Current Events > Welp. Don't be racist and you won't get fucked up.

(+) Yeah! (+)

How was the dude able to get away without someone beating the fuck out of the sissy? As soon as he threw somebody should of been on his ass. There is no excuse for a sucker punch like that.
---

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

How was the dude able to get away without someone beating the fuck out of the sissy?

Lily-livers on this board think you should never swing at someone ever.
---

s0nicfan posted...

Where was the racism?

Look at s0nicfan, like a moth to a flame, rubbing his hands together, looking for that tasty racism he feeds off of.
---

Kineth posted...

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

How was the dude able to get away without someone beating the fuck out of the sissy?

Lily-livers on this board think you should never swing at someone ever.

Yeah, I've noticed trumpieheads like admiral and others practically almost calling for the death penalty for violence as mild as lightly flicking someone.
---

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Kineth posted...

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

How was the dude able to get away without someone beating the fuck out of the sissy?

Lily-livers on this board think you should never swing at someone ever.

Yeah, I've noticed trumpieheads like admiral and others practically almost calling for the death penalty for violence as mild as lightly flicking someone.

Im not saying to not defend yourself. But come on the dude should of gotten his ass beat for that sucker punch.
---

He clearly says "you don't sit" The context is that the old guy is pissed that the puncher has been standing and blocking his view the whole game. The guy who puched is also confirmed Irish and not Hispanic.

TC's gimmick is to be racist, though.
---

Why do people still respond to Kineth

Krojen posted...

He clearly says "you don't sit" The context is that the old guy is pissed that the puncher has been standing and blocking his view the whole game. The guy who puched is also confirmed Irish and not Hispanic.

Yeah, like even in context race had nothing to do with it.
---

If the old guy really was making racial insults then its Verbal abuse Vs physical violence. Old guy should be fined. The Younger sucker punch guy should be fined and prosecuted. Hopefully with jail sentence. And criminal record.
---

It sounds like he called him a little shit.

Which is super tame compared to geriatric fuck.

Also I always stand at football games. I never sit
---

Tc is a race baiting pos. Just ignore him
---

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Kineth posted...

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

How was the dude able to get away without someone beating the fuck out of the sissy?

Lily-livers on this board think you should never swing at someone ever.

Yeah, I've noticed trumpieheads like admiral and others practically almost calling for the death penalty for violence as mild as lightly flicking someone.

Im not saying to not defend yourself. But come on the dude should of gotten his ass beat for that sucker punch.

"Should of" does not exist. Have if the word you meant to use.
---

If you have headphones, you can clearly hear him say don't. "You don't shit?" lmao
---

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

ImTheMacheteGuy posted...

Kineth posted...

Wu_Tang_Shogun posted...

How was the dude able to get away without someone beating the fuck out of the sissy?

Lily-livers on this board think you should never swing at someone ever.

Yeah, I've noticed trumpieheads like admiral and others practically almost calling for the death penalty for violence as mild as lightly flicking someone.

Im not saying to not defend yourself. But come on the dude should of gotten his ass beat for that sucker punch.

"Should of" does not exist. Have if the word you meant to use.

>Correcting someone else's grammar
>Typo
Shiggydiggydoo
---

What a fucking moron. Punched an old man over words and caught himself an assault charge.

It's always funny when motherfuckers think they're tough over words and catch feelings and then end up with a record. The other person obviously got the last laugh.
---

Wait I actually heard the slur on the second listen. Still can't say for sure that's what he said.

If he did say it though, considering the young guy called him a geriatric fuck and the F word, did he honestly not expect to call him an offensive word back?
---

Kineth posted...

C_Pain posted...

I disagree. I don't think you should be allowed to hit someone regardless of their words.

Good job supporting verbal abuse.

There are other, betters ways to handle verbal abuse. And I'm no expert, but I feel like since men are typically stronger than women and if one is verbally abusive in a relationship, hitting them would cause the guy to retaliate and attack the woman back and he'd probably hurt her more than she could hurt him.

Kineth posted...

you basement dwellers can't understand this.

Funny what your sig says when you simply insult the person who made the first reply. Shit like that is why I can't take this place seriously lol smh

this is shocking

professional sports usually brings out the best in people

LJRENEGADE posted...

Kineth posted...

C_Pain posted...

I disagree. I don't think you should be allowed to hit someone regardless of their words.

Good job supporting verbal abuse.

There are other, betters ways to handle verbal abuse. And I'm no expert, but I feel like since men are typically stronger than women and if one is verbally abusive in a relationship, hitting them would cause the guy to retaliate and attack the woman back and he'd probably hurt her more than she could hurt him.

Kineth posted...

you basement dwellers can't understand this.

Funny what your sig says when you simply insult the person who made the first reply. Shit like that is why I can't take this place seriously lol smh

Kineth is literally a violent thug himself, thats why he thinks violence is acceptable
---

ModLogic posted...

LJRENEGADE posted...

Kineth posted...

C_Pain posted...

I disagree. I don't think you should be allowed to hit someone regardless of their words.

Good job supporting verbal abuse.

There are other, betters ways to handle verbal abuse. And I'm no expert, but I feel like since men are typically stronger than women and if one is verbally abusive in a relationship, hitting them would cause the guy to retaliate and attack the woman back and he'd probably hurt her more than she could hurt him.

Kineth posted...

you basement dwellers can't understand this.

Funny what your sig says when you simply insult the person who made the first reply. Shit like that is why I can't take this place seriously lol smh

Kineth is literally a violent thug himself, thats why he thinks violence is acceptable

Source? Can't believe that on blind faith + burden of proof on accuser.
---

Kineth posted...

Good job supporting abusive relationships. Yes some of them struck them over words. Words that had been said many times for either months or years. Refer to what I said in the other paragraph.

Ah, in that case it was your friends who were the physically abusive one and the most abusive party in those relationships. Not surprised your demented thuggish brain would twist it around so that the non violent party is the abusive one. You're one of those types who think women can't be abusive aren't you? You're the reason why women are allowed to get away with domestic violence. Ironically you're the one who supports abusive relationships.But it's not much of a surprise you're friends with such horrible people, being the animalistic thug you yourself are.
---

ModLogic posted...

It's not surprising that BrutaI's alt account that he uses to talk shit about people would be against responding to verbal abuse. Also, nice splash of racism.
---

MikeArmstrong posted...

Why do people still respond to Kineth

39 karma alt account. *yawn*

LJRENEGADE posted...

There are other, betters ways to handle verbal abuse. And I'm no expert, but I feel like since men are typically stronger than women and if one is verbally abusive in a relationship, hitting them would cause the guy to retaliate and attack the woman back and he'd probably hurt her more than she could hurt him.

Verbally abusive people are generally cowards. Much like the people who hide behind a computer screen on this website and just needless troll.

Funny what your sig says when you simply insult the person who made the first reply. Shit like that is why I can't take this place seriously lol smh

The thing is that it's not the first time I've heard this from people and I'm tired of seeing the same bullshit arguments that fail to account for reality. You damn right I'm going straight to insults at that point if people are gonna go for some faux sense of moral superiority.
---

The Admiral posted...

Thug in the Panthers jersey deserves jail time for that shit.

He's an extremist, not a thug.
---

Kineth posted...

Verbally abusive people are generally cowards.

And hitting them would make you physically abusive. If someone says some fucked up shit to you, that sucks and I feel sympathy, but it doesn't make it okay to hit them. There's better ways to handle that. And the sad thing is, that's how physically abusive people justify their abuse too. Things like "she made me do it".

Not to mention if the men aren't cowards and decide to beat the shit out of the woman for hitting him, its just gonna make the whole situation much worse. Its a stupid way to handle things.

Much like the people who hide behind a computer screen on this website and just needless troll.

I don't know why people use this like its a good argument. We're on a website. No one here is "hiding" behind a computer screen anymore than you or me. You are insulting people, also from behind a computer screen. If anyone here is a coward for that, then you would be too?

And not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll.

The thing is that it's not the first time I've heard this from people and I'm tired of seeing the same bullshit arguments that fail to account for reality. You damn right I'm going straight to insults at that point if people are gonna go for some faux sense of moral superiority.

How is thinking people shouldn't get violent over words (with some exceptions of course, I'll give you that) trying to go for moral superiority? You insulting people for it just makes it harder to take your arguments seriously. Thinking words shouldn't warrant violence is a completely legitimate view to have.

Kineth posted...

No, I throw the basement dwellers insult around because getting the idea of having moral superiority and condescension for someone feeling a certain way is literally a definition of a shut-in.

No, the 'literal' definition of a shut-in is someone who deosn't leave their home. Honestly, I can't imagine how you could fuck that up.

And get off of this "you people sit at computers and don't know the real world" bullshit. It's a deflection, and it makes you look like a fucking idiot. When I was a kid, I was the guy who would throw hands over insults. Someone talks shit, I'd pop them in the fucking mouth.

Guess what? I was wrong every single time. How do I know that? I grew up. Reacting to mere words with physical violence is what immature, stupid children do. You can cry about racism all you want, but as I said before, if you lay hands on a guy because he says something racist, you're just proving him right.

Edit:
prettyprincess posted...

take care, you may mean to say "you're just proving his perception of you right" instead

---

take care, you may mean to say "you're just proving his perception of you right" instead
---

Yeah it's not exactly naive to understand that words don't necessitate violence. You're generally gonna be seen as being in the wrong if you hit someone because they mouthed off to you
---

Kineth posted...

C_Pain posted...

I disagree. I don't think you should be allowed to hit someone regardless of their words.

I think words can physically hurt you.

Awwwwww, muffin
---

LJRENEGADE posted...

If someone says some fucked up shit to you, that sucks and I feel sympathy, but it doesn't make it okay to hit them. There's better ways to handle that.

Explain.
---

gmanthebest posted...

Kineth posted...

C_Pain posted...

I disagree. I don't think you should be allowed to hit someone regardless of their words.

I think words can physically hurt you.

Awwwwww, muffin

:D

I know I didn't say that, but if words can make you happy and lift you up, they can surely be used in the opposite, negative fashion.
---

LJRENEGADE posted...

I don't know why people use this like its a good argument. We're on a website. No one here is "hiding" behind a computer screen anymore than you or me. You are insulting people, also from behind a computer screen. If anyone here is a coward for that, then you would be too?

And not everyone who disagrees with you is a troll.

So I never intended for it to be a salient point, but there is something there. Just because I'm critical of a group that has some Venn Diagram relation to you, it doesn't necessarily mean I'm talking about you. I will say, however, that I do have at least 2 posters using alts to harass me and/or spread straight up lies so it's not a crazed supposition or a hypothesis.

Anyway, yes there is some inherent hypocrisy at my notion, but an insult isn't a pattern. Abuse is a pattern. On top of that, it's pretty bogus to assume that generic shit talk is the same as a racial slur. The context isn't the same. That said, I do agree that it has a hypocritical nature to it.

Either way, a coward wouldn't admit a weakness, flaw or error so I hope you see that it's not the case.

And hitting them would make you physically abusive. If someone says some fucked up shit to you, that sucks and I feel sympathy, but it doesn't make it okay to hit them. There's better ways to handle that. And the sad thing is, that's how physically abusive people justify their abuse too. Things like "she made me do it".

Not to mention if the men aren't cowards and decide to beat the shit out of the woman for hitting him, its just gonna make the whole situation much worse. Its a stupid way to handle things.

So as I said, abuse is a pattern. Someone physically assaulting someone isn't abuse because it isn't a pattern. Not making an excuse for it, but that's just unfairly representing the situation from the get go. As a side note, I consider it pretty cowardly to pick a fight with a woman because (with there being exceptions, of course), the woman is gonna be physically outmatched by the guy. There's nothing uncowardly about picking a fight with someone weaker than you.

Suffice to say, I agree with you a little, but I think your characterization of what is happening or what is present is incorrect.

And I'll just say it again since people seem to assume what I believe. I don't think it's a good idea to assault somebody in response to a singular passive aggressive provocation. That is something that, yes, is often not even worth acknowledging and isn't full up provoking someone. In the situations I'm referring to is when there is a direct intent to provoke a person or incense them. By the person doing that, they have then made it more likely for someone to feel provoked and want to hit them. That there is more burden of responsibility placed on a person to not react to a person being shitty as opposed to a person not being shitty is where I just don't agree. It's illogical to assume that all people should and/or will act or respond a certain way and it's also illogical to assume that a person will respect another person's views or rules, if they, themselves, have shown no respect for theirs. That's another side of the abuse.

How is thinking people shouldn't get violent over words (with some exceptions of course, I'll give you that) trying to go for moral superiority? You insulting people for it just makes it harder to take your arguments seriously. Thinking words shouldn't warrant violence is a completely legitimate view to have.

No, it isn't. A majority of fights start with words. Wars start with words. The pen is mightier than the sword. The Word is literally an aspect of God in the Bible (I'm Agnostic Buddhist so don't worry, not preaching). Assuming that it's absolutely right is where the sense of superiority comes from.
---

omega cookie posted...

No, the 'literal' definition of a shut-in is someone who deosn't leave their home. Honestly, I can't imagine how you could fuck that up.

There's a colloquial definition of the term that is easily understood to not necessarily be the true extreme. Homebody, would be the better term. Regardless, a petty insult is exactly that. I felt no incentive to be exact about it because I was clearly being petty and insulting.

Seriously though, choosing grammar/language police as the opening to your counterargument isn't exactly stellar either.

And get off of this "you people sit at computers and don't know the real world" bullshit. It's a deflection, and it makes you look like a fucking idiot. When I was a kid, I was the guy who would throw hands over insults. Someone talks shit, I'd pop them in the fucking mouth.

Guess what? I was wrong every single time. How do I know that? I grew up. Reacting to mere words with physical violence is what immature, stupid children do.

So honestly, my response to this would be to just read post 83. I honestly don't think you're a bad guy if I'm remembering you correctly. There is a literal disconnect with me in understanding how some people see there being more wrong in a person being successfully provoked as opposed to the person rolling the provocation check.

Maybe we're all just not imagining similar scenarios. I understand that someone just randomly throwing a slur out is something that people should be able to cope with and not erupt in anger. When someone is actually trying to provoke someone directly, however, they might actually succeed. I don't know how another random person's day, week, month, year or life has gone, but I'm 100% certain that talking shit to other people will raise my chances of getting hit, especially if I'm actually trying to antagonize them. How would I not share any blame for getting clocked or assaulted if I was egging them on? I don't get it.

You can cry about racism all you want, but as I said before, if you lay hands on a guy because he says something racist, you're just proving him right.

Edit:
prettyprincess posted...

take care, you may mean to say "you're just proving his perception of you right" instead

If a person is that type of virulent, nasty racist, why would you think there's any chance of proving their perception of me wrong?

Regardless, I still don't think we're quite speaking of the same scenario.
---

Kineth posted...

There's a colloquial definition of the term that is easily understood to not necessarily be the true extreme. Homebody, would be the better term. Regardless, a petty insult is exactly that. I felt no incentive to be exact about it because I was clearly being petty and insulting.

Seriously though, choosing grammar/language police as the opening to your counterargument isn't exactly stellar either.

Yeah, that was me being a sarcastic dick. Hadn't had my coffee yet, iirc.

Kineth posted...

So honestly, my response to this would be to just read post 83. I honestly don't think you're a bad guy if I'm remembering you correctly. There is a literal disconnect with me in understanding how some people see there being more wrong in a person being successfully provoked as opposed to the person rolling the provocation check.

Maybe we're all just not imagining similar scenarios. I understand that someone just randomly throwing a slur out is something that people should be able to cope with and not erupt in anger. When someone is actually trying to provoke someone directly, however, they might actually succeed. I don't know how another random person's day, week, month, year or life has gone, but I'm 100% certain that talking shit to other people will raise my chances of getting hit, especially if I'm actually trying to antagonize them. How would I not share any blame for getting clocked or assaulted if I was egging them on? I don't get it.

You know, I think we might be arguing the same point from two different sides. I'm not saying that the guy who is spewing hate speech is in the right and the guy who pops him in the mouth is in the wrong, I'm saying they're both wrong. The racist guy for being a toxic bag of filth, and the guy who hits him for committing assault.

Now, this is under the assumption that the racist guy is just throwing out words. If it turns into "Yee haw, Cleetus go fetch me muh hangin' rope", you kill that guy. I'm not saying responding with violence is never justified, just that it isn't an appropriate response to simple insults. If you need to protect yourself? You throw hands, and keep throwing them until that guy is no longer capable of being a threat.

I just can't support hitting people over mere words, because I was that guy. Ten years ago, if somebody called me a Nazi, or god forbid they call me a Mick? Either they are going to the hospital, or I am. It's just not okay, and I wish I had been adult enough to just laugh and walk away. Would have saved me a lot of pain, and a lot of trouble with the law.
---

Kineth posted...

If a person is that type of virulent, nasty racist, why would you think there's any chance of proving their perception of me wrong?

unlikely
I was merely pointing out the minute phrasing difference between it being perceived rather than somehow demonstrably related

I realize now that was not to me, I just saw my name and misread
---

Kineth posted...

I don't know where you guys get the notion that the two are mutually exclusive o

Kineth admitting he can't comprehend the difference between logic and emotion
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kineth posted...

I don't know where you guys get the notion that the two are mutually exclusive o

Kineth admitting he can't comprehend the difference between logic and emotion

He's friends with domestic abusers.
---

LepartialJury posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kineth posted...

I don't know where you guys get the notion that the two are mutually exclusive o

Kineth admitting he can't comprehend the difference between logic and emotion

He's friends with domestic abusers.

I'm friends with former domestic abuse victims. God, you manchildren are fucking pathetic.
---

Kineth is setting records for stupid as shit posts in this topic. Comparing women who were being repeatedly assaulted by their partners to a degenerate thug who was talking shit and got his feelings hurt. Must be horrible to live in a world where emotions control you like that.
---

Kineth posted...

LepartialJury posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kineth posted...

I don't know where you guys get the notion that the two are mutually exclusive o

Kineth admitting he can't comprehend the difference between logic and emotion

He's friends with domestic abusers.

I'm friends with former domestic abuse victims. God, you manchildren are fucking pathetic.

Yeah, that's what your demented mind would warp it as. Sorry, but in the real world a person who hits someone first over words is the actual domestic abuser and it's no surprise you'd be defending it. Since you clearly seem to have grown up in a "hood" world in the real world people grow out of hitting people because "MOM HE SAID MEAN WORDS" before middle school and what you're supporting is uncivilized thuggish manchildren and punk behavior.
---

loool this topic's been dead and you scrubs want to still gaslight.

It's no surprise that people who gaslight are also supporters of abuse.
---

Kineth is so full of shit.
---

Kineth posted...

loool this topic's been dead and you scrubs want to still gaslight.

It's no surprise that people who gaslight are also supporters of abuse.

You're projecting big time. It's pretty clear your entire life is just spent in shitty ghettoesque neighborhoods.
---

LepartialJury posted...

Kineth posted...

loool this topic's been dead and you scrubs want to still gaslight.

It's no surprise that people who gaslight are also supporters of abuse.

You're projecting big time. It's pretty clear your entire life is just spent in shitty ghettoesque neighborhoods.

What racist bullshit. Yes, your supposition that I, a black guy, grew up in the ghetto is fucking racist. I grew up near a golf course in an upper middle class neighborhood and attended Baylor. I grew up in a neighborhood that didn't foster antisocial behaviors like whatever cesspool bred you. You think that's how you talk to people in public? Got no manners?
---

Kineth posted...

LepartialJury posted...

Kineth posted...

loool this topic's been dead and you scrubs want to still gaslight.

It's no surprise that people who gaslight are also supporters of abuse.

You're projecting big time. It's pretty clear your entire life is just spent in shitty ghettoesque neighborhoods.

What racist bullshit. Yes, your supposition that I, a black guy, grew up in the ghetto is fucking racist. I grew up near a golf course in an upper middle class neighborhood and attended Baylor. I grew up in a neighborhood that didn't foster antisocial behaviors like whatever cesspool bred you. You think that's how you talk to people in public? Got no manners?

Or maybe it's because only people who grew up in ghettos would think violence is ever the answer to non physically threatening words. Doesn't matter what race you are. I didn't even know you were black but the fact that you just randomly brought it up means the only thing you can resort to now is the race card. And lol more projection. I'm not the antisocial violent punk that thinks it's justified to beat up people for hurting feelings.
---

Dont be around violent people and you wont get fucked up.

Dont be an actress and you wont get fucked by Harvey Weinstein.

Dont be in a car and you wont get crashed into by a drunk driver.
---

UnfairRepresent posted...

Kineth vs omega cookie

Talk about a resistable force meeting a movable object.

youre one to talk

youre both at once
---