Current Events > How Congress sweeps sexual harassment under the rug

Topic List
Page List: 1
Antifar
11/20/17 10:56:28 PM
#1:


https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/she-complained-that-a-powerful-congressman-harassed-her
Michigan Rep. John Conyers, a Democrat and the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives, settled a wrongful dismissal complaint in 2015 with a former employee who alleged she was fired because she would not succumb to [his] sexual advances.

Documents from the complaint obtained by BuzzFeed News include four signed affidavits, three of which are notarized, from former staff members who allege that Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the powerful House Judiciary Committee, repeatedly made sexual advances to female staff that included requests for sexual favors, contacting and transporting other women with whom they believed Conyers was having affairs, caressing their hands sexually, and rubbing their legs and backs in public. Four people involved with the case verified the documents are authentic.

And the documents also reveal the secret mechanism by which Congress has kept an unknown number of sexual harassment allegations secret: A grinding, closely held process that left the alleged victim feeling, she told BuzzFeed News, that she had no option other than to stay quiet and accept a settlement offered to her.

I was basically blackballed. There was nowhere I could go, she said in a phone interview. BuzzFeed News is withholding the womans name at her request, because she said she fears retribution.

Last week the Washington Post reported that the office paid out $17 million for 264 settlements with federal employees over 20 years for various violations, including sexual harassment. The Conyers documents, however, give a glimpse into the inner workings of the Office of Compliance, which has for decades concealed episodes of sexual abuse by powerful political figures

The woman who settled with Conyers launched the complaint in 2014 with Congresss Office of Compliance alleging that she was fired for refusing his sexual advances and ended up facing a daunting process that ended with a confidentiality agreement in exchange for a $27,111.75 settlement. Her settlement, however, came from Conyers office budget rather than the designated fund for settlements.

Congress has no human resources department. Instead, congressional employees have 180 days to report a sexual harassment incident to the Office of Compliance, which then leads to a lengthy process involves counseling, mediation, and requires the signing of a confidentiality agreement before a complaint can go forward.

After this, an employee can choose to take the matter to federal district court, but another avenue is available: an administrative hearing, after which a negotiation and settlement may follow.

Some members of Congress have raised major concerns with the current system over the years, but the calls for an overhaul have grown louder in the post-Weinstein era. Members have argued that 90 days is too long to make a person continue working in the same environment with their harasser; that interns and fellows should be eligible to pursue complaints through this process; and that it is unfair for a victim to have to pay for legal representation while the office of the harasser is represented for free by the House's counsel.

In this case, one of Conyers former employees was offered a settlement, in exchange for her silence, that would be paid out of Conyers taxpayer-funded office budget. His office would rehire the woman as a temporary employee despite her being directed not to come into the office or do any actual work, according to the document. The complainant would receive a total payment of $27,111.75 over the three months, after which point she would be removed from the payroll, according to the document.

The draft agreement viewed by BuzzFeed News was unsigned, but congressional employment records match the timing and amounts outlined in the document.

---
kin to all that throbs
... Copied to Clipboard!
CiIantro
11/20/17 10:57:42 PM
#2:


... Copied to Clipboard!
lilORANG
11/20/17 11:01:26 PM
#3:


On the one hand, I don't like that tax dollars are going to protect pervs like this.

On the other, I can't help but feel a little bit like maybe instead of signing confidentiality agreements the victims should publicly accuse the person. Who else is in a better position to take these dudes down?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Antifar
11/21/17 9:31:18 AM
#4:


bump
---
kin to all that throbs
... Copied to Clipboard!
eston
11/21/17 9:41:13 AM
#5:


Requiring the complainant to sign a confidentiality agreement before the complaint can move forward is some shady ass shit
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
E32005
11/21/17 9:41:55 AM
#6:


... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1