Since Rep. Liz Cheney accepted House Speaker Nancy Pelosis offer to serve as the vice chair of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, the Wyoming Republican has exerted a remarkable level of control over much of the committees public and private work.
Now, less than six weeks before the conclusion of the committees work, Cheneys influence over the committees final report has rankled many current and former committee staff. They are angered and disillusioned by Cheneys push to focus the report primarily on former president Donald Trump, and have bristled at the committee morphing into what they have come to view as the vehicle for the outgoing Wyoming lawmakers political future.
Fifteen former and current staffers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, expressed concerns that important findings unrelated to Trump will not become available to the American public. The feuding brings to the fore a level of public acrimony within the Jan. 6 committee that previously had largely played out behind the scenes, as public attention was focused on a series of blockbuster public hearings focused on Trumps role fomenting the attack.
Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committees Gold Team, excluding reams of other investigative work. Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the Blue Team the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence communitys failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the Jan. 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined militia groups and extremism.
We all came from prestigious jobs, dropping what we were doing because we were told this would be an important fact-finding investigation that would inform the public, said one former committee staffer. But when [the committee] became a Cheney 2024 campaign, many of us became discouraged.
Cheney spokesman Jeremy Adler issued a blistering statement Wednesday to The Washington Post in response to the criticisms. Donald Trump is the first president in American history to attempt to overturn an election and prevent the peaceful transfer of power, Adler said. So, damn right Liz is prioritizing understanding what he did and how he did it and ensuring it never happens again. Adler added, Some staff have submitted subpar material for the report that reflects long-held liberal biases about federal law enforcement, Republicans, and sociological issues outside the scope of the Select Committees work. She wont sign onto any narrative that suggests Republicans are inherently racist or smears men and women in law enforcement, or suggests every American who believes God has blessed America is a white supremacist. Tim Mulvey, the select committees spokesman, said in a separate statement that the panels historic, bipartisan fact-finding effort speaks for itself, and that wont be changed by a handful of disgruntled staff who are uninformed about many parts of the committees ongoing work.
Theyve forgotten their duties as public servants and their cowardice is helping Donald Trump and others responsible for the violence of January 6th, Mulveys statement continued. All nine committee members continue to review materials and make contributions to the draft report, which will address every key aspect of the committees investigation. Decisions about the contents of the report ultimately rest with the committees bipartisan membership, not the staff. ... Some staffers noted that the mission of the committee as spelled out in the resolution authorizing its formation was to discover what political forces and intelligence and security failures allowed the U.S. Capitol Police and its partners to be so overwhelmed and ill-prepared for the attack and to ensure that such an event could not happen again. Leaving any relevant information out of the final report would ignore important lessons for the future and issues that will outlive Trump, they argued.
But in the wake of an NBC News story earlier this month that the final report would not include much of the panels work not directly related to Trump, lawmakers on the committee are now reassessing what to include in the final draft and also eyeing different ways to publicly share more of the investigators work outside of the report. That could include sharing findings on the committees website or releasing internal transcripts.
A senior committee staffer told staff in a virtual conference meeting two weeks ago that none of the work done by people serving on teams other than the Gold Team that didnt focus on Trump would be included in the final report. Everybody freaked out, the staffer said.
The announcement, this staffer argued, was premature and based on negative reactions from lawmakers who concluded that draft chapters written by non-Gold investigative teams should not be included because they were either too long or too academic in nature. However, the staffer said, while committee members disliked those chapters, they were open to including some of that material in a more concise or streamlined form.
Its not a class project everyone doesnt get a participation prize, said a senior Democratic aide. The Green Team has chapters and chapters of good work, but the problem is theyve learned a lot of great stuff about objectionable but completely legal things.
Tensions among lawmakers on the committee are also high, with some members angry about information being shared with the press regarding internal discussions on what to include or exclude from the final report, according to people familiar with the mood on the committee. Some distrust has been sown between lawmakers and staff over the NBC News story, and some senior staff called complaints about Cheney from committee staff unprofessional and said that ultimately, the members call the final shots.
Ten years from now, most of us are going to think that the work of the committee has been the most important thing weve ever done in our careers, and I think its just very shortsighted to have these kinds of smaller, petty kind of complaints, a senior committee staffer said.
People familiar with the committees work said Cheney has taken a far more hands-on role than Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.), who is chairing the committee. She is said by multiple staffers to want the report to focus on Trump, and has pushed for the hearings to focus extensively on his conduct and not what she views as other sideshows.
Two people familiar with the process argued that without Cheneys guidance, the committee would not be on track to submit a cohesive final report by the end of the year. One of these people described some of the output from investigators as being uneven.
They were headed for a worse version of the Mueller report, which nobody read and Cheney knew that, this person said.
Some staff vehemently objected to the characterization that some of the work product was weak or inconsistent, and countered that its long been clear that Cheney deprioritized findings that didnt fit a specific narrative about Trumps efforts to foment the insurrection.