Current Events > Should these MtF trans women be legally required to use the male restroom?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
tennisdude818 12/24/17 7:08:31 PM #103:	CiIantro posted... tennisdude818 posted... Regressives cant argue with that. lol your argument is invalidated the moment you start calling names. Thats not how it works. If I say, youre wrong because youre just an X and then drop the mic, you would have a point. But the fact I used a word you dont like at the end of a post doesnt invalidate anything. --- "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." -Thomas Sowell <cite>tennisdude818 posted [p:892812034] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tennisdude818 posted...</cite> <quote>Regressives cant argue with that.</quote> lol your argument is invalidated the moment you start calling names.</quote> Thats not how it works. If I say, youre wrong because youre just an X and then drop the mic, you would have a point. But the fact I used a word you dont like at the end of a post doesnt invalidate anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CiIantro 12/24/17 9:03:20 PM #104:	tennisdude818 posted... CiIantro posted... tennisdude818 posted... Regressives cant argue with that. lol your argument is invalidated the moment you start calling names. Thats not how it works. If I say, youre wrong because youre just an X and then drop the mic, you would have a point. But the fact I used a word you dont like at the end of a post doesnt invalidate anything. Nope. Only children call names. You will never be taken seriously if you do it. <cite>CiIantro posted [p:892817431] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>tennisdude818 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>tennisdude818 posted...</cite> <quote>Regressives cant argue with that.</quote> lol your argument is invalidated the moment you start calling names.</quote> Thats not how it works. If I say, youre wrong because youre just an X and then drop the mic, you would have a point. But the fact I used a word you dont like at the end of a post doesnt invalidate anything.</quote> Nope. Only children call names. You will never be taken seriously if you do it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/25/17 4:54:39 AM #105:	CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:892832510] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CiIantro 12/25/17 1:59:21 PM #106:	nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow. <cite>CiIantro posted [p:892847867] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/25/17 4:30:43 PM #107:	CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow. You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men? --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:892854540] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow.</quote> You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
einegutePerson 12/25/17 4:32:16 PM #108:	Duncanwii posted... Sayoria posted... I really need to shape my body more. With clothes on, I have a good shape, but I still have a belly. I need to get rid of it, but I need like.... a dedicated workout buddy as well as more time. I never have time to go. Aw, I'm sure you look fine. --- im a good person <cite>einegutePerson posted [p:892854598] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>Duncanwii posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sayoria posted...</cite> <quote>I really need to shape my body more. With clothes on, I have a good shape, but I still have a belly. I need to get rid of it, but I need like.... a dedicated workout buddy as well as more time. I never have time to go.</quote> Aw, I'm sure you look fine.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CiIantro 12/25/17 5:35:30 PM #109:	nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow. You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men? lol even my grandmother is less uptight than you <cite>CiIantro posted [p:892857146] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow.</quote> You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men?</quote> lol even my grandmother is less uptight than you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Turbam 12/25/17 5:37:44 PM #110:	I don't really care, that's not my fight --- ~snip (V)_(;,;)_(V) snip~ I'm just one man! Whoa! Well, I'm a one man band! http://i.imgur.com/p9Xvjvs.gif <cite>Turbam posted [p:892857261] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote>I don't really care, that's not my fight</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/25/17 6:47:37 PM #111:	CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow. You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men? lol even my grandmother is less uptight than you Your grandmother shits in front of men? Your grandma is fucking nuts. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:892860255] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow.</quote> You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men?</quote> lol even my grandmother is less uptight than you</quote> Your grandmother shits in front of men? Your grandma is fucking nuts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CiIantro 12/25/17 8:00:52 PM #112:	nicklebro posted... Your grandmother shits in front of men? Your grandma is fucking nuts. You seem to be under the impression that bathrooms don't have privacy stalls. <cite>CiIantro posted [p:892863388] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>Your grandmother shits in front of men? Your grandma is fucking nuts.</quote> You seem to be under the impression that bathrooms don't have privacy stalls.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/25/17 8:42:30 PM #113:	CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... Your grandmother shits in front of men? Your grandma is fucking nuts. You seem to be under the impression that bathrooms don't have privacy stalls. Man, so uptight! Why have privacy stalls? How prudish can one person be? --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:892865402] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>Your grandmother shits in front of men? Your grandma is fucking nuts.</quote> You seem to be under the impression that bathrooms don't have privacy stalls.</quote> Man, so uptight! Why have privacy stalls? How prudish can one person be?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LepartialJury 12/28/17 3:39:22 AM #114:	nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow. You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men? And what's the argument against it other than eww it's icky or tradition? There's one I can think of- the possibility of sexual harassment/assault. I'd like to see the actual statistics on that though --- Simple-straight-narrow <cite>LepartialJury posted [p:892992236] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> LOL should women not be allowed to show their ankles either? The Victorian era was a shitshow.</quote> You're comparing women not showing their ankles to not pissing and shitting in front of men?</quote> And what's the argument against it other than eww it's icky or tradition? There's one I can think of- the possibility of sexual harassment/assault. I'd like to see the actual statistics on that though</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thronedfire2 12/28/17 3:41:53 AM #115:	nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... nicklebro posted... CiIantro posted... Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles) wat Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety. That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner. but..why is it improper? we do the same shit(pun fully intended) in there --- I could see you, but I couldn't hear you You were holding your hat in the breeze Turning away from me In this moment you were stolen... <cite>thronedfire2 posted [p:892992305] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CiIantro posted...</cite> <quote>Honestly, the idea of segregated bathrooms is pretty stupid and is only a thing because it got started in the Victorian era (the same era where women couldnt show their ankles)</quote> wat</quote> Women were originally given their own bathrooms because it was "improper" for them to be near a man while he did his business. It had nothing to do with safety.</quote> That doesn't mean they're stupid. Its still improper for men and women to use the bathroom near each other, and I think its totally rational for society to operate in that manner.</quote> but..why is it improper? we do the same shit(pun fully intended) in there</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/28/17 5:02:47 PM #116:	LepartialJury posted... And what's the argument against it other than eww it's icky or tradition? There's one I can think of- the possibility of sexual harassment/assault. I'd like to see the actual statistics on that though Why aren't those legitimate reasons to you? I've never heard anyone say we shouldn't have separate bathrooms. thronedfire2 posted... but..why is it improper? we do the same shit(pun fully intended) in there It just is, its self evident. Like why do we wear clothes? Even people who live in the hottest areas on earth still feel shame at exposing their fully naked bodies. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893023770] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote> And what's the argument against it other than eww it's icky or tradition? There's one I can think of- the possibility of sexual harassment/assault. I'd like to see the actual statistics on that though</quote> Why aren't those legitimate reasons to you? I've never heard anyone say we shouldn't have separate bathrooms. <cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote> but..why is it improper? we do the same shit(pun fully intended) in there</quote> It just is, its self evident. Like why do we wear clothes? Even people who live in the hottest areas on earth still feel shame at exposing their fully naked bodies.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LepartialJury 12/30/17 3:07:55 AM #117:	nicklebro posted... LepartialJury posted... And what's the argument against it other than eww it's icky or tradition? There's one I can think of- the possibility of sexual harassment/assault. I'd like to see the actual statistics on that though Why aren't those legitimate reasons to you? I've never heard anyone say we shouldn't have separate bathrooms. thronedfire2 posted... but..why is it improper? we do the same shit(pun fully intended) in there It just is, its self evident. Like why do we wear clothes? Even people who live in the hottest areas on earth still feel shame at exposing their fully naked bodies. Because it's an outdated way of thinking. It's the same arguments made against homosexuality or sex before marriage. Let me guess, you're against that too. And we wear clothes because it protects our most sensitive spots. Most people will wear shoes in the hottest areas too. --- Simple-straight-narrow <cite>LepartialJury posted [p:893108965] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote> And what's the argument against it other than eww it's icky or tradition? There's one I can think of- the possibility of sexual harassment/assault. I'd like to see the actual statistics on that though</quote> Why aren't those legitimate reasons to you? I've never heard anyone say we shouldn't have separate bathrooms. <cite>thronedfire2 posted...</cite> <quote> but..why is it improper? we do the same shit(pun fully intended) in there</quote> It just is, its self evident. Like why do we wear clothes? Even people who live in the hottest areas on earth still feel shame at exposing their fully naked bodies.</quote> Because it's an outdated way of thinking. It's the same arguments made against homosexuality or sex before marriage. Let me guess, you're against that too. And we wear clothes because it protects our most sensitive spots. Most people will wear shoes in the hottest areas too.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/31/17 1:17:11 AM #118:	LepartialJury posted... Because it's an outdated way of thinking. It's the same arguments made against homosexuality or sex before marriage. Let me guess, you're against that too. And we wear clothes because it protects our most sensitive spots. Most people will wear shoes in the hottest areas too. Its outdated because what? Because you say so? And don't try to compare it to arguments against homosexuality, they're totally different topics. And just like everything else you've said, you're dead wrong about me being against that too. Lol and do you seriously think the only reason we wear clothes is for protection? That's seriously going to be your argument? Man, you're impossible to take seriously. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893159092] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote> Because it's an outdated way of thinking. It's the same arguments made against homosexuality or sex before marriage. Let me guess, you're against that too. And we wear clothes because it protects our most sensitive spots. Most people will wear shoes in the hottest areas too. </quote> Its outdated because what? Because you say so? And don't try to compare it to arguments against homosexuality, they're totally different topics. And just like everything else you've said, you're dead wrong about me being against that too. Lol and do you seriously think the only reason we wear clothes is for protection? That's seriously going to be your argument? Man, you're impossible to take seriously.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LepartialJury 12/31/17 1:52:10 AM #119:	nicklebro posted... LepartialJury posted... Because it's an outdated way of thinking. It's the same arguments made against homosexuality or sex before marriage. Let me guess, you're against that too. And we wear clothes because it protects our most sensitive spots. Most people will wear shoes in the hottest areas too. Its outdated because what? Because you say so? And don't try to compare it to arguments against homosexuality, they're totally different topics. And just like everything else you've said, you're dead wrong about me being against that too. Lol and do you seriously think the only reason we wear clothes is for protection? That's seriously going to be your argument? Man, you're impossible to take seriously. It's outdated because it's completely irrational and stems from emotion. It's exactly the same arguments made against homosexuality and other social issues. Why can't they be compared? Just because you say so and it hurts your irrational mindset? I'm surprised you're aren't against homosexuality because the logic you're using is the same thing so you're really just being inconsistent in order to ride on a popular opinion. There is one other reason that we wear clothes (though that doesn't apply to restrooms) but I'll let you answer it yourself since if you're ignorant enough to not know I'm not going to give the answers to you. And lol at the idea of the loser who gets warned/suspended on a constant basis for being a trash person talking about taking things seriously. --- Simple-straight-narrow <cite>LepartialJury posted [p:893160296] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote> Because it's an outdated way of thinking. It's the same arguments made against homosexuality or sex before marriage. Let me guess, you're against that too. And we wear clothes because it protects our most sensitive spots. Most people will wear shoes in the hottest areas too. </quote> Its outdated because what? Because you say so? And don't try to compare it to arguments against homosexuality, they're totally different topics. And just like everything else you've said, you're dead wrong about me being against that too. Lol and do you seriously think the only reason we wear clothes is for protection? That's seriously going to be your argument? Man, you're impossible to take seriously.</quote> It's outdated because it's completely irrational and stems from emotion. It's exactly the same arguments made against homosexuality and other social issues. Why can't they be compared? Just because you say so and it hurts your irrational mindset? I'm surprised you're aren't against homosexuality because the logic you're using is the same thing so you're really just being inconsistent in order to ride on a popular opinion. There is one other reason that we wear clothes (though that doesn't apply to restrooms) but I'll let you answer it yourself since if you're ignorant enough to not know I'm not going to give the answers to you. And lol at the idea of the loser who gets warned/suspended on a constant basis for being a trash person talking about taking things seriously.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
008Zulu 12/31/17 1:56:03 AM #120:	I imagine that there would be no issue if all the bathrooms were unisex, and not gender specific. --- Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer. <cite>008Zulu posted [p:893160417] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote>I imagine that there would be no issue if all the bathrooms were unisex, and not gender specific.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/31/17 2:00:08 AM #121:	LepartialJury posted... It's outdated because it's completely irrational and stems from emotion. It's exactly the same arguments made against homosexuality and other social issues. Why can't they be compared? Just because you say so and it hurts your irrational mindset? I'm surprised you're aren't against homosexuality because the logic you're using is the same thing so you're really just being inconsistent in order to ride on a popular opinion. There is one other reason that we wear clothes (though that doesn't apply to restrooms) but I'll let you answer it yourself since if you're ignorant enough to not know I'm not going to give the answers to you. And lol at the idea of the loser who gets warned/suspended on a constant basis for being a trash person talking about taking things seriously. You say its irrational, but there's plenty of rational reasons behind it. And something stemming from emotion doesn't mean its wrong. Lol you keep bringing up homosexuality despite there being literally nothing similar about the arguments at all. It isn't like people are begging to use the same bathroom. Its literally why you haven't actually been able to show how the arguments are similar at all, you just keep saying they are. Show me how one argument is replaceable with the other, if you can't, you're just wrong. Lol and what is a "constant" basis to you? I can't even remember the last time I was suspended, I just got warned for saying that the bald gene should die out. So that somehow makes me a loser and a trash person huh? Why you getting so emotional over this? --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893160555] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>LepartialJury posted...</cite> <quote> It's outdated because it's completely irrational and stems from emotion. It's exactly the same arguments made against homosexuality and other social issues. Why can't they be compared? Just because you say so and it hurts your irrational mindset? I'm surprised you're aren't against homosexuality because the logic you're using is the same thing so you're really just being inconsistent in order to ride on a popular opinion. There is one other reason that we wear clothes (though that doesn't apply to restrooms) but I'll let you answer it yourself since if you're ignorant enough to not know I'm not going to give the answers to you. And lol at the idea of the loser who gets warned/suspended on a constant basis for being a trash person talking about taking things seriously.</quote> You say its irrational, but there's plenty of rational reasons behind it. And something stemming from emotion doesn't mean its wrong. Lol you keep bringing up homosexuality despite there being literally nothing similar about the arguments at all. It isn't like people are begging to use the same bathroom. Its literally why you haven't actually been able to show how the arguments are similar at all, you just keep saying they are. Show me how one argument is replaceable with the other, if you can't, you're just wrong. Lol and what is a "constant" basis to you? I can't even remember the last time I was suspended, I just got warned for saying that the bald gene should die out. So that somehow makes me a loser and a trash person huh? Why you getting so emotional over this?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
nicklebro 12/31/17 2:02:21 AM #122:	008Zulu posted... I imagine that there would be no issue if all the bathrooms were unisex, and not gender specific. You don't think anyone would have a problem with it? Or you just wouldn't have a problem with it? I mean I wouldn't care personally, but I imagine quite a few women would not want to use the same bathroom as men for a plethora of reasons. Safety being a big one, as well as not feeling comfortable use the restroom around men. --- Now you can't call me a sigless user. <cite>nicklebro posted [p:893160631] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>008Zulu posted...</cite> <quote>I imagine that there would be no issue if all the bathrooms were unisex, and not gender specific.</quote> You don't think anyone would have a problem with it? Or you just wouldn't have a problem with it? I mean I wouldn't care personally, but I imagine quite a few women would not want to use the same bathroom as men for a plethora of reasons. Safety being a big one, as well as not feeling comfortable use the restroom around men.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
008Zulu 12/31/17 3:55:58 AM #123:	nicklebro posted... Safety being a big one, as well as not feeling comfortable use the restroom around men. Women are no safer in a women's bathroom, than they are in a unisex. --- Talent hits a target no one else can hit. Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer. <cite>008Zulu posted [p:893163829] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>Safety being a big one, as well as not feeling comfortable use the restroom around men.</quote> Women are no safer in a women's bathroom, than they are in a unisex.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
GiftedACIII 12/31/17 10:40:20 AM #124:	nicklebro posted... Lol and what is a "constant" basis to you? I can't even remember the last time I was suspended, I just got warned for saying that the bald gene should die out. So that somehow makes me a loser and a trash person huh? Why you getting so emotional over this? You literally got like a three month purgatory this year lol. Remember when you said you'd close your account if trump became president? Why is it still open? --- </topic> <cite>GiftedACIII posted [p:893172618] in Should the... [t:76063146]...</cite> <quote><cite>nicklebro posted...</cite> <quote>Lol and what is a "constant" basis to you? I can't even remember the last time I was suspended, I just got warned for saying that the bald gene should die out. So that somehow makes me a loser and a trash person huh? Why you getting so emotional over this?</quote> You literally got like a three month purgatory this year lol. Remember when you said you'd close your account if trump became president? Why is it still open?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Should these MtF trans women be legally required to use the male restroom? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Should these MtF trans women be legally required to use the male restroom?