Current Events > Physics question

Topic List
Page List: 1
Garioshi
10/17/17 9:50:45 AM
#1:


Particle colliders can create antimatter as a result of particle collision.
Annihilation creates a ridiculous amount of energy proportional to the mass annihilated.
Given these facts, could a particle collider create enough antimatter that the annihilation of that antimatter could power the particle collider to create more antimatter, and so on? Would that solve the problem of energy generation?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG
10/17/17 9:53:00 AM
#2:


idk but you'd still have to harness the energy and put it to practical use. Which means storing it in something and transporting it to where it needs to go.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro
10/17/17 9:53:07 AM
#3:


tl;dr: Can I perpetual motion?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Garioshi
10/17/17 9:57:12 AM
#4:


DevsBro posted...
tl;dr: Can I perpetual motion?

No, you'll eventually run out of matter.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Garioshi
10/17/17 10:12:14 AM
#5:


lilORANG posted...
idk but you'd still have to harness the energy and put it to practical use. Which means storing it in something and transporting it to where it needs to go.

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2010/11/17/antimatter-atoms/
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro
10/17/17 10:17:26 AM
#6:


Oh, I see. I read it wrong.

I don't know enough about how these work to give a complete answer but here's a thought at least:

Each iteration through the process requires a certain amount of energy and a certain amount of fuel, and produces a certain amount of energy and certain amoint of waste. The process can continue as long as one iteration produces more energy than it consumes, plus enough to cover losses due to friction, sound or what have you.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius
10/17/17 10:29:50 AM
#7:


DevsBro posted...
tl;dr: Can I perpetual motion?

Theoretically, but you'd never gain any net energy: all you'd end up doing is creating a closed system that oscillates between photons and leptons.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Garioshi
10/17/17 11:12:58 AM
#8:


Another physics question, could simple harmonic motion be achieved between two magnets?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
DevsBro
10/17/17 11:28:25 AM
#9:


Hm. Maybe. I'm a little rusty on.my physics, but I'll take a stab at it.

If one magnet were really strong and really far away and the other were tied to a pendulum or a spring, then yes, I would expect so.

Simple harmonic motion is defined by x''(t) = -kx, while magnetic force varies inversely with r^2, so at close proximities you could have some sort of oscillation but it would be more complex. Technically speaking, even at great distances the sitution would only be approximatable as SHM, but this is the case with a gravitational pendulum/spring system too.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Garioshi
10/17/17 12:08:23 PM
#10:


Looking at the mass-energy equivalence, it appears that almost all of the matter would have to be converted to antimatter, which is something that I'm pretty sure just doesn't happen. Oh well.
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius
10/17/17 1:17:46 PM
#11:


Garioshi posted...
Another physics question, could simple harmonic motion be achieved between two magnets?

You could probably rig something up with rare-earth magnets and bismuth.

https://cdn.instructables.com/FGQ/OSL5/FTNHEJ5C/FGQOSL5FTNHEJ5C.MEDIUM.jpg
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1