Current Events > Trump administration plans to kill Net Neutrality

(+) Yeah! (+)

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/330703-fcc-head-unveils-plan-to-roll-back-net-neutrality

Ok Republicans enlighten me. How does this help consumers?
---

It doesn't. You should know by now they only care about corporate money.

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.
---

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

Oh-ho-ho, watch out for Mr. Intro to Economics over here!

Back up your claims or shut the hell up.
---

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

GlT 'IM
---

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

I know what it does and why we need it. I was asking why removing it is a good thing
---

Good way to lose tons of young voters next election. Worst case scenario it will be fixed in a few years when they get btfo.

You can take away our freedoms but don't fuck with our Netflix.
---

Old news is old.
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

Oh-ho-ho, watch out for Mr. Intro to Economics over here!

Back up your claims or shut the hell up.

*rolls eyes* You don't actually have any problems with what I said.

ZombiePelican posted...

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

I know what it does and why we need it. I was asking why removing it is a good thing

It isn't unless they see issues with the current way it is done and have a plan to better implement net neutrality.
---

uwnim posted...

*rolls eyes* You don't actually have any problems with what I said.

Oh, so you have absolutely nothing to back up your shit claim and you're just wasting everyone's time. Thanks for the confirmation. Tagged so I know to never take you seriously in the future.
---

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

It costs ISPs money in the sense of there is no reason to buy their shitty ass $200/month broadcast TV packages.

That's why they're trying to kill Net Neutrality. So they can make it harder to use Netflix / Hulu / Prime Video
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

uwnim posted...

*rolls eyes* You don't actually have any problems with what I said.

Oh, so you have absolutely nothing to back up your shit claim and you're just wasting everyone's time. Thanks for the confirmation. Tagged so I know to never take you seriously in the future.

Wow sure told em bet he'll be crying for days about his tag
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

uwnim posted...

*rolls eyes* You don't actually have any problems with what I said.

Oh, so you have absolutely nothing to back up your shit claim and you're just wasting everyone's time. Thanks for the confirmation. Tagged so I know to never take you seriously in the future.

You didn't refute a thing he said.
---

Since when is the burden of proof on the listener and not the speaker? You can shut the hell up too. Also tagged.
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

Since when is the burden of proof on the listener and not the speaker? You can shut the hell up too. Also tagged.

god damn you're hostile

I don't think anybody gives a shit what you tag them considering you have no authority and aren't willing to even do the basic task of engaging in a debate, jesus fucking christ
---

Trump wouldn't push this unless it was beneficial to us. He's making excellent decisions and only gaining more and more support from us citizens.
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

Since when is the burden of proof on the listener and not the speaker? You can shut the hell up too. Also tagged.

You're the one engaging him. You didn't address anything he said, all you did was mock and cajole. No argument whatsoever.
---

TheRealDill2000 posted...

Trump wouldn't push this unless it was beneficial to us. He's making excellent decisions and only gaining more and more support from us citizens.

lol
---

AssAnihilated
---

ChromaticAngel posted...

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

It costs ISPs money in the sense of there is no reason to buy their shitty ass $200/month broadcast TV packages.

That's why they're trying to kill Net Neutrality. So they can make it harder to use Netflix / Hulu / Prime Video

Then switch to a less shitty ISP that won't charge you money. You know, like back before 2015 when NN didn't exist as law?

I told him to back his shit up, he couldn't do it because he can't do it. I can't make an argument when he doesn't actually have anything to argue against. Is that so hard to understand?

What am I saying? I'm on CE. Of course you can't grasp even that simple concept.
---

TheRealDill2000 posted...

Trump wouldn't push this unless it was beneficial to us. He's making excellent decisions and only gaining more and more support from us citizens.

I've lost the ability to tell sarcasm from genuine belief when it comes to Trump supporters.
---

HiddenRoar posted...

ChromaticAngel posted...

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

It costs ISPs money in the sense of there is no reason to buy their shitty ass $200/month broadcast TV packages.

That's why they're trying to kill Net Neutrality. So they can make it harder to use Netflix / Hulu / Prime Video

Then switch to a less shitty ISP that won't charge you money. You know, like back before 2015 when NN didn't exist as law?

Good luck doing that when there's only one ISP in a lot of areas.

AzureAnihilator posted...

I told him to back his shit up, he couldn't do it because he can't do it. I can't make an argument when he doesn't actually have anything to argue against. Is that so hard to understand?

What am I saying? I'm on CE. Of course you can't grasp even that simple concept.

Rough day?
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

I told him to back his shit up, he couldn't do it because he can't do it. I can't make an argument when he doesn't actually have anything to argue against. Is that so hard to understand?

What am I saying? I'm on CE. Of course you can't grasp even that simple concept.

He does have an argument. The fact that he doesn't source anything he says should make it that much easier to refute his post, yet you can't.
---

HiddenRoar posted...

ChromaticAngel posted...

uwnim posted...

Net Neutrality, if done right, doesn't actually cost ISPs anything and ensures fair competition for the various websites that actually give the internet value. It is the sort of regulation that is objectively a net plus for the economy.

It costs ISPs money in the sense of there is no reason to buy their shitty ass $200/month broadcast TV packages.

That's why they're trying to kill Net Neutrality. So they can make it harder to use Netflix / Hulu / Prime Video

Then switch to a less shitty ISP that won't charge you money. You know, like back before 2015 when NN didn't exist as law?

Many places don't have an option. You either use one ISP, or you use slow as shit internet.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/08/us-broadband-still-no-isp-choice-for-many-especially-at-higher-speeds/
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

I told him to back his shit up, he couldn't do it because he can't do it. I can't make an argument when he doesn't actually have anything to argue against. Is that so hard to understand?

What am I saying? I'm on CE. Of course you can't grasp even that simple concept.

He literally provided an argument. Not only did he do so, he did so in a fair manner that didn't insult anybody. You, however, immediately opened by telling him to "shut the hell up". You clearly have an issue with what he said, but you won't specify the problem with his post.

He has no reason to actually oblige you when your immediate reaction was childish hostility and non-arguments to his argument. Temp down the ego.
---

AzureAnihilator posted...

I told him to back his shit up, he couldn't do it because he can't do it. I can't make an argument when he doesn't actually have anything to argue against. Is that so hard to understand?

What am I saying? I'm on CE. Of course you can't grasp even that simple concept.

Holy shit prepare to be tagged people
---