-expanded-universe-turns-a-new-page http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon As of April 25, 2014, the only previously published materials that are considered canon are the six Star Wars films, the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series and film, and the stand-alone Dark Horse Comics arc Star Wars: Darth MaulSon of Dathomir. Meanwhile, the Expanded Universe is no longer considered canon and was re-termed as the "Legends" brand. Most Star Wars material released after April 25, 2014with some exceptionsis composed in collaboration with the Lucasfilm Story Group, making it part of the "new canon." This is a basic fucking fact of canon that literally everyone who knows anything about Star Wars is aware of. Stick to a topic that you know even the slightest bit about please. <cite>scar the 1 posted...</cite> <quote>Is there an official statement about this? I mean about how the TFA novelization is canon except for when it contradicts the movie.</quote> They were said to be canon(ish), but when people pointed out that Rey and Poe meet in the TFA novelization, and asked Pablo how that works when they meet in TLJ, he said defer to the movie, because the novelizations are written often before the movie comes out and the scene of them meeting was cut from TFA but made it to the book.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
glitteringfairy 01/27/18 2:13:27 PM #70:	gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways. Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact. waits for proof that verifies this claim Well I don't think he knows more than me but he certainly knows more than most of CE including you. I'm a star wars fanatic, I have an entire room in my house dedicated to it and I rarely find any arguments against rebels star wars knowledge --- "How come you can believe in God but not Bigfoot?" V-E-G-Y http://i.imgur.com/AqR3aeX.jpg http://i.imgur.com/vvuUXpp.jpg https://imgur.com/r9xK2NR <cite>glitteringfairy posted [p:894911366] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways.</quote> Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much</quote> LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact.</quote> waits for proof that verifies this claim</quote> Well I don't think he knows more than me but he certainly knows more than most of CE including you. I'm a star wars fanatic, I have an entire room in my house dedicated to it and I rarely find any arguments against rebels star wars knowledge</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 2:17:55 PM #71:	glitteringfairy posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... gunplagirl posted... RebelElite791 posted... You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways. Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact. waits for proof that verifies this claim Well I don't think he knows more than me but he certainly knows more than most of CE including you. I'm a star wars fanatic, I have an entire room in my house dedicated to it and I rarely find any arguments against rebels star wars knowledge How many Jawa with vinyl capes in original packaging do you have? I never actually expect a number other than 0 but tbh I want to see a pic of one that isn't just some toy collection archive pic. --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894911579] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>glitteringfairy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>You just said they were canon. They aren't. Stop backpedaling. And no, not everything in the novelizations was per Lucas anyways.</quote> Read what I said again in both parts. I said novelizations are canon and provide supplemental details that the films failed to adequately provide. This was true of EU as well. I never retracted that point, I addressed your point so as to arrive at the "the answer is 'because' now" bit. That's not backpedaling. It's qualifying a point. You really shouldn't start an argument if you don't even understand that much</quote> LOL I guarantee I know far more about Star Wars than you and probably anyone on this board. They aren't canon. This. Is. A. Fact.</quote> waits for proof that verifies this claim</quote> Well I don't think he knows more than me but he certainly knows more than most of CE including you. I'm a star wars fanatic, I have an entire room in my house dedicated to it and I rarely find any arguments against rebels star wars knowledge</quote> How many Jawa with vinyl capes in original packaging do you have? I never actually expect a number other than 0 but tbh I want to see a pic of one that isn't just some toy collection archive pic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
scar the 1 01/27/18 2:19:08 PM #72:	RebelElite791 posted... They were said to be canon(ish), but when people pointed out that Rey and Poe meet in the TFA novelization, and asked Pablo how that works when they meet in TLJ, he said defer to the movie, because the novelizations are written often before the movie comes out and the scene of them meeting was cut from TFA but made it to the book. Alright, so they can't really be said to be canon. There are tons of small details in the novelization that contradict or are different from the movie, after all. --- Everything has an end, except for the sausage. It has two. <cite>scar the 1 posted [p:894911645] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote>They were said to be canon(ish), but when people pointed out that Rey and Poe meet in the TFA novelization, and asked Pablo how that works when they meet in TLJ, he said defer to the movie, because the novelizations are written often before the movie comes out and the scene of them meeting was cut from TFA but made it to the book.</quote> Alright, so they can't really be said to be canon. There are tons of small details in the novelization that contradict or are different from the movie, after all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 2:23:05 PM #73:	RebelElite791 posted... I meant that you know more than everyone on ce. --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894911852] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> I meant that you know more than everyone on ce.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Funbazooka 01/27/18 2:44:48 PM #74:	I've grown to enjoy some outrageous bits of Palpatine's dueling. His duel with Yoda still belongs in the trash though. --- I'll defend any man's Funbazooka! <cite>Funbazooka posted [p:894912959] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>I've grown to enjoy some outrageous bits of Palpatine's dueling. His duel with Yoda still belongs in the trash though. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ViewtifulGrave 01/27/18 2:48:56 PM #75:	Lol at all the people talking out of their ass and/or using out dated information. --- You enjoy teaching high schoolers, and I'll enjoy creating my crappy manga. Let's see where we both are in a year. TheDoorMouse Update http://imgur.com/vz0c9xf <cite>ViewtifulGrave posted [p:894913172] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>Lol at all the people talking out of their ass and/or using out dated information.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kuwab0 01/27/18 3:32:36 PM #76:	An Online Class --- http://i.imgur.com/QfpP05s.png http://i.imgur.com/vdnZ1o6.png http://i.imgur.com/zTgf822.png <cite>kuwab0 posted [p:894915293] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>An Online Class</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gunplagirl 01/27/18 9:11:08 PM #77:	kuwab0 posted... An Online Class You think that scam colleges for the force existed a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away? "Hut University is a scam!" --- Pokemon Moon FC: 1994-2190-5020 IGN: Vanessa <cite>gunplagirl posted [p:894933725] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>kuwab0 posted...</cite> <quote>An Online Class</quote> You think that scam colleges for the force existed a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away? "Hut University is a scam!"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OrangeCrush980 01/28/18 5:21:54 AM #78:	Expanded Universe is still the real canon. Episodes 7 and 8 are bad fanfiction. --- "Total sentence imposed is ten [years in the state prison]" - Lyrics of "Knight of Fire" boss theme in Xenogears <cite>OrangeCrush980 posted [p:894953936] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>Expanded Universe is still the real canon. Episodes 7 and 8 are bad fanfiction.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
au_gold 01/28/18 5:48:02 AM #79:	7 was good at least. 8 was a mess. --- Let me talk to your mother. Get your mother please. <cite>au_gold posted [p:894954443] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote>7 was good at least. 8 was a mess.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
dave_is_slick 01/28/18 6:03:21 AM #80:	RebelElite791 posted... Tyranthraxus posted... gunplagirl posted... Literally the answer is "Because." As of TPM that is the canon answer. There was actually a meaning to the colors until Samuel L Jackson threw a fit about wanting to have a purple lightsaber. No there wasn't. Any meaning was just EU bs. They made Luke's saber green because it stood out better against a blue sky No, I would've bet my life I've seen you bitch about literally the exact opposite before. --- The most relaxing version of Aquatic Ambiance I've ever heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bl61y1XM7sM <cite>dave_is_slick posted [p:894954798] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>RebelElite791 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Tyranthraxus posted...</cite> <quote><cite>gunplagirl posted...</cite> <quote>Literally the answer is "Because."</quote> As of TPM that is the canon answer. There was actually a meaning to the colors until Samuel L Jackson threw a fit about wanting to have a purple lightsaber.</quote> No there wasn't. Any meaning was just EU bs. They made Luke's saber green because it stood out better against a blue sky</quote> No, I would've bet my life I've seen you bitch about literally the exact opposite before.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CarlGrimes 01/28/18 6:20:15 AM #81:	BruceWayneJr posted... Ever wonder why Grievous uses lightsabers? He certainly isn't a Jedi or a Sith. He was an avid collector of lighsabers. --- You'll get a funeral if you don't wise up and call me....Carl Poppa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9aM9Ch97U8 <cite>CarlGrimes posted [p:894955130] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>BruceWayneJr posted...</cite> <quote>Ever wonder why Grievous uses lightsabers? He certainly isn't a Jedi or a Sith.</quote> He was an avid collector of lighsabers.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
bulletproofvita 01/28/18 6:28:16 AM #82:	Steve Nick posted... au_gold posted... BruceWayneJr posted... Ever wonder why Grievous uses lightsabers? He certainly isn't a Jedi or a Sith. Dooku trained him. Who would win? One four armed mechanical monster with four light sabers, or one Obi-boi? Hello there --- PSN: bulletproofvita <cite>bulletproofvita posted [p:894955270] in Where did ... [t:76248561]...</cite> <quote><cite>Steve Nick posted...</cite> <quote><cite>au_gold posted...</cite> <quote><cite>BruceWayneJr posted...</cite> <quote>Ever wonder why Grievous uses lightsabers? He certainly isn't a Jedi or a Sith.</quote> Dooku trained him.</quote> Who would win? One four armed mechanical monster with four light sabers, or one Obi-boi?</quote> Hello there</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > Where did Palpatine learn to use a lightsaber? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Where did Palpatine learn to use a lightsaber?