Current Events > Aww, damn. Admiral's topic got locked :(

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4
The Admiral 09/19/17 4:06:10 PM #151:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... The Admiral posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... I think the italicized part is important. If conditions in the bible belt of the US were as they are in syria, would you not expect christians in that area to behave the same way islamic terrorists do? Christians live in third-world countries across the globe, have similar numbers to Muslims, and aren't showing up on that graph for acting this way. The Bible belt is a trivially small portion of global Christians. that doesn't answer his nor question address the part I put emphasis on the italics. I specifically asked for you to elaborate. if that link is what that was intended to be, you still haven't done your job. You asked me to elaborate on how they're not equivalent in terms of violence. I gave you a link showing that one group is committing violence at ten times the rate of all others combined. Thus, they are not equivalent in terms of violence. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886902540] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> I think the italicized part is important. If conditions in the bible belt of the US were as they are in syria, would you not expect christians in that area to behave the same way islamic terrorists do?</quote> Christians live in third-world countries across the globe, have similar numbers to Muslims, and aren't showing up on that graph for acting this way. The Bible belt is a trivially small portion of global Christians.</quote> that doesn't answer his nor question address the part I put emphasis on the italics. I specifically asked for you to elaborate. if that link is what that was intended to be, you still haven't done your job.</quote> You asked me to elaborate on how they're not equivalent in terms of violence. I gave you a link showing that one group is committing violence at ten times the rate of all others combined. Thus, they are not equivalent in terms of violence.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 4:33:19 PM #152:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... The Admiral posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... I think the italicized part is important. If conditions in the bible belt of the US were as they are in syria, would you not expect christians in that area to behave the same way islamic terrorists do? Christians live in third-world countries across the globe, have similar numbers to Muslims, and aren't showing up on that graph for acting this way. The Bible belt is a trivially small portion of global Christians. that doesn't answer his nor question address the part I put emphasis on the italics. I specifically asked for you to elaborate. if that link is what that was intended to be, you still haven't done your job. You asked me to elaborate on how they're not equivalent in terms of violence. I gave you a link showing that one group is committing violence at ten times the rate of all others combined. Thus, they are not equivalent in terms of violence. do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well? --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886904072] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> I think the italicized part is important. If conditions in the bible belt of the US were as they are in syria, would you not expect christians in that area to behave the same way islamic terrorists do? </quote> Christians live in third-world countries across the globe, have similar numbers to Muslims, and aren't showing up on that graph for acting this way. The Bible belt is a trivially small portion of global Christians. </quote> that doesn't answer his nor question address the part I put emphasis on the italics. I specifically asked for you to elaborate. if that link is what that was intended to be, you still haven't done your job.</quote> You asked me to elaborate on how they're not equivalent in terms of violence. I gave you a link showing that one group is committing violence at ten times the rate of all others combined. Thus, they are not equivalent in terms of violence.</quote> do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/19/17 5:02:04 PM #153:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well? I'm not sure what's confusing to you. If one extremist group's actions are significantly more frequent than another's, there is no discussion of "same manner." They're not equivalent. I agree that violence should definitely be demonized when it occurs regardless of who's doing it, but I also believe in working big to small and prioritizing the cause of tens of thousands of deaths before the one causing hundreds of deaths. That seems like the logical thing for anyone to be doing. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886905825] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well?</quote> I'm not sure what's confusing to you. If one extremist group's actions are significantly more frequent than another's, there is no discussion of "same manner." They're not equivalent. I agree that violence should definitely be demonized when it occurs regardless of who's doing it, but I also believe in working big to small and prioritizing the cause of tens of thousands of deaths before the one causing hundreds of deaths. That seems like the logical thing for anyone to be doing.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
mario2000 09/19/17 5:14:52 PM #154:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well? I'm not sure what's confusing to you. If one extremist group's actions are significantly more frequent than another's, there is no discussion of "same manner." They're not equivalent. I agree that violence should definitely be demonized when it occurs regardless of who's doing it, but I also believe in working big to small and prioritizing the cause of tens of thousands of deaths before the one causing hundreds of deaths. That seems like the logical thing for anyone to be doing. so what are you personally doing to stop islamic extremism? --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:886906553] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well?</quote> I'm not sure what's confusing to you. If one extremist group's actions are significantly more frequent than another's, there is no discussion of "same manner." They're not equivalent. I agree that violence should definitely be demonized when it occurs regardless of who's doing it, but I also believe in working big to small and prioritizing the cause of tens of thousands of deaths before the one causing hundreds of deaths. That seems like the logical thing for anyone to be doing.</quote> so what are you personally doing to stop islamic extremism?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 5:18:50 PM #155:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well? I'm not sure what's confusing to you. If one extremist group's actions are significantly more frequent than another's, there is no discussion of "same manner." They're not equivalent. I agree that violence should definitely be demonized when it occurs regardless of who's doing it, but I also believe in working big to small and prioritizing the cause of tens of thousands of deaths before the one causing hundreds of deaths. That seems like the logical thing for anyone to be doing. I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. so you're saying that despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? is this limited to religion or does it expand to other groups often caught in identity politics as well? I'm hoping for some consistency. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886906770] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> do you agree that because they're both violent in the same manner, that they should be demonized the same as well? </quote> I'm not sure what's confusing to you. If one extremist group's actions are significantly more frequent than another's, there is no discussion of "same manner." They're not equivalent. I agree that violence should definitely be demonized when it occurs regardless of who's doing it, but I also believe in working big to small and prioritizing the cause of tens of thousands of deaths before the one causing hundreds of deaths. That seems like the logical thing for anyone to be doing.</quote> I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. so you're saying that despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? is this limited to religion or does it expand to other groups often caught in identity politics as well? I'm hoping for some consistency.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/19/17 6:27:55 PM #156:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. My principle is that I'm going to prioritize my energy towards an issue that's responsible for killing tens of thousands of people over one killing hundreds of people. What is so complicated about this concept that you're struggling this hard? --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886910619] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question.</quote> My principle is that I'm going to prioritize my energy towards an issue that's responsible for killing tens of thousands of people over one killing hundreds of people. What is so complicated about this concept that you're struggling this hard?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 6:33:20 PM #157:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. My principle is that I'm going to prioritize my energy towards an issue that's responsible for killing tens of thousands of people over one killing hundreds of people. What is so complicated about this concept that you're struggling this hard? what specifically are you doing to spend your energy other than demonizing one group over the other? I believe someone else asked you that, too. unanswered. despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? is this limited to religion or does it expand to other groups often caught in identity politics as well? I'm hoping for some consistency. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886910929] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. </quote> My principle is that I'm going to prioritize my energy towards an issue that's responsible for killing tens of thousands of people over one killing hundreds of people. What is so complicated about this concept that you're struggling this hard?</quote> what specifically are you doing to spend your energy other than demonizing one group over the other? I believe someone else asked you that, too. unanswered. despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? is this limited to religion or does it expand to other groups often caught in identity politics as well? I'm hoping for some consistency.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/19/17 6:38:17 PM #158:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that as a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886911231] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers?</quote> This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that as a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 6:42:22 PM #159:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine. you're doing your best to play dumb because you clearly see the point I'm building up to. but these questions still need to be answered within the context I actually put them in. try again. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886911474] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? </quote> This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine.</quote> you're doing your best to play dumb because you clearly see the point I'm building up to. but these questions still need to be answered within the context I actually put them in. try again.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 6:42:47 PM #160:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. My principle is that I'm going to prioritize my energy towards an issue that's responsible for killing tens of thousands of people over one killing hundreds of people. What is so complicated about this concept that you're struggling this hard? what specifically are you doing to spend your energy other than demonizing one group over the other? I believe someone else asked you that, too. unanswered. despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? is this limited to religion or does it expand to other groups often caught in identity politics as well? I'm hoping for some consistency. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886911495] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> I'm just trying to get some solid statements from you to see if you actually stand for basic principles, or if your principles change based on the group in question. </quote> My principle is that I'm going to prioritize my energy towards an issue that's responsible for killing tens of thousands of people over one killing hundreds of people. What is so complicated about this concept that you're struggling this hard?</quote> what specifically are you doing to spend your energy other than demonizing one group over the other? I believe someone else asked you that, too. unanswered. despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? is this limited to religion or does it expand to other groups often caught in identity politics as well? I'm hoping for some consistency.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/19/17 6:47:35 PM #161:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine. you're doing your best to play dumb because you clearly see the point I'm building up to. but these questions still need to be answered within the context I actually put them in. try again. Why don't you tell me your point and why you don't think a difference of tens of thousands of deaths should be an important factor in relative judgment. I'm all ears, Ricky. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886911777] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? </quote> This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine.</quote> you're doing your best to play dumb because you clearly see the point I'm building up to. but these questions still need to be answered within the context I actually put them in. try again.</quote> Why don't you tell me your point and why you don't think a difference of tens of thousands of deaths should be an important factor in relative judgment. I'm all ears, Ricky.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 6:54:29 PM #162:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine. you're doing your best to play dumb because you clearly see the point I'm building up to. but these questions still need to be answered within the context I actually put them in. try again. Why don't you tell me your point and why you don't think a difference of tens of thousands of deaths should be an important factor in relative judgment. I'm all ears, Ricky. my point is that you've got an overt bias that you couldn't hide if you tried. you misconstrue questions and statements, you avoid answering the actual questions asked, you cherry pick what is and isn't relevant with no rational reason, create criteria under your own authority, etc... my point? you're completely disingenuous, and you should never be taken seriously. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886912187] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> despite these groups being the same as far as violent idealogy, you believe that one should be prioritized higher on the demonization list than the other based on numbers? </quote> This statement is incorrect, and the numbers bear it out. I don't really care to get into the tit-for-tat finding of violent verses in the Bible versus the Quran, I care about how the members of each group are actually interpreting that text in their daily lives. One is interpreting that a violent ideology at a far, far greater rate than the other, so it's perfectly accurate to say they're not equivalent. The fact that you think the scope of the violence is somehow irrelevant to how the ideology should be judged is asinine. </quote> you're doing your best to play dumb because you clearly see the point I'm building up to. but these questions still need to be answered within the context I actually put them in. try again. </quote> Why don't you tell me your point and why you don't think a difference of tens of thousands of deaths should be an important factor in relative judgment. I'm all ears, Ricky.</quote> my point is that you've got an overt bias that you couldn't hide if you tried. you misconstrue questions and statements, you avoid answering the actual questions asked, you cherry pick what is and isn't relevant with no rational reason, create criteria under your own authority, etc... my point? you're completely disingenuous, and you should never be taken seriously.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/19/17 7:00:28 PM #163:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... my point is that you've got an overt bias that you couldn't hide if you tried. Yes, I am biased against oppressive ideologies and religious-based violence on a large scale. I'm happy to admit that. RickyTheBAWSE posted... my point? you're completely disingenuous, and you should never be taken seriously. This coming from the guy who has dodged this question five times now: Why don't you tell me why you don't think a difference of tens of thousands of deaths should be an important factor in relative judgment. And we all know why you're not saying a damn thing, despite this being the most relevant point in this entire topic. The lengths that you are going to to justify a false equivalency in this topic are astounding. --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886912516] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>my point is that you've got an overt bias that you couldn't hide if you tried.</quote> Yes, I am biased against oppressive ideologies and religious-based violence on a large scale. I'm happy to admit that. <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>my point? you're completely disingenuous, and you should never be taken seriously.</quote> This coming from the guy who has dodged this question five times now: <quote>Why don't you tell me why you don't think a difference of tens of thousands of deaths should be an important factor in relative judgment.</quote> And we all know why you're not saying a damn thing, despite this being the most relevant point in this entire topic. The lengths that you are going to to justify a false equivalency in this topic are astounding.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/19/17 7:16:32 PM #164:	that was a question based on a straw man statement that never came from me, therefore not relevant. if it weren't meant to be a baseless accusation, maybe you can ask again properly. context? context!? C/D: Admiral believes violent idealogies should have their moral alignment be judged by numbers rather than by ideals practiced. C/D: if the first is C, Admiral also believes all demographicss involved in social politics should be judged by the same standards? --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886913415] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote>that was a question based on a straw man statement that never came from me, therefore not relevant. if it weren't meant to be a baseless accusation, maybe you can ask again properly. context? context!? C/D: Admiral believes violent idealogies should have their moral alignment be judged by numbers rather than by ideals practiced. C/D: if the first is C, Admiral also believes all demographicss involved in social politics should be judged by the same standards?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkAndEpona 09/19/17 7:30:13 PM #165:	The Religion of Peace will not be mocked. <cite>LinkAndEpona posted [p:886914134] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote>The Religion of Peace will not be mocked.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#166	Post #166 was unavailable or deleted.
Ammonitida 09/19/17 9:57:46 PM #167:	DarkPink posted... Capn Circus posted... It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it. Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype. <cite>Ammonitida posted [p:886922781] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. </quote> when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it.</quote> Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tezlok 09/19/17 9:58:54 PM #168:	Ammonitida posted... DarkPink posted... Capn Circus posted... It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it. Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype. yep. alot of people still seem not know that he was raised Muslim. they always yell at him when he talks bad about the religion, not knowing he has a right to <cite>Tezlok posted [p:886922866] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. </quote> when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it.</quote> Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype.</quote> yep. alot of people still seem not know that he was raised Muslim. they always yell at him when he talks bad about the religion, not knowing he has a right to</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thanosibe 09/20/17 12:36:30 AM #169:	Ammonitida posted... DarkPink posted... Capn Circus posted... It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it. Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype. Generalizations are all some people have. And it becomes quite evident when they can't resort to anything else but when confronted with an opinion they don't like. --- I think I need a drink. Almost everybody does only they don't know it. -- Charles Bukowski <cite>thanosibe posted [p:886930810] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. </quote> when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it.</quote> Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype.</quote>Generalizations are all some people have. And it becomes quite evident when they can't resort to anything else but when confronted with an opinion they don't like.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#170	Post #170 was unavailable or deleted.
RickyTheBAWSE 09/20/17 2:11:21 AM #171:	SerperiorThanU posted... DarkPink posted... fair enough. actually he does look a little middle eastern. Gavi is literally a gay middle eastern former muslim. He knows more about its effects than likely anyone else in this topic. a gay Muslim? I'd probably be angry, too. but hopefully people don't use him for validation of their own Muslim beefs the way Fox did Stacey Dash for Black people period, lol --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886934310] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>SerperiorThanU posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote> fair enough. actually he does look a little middle eastern.</quote> Gavi is literally a gay middle eastern former muslim. He knows more about its effects than likely anyone else in this topic.</quote> a gay Muslim? I'd probably be angry, too. but hopefully people don't use him for validation of their own Muslim beefs the way Fox did Stacey Dash for Black people period, lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkPink 09/20/17 2:45:58 AM #172:	SerperiorThanU posted... DarkPink posted... fair enough. actually he does look a little middle eastern. Gavi is literally a gay middle eastern former muslim. He knows more about its effects than likely anyone else in this topic. he also is kinda psychopathic and is very likely to be locked up for forcing those below him to kiss his ass as evident in the other topic. i admit i didnt know he was a former muslim but come on people hes not exactly credible when it comes to things he doesnt like. although now i can understand why some of the far right trolls on this board get behind gavi when he talks shit about islam similar to how they do the same thing when it comes to someone like Ayyan hirsi ali. --- Do the best you can in every task, no matter how unimportant it may seem at the time. No one learns more about a problem than the person at the bottom. <cite>DarkPink posted [p:886935416] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>SerperiorThanU posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote> fair enough. actually he does look a little middle eastern.</quote> Gavi is literally a gay middle eastern former muslim. He knows more about its effects than likely anyone else in this topic.</quote> he also is kinda psychopathic and is very likely to be locked up for forcing those below him to kiss his ass as evident in the other topic. i admit i didnt know he was a former muslim but come on people hes not exactly credible when it comes to things he doesnt like. although now i can understand why some of the far right trolls on this board get behind gavi when he talks shit about islam similar to how they do the same thing when it comes to someone like Ayyan hirsi ali.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#173	Post #173 was unavailable or deleted.
iron jojo 09/20/17 3:23:44 AM #174:	BLAKUboy posted... Oh, it was about Islam? Even fairer, nexter then. Lmao what a clown --- vickfan-chucky they hated Jesus homie chuckyhacks-who teh hell is "jesus homie" <cite>iron jojo posted [p:886936446] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>BLAKUboy posted...</cite> <quote>Oh, it was about Islam? Even fairer, nexter then.</quote> Lmao what a clown</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
unpleasant_milk 09/20/17 3:28:18 AM #175:	ThePrinceFish posted... mario2000 posted... https://www.glamour.com/story/teenage-muslim-girl-beaten-to-death-virginia Not sure how Muslim girl beaten to death by illegal immigrant equates to Muslim beaten to death in school by Christian peers You know how much they love the 'ol false equivalency' argument. Islamist terrorism claims fresh victims every day Some Christian raised nutjob kills several people the other month. B-but all religion is equally bad, stop shitting on Islam. Happens quite a lot on here. Admiral posted the stats for this previously which highlight the common denominator with terror attacks. I suggest more people - who are in denial about this, take note. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?search=Islam+&sa.x=0&sa.y=0&sa=Search --- GT unpleasant milk #I want a poacher skin rug ~ http://imgur.com/a/V10yv <cite>unpleasant_milk posted [p:886936581] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>ThePrinceFish posted...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>https://www.glamour.com/story/teenage-muslim-girl-beaten-to-death-virginia</quote> Not sure how Muslim girl beaten to death by illegal immigrant equates to Muslim beaten to death in school by Christian peers</quote> You know how much they love the 'ol false equivalency' argument. Islamist terrorism claims fresh victims every day Some Christian raised nutjob kills several people the other month. B-but all religion is equally bad, stop shitting on Islam. Happens quite a lot on here. Admiral posted the stats for this previously which highlight the common denominator with terror attacks. I suggest more people - who are in denial about this, take note. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?search=Islam+&sa.x=0&sa.y=0&sa=Search</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkPink 09/20/17 3:31:03 AM #176:	SerperiorThanU posted... Why would he be locked up? He doesn't do anything illegal. He offers them hundreds-thousands of dollars and they voluntarily do it. He doesn't force anyone to do anything. And besides some illegal stuff that could get him modded he's very forthcoming about his life. Hell, you can ask for his facebook if you wanted to or skype to get a closer real life interaction and he'll gladly oblige. Unlike most people here he has no need to hide behind a screen name for anonymity. i guess you werent following his recent court drama then, but i would be interested in taking a peek at his facebook, if only to see if he ever really acts like a decent human being. also because just because hes so open about his life doesnt mean hes automatically a good person. --- Do the best you can in every task, no matter how unimportant it may seem at the time. No one learns more about a problem than the person at the bottom. <cite>DarkPink posted [p:886936663] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>SerperiorThanU posted...</cite> <quote>Why would he be locked up? He doesn't do anything illegal. He offers them hundreds-thousands of dollars and they voluntarily do it. He doesn't force anyone to do anything. And besides some illegal stuff that could get him modded he's very forthcoming about his life. Hell, you can ask for his facebook if you wanted to or skype to get a closer real life interaction and he'll gladly oblige. Unlike most people here he has no need to hide behind a screen name for anonymity. </quote> i guess you werent following his recent court drama then, but i would be interested in taking a peek at his facebook, if only to see if he ever really acts like a decent human being. also because just because hes so open about his life doesnt mean hes automatically a good person.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DrizztLink 09/20/17 3:31:38 AM #177:	Ammonitida posted... DarkPink posted... Capn Circus posted... It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it. Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype. --- http://guidesmedia.ign.com/guides/9846/images/slowpoke.gif <cite>DrizztLink posted [p:886936680] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. </quote> when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it.</quote> Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype.</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#178	Post #178 was unavailable or deleted.
ImTheMacheteGuy 09/20/17 12:51:38 PM #179:	Tezlok posted... Ammonitida posted... DarkPink posted... Capn Circus posted... It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it. Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype. yep. alot of people still seem not know that he was raised Muslim. they always yell at him when he talks bad about the religion, not knowing he has a right to I was technically raised as a christian, so I will be sure to cite this parallel anytime anyone here gives me shit for bashing christianity --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:886955281] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>Tezlok posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ammonitida posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkPink posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Capn Circus posted...</cite> <quote>It's always amusing to see "bigot" and "racist" get tossed around on users' perceived whiteness, but when faced with a minority Trump supporter or Islam story poster, they need to change their song and dance routine. </quote> when the main bashers of islam are like admiral, gavirulax and unplesant milk, all very likely white people with no experience with islam at all besides what they see in the news people will call them out on it.</quote> Gavirulax was raised as a Muslim. So much for your stereotype.</quote> yep. alot of people still seem not know that he was raised Muslim. they always yell at him when he talks bad about the religion, not knowing he has a right to</quote> I was technically raised as a christian, so I will be sure to cite this parallel anytime anyone here gives me shit for bashing christianity</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
OpheliaAdenade 09/20/17 12:52:39 PM #180:	Gavi is in prison right now. :u He shouldn't be used as a positive example for anything. --- http://imgur.com/Q6Qj55q <cite>OpheliaAdenade posted [p:886955332] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote>Gavi is in prison right now. :u He shouldn't be used as a positive example for anything.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vindris_SNH 09/20/17 12:55:34 PM #181:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently. Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place. I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient. Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc. --- glitteringfairy: Just build the damn wall ThyCorndog: and how exactly will that stop the mexican space program from orbital dropping illegal immigrants? <cite>Vindris_SNH posted [p:886955493] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently.</quote> Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place.</quote> I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient.</quote> Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 09/20/17 12:58:29 PM #182:	Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently. Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place. I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient. Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc. I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:886955632] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently.</quote> Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place.</quote> I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient.</quote> Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc.</quote> I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 09/20/17 12:58:44 PM #183:	OpheliaAdenade posted... Gavi is in prison right now. :u He shouldn't be used as a positive example for anything. lol --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:886955649] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>OpheliaAdenade posted...</cite> <quote>Gavi is in prison right now. :u He shouldn't be used as a positive example for anything.</quote> lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Nepsy 09/20/17 12:58:56 PM #184:	Libruls and SJWs swarm r/exmuslim for downvote brigading and that's just so fucking awful and despicable but what we expect from those intolerant types. --- GameRaven 3.1.4 http://m.imgur.com/nMk7Yai?r <cite>Nepsy posted [p:886955660] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote>Libruls and SJWs swarm r/exmuslim for downvote brigading and that's just so fucking awful and despicable but what we expect from those intolerant types.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Vindris_SNH 09/20/17 12:59:41 PM #185:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently. Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place. I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient. Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc. I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths. You can use whatever term you want. My original point still stands. --- glitteringfairy: Just build the damn wall ThyCorndog: and how exactly will that stop the mexican space program from orbital dropping illegal immigrants? <cite>Vindris_SNH posted [p:886955700] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently.</quote> Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place.</quote> I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient.</quote> Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc.</quote> I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths.</quote> You can use whatever term you want. My original point still stands.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ImTheMacheteGuy 09/20/17 1:07:28 PM #186:	Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently. Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place. I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient. Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc. I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths. You can use whatever term you want. My original point still stands. I mean yeah, people will still find excuses to be bullshit. That's human nature. Eliminating religion would add an element of transparency to people who otherwise would be hiding their bullshit behind a facade of self-righteousness. It wouldn't solve all problems but it would be an overall net gain. --- Place-holder sig because new phone and old sigs not saved :/ <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted [p:886956137] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently.</quote> Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place.</quote> I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient.</quote> Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc.</quote> I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths.</quote> You can use whatever term you want. My original point still stands.</quote> I mean yeah, people will still find excuses to be bullshit. That's human nature. Eliminating religion would add an element of transparency to people who otherwise would be hiding their bullshit behind a facade of self-righteousness. It wouldn't solve all problems but it would be an overall net gain.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/20/17 1:54:08 PM #187:	ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... Vindris_SNH posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently. Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place. I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient. Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc. I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths. You can use whatever term you want. My original point still stands. I mean yeah, people will still find excuses to be bullshit. That's human nature. Eliminating religion would add an element of transparency to people who otherwise would be hiding their bullshit behind a facade of self-righteousness. It wouldn't solve all problems but it would be an overall net gain. these situations are pretty amusing to me because the people who attack Islam are usually Christians who like to ignore their OWN bias, and start trying to split hairs to justify their bigotry when confronted. then when you point out how the pot is calling the kettle black, they often start trying to create their own arbitrary criteria to justify attacking one but not their own, use straw man arguments, and whatever other tactics that dishonest people use. whether you're Christian or Muslim, the fundamentalist are detrimental to society and should both be shunned together. the divisive rhetoric from these blind tribal folk is regressive at best. shitty people are shitty people regardless of what idealogy they're hiding behind and country they live in. I wouldn't call Brock Turner a slightly better person than Bill Cosby just because one has a higher body count. they're both fucking rapist who should be thrown under the jail. one had more power to have his way, but they both operated within their own power. both are rapist. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886958696] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>Vindris_SNH posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>ImTheMacheteGuy posted...</cite> <quote> for a common cause of disbanding organized religion permanently. </quote> Sure, religion has caused some pretty stupid stuff to happen in the world. But it has also motivated people to do a lot of great things for humanity. Evil people will always find an excuse to be evil. Removing religion won't make the world a better place. </quote> I don't believe in evil. I think the concept is an amalgamation that's too convenient. </quote> Evil, as in hateful, destructive, corrupt, etc. </quote> I prefer the term inherently negative. It dissociates from nonsense ideas like the devil or demons or other myths. </quote> You can use whatever term you want. My original point still stands. </quote> I mean yeah, people will still find excuses to be bullshit. That's human nature. Eliminating religion would add an element of transparency to people who otherwise would be hiding their bullshit behind a facade of self-righteousness. It wouldn't solve all problems but it would be an overall net gain.</quote> these situations are pretty amusing to me because the people who attack Islam are usually Christians who like to ignore their OWN bias, and start trying to split hairs to justify their bigotry when confronted. then when you point out how the pot is calling the kettle black, they often start trying to create their own arbitrary criteria to justify attacking one but not their own, use straw man arguments, and whatever other tactics that dishonest people use. whether you're Christian or Muslim, the fundamentalist are detrimental to society and should both be shunned together. the divisive rhetoric from these blind tribal folk is regressive at best. shitty people are shitty people regardless of what idealogy they're hiding behind and country they live in. I wouldn't call Brock Turner a slightly better person than Bill Cosby just because one has a higher body count. they're both fucking rapist who should be thrown under the jail. one had more power to have his way, but they both operated within their own power. both are rapist.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lathissamus 09/20/17 1:56:48 PM #188:	unpleasant_milk posted... Mustn't talk negatively about Islam now. That's not allowed.. (Although arguably warranted) Is this the forum for that? --- http://i.imgur.com/olOXz6h.jpg https://i.imgur.com/kaFczn3.gif <cite>Lathissamus posted [p:886958848] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>unpleasant_milk posted...</cite> <quote>Mustn't talk negatively about Islam now. That's not allowed.. (Although arguably warranted)</quote> Is this the forum for that?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The Admiral 09/20/17 2:38:35 PM #189:	RickyTheBAWSE posted... I wouldn't call Brock Turner a slightly better person than Bill Cosby just because one has a higher body count I'm really trying to understand the way your mind works here, Ricky. Just for clarity, you believe a man who murders a single person is equivalent to a serial killer who murders 20 people simply because they both committed murder? Is that correct? You don't think it's fair to judge one of those people as being worse than the other? --- - The Admiral <cite>The Admiral posted [p:886961215] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote>I wouldn't call Brock Turner a slightly better person than Bill Cosby just because one has a higher body count</quote> I'm really trying to understand the way your mind works here, Ricky. Just for clarity, you believe a man who murders a single person is equivalent to a serial killer who murders 20 people simply because they both committed murder? Is that correct? You don't think it's fair to judge one of those people as being worse than the other?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RickyTheBAWSE 09/20/17 3:43:18 PM #190:	The Admiral posted... RickyTheBAWSE posted... I wouldn't call Brock Turner a slightly better person than Bill Cosby just because one has a higher body count I'm really trying to understand the way your mind works here, Ricky. Just for clarity, you believe a man who murders a single person is equivalent to a serial killer who murders 20 people simply because they both committed murder? Is that correct? You don't think it's fair to judge one of those people as being worse than the other? if they've got murderous beliefs and have actually acted on them, they should both be shunned equally. you understand me perfectly which is why you keep playing dumb. I keep using words like judge, demonize, shunned, etc... and for some reason you keep glossing over that context. that's always been my point and you never want to acknowledge it. I choose the words I use on purpose. emphasize on them or don't bother replying. --- Never let those intent on misunderstanding you be the narrator to YOUR story! Context? Context!? CONTEXT!!! <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted [p:886964894] in Aww, damn.... [t:75791925]...</cite> <quote><cite>The Admiral posted...</cite> <quote> <cite>RickyTheBAWSE posted...</cite> <quote> I wouldn't call Brock Turner a slightly better person than Bill Cosby just because one has a higher body count </quote> I'm really trying to understand the way your mind works here, Ricky. Just for clarity, you believe a man who murders a single person is equivalent to a serial killer who murders 20 people simply because they both committed murder? Is that correct? You don't think it's fair to judge one of those people as being worse than the other?</quote> if they've got murderous beliefs and have actually acted on them, they should both be shunned equally. you understand me perfectly which is why you keep playing dumb. I keep using words like judge, demonize, shunned, etc... and for some reason you keep glossing over that context. that's always been my point and you never want to acknowledge it. I choose the words I use on purpose. emphasize on them or don't bother replying.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4

Current Events > Aww, damn. Admiral's topic got locked :( (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Aww, damn. Admiral's topic got locked :(