Current Events > Nobody ever talks about Christopher Dorner anymore

(+) Yeah! (+)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/14/margie-carranza-emma-hernandez_n_2879391.html

_Kowalski_ posted...

This was a conspiracy government killed him to cover up some of the truthful stuff he was ranting about. And then they doctored his manifesto to make him seem crazy. Burnt him up and made sure he couldn't escape. Just another truth seeker lost to the cause yo

Imagine actually believing that.

CE sucks.
---

D-Lo_BrownTown posted...

lol remember when the LAPD shot at a bunch of unrelated blue trucks because they were scared shitless of the guy?

Yeah they ended up getting millions in lawsuit money.
---

Bagamak posted...

_Kowalski_ posted...

government killed him to cover up some of the truthful stuff he was ranting about

no thye killed him cause he was murdering random people

_Kowalski_ posted...

make him seem crazy.

he did that himself without any help

how do you explain his killing innocent non cops? where does that fit into the "he was framed" story?

So you're saying everything he claimed about the police and the government is a complete and utterly.
---

Veggeta X posted...

So you're saying everything he claimed about the police and the government is a complete and utterly.

im saying I don't care what he said. because the moment he killed innocent people he lost his arguement. I don't care what happened to him. it doesn't justify killing non cops.

i hate cops because they're a bunch of psycho murderers, now excuse me while i idolize and cheer on this psycho murderer
---

ImAMarvel posted...

TrollSlayer11 posted...

The hispanic women miraculously survived the shooting. They barely got shit from the government I think they barely got a million and at first the LAPD simply tried to replace their truck and that's it. I was following the case and was really pissed off about it just cuz it happened so close to home.

You're right, they did survive. My bad. >_>

Still though.

TrollSlayer11 posted...

But yes it was a really bad look for LAPD. It showed how corrupt they are and how egregiously bad police work is swept under the rug. I was disgusted by the entire situation and how the cops handled it. The cops were damn near a few steps away from putting martial law into place over those 2 days.

Yeah, you were there, man. If anyone knows anything about the whole situation here, it'd be you and anyone else here in the LA area.

Coming from someone all the way on the other coast, it's really a damn shame how no one seems to remember this. I think people have forgotten or at best, maybe have some vague memories of a cop going rogue in LA or something. I really feel like this should've been a bigger deal than it was.

Yep I remember this one. They were gonna give them the value of a used truck rather than a new truck. Lol after firing 100 shots at two old ladies

I say the people who drove him mad deserves some blame especially when they go about it heavily suspiciously taking him down.
---

Skywalker82 posted...

I'm surprised they didn't make a made for tv movie about him starring LL Cool J.

lolololol
---

Veggeta X posted...

Veggeta X posted...

@Dash_Harber posted...

Because he was a madman who killed some innocent people? He's not exactly the first one, nor will he be the last.

Do you give any ounce of blame to the people who drove him mad?

No. That may explain his behavior, but that doesn't forgive it. Regardless of his anger with police, he killed innocent people just because of their job choice. Does that mean that the survivors can each go mad and kill every person they meet? Obviously not.

It is not even like it was an ccident or in a scuffle or in a moment of passion. He literally planned out the murders. He had ample time to rethink his actions. Unfortunately, we are all safer without him.

Dash_Harber posted...

Regardless of his anger with police, he killed innocent people just because of their job choice.

He killed innocent because of their relative's job choice.
---

RickyTheBAWSE posted...

there's nothing to discuss.

---

DreadedWave posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

Regardless of his anger with police, he killed innocent people just because of their job choice.

He killed innocent because of their relative's job choice.

Sort of even worse.

One of the victim's was the police chief's daughter I think. It's like killing Barbara Gordon. Dorner was literally Joker

fuck the lapd
---

ImAMarvel posted...

RE_expert44 posted...

ImAMarvel posted...

Christopher Dorner did nothing wrong.

Didn't he kill several people?

Well I was joking. Of course he did plenty wrong.

But I don't disagree with the notion that the LAPD is full of violent, corrupt racists who always use way more force than necessary. Read his manifesto. The man's ideals and integrity were admirable, he just went about protesting the LAPD in the wrong way.

"I was fired for reporting police brutality... now I'm going to brutalize the police and their families!"

Seemed like a good idea, Im sure...
---

Dash_Harber posted...

No. That may explain his behavior, but that doesn't forgive it. Regardless of his anger with police, he killed innocent people just because of their job choice. Does that mean that the survivors can each go mad and kill every person they meet? Obviously not.

It is not even like it was an ccident or in a scuffle or in a moment of passion. He literally planned out the murders. He had ample time to rethink his actions. Unfortunately, we are all safer without him.

So hypothetically speaking, because he killed innocents, what if a relative of one of those innocent people went mad because of Dorner and started killing innocent policemen. That said mad men would be his own fault and then it wouldn't be Dorner's fault by your logic right?
---

Veggeta X posted...

So hypothetically speaking, because he killed innocents, what if a relative of one of those innocent people went mad because of Dorner and started killing innocent policemen. That said mad men would be his own fault and then it wouldn't be Dorner's fault by your logic right?

Yep, they're supposed to live with injustice and only take actions that are approved by our clearly incompetent overlords.
---

Are you being sarcastic?
---

Veggeta X posted...

Are you being sarcastic?

Yes, sorry that text doesn't convey tone. The idea that some of his actions invalidate how he showed how the LAPD is held to extremely low standards is absurd and the opinion of people who are constantly looking to feel morally superior as if there is some sort of point tally going on for who can shed the most crocodile tears.
---

I agree with you which is why I said the people who drove him mad should be partially blamed.
---

Veggeta X posted...

Dash_Harber posted...

No. That may explain his behavior, but that doesn't forgive it. Regardless of his anger with police, he killed innocent people just because of their job choice. Does that mean that the survivors can each go mad and kill every person they meet? Obviously not.

It is not even like it was an ccident or in a scuffle or in a moment of passion. He literally planned out the murders. He had ample time to rethink his actions. Unfortunately, we are all safer without him.

So hypothetically speaking, because he killed innocents, what if a relative of one of those innocent people went mad because of Dorner and started killing innocent policemen. That said mad men would be his own fault and then it wouldn't be Dorner's fault by your logic right?

What? I'm not sure you got what I was saying.

He was wrong for killing. Even though his motivations may be sympathetic, he made a horrible decision and encouraging that sort of violent retribution only leads to more wanton death and violence.