Current Events > People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
#53	Post #53 was unavailable or deleted.
Samurontai 05/03/17 4:19:50 PM #54:	fenderbender321 posted... I like gender segregation in video games. When I play RPGs, my party is always all men if I can control it. I'd love to see more games that only have all men so that myself and many others like me can have a better gaming experience. And of course, there should be more game with just women so that women who are like me (but a woman) can have a better gaming experience with them. Nobody cares --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:878409601] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>fenderbender321 posted...</cite> <quote>I like gender segregation in video games. When I play RPGs, my party is always all men if I can control it. I'd love to see more games that only have all men so that myself and many others like me can have a better gaming experience. And of course, there should be more game with just women so that women who are like me (but a woman) can have a better gaming experience with them.</quote> Nobody cares</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Go_Totodile 05/03/17 4:20:12 PM #55:	It's not like it will affect their sales any and I honestly couldn't give less of a fuck <cite>Go_Totodile posted [p:878409626] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>It's not like it will affect their sales any and I honestly couldn't give less of a fuck</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weapon_d00d816 05/03/17 4:21:39 PM #56:	Broseph_Stalin posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement. yeah that's usually your problem Extremely predictable post. --- SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG <cite>weapon_d00d816 posted [p:878409721] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote>I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.</quote> yeah that's usually your problem</quote> Extremely predictable post.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chill02 05/03/17 4:22:00 PM #57:	I mean, multiplayer modes will usually throw canon or historical accuracy out the window for the sake of fun There's nothing stopping you from having a lobby in Forza full of Pagani Zonda Cinques, even though literally only 5 of them exist and they're all in a showroom in Hong Kong now if it was a single player campaign full of American women fighting in the frontlines then I could understand the complaints, unless they're doing some alternate history thing like in Wolfenstein --- Ave, true to Caesar. <cite>chill02 posted [p:878409739] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>I mean, multiplayer modes will usually throw canon or historical accuracy out the window for the sake of fun There's nothing stopping you from having a lobby in Forza full of Pagani Zonda Cinques, even though literally only 5 of them exist and they're all in a showroom in Hong Kong now if it was a single player campaign full of American women fighting in the frontlines then I could understand the complaints, unless they're doing some alternate history thing like in Wolfenstein</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Ivory_Man 05/03/17 4:23:03 PM #58:	Samurontai posted... The_Ivory_Man posted... I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat. And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool. And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer. Having American soldiers as women would be stupid. The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument. There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics. There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well. It's a separate game mode. And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction? --- "Just because someone is killed doesn't mean they died" - Shojikan <cite>The_Ivory_Man posted [p:878409793] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_Ivory_Man posted...</cite> <quote>I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat. And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool. And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer. Having American soldiers as women would be stupid. The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.</quote> There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics.</quote> There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well. It's a separate game mode. And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weapon_d00d816 05/03/17 4:23:29 PM #59:	Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement. Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? chill02 posted... if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics. The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off. --- SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG <cite>weapon_d00d816 posted [p:878409822] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol </quote> People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.</quote> Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? <cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote>if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power</quote> This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.</quote> The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Broseph_Stalin 05/03/17 4:24:45 PM #60:	people actually think single player campaigns are historically accurate like what little they think they know about history comes from video games amazing <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted [p:878409921] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>people actually think single player campaigns are historically accurate like what little they think they know about history comes from video games amazing</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chill02 05/03/17 4:26:55 PM #61:	But then the question is how many CoD players will pick female soldiers online, and I have no clue because I haven't played them. All I know is Ghosts has them, so if you can find stats for that it should give you an idea, but my wild guess is that lobbies generally don't look like an Amazon brigade --- Ave, true to Caesar. <cite>chill02 posted [p:878410060] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>But then the question is how many CoD players will pick female soldiers online, and I have no clue because I haven't played them. All I know is Ghosts has them, so if you can find stats for that it should give you an idea, but my wild guess is that lobbies generally don't look like an Amazon brigade</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 05/03/17 4:27:32 PM #62:	The_Ivory_Man posted... Samurontai posted... The_Ivory_Man posted... I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat. And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool. And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer. Having American soldiers as women would be stupid. The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument. There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics. There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well. It's a separate game mode. And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction? Zombies is a multiplayer game mode. You're trying too hard to find an argument where there isn't one --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:878410106] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>The_Ivory_Man posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_Ivory_Man posted...</cite> <quote>I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat. And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool. And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer. Having American soldiers as women would be stupid. The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.</quote> There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics.</quote> There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well. It's a separate game mode. And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction?</quote> Zombies is a multiplayer game mode. You're trying too hard to find an argument where there isn't one</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 05/03/17 4:29:21 PM #63:	weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement. Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? chill02 posted... if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics. The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off. Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. Broseph_Stalin posted... people actually think single player campaigns are historically accurate like what little they think they know about history comes from video games amazing Nobody said this. It's more historically accurate than the multiplayer is, which isn't supposed to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics. --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:878410236] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol </quote> People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.</quote> Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? <cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote>if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power</quote> This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.</quote> The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.</quote> Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. <cite>Broseph_Stalin posted...</cite> <quote>people actually think single player campaigns are historically accurate like what little they think they know about history comes from video games amazing</quote> Nobody said this. It's more historically accurate than the multiplayer is, which isn't supposed to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
SGT_Conti 05/03/17 4:34:05 PM #64:	Samurontai posted... only a certain amount of snipers god bless --- "I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be." <cite>SGT_Conti posted [p:878410541] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote>only a certain amount of snipers</quote> god bless</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weapon_d00d816 05/03/17 4:35:09 PM #65:	Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement. Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? chill02 posted... if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics. The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off. Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. I would prefer faction-specific weaponry but unfortunately there are too many people who would whine about not being able to use their MP40 all the time. It also isn't necessary to be that realistic to feel like WWII. Freedom of weaponry feels like CoD, and since you're playing CoD, it doesn't take you out of the experience. You're experiencing WWII through a CoD multiplayer filter. Having an abundance of female combatants feels like neither. --- SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG <cite>weapon_d00d816 posted [p:878410623] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol </quote> People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.</quote> Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? <cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote>if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power</quote> This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.</quote> The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.</quote> Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. </quote> I would prefer faction-specific weaponry but unfortunately there are too many people who would whine about not being able to use their MP40 all the time. It also isn't necessary to be that realistic to feel like WWII. Freedom of weaponry feels like CoD, and since you're playing CoD, it doesn't take you out of the experience. You're experiencing WWII through a CoD multiplayer filter. Having an abundance of female combatants feels like neither.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 05/03/17 4:39:09 PM #66:	weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement. Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? chill02 posted... if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics. The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off. Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. I would prefer faction-specific weaponry but unfortunately there are too many people who would whine about not being able to use their MP40 all the time. It also isn't necessary to be that realistic to feel like WWII. Freedom of weaponry feels like CoD, and since you're playing CoD, it doesn't take you out of the experience. You're experiencing WWII through a CoD multiplayer filter. Having an abundance of female combatants feels like neither. 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter. --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:878410875] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote>Nobody said this lmao You're dumber than a fucking rock sometimes I swear lol </quote> People implied it by constantly going on about all these little specific exceptions. I can't see how that could possibly be construed as a dumb statement.</quote> Because there's a pretty hefty difference between the renownly ahistorical multiplayer and the more historical single player, which is something that carries across to basically... I don't know.... nearly every game in existence? <cite>chill02 posted...</cite> <quote>if we're talking strictly about multiplayer, there's still the issue with the abundance of, well, anything that's not a bolt action rifle, or the arbitrary gun power</quote> This post says it best. Multiplayer is not meant to be historically accurate beyond a few characteristics.</quote> The multiplayer is still supposed to feel like WWII despite taking liberties for the sake of gameplay. Having an abundance of female soldiers would feel incredibly off.</quote> Then they better only allow faction specific weapons, only a certain amount of snipers, and only a select few fully automatic weaponry. </quote> I would prefer faction-specific weaponry but unfortunately there are too many people who would whine about not being able to use their MP40 all the time. It also isn't necessary to be that realistic to feel like WWII. Freedom of weaponry feels like CoD, and since you're playing CoD, it doesn't take you out of the experience. You're experiencing WWII through a CoD multiplayer filter. Having an abundance of female combatants feels like neither.</quote> 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Maeiv 05/03/17 4:43:15 PM #67:	I feel like the idea of gunning down female combatants would be unnerving to the political left --- Achieve the dream 76ers, Eagles <cite>Maeiv posted [p:878411129] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>I feel like the idea of gunning down female combatants would be unnerving to the political left</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#68	Post #68 was unavailable or deleted.
weapon_d00d816 05/03/17 4:44:27 PM #69:	Samurontai posted... 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter. People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible. Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII. --- SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG <cite>weapon_d00d816 posted [p:878411208] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote> 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.</quote> People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible. Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 05/03/17 4:47:30 PM #70:	weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter. People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible. Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII. The same could be said for the automatic weaponry as well. You can't pick and choose. Female soldiers are just as much a part of COD now as the weapons. Maeiv posted... I feel like the idea of gunning down female combatants would be unnerving to the political left Pretty sure nobody would care though. You can literally stick a sword straight down the spine of female soldiers in For Honor. --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:878411413] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote> 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.</quote> People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible. Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII.</quote> The same could be said for the automatic weaponry as well. You can't pick and choose. Female soldiers are just as much a part of COD now as the weapons. <cite>Maeiv posted...</cite> <quote>I feel like the idea of gunning down female combatants would be unnerving to the political left</quote> Pretty sure nobody would care though. You can literally stick a sword straight down the spine of female soldiers in For Honor.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
weapon_d00d816 05/03/17 4:55:16 PM #71:	Samurontai posted... weapon_d00d816 posted... Samurontai posted... 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter. People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible. Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII. The same could be said for the automatic weaponry as well. You can't pick and choose. Female soldiers are just as much a part of COD now as the weapons. They provide absolutely nothing to the gameplay. --- SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG <cite>weapon_d00d816 posted [p:878411910] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote> 1) who said there would be an abundance of female combatants? The last COD game I played, to be fair, was Ghost, but even then there weren't very many female soldiers running around. 2) female soldiers is part of the COD filter.</quote> People choose female character models in a lot of shooters for the smaller silhouette. I haven't played CoD in a long time, but in most shooters there tends to be at least one-third of the lobby playing females when possible. Regardless of whether female soldiers feel like CoD or not, it clashes too heavily with feeling like WWII.</quote> The same could be said for the automatic weaponry as well. You can't pick and choose. Female soldiers are just as much a part of COD now as the weapons. </quote> They provide absolutely nothing to the gameplay.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
eston 05/03/17 4:56:35 PM #72:	They also don't take anything away from the gameplay --- http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i215/estonc/grizzly_bear_chairs_2.jpg http://i.imgur.com/8kjZU.jpg <cite>eston posted [p:878411991] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>They also don't take anything away from the gameplay</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
thompsontalker7 05/03/17 5:04:44 PM #73:	What was the last CoD you felt immersed in hmm I highly doubt it had anything to do with the soldiers you played as --- You haven't set a signature for the message boards yet. Might wanna get on that, yeah? <cite>thompsontalker7 posted [p:878412498] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>What was the last CoD you felt immersed in hmm I highly doubt it had anything to do with the soldiers you played as</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
kuwab0 05/03/17 5:09:12 PM #74:	Russia used Women soldiers, although I wonder if Call of Duty will get rid of the Russians like Batlefield 1 --- http://i.imgur.com/QfpP05s.png http://i.imgur.com/vdnZ1o6.png http://i.imgur.com/zTgf822.png <cite>kuwab0 posted [p:878412765] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>Russia used Women soldiers, although I wonder if Call of Duty will get rid of the Russians like Batlefield 1</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DemonBuffet 05/03/17 5:10:56 PM #75:	Menardi posted... Imagine getting mad about a COD game. --- Trololol <cite>DemonBuffet posted [p:878412875] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Menardi posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine getting mad about a COD game.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 05/03/17 5:11:50 PM #76:	DemonBuffet posted... Menardi posted... Imagine getting mad about a COD game. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:878412931] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>DemonBuffet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Menardi posted...</cite> <quote>Imagine getting mad about a COD game.</quote></quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Xeno14 05/03/17 5:13:50 PM #77:	i think a historical recreation would be more interesting then the current schlock. non integrated units, white soliders refusing transfusions from blacks because they think it will give them diseases. Show how ugly things were rather then a whitewashed version. --- http://i.imgur.com/brMr5Ig.jpg http://i.imgur.com/MoXxySu.gif https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyGM7qMXgAAwhbT.jpg:large <cite>Xeno14 posted [p:878413053] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>i think a historical recreation would be more interesting then the current schlock. non integrated units, white soliders refusing transfusions from blacks because they think it will give them diseases. Show how ugly things were rather then a whitewashed version.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
UnfairRepresent 05/03/17 5:16:49 PM #78:	Xeno14 posted... i think a historical recreation would be more interesting then the current schlock. non integrated units, white soliders refusing transfusions from blacks because they think it will give them diseases. Show how ugly things were rather then a whitewashed version. Little did he know video games are meant to be fucking fun. "Press X to deny blood because it came from a black guy!" Isn't riveting Maybe they can add a pain adaptor that allows you to experience utter agony when you get shot and your leg is amputated It's a video game. Its about people who can run forever without getting tried having pew pew pews with guys who talk in funny accents and therefore are evil. --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:878413237] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Xeno14 posted...</cite> <quote>i think a historical recreation would be more interesting then the current schlock. non integrated units, white soliders refusing transfusions from blacks because they think it will give them diseases. Show how ugly things were rather then a whitewashed version.</quote> Little did he know video games are meant to be fucking fun. "Press X to deny blood because it came from a black guy!" Isn't riveting Maybe they can add a pain adaptor that allows you to experience utter agony when you get shot and your leg is amputated It's a video game. Its about people who can run forever without getting tried having pew pew pews with guys who talk in funny accents and therefore are evil.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chill02 05/03/17 5:39:46 PM #79:	weapon_d00d816 posted... They provide absolutely nothing to the gameplay. but you said they have a smaller hitbox, there's a gameplay attribute --- Ave, true to Caesar. <cite>chill02 posted [p:878414683] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>weapon_d00d816 posted...</cite> <quote>They provide absolutely nothing to the gameplay.</quote> but you said they have a smaller hitbox, there's a gameplay attribute</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Samurontai 05/03/17 5:43:44 PM #80:	Xeno14 posted... i think a historical recreation would be more interesting then the current schlock. non integrated units, white soliders refusing transfusions from blacks because they think it will give them diseases. Show how ugly things were rather then a whitewashed version. In single player? Sure, why not. --- http://i.imgur.com/Scl5rwX.gif http://i.imgur.com/Fjgt7Qq.gif http://i.imgur.com/NidhAni.gif http://i.imgur.com/IGIbQPk.gif <cite>Samurontai posted [p:878414932] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Xeno14 posted...</cite> <quote>i think a historical recreation would be more interesting then the current schlock. non integrated units, white soliders refusing transfusions from blacks because they think it will give them diseases. Show how ugly things were rather then a whitewashed version.</quote> In single player? Sure, why not.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ForestLogic 05/03/17 5:47:17 PM #81:	The real question here is do girls actually play Call of Duty. --- AKA Level 36 ForestWanderer / ObjectiveLogic http://www.poorcouplesfoodguide.com - Pizza Time! <cite>ForestLogic posted [p:878415148] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>The real question here is do girls actually play Call of Duty.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chill02 05/03/17 5:47:53 PM #82:	I know of three, but, you know, anecdotal evidence and all that --- Ave, true to Caesar. <cite>chill02 posted [p:878415185] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>I know of three, but, you know, anecdotal evidence and all that</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VandorLee 05/03/17 5:49:32 PM #83:	No trans? im offended. --- "God didn't create humans, no, it's humans who created God." Dr. Londes, Cowboy Bebop: "Brain Scratch" (#1.23) (1999) <cite>VandorLee posted [p:878415280] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>No trans? im offended.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Axiom 05/03/17 5:50:19 PM #84:	Lmao what a trivial thing to bitch about <cite>Axiom posted [p:878415322] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>Lmao what a trivial thing to bitch about</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LJRENEGADE 05/03/17 5:50:47 PM #85:	faizan_faizan posted... It also has them in the campaign. It harms its authenticity, in my opinion. This, but at the same time I don't really care. Its not too big of a thing to the point where its ridiculous imo. <cite>LJRENEGADE posted [p:878415344] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>faizan_faizan posted...</cite> <quote>It also has them in the campaign. It harms its authenticity, in my opinion.</quote> This, but at the same time I don't really care. Its not too big of a thing to the point where its ridiculous imo.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
gafemaqs 05/03/17 5:54:28 PM #86:	UnfairRepresent posted... Little did he know video games are meant to be fucking fun. It's 2017. Games haven't been fun for like a decade. <cite>gafemaqs posted [p:878415557] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>Little did he know video games are meant to be fucking fun.</quote> It's 2017. Games haven't been fun for like a decade.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#87	Post #87 was unavailable or deleted.
mario2000 05/03/17 6:35:21 PM #88:	its about ethics in gaming journalism --- Arrrr the SS Goku, Mighty fine boat... -fatmatt Hope Frieza doesn't chuck an Iceberg at the Goku, otherwise it's all over. -Nekoslash <cite>mario2000 posted [p:878418020] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote>its about ethics in gaming journalism</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DKFjalfe 05/03/17 6:47:36 PM #89:	mario2000 posted... ethics in gaming journalism Lololololol <cite>DKFjalfe posted [p:878418798] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>mario2000 posted...</cite> <quote>ethics in gaming journalism</quote> Lololololol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
The_Ivory_Man 05/03/17 10:54:31 PM #90:	Samurontai posted... The_Ivory_Man posted... Samurontai posted... The_Ivory_Man posted... I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat. And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool. And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer. Having American soldiers as women would be stupid. The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument. There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics. There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well. It's a separate game mode. And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction? Zombies is a multiplayer game mode. You're trying too hard to find an argument where there isn't one The campaign is a multiplayer game mode as well considering there's co-op then. I'm not trying to find an argument. --- "Just because someone is killed doesn't mean they died" - Shojikan <cite>The_Ivory_Man posted [p:878432876] in People are... [t:75307766]...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_Ivory_Man posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Samurontai posted...</cite> <quote><cite>The_Ivory_Man posted...</cite> <quote>I don't mind French Resistance, Soviet, or later on Germans in Europe being women in combat. And showing viewpoints that aren't done much is cool. And I wish BF1 actually did this by showing how the US treated black regiments in WW1 and how the French were the ones using them instead of having the troops integrated in the multiplayer. Having American soldiers as women would be stupid. The "there are zombies in the game so everything else about the game can throughout into full fiction" is a ridiculous argument. Why not have the Nazis look like Whoopi Goldberg, why not have the Emperor of Japan be a transformer who lives on the surface of the sun, and so on. There's no logic in that argument.</quote> There is logic in that argument because I was talking about the Multiplayer specifically, which typically never had a basis in reality beyond certain characteristics.</quote> There aren't zombies in the multiplayer as well. It's a separate game mode. And Saving Private Ryan doesn't have any real basis in reality aside from taking place in WW2, does that mean criticism can't occur over errors in what it does because it's fiction?</quote> Zombies is a multiplayer game mode. You're trying too hard to find an argument where there isn't one</quote> The campaign is a multiplayer game mode as well considering there's co-op then. I'm not trying to find an argument.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > People are mad because COD WWII will have female soldiers in multiplayer lol