Current Events > Why won't Trump say "radical islamic terrorism" anymore?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3
jfoley88 05/27/17 4:22:21 PM #102:	He hasn't stopped calling it what it is.... Can you people please stop twisting things and lying? It's why you lost the election, remember? <cite>jfoley88 posted [p:879919717] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote>He hasn't stopped calling it what it is.... Can you people please stop twisting things and lying? It's why you lost the election, remember?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dash_Harber 05/27/17 4:34:08 PM #103:	But Nazism is a lifestyle choice and reporters aren't even human! ~~>_>~~ <cite>Dash_Harber posted [p:879920275] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote>But Nazism is a lifestyle choice and reporters aren't even human! >_></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 05/27/17 9:45:30 PM #104:	Ampelas posted... Like I said, it's just he constantly, constantly pushed that specific phrase. Never once suggested just "Islamic terrorism" be used. You're really doubling down on this aren't you? You're really doing the mental backflips to call Trump a hypocrite even though he is linking Islam to terrorism in the faces of Saudi government officials, something Obama never had the balls to do, aren't you? Obama's refusal has always been to not say "Islamic terrorism". From CNN "There is no doubt, and I've said repeatedly, where we see terrorist organizations like al Qaeda or ISIL -- They have perverted and distorted and tried to claim the mantle of Islam for an excuse for basically barbarism and death," he said. "These are people who've killed children, killed Muslims, take sex slaves, there's no religious rationale that would justify in any way any of the things that they do," he said. "But what I have been careful about when I describe these issues is to make sure that we do not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country, who are peaceful, who are responsible, who, in this country, are fellow troops and police officers and fire fighters and teachers and neighbors and friends." The President compared using the term to if a Christian were a murderer but claiming their religion in their actions. "If you had an organization that was going around killing and blowing people up and said, 'We're on the vanguard of Christianity.' As a Christian, I'm not going to let them claim my religion and say, 'you're killing for Christ.' I would say, that's ridiculous," Obama said. Do you see any hullabaloo over the word "radical"? I thought not. Will you really keep insisting on this point even though everyone else on your side has fled from this topic? --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:879935022] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, it's just he constantly, constantly pushed that specific phrase. Never once suggested just "Islamic terrorism" be used. </quote> You're really doubling down on this aren't you? You're really doing the mental backflips to call Trump a hypocrite even though he is linking Islam to terrorism in the faces of Saudi government officials, something Obama never had the balls to do, aren't you? Obama's refusal has always been to not say "Islamic terrorism". From CNN <quote>"There is no doubt, and I've said repeatedly, where we see terrorist organizations like al Qaeda or ISIL -- They have perverted and distorted and tried to claim the mantle of Islam for an excuse for basically barbarism and death," he said. "These are people who've killed children, killed Muslims, take sex slaves, there's no religious rationale that would justify in any way any of the things that they do," he said. "But what I have been careful about when I describe these issues is to make sure that we do not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country, who are peaceful, who are responsible, who, in this country, are fellow troops and police officers and fire fighters and teachers and neighbors and friends." The President compared using the term to if a Christian were a murderer but claiming their religion in their actions. "If you had an organization that was going around killing and blowing people up and said, 'We're on the vanguard of Christianity.' As a Christian, I'm not going to let them claim my religion and say, 'you're killing for Christ.' I would say, that's ridiculous," Obama said.</quote> Do you see any hullabaloo over the word "radical"? I thought not. Will you really keep insisting on this point even though everyone else on your side has fled from this topic?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 05/27/17 9:46:45 PM #105:	Mal_Fet posted... Ampelas posted... Like I said, it's just he constantly, constantly pushed that specific phrase. Never once suggested just "Islamic terrorism" be used. You're really doubling down on this aren't you? You're really doing the mental backflips to call Trump a hypocrite even though he is linking Islam to terrorism in the faces of Saudi government officials, something Obama never had the balls to do, aren't you? Obama's refusal has always been to not say "Islamic terrorism". From CNN "There is no doubt, and I've said repeatedly, where we see terrorist organizations like al Qaeda or ISIL -- They have perverted and distorted and tried to claim the mantle of Islam for an excuse for basically barbarism and death," he said. "These are people who've killed children, killed Muslims, take sex slaves, there's no religious rationale that would justify in any way any of the things that they do," he said. "But what I have been careful about when I describe these issues is to make sure that we do not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country, who are peaceful, who are responsible, who, in this country, are fellow troops and police officers and fire fighters and teachers and neighbors and friends." The President compared using the term to if a Christian were a murderer but claiming their religion in their actions. "If you had an organization that was going around killing and blowing people up and said, 'We're on the vanguard of Christianity.' As a Christian, I'm not going to let them claim my religion and say, 'you're killing for Christ.' I would say, that's ridiculous," Obama said. Do you see any hullabaloo over the word "radical"? I thought not. Will you really keep insisting on this point even though everyone else on your side has fled from this topic? I didn't even read this, and won't, but why do people still reply to you --- Now Playing: Final Fantasy XV, Tokyo Mirage Sessions, BoTW, Bayonetta <cite>Amputation posted [p:879935068] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote>Like I said, it's just he constantly, constantly pushed that specific phrase. Never once suggested just "Islamic terrorism" be used. </quote> You're really doubling down on this aren't you? You're really doing the mental backflips to call Trump a hypocrite even though he is linking Islam to terrorism in the faces of Saudi government officials, something Obama never had the balls to do, aren't you? Obama's refusal has always been to not say "Islamic terrorism". From CNN <quote>"There is no doubt, and I've said repeatedly, where we see terrorist organizations like al Qaeda or ISIL -- They have perverted and distorted and tried to claim the mantle of Islam for an excuse for basically barbarism and death," he said. "These are people who've killed children, killed Muslims, take sex slaves, there's no religious rationale that would justify in any way any of the things that they do," he said. "But what I have been careful about when I describe these issues is to make sure that we do not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country, who are peaceful, who are responsible, who, in this country, are fellow troops and police officers and fire fighters and teachers and neighbors and friends." The President compared using the term to if a Christian were a murderer but claiming their religion in their actions. "If you had an organization that was going around killing and blowing people up and said, 'We're on the vanguard of Christianity.' As a Christian, I'm not going to let them claim my religion and say, 'you're killing for Christ.' I would say, that's ridiculous," Obama said.</quote> Do you see any hullabaloo over the word "radical"? I thought not. Will you really keep insisting on this point even though everyone else on your side has fled from this topic?</quote> I didn't even read this, and won't, but why do people still reply to you</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ampelas 05/28/17 12:02:34 AM #106:	Ampelas posted... Do you have a reason why they'd be running damage control instead of just saying that what he said was the same thing? Clearly they think "Radical" creates some distinction. Still avoiding my question. Clearly there's a reason <cite>Ampelas posted [p:879940804] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote>Do you have a reason why they'd be running damage control instead of just saying that what he said was the same thing? Clearly they think "Radical" creates some distinction.</quote> Still avoiding my question. Clearly there's a reason</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yemmy 05/28/17 12:08:35 AM #107:	lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something. --- p226 <cite>yemmy posted [p:879941030] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote>lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 05/28/17 12:12:01 AM #108:	yemmy posted... lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something. yem69420? --- Now Playing: Final Fantasy XV, Tokyo Mirage Sessions, BoTW, Bayonetta <cite>Amputation posted [p:879941164] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote>lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something.</quote> yem69420?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SK8T3R215 05/28/17 12:17:11 AM #109:	>Why does Trump do thing lmao >Why isn't Trump doing thing anymore --- New York Knicks, New York Jets, New York Yankees. <cite>SK8T3R215 posted [p:879941370] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote>>Why does Trump do thing lmao >Why isn't Trump doing thing anymore</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yemmy 05/28/17 12:17:16 AM #110:	not going there with you spend your time doing something constructive instead of just trying to antagonize people for hours. you don't seem like a dumb person --- p226 <cite>yemmy posted [p:879941375] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote>not going there with you spend your time doing something constructive instead of just trying to antagonize people for hours. you don't seem like a dumb person</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Amputation 05/28/17 12:21:13 AM #111:	yemmy posted... not going there with you spend your time doing something constructive instead of just trying to antagonize people for hours. you don't seem like a dumb person I wasn't going to bother you, just wondering. You did the honorable thing with the account bet so nothing bad to say here --- Now Playing: Final Fantasy XV, Tokyo Mirage Sessions, BoTW, Bayonetta <cite>Amputation posted [p:879941524] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote>not going there with you spend your time doing something constructive instead of just trying to antagonize people for hours. you don't seem like a dumb person</quote> I wasn't going to bother you, just wondering. You did the honorable thing with the account bet so nothing bad to say here</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ampelas 05/28/17 12:25:58 AM #112:	yemmy posted... lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something. My point is that the White House immediately jumped on damage control, saying he would have said it, but he "was exhausted". Can you explain why they felt like they needed to justify it if it's all the same? <cite>Ampelas posted [p:879941695] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote>lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something.</quote> My point is that the White House immediately jumped on damage control, saying he would have said it, but he "was exhausted". Can you explain why they felt like they needed to justify it if it's all the same?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yemmy 05/28/17 12:29:14 AM #113:	Ampelas posted... yemmy posted... lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something. My point is that the White House immediately jumped on damage control, saying he would have said it, but he "was exhausted". Can you explain why they felt like they needed to justify it if it's all the same? shit I dunno. that was the official statement from the white house? damn I could do better damage control for like 40 grand a year. I bet those bitches get paid 20x that. --- p226 <cite>yemmy posted [p:879941817] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote>lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something.</quote> My point is that the White House immediately jumped on damage control, saying he would have said it, but he "was exhausted". Can you explain why they felt like they needed to justify it if it's all the same?</quote> shit I dunno. that was the official statement from the white house? damn I could do better damage control for like 40 grand a year. I bet those bitches get paid 20x that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#114	Post #114 was unavailable or deleted.
Kineth 05/28/17 12:30:30 AM #115:	Because he has Alzheimer's and can barely enunciate. --- If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply. <cite>Kineth posted [p:879941862] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote>Because he has Alzheimer's and can barely enunciate.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ampelas 05/28/17 12:34:57 AM #116:	yemmy posted... Ampelas posted... yemmy posted... lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something. My point is that the White House immediately jumped on damage control, saying he would have said it, but he "was exhausted". Can you explain why they felt like they needed to justify it if it's all the same? shit I dunno. that was the official statement from the white house? damn I could do better damage control for like 40 grand a year. I bet those bitches get paid 20x that. http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/334477-senior-wh-official-trump-mixed-up-words-in-speech-because-hes This administration is a fucking joke <cite>Ampelas posted [p:879942039] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote>lol he said there was a "crisis of islamic extremism" and told them to drive the terrorists out of their countries, but he didn't say the three words in that combination so he must be up to something.</quote> My point is that the White House immediately jumped on damage control, saying he would have said it, but he "was exhausted". Can you explain why they felt like they needed to justify it if it's all the same?</quote> shit I dunno. that was the official statement from the white house? damn I could do better damage control for like 40 grand a year. I bet those bitches get paid 20x that.</quote> http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/334477-senior-wh-official-trump-mixed-up-words-in-speech-because-hes This administration is a fucking joke</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
yemmy 05/28/17 12:47:02 AM #117:	Ampelas posted... This administration is a fucking joke I think their end goal is to fuck up the republican party. Maybe Trump didn't plan on winning. But at least Bush Jr got some smart people to do his dirty work. You can say that Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Rove are evil or whatever but they weren't stupid. --- p226 <cite>yemmy posted [p:879942451] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote>This administration is a fucking joke </quote> I think their end goal is to fuck up the republican party. Maybe Trump didn't plan on winning. But at least Bush Jr got some smart people to do his dirty work. You can say that Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Rove are evil or whatever but they weren't stupid.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mal_Fet 05/28/17 12:56:17 AM #118:	Ampelas posted... Ampelas posted... Do you have a reason why they'd be running damage control instead of just saying that what he said was the same thing? Clearly they think "Radical" creates some distinction. Still avoiding my question. Clearly there's a reason Whoever wrote the speech wrote "Islamist" where Trump said "Islamic" over and over. That's why the limpdicks in the white house are freaking out. The word "radical" had nothing to do at fucking all with anything. You are literally the only person who is trying to use this godawful defense. --- Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -George Orwell <cite>Mal_Fet posted [p:879942774] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote>Do you have a reason why they'd be running damage control instead of just saying that what he said was the same thing? Clearly they think "Radical" creates some distinction.</quote> Still avoiding my question. Clearly there's a reason</quote> Whoever wrote the speech wrote "Islamist" where Trump said "Islamic" over and over. That's why the limpdicks in the white house are freaking out. The word "radical" had nothing to do at fucking all with anything. You are literally the only person who is trying to use this godawful defense.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ampelas 05/28/17 12:57:39 AM #119:	yemmy posted... Ampelas posted... This administration is a fucking joke I think their end goal is to fuck up the republican party. Maybe Trump didn't plan on winning. But at least Bush Jr got some smart people to do his dirty work. You can say that Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Rove are evil or whatever but they weren't stupid. With the job he's doing, it's not that far fetched that Trump is a plant to bring down the GOP from within. Not that I believe it, but the idea has more credence now than some nonsense like Pizzagate. Yeah, Bush had brilliant people working for him. Aside from Mattis, Trump basically got incompetent crooks like himself. <cite>Ampelas posted [p:879942813] in Why won't ... [t:75392234]...</cite> <quote><cite>yemmy posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Ampelas posted...</cite> <quote>This administration is a fucking joke </quote> I think their end goal is to fuck up the republican party. Maybe Trump didn't plan on winning. But at least Bush Jr got some smart people to do his dirty work. You can say that Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Rove are evil or whatever but they weren't stupid.</quote> With the job he's doing, it's not that far fetched that Trump is a plant to bring down the GOP from within. Not that I believe it, but the idea has more credence now than some nonsense like Pizzagate. Yeah, Bush had brilliant people working for him. Aside from Mattis, Trump basically got incompetent crooks like himself.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3

Current Events > Why won't Trump say "radical islamic terrorism" anymore? (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > Why won't Trump say "radical islamic terrorism" anymore?