Current Events > Tyler Barriss charged with involuntary manslaughter for swatting

(+) Yeah! (+)

hockeybub89 posted...

KingCrabCake posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

And somehow nothing will happen to the cops.

Good

So now they're just mindless automatons used by a troll?

I never said that.
---

KingCrabCake posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

KingCrabCake posted...

hockeybub89 posted...

And somehow nothing will happen to the cops.

Good

So now they're just mindless automatons used by a troll?

I never said that.

Well then goose and gander and all that
---

I have to say I'm terrified to know committing a murder could be as easy as making up a story for the cops and knowing they'll drive to the alleged problem and shoot it first and ask questions later. No accountability. They apparently have emotions but no free will.
---

hockeybub89 posted...

I have to say I'm terrified to know committing a murder could be as easy as making up a story for the cops and knowing they'll drive to the alleged problem and shoot it first and ask questions later. No accountability. They apparently have emotions but no free will.

Sure
---

KingCrabCake posted...

darkjedilink posted...

I never said they didn't. However, by using THAT as the excuse for cops to kill unarmed, law-abiding citizens, you're arguing that the lives of cops are worth more than the lives of unarmed, law-abiding citizens. I reject that argument wholly.

I MIGHT respond to the idea that MORE cops die as a result of a seemingly-unarmed person killing a cop, but in order to make that claim, I want to see the number of cops shot by seemingly-unarmed persons shooting a police officer who had his firearm trained on the suspect, and compare it to the number of times police kill an unarmed man who committed no hostile act.

And, no, simply moving your arm isn't a hostile act.

Okay we will disagree here and thankfully judges and the laws of america disagree with your silly logic as well.

You realize that you're arguing that it's silly to think cops shouldn't kill innocent, unarmed people...
---

fair
---

darkjedilink posted...

KingCrabCake posted...

darkjedilink posted...

I never said they didn't. However, by using THAT as the excuse for cops to kill unarmed, law-abiding citizens, you're arguing that the lives of cops are worth more than the lives of unarmed, law-abiding citizens. I reject that argument wholly.

I MIGHT respond to the idea that MORE cops die as a result of a seemingly-unarmed person killing a cop, but in order to make that claim, I want to see the number of cops shot by seemingly-unarmed persons shooting a police officer who had his firearm trained on the suspect, and compare it to the number of times police kill an unarmed man who committed no hostile act.

And, no, simply moving your arm isn't a hostile act.

Okay we will disagree here and thankfully judges and the laws of america disagree with your silly logic as well.

You realize that you're arguing that it's silly to think cops shouldn't kill innocent, unarmed people...

Cause i understand context
---

DifferentialEquation posted...

The guy's picture is here: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/12/30/los-angeles-man-arrested-after-swatting-call-led-innocent-mans-death-kansas/992615001/

He might have the most punchable face of all time.

I'd love to see him crying in pain.
---

Has anyone ever had a civil and mature debate with @KingCrabCake or do they all end up this way? Cuz I've seen him do this a bunch of times and every debate I've had with him ends with him acting in this same exact manner. I just can't imagine being such a child that you'd enjoy conversing like this as often as that kid does.
---

@nicklebro posted...

Has anyone ever had a civil and mature debate with KingCrabCake or do they all end up this way? Cuz I've seen him do this a bunch of times and every debate I've had with him ends with him acting in this same exact manner. I just can't imagine being such a child that you'd enjoy conversing like this as often as that kid does.

You mean that i constantly get attacked instead of debated? Im always the one on the defense. Even your comment is a passive aggressive bullshit post. The left cannot have a mature conversation
---

KingCrabCake posted...

@nicklebro posted...

Has anyone ever had a civil and mature debate with KingCrabCake or do they all end up this way? Cuz I've seen him do this a bunch of times and every debate I've had with him ends with him acting in this same exact manner. I just can't imagine being such a child that you'd enjoy conversing like this as often as that kid does.

You mean that i constantly get attacked instead of debated? Im always the one on the defense. Even your comment is a passive aggressive bullshit post. The left cannot have a mature conversation

Lmao oh I see you're just an innocent victim who always ends up in flame wars because it's everyone else's fault. You're just there sincerely trying to have a polite debate with people you just claimed are incapable of having a mature discussion.

Lmao no one is buying that nonsense dude. Everyone who's seen you post knows that you resort to trolling and name calling basically immediately.

But look, if you just clean it up and start actually trying to be a mature poster, then that will all change. Even if someone attacks you first you don't have to sink down to their level and act like a petulant child as well. Just maintain your composure and no matter what nonsense they throw at you, you'll come off as the reasonable mature adult and they'll be exposed. It's what I've done to you numerous times and it always works. You can do it too tho. Just sacrifice your instant gratification posts for the mature posts that pay off in the long run. People will like you a lot more if you do that, plus it'll make you the consensus victor in a lot more debates.
---

nicklebro posted...

Lmao oh I see you're just an innocent victim who always ends up in flame wars because it's everyone else's fault. You're just there sincerely trying to have a polite debate with people you just claimed are incapable of having a mature discussion.

You literally came into a topic that was dead just to insult me...

Lmao no one is buying that nonsense dude. Everyone who's seen you post knows that you resort to trolling and name calling basically immediately.

I only name call once its done to me. So theres that.

But look, if you just clean it up and start actually trying to be a mature poster, then that will all change. Even if someone attacks you first you don't have to sink down to their level and act like a petulant child as well. Just maintain your composure and no matter what nonsense they throw at you, you'll come off as the reasonable mature adult and they'll be exposed. It's what I've done to you numerous times and it always works. You can do it too tho. Just sacrifice your instant gratification posts for the mature posts that pay off in the long run. People will like you a lot more if you do that, plus it'll make you the consensus victor in a lot more debates.

You're always riding some high horse and its quite confusing
---

Imagine responding to nickelbackbro seriously.
---

thelovefist posted...

Imagine responding to nickelbackbro seriously.

Eh i usually dont. He's a lying welcher.
---

KingCrabCake posted...

You literally came into a topic that was dead just to insult me...

I don't post here every day so I respond to a lot of old topics. But nothing you just said refutes my post, so I guess you're just ceding that point.

KingCrabCake posted...

I only name call once its done to me. So theres that.

I don't believe you. You've called me names since before I knew who you were. And I've seen you do it to other people.

KingCrabCake posted...

You're always riding some high horse and its quite confusing

I'm trying to help you become a better poster. Sure that may sound condescending, but how else am I supposed to word it? You're a pretty immature, rough around the edges poster. This is a fact. I'm giving you suggestions on how to be better. There's no way for me to do that without giving you an excuse to claim I'm "riding some high horse"
---

KingCrabCake posted...

thelovefist posted...

Imagine responding to nickelbackbro seriously.

Eh i usually dont. He's a lying welcher.

Dude I'm the one you should be taking seriously, not that guy, his entire life is dedicated to trolling. He literally does nothing else. You at least have to get sucked into trolling or work your way up to it, you don't seem to come online with the sole intention of trolling as hard as possible. Thelovefist does.

Oh and he's an actual welcher btw, like in a one on one bet with someone else. So careful who you make friends with.
---

nicklebro posted...

KingCrabCake posted...

You literally came into a topic that was dead just to insult me...

I don't post here every day so I respond to a lot of old topics. But nothing you just said refutes my post, so I guess you're just ceding that point.

KingCrabCake posted...

I only name call once its done to me. So theres that.

I don't believe you. You've called me names since before I knew who you were. And I've seen you do it to other people.

KingCrabCake posted...

You're always riding some high horse and its quite confusing

I'm trying to help you become a better poster. Sure that may sound condescending, but how else am I supposed to word it? You're a pretty immature, rough around the edges poster. This is a fact. I'm giving you suggestions on how to be better. There's no way for me to do that without giving you an excuse to claim I'm "riding some high horse"

Youre a literal liar and welcher soooo theres that
---

Sign... Ok man. I tried. I hope things work out for you.
---

nicklebro posted...

Sign... Ok man. I tried. I hope things work out for you.

Okay hopefully you close your account and stop lying
---