Current Events > Is The Admiral Racist?

(+) Yeah! (+)

I don't think he's racist, I do wish he exercised some wisdom and self-control to avoid pointless convos.

I mean if I see Ricky, Kineth, Bishop (edit) or RichHomie talk about black people I know where they are going with the conversation.

Same with Hockey & Negi on trans (mostly women) issues.
---

He's rational and says a lot of things I agree with. I have him tagged as Should Be Mod Again.

Admiral is about as racist as he is a regressive leftist troll

It's easier to throw around racist and other buzzwords than it is take take on arguments directly. Not following the liberal circlejerk is considered racist, for example. It's all a part of why dorks here are so entertaining.
---

Not even the slightest bit.
---

Yeah cause I recall a couple instances where some crime or attack happened and he was so quick to accuse BLM but it turned out to be a white guy so he immediately disappeared form those topics once called out.

I mean he might not be IRL but he definitely comes off as one here even if it's a gimmick.
---

I've always pegged The Admiral as a consecutive shitposter willing to come off as racist, but no I don't think he's actually racist.
---

Bio1590 posted...

Well there was that time that guy ambushed and killed those two cops in Iowa and he immediately jumped on the "Fuck BLM this is their fault!" assuming the person who did it was a BLM member (with literally no evidence it was) and we all know how that turned out.





(The guy was white, and a known racist and Trump supporter)

I came in to point this out. This one of the most blatant examples. And immediately after I called him out, he deleted his post.
---

Oh maybe we should add in the extra sentence explaining he admitted he was wrong and that's why he deleted it but that would detract from the progressive agenda of ignoring facts

I can't speak for anyone's personal life but he doesn't post racism.

Hating Admiral is a meme. Most of his haters don't even pay attention to his posts.
---

Marklar posted...

Oh maybe we should add in the extra sentence explaining he admitted he was wrong and that's why he deleted it but that would detract from the progressive agenda of ignoring facts

The fact that he came in with preconceived notions that not only the guy was black, but a member of BLM is already racist enough.

The only reason he apologized was because he had been exposed and several people had come into the topic and read the comment and quoted it.
---

He made a topic like a week ago about racial intelligence.

He's not the worst though. The one really annoying thing he does is disappear from topics when he's shown to be wrong, instead of just admitting his mistake like an adult. Especially hypocritical given his tendency to accuse liberals of doing the same thing.
---

Oh good. Mind reading. The noble ability of the regressive left.

No, only a complete moron would say yes.

RighteousTip posted...

Marklar posted...

Oh maybe we should add in the extra sentence explaining he admitted he was wrong and that's why he deleted it but that would detract from the progressive agenda of ignoring facts

The fact that he came in with preconceived notions that not only the guy was black, but a member of BLM is already racist enough.

The only reason he apologized was because he had been exposed and several people had come into the topic and read the comment and quoted it.

So he still amitted he was wrong. But yet still bringing this up happens because ....

weapon_d00d816 posted...

Hating Admiral is a meme. Most of his haters don't even pay attention to his posts.

---

No, he's a pretty swell poster.

He just rustles liberal jimmies and when they can't refute calls him a racist. It's liberal debate tactics 101.
---

Annihilated posted...

No, only a complete moron would say yes.

voldothegr8 posted...

No, he's a pretty swell poster.

He just rustles liberal jimmies and when they can't refute calls him a racist. It's liberal debate tactics 101.

Funny how the most questionable posters rush to his defense.
---

Look at the people defending him. Mostly the usual suspects.
---

thanosibe posted...

So he still amitted he was wrong. But yet still bringing this up happens because ....

But continue to ignore the fact that the article that was posted did not bring up race or BLM but his first comment was something akin to "Let's see how liberals try to defend BLM this time."

Sure, the apology was fine, but if you want to make a comment about it, there is no reason to shitpost and not only target liberals but black people as well AND be wrong on both accounts. You can apologize, but it doesn't take away the fact that he posted what he posted.
---

What's more cringe worthy here is his rabid followers here defending this goof.

Relax admirals feelings arnt hurt he busy making million dollar deals on a golf course pulling up them bootstraps.
---

It's strange how the regressive left doesn't actually quite comprehend that disagreeing that all cops are racist and out to destroy blacks means you aren't racist.

Marklar posted...

It's strange how the regressive left doesn't actually quite comprehend that disagreeing that all cops are racist and out to destroy blacks means you aren't racist.

Disagreeing that all cops are racist doesn't mean you're racist.

Defending the cops as an institution does

Imagine a place where cops were unchecked like several 3rd world countries

-Gavirulax- posted...

voldothegr8 posted...

when they can't refute calls him a racist. It's liberal debate tactics 101.

Racist, bigot, somethingaphobe, the usual.

"There is more crime in this communit....."

RACIST!!!!

It's more the subtle implications that minorities are naturally more violent.
---

I've never seen him say anything racist. Unless people here think being against BLM is racist in which case like 90% of america and pretty much everyone in my country who watches the shit they do online/the news is racist.
---

Marklar posted...

It's strange how the regressive left doesn't actually quite comprehend that disagreeing that all cops are racist and out to destroy blacks means you aren't racist.

No one believes this.
---

It's funny how people on this board have stated that the police force are a racist intistution to massacre blacks but people can't seem to accept it.
But I will do what you do. I never seen Admiral say anything any of the progressives claimed he has. So you're all lying and he's innocent of any crime you accuse him of.

So it's pretty much a guarantee that he's posting with alts in this topic.
---

CowboyDan posted...

-Gavirulax- posted...

voldothegr8 posted...

when they can't refute calls him a racist. It's liberal debate tactics 101.

Racist, bigot, somethingaphobe, the usual.

"There is more crime in this communit....."

RACIST!!!!

It's more the subtle implications that minorities are naturally more violent.

See, this guy gets it. Like how quickly they latch on to narratives of riots and looting as if they're commonplace and exclusive to black people.
---

RighteousTip posted...

thanosibe posted...

So he still amitted he was wrong. But yet still bringing this up happens because ....

But continue to ignore the fact that the article that was posted did not bring up race or BLM but his first comment was something akin to "Let's see how liberals try to defend BLM this time."

Sure, the apology was fine, but if you want to make a comment about it, there is no reason to shitpost and not only target liberals but black people as well AND be wrong on both accounts. You can apologize, but it doesn't take away the fact that he posted what he posted.

Yeah I remember the topic. He did jump the gun and accuse a black man of being the culprit before any evidence was found. And yes after the fact he did say "sorry" only because he was getting called out. I'm more pointing to that this event keeps coming up as an excuse to dismiss what he says now. It's a lame debate tactic in my opinion and one a lot of his detractors do. They seem to be incapable of separating the poster from his posts and knee jerk react to everything he posts whether it's racist or not.
---

Progressives don't allow people to make mistakes. But will hide the mistakes of their own clan.

thanosibe posted...

RighteousTip posted...

thanosibe posted...

So he still amitted he was wrong. But yet still bringing this up happens because ....

But continue to ignore the fact that the article that was posted did not bring up race or BLM but his first comment was something akin to "Let's see how liberals try to defend BLM this time."

Sure, the apology was fine, but if you want to make a comment about it, there is no reason to shitpost and not only target liberals but black people as well AND be wrong on both accounts. You can apologize, but it doesn't take away the fact that he posted what he posted.

Yeah I remember the topic. He did jump the gun and accuse a black man of being the culprit before any evidence was found. And yes after the fact he did say "sorry" only because he was getting called out. I'm more pointing to that this event keeps coming up as an excuse to dismiss what he says now. It's a lame debate tactic in my opinion and one a lot of his detractors do. They seem to be incapable of separating the poster from his posts and knee jerk react to everything he posts whether it's racist or not.

I have no idea what he says or posts now since I don't seek him out to see what he posts, but I had him marked as "racist troll" before that for whatever reason and he seemed to follow through then.

I have no idea if he's actually racist or not, but if you post racist things what am I supposed to think?
---

'I don't know if he's actually racist but I'll call him racist' - progressive logic

RighteousTip posted...

I have no idea if he's actually racist or not, but if you post racist things what am I supposed to think?

Right? Like that time he equated Ebonics to animal noises.
---

That never happened

Is the sky blue?
Does the earth revolve around the sun?
Do we need water to live?

The character he plays on CE definitely is.
---

RighteousTip posted...

thanosibe posted...

RighteousTip posted...

thanosibe posted...

So he still amitted he was wrong. But yet still bringing this up happens because ....

But continue to ignore the fact that the article that was posted did not bring up race or BLM but his first comment was something akin to "Let's see how liberals try to defend BLM this time."

Sure, the apology was fine, but if you want to make a comment about it, there is no reason to shitpost and not only target liberals but black people as well AND be wrong on both accounts. You can apologize, but it doesn't take away the fact that he posted what he posted.

Yeah I remember the topic. He did jump the gun and accuse a black man of being the culprit before any evidence was found. And yes after the fact he did say "sorry" only because he was getting called out. I'm more pointing to that this event keeps coming up as an excuse to dismiss what he says now. It's a lame debate tactic in my opinion and one a lot of his detractors do. They seem to be incapable of separating the poster from his posts and knee jerk react to everything he posts whether it's racist or not.

I have no idea what he says or posts now since I don't seek him out to see what he posts, but I had him marked as "racist troll" before that for whatever reason and he seemed to follow through then.

I have no idea if he's actually racist or not, but if you post racist things what am I supposed to think?

I don't seek him out either and I'm not trying to challenge your estimation of him or say he's not racist.

I'm more observing the phenomenon that surrounds him. Like bringing up year old posts, sock puppet accusations and other deflections a lot of his haters do. It's shitty even if Admiral is wrong at that time or a racists. Hell I posted in one of his topics, still in my AMA, that didn't even agree with his OP and some shit posting Admiral hating troll called me an Admiral alt. Some people take the hate to level where it's hard for anyone to debate when he's around.
---

garan posted...

Doom_Art posted...

He is.

Probably why he got demodded IMO

I love children like this who claim he was demodded for being mean, even though it has been repeatedly disproved by multiple mods who have no reason to stick up for Admiral.

I'll admit, I cant stand Admiral, but he stepped down from being a mod, he wasn't removed.

He was also way more tame back when he was a mod, if he had posted half the shit he does now while he was a mod, he probably would have actually been demodded tbh. But, that's just my personal theory, as it stands, he wasn't actually removed.
---

thanosibe posted...

I don't seek him out either.

You seem to appear to defend him at every opportunity so that's hard to believe.
---

It's a common regressive tactic to assume everyone is the same person.
It scares the to think outside of their meetings and their clan nodding that more than one person in the universe is actually not agreeing with their brainwashing

I like how Brutal is just talking to himself repeatedly and nobody's biting lol.
---

Admiral's not a racist. It's frustrating for some of the liberals and leftists here who constantly get rekt by him in debates, so they fall back on their old standby of accusing the other side of being racist.
---

DifferentialEquation posted...

Admiral's not a racist. It's frustrating for some the liberals and leftists here who constantly get rekt by him in debates, so they fall back on their old standby of accusing the other side of being racist.

They're all "rekt" when he runs off never to be seen again after being proven wrong yeah.
---

This topic is gold, Jerry. Gold!!
---