Poll of the Day > Which two group of extremists do you think is worse to deal with...

(+) Yeah! (+)

I would say they both are even when it comes to being annoying, miserable sack of shits(especially behind their computer screens/on the internet) since they both actually have one or two major things in common with each other than they think. Both only prefer to hear things that fits with their own world views while filtering out any other differing world views/opinions that doesn't fit with their own agendas.

Both SJWs and Alt Rights also seem to have a mutual hatred/dislike for people who are moderate/in the middle ground since they're too smart to not subscribe to either of their extremist philosophies and both are bigots in slightly different forms(with SJWs being more sneaky about their bigotry and White Supremacists being more lost and confused with who they should consider "true whites").

SJWs
---

At least the alt-right knows how to have fun.
---

Hardcore right wingers are harder to deal with because they never back down, they've been indoctrinated with a lifetime of a million conspiracies and angry radio hosts, you have to go through each and every thing and then it just gets deflected to some shitty thing Democrats did. SJWs can be taken down with simple logic and they usually block you afterward.

I'd rather just deal with some manhater.

jamieyello3 posted...

Hardcore right wingers are harder to deal with because they never back down, they've been indoctrinated with a lifetime of a million conspiracies and angry radio hosts, you have to go through each and every thing and then it just gets deflected to some shitty thing Democrats did. SJWs can be taken down with simple logic and they usually block you afterward.

I'd rather just deal with some manhater.

Yeah, not only do hardcore right wingers never back down with their views, they also constantly live in their little delusional bubbles, truly believing that their opinionated rants and conspiracy theories are "facts and logic" without providing any valid, reliable sources to back up their claim. Then they'll either do as what you stated(switching topics by pointing out shitty things that Democrats did) or cry "White Genocide" or "Anti-White" while they treat consented racial miscegenation and welcomed multiculturalism as if they're morally worse than the Holocaust and mass murder, throwing the word "Genocide" around like hot potatoes since clearly neither of these fit with their views.

the rightwing extremists. At least with the far left, you can agree that a reality with set events exists. With the right, they tend to just make up stuff that objectively didn't happen. Its really annoying.
---

Both.
---

SJWs. They're more whiny and lately the violent ones as well. They turn everything into a grown up version of a toddler meltdown. I wish they stopped existing.
---

I'm choosing the white racist terrorists.

And if you don't choose them over SJWs... I have no idea what to tell you.
---

SJWs have never tried to murder members of my family, so they win by default.

(win meaning they're less bad to deal with)

It really says a lot about the demographics here when half of the votes are for SJWs instead of racist people who want to kill anyone who's not white.
---

PK_Spam posted...

And if you don't choose them over SJWs... I have no idea what to tell you.

You're on a video game message board full of single dudes. Nothing needs to be said.

SJWs, because they are currently larger in number, and supported by the media and the rest of the establishment.

Generally, the bigger donkey holes are just who currently has more power.
---

Both. Anybody who says otherwise has never had the pleasure of actually dealing with both. One side throws a tantrum if you mention white men, another side throws a tantrum if you don't mention white men. It's like asking whether you'd want to be frozen to death or burned to death. One maybe less painful than the other but such a factor is meaningless because it's going to be an unpleasant experience regardless.
---

SJW
They are tolerant as long as you don't offend them. The problem is they keep getting offended by new things every other day
---

SJWs, because they hide behind an easily agreeable message to push their agenda while being incredible hypocrites. They fly the banner of love and tolerance while striving to silence any who disagree.
---

PostCrisisJ2 posted...

Both. Anybody who says otherwise has never had the pleasure of actually dealing with both. One side throws a tantrum if you mention white men, another side throws a tantrum if you don't mention white men. It's like asking whether you'd want to be frozen to death or burned to death. One maybe less painful than the other but such a factor is meaningless because it's going to be an unpleasant experience regardless.

God forbid you deny "Straight White male privilege" right in SJWs' faces or god forbid you deny "White Genocide" right in Hardcore Alt Righters' faces.

At least with "Straight White Male Privilege", there are some degree of truths to it(regarding the white race part to it or just lighter skin in genreal) where "White Genocide" on the other hand, is just a flat out made-up term constructed by a bunch of whiny White Supremacists on the internet who call themselves "Nationalists", regarding consented race-mixing and multiculturalism in a few European countries(and all predominantly White Non-European countries) that ironically other White people(who aren't white supremacists) themselves allowed and welcomed into these countries, in the first place.

Socialists and communists were responsible for Venezula, the USSR, "PR"C, Vietnam, North Korea, and more. That the far-left refuses to acknowledge that they could go too far (and have their foot halfway in it, while seeing their failings as signs that they need to go further) is terrifying, and their utter disregard for history (especially the failings of appeasement and the idea that we can just let dangers sort themselves out) is just as bad. But the right-wingers are just as bad. The "PR"C is now fascist (except in name), the Islamic terrorists and terrorist sympathizers (not to be confused with Muslims in general) have a fascist mindset, and these are who they oppose? They're isolationist in a very global world, and end up being just as self-centered, and perhaps even more in-your-face. The utter disregard for people distant from them may well even be worse than the leftist contempt for the people right next to them. (Not sure which has worse politicians, but that's like asking which is more deadly: being dunked in lye or being shot in the head ten times.)

The left would be mildly less annoying if it weren't that I believed them to be mildly more dangerous. Not a lot, but enough to damage them more. But to be fair, I'm a Buckley/Reagan/Thatcher Conservative (as opposed to Trump/Le Pen/Duterte/Xí Conservative).
---