Current Events > 'X-Men '97' Creator Beau DeMayo Fired Weeks Before Show Aires.

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
[deleted] 03/12/24 2:01:53 PM #34:	[deleted] <cite>[deleted] posted [p:979332830] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>[deleted]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Necronmon 03/12/24 3:21:42 PM #1:	https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/marvel-shocker-x-men-97-creator-beau-demayo-fired-1235850423/ Er...hopefully this is not a foreboding sigh of the fate of the show... <cite>Necronmon posted [p:979331955] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/marvel-shocker-x-men-97-creator-beau-demayo-fired-1235850423/Er...hopefully this is not a foreboding sigh of the fate of the show...</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DiScOrDtHeLuNaTiC 03/12/24 3:22:56 PM #2:	I would have fired him as soon as he wanted to put Magneto in that fucking stupid M costume. --- The world may be going to Hell, but I am personally awash with convenience. <cite>DiScOrDtHeLuNaTiC posted [p:979331979] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>I would have fired him as soon as he wanted to put Magneto in that fucking stupid M costume. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#3	Post #3 was unavailable or deleted.
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 3:29:09 PM #4:	did he choose to censor Rogue's butt? <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332086] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>did he choose to censor Rogue's butt?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/12/24 3:30:59 PM #5:	I think it's time we learn what censor actually means. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:979332117] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>I think it's time we learn what censor actually means. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 3:33:42 PM #6:	Jupiter posted... I think it's time we learn what censor actually means. "we think this is too much for kids so we will change it" that is what censor means <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332163] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>Jupiter posted... </cite><quote>I think it's time we learn what censor actually means.</quote>"we think this is too much for kids so we will change it"that is what censor means</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 3:35:04 PM #7:	WingsOfGood posted... "we think this is too much for kids so we will change it" that is what censor means it actually isn't... --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332183] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>"we think this is too much for kids so we will change it"that is what censor means</quote>it actually isn't... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 3:35:43 PM #8:	CrimsonGear80 posted... it actually isn't... so 4kids removing guns out of yugioh and changing death to the shadow realm is not censoring? <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332195] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>it actually isn't...</quote>so 4kids removing guns out of yugioh and changing death to the shadow realm is not censoring?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 3:36:27 PM #9:	WingsOfGood posted... so 4kids removing guns out of yugioh and changing death to the shadow realm is not censoring? no that was but nothing in x-men '97 is altered like that. the show is airing as intended. --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332205] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>so 4kids removing guns out of yugioh and changing death to the shadow realm is not censoring?</quote>no that wasbut nothing in x-men '97 is altered like that. the show is airing as intended. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 3:37:55 PM #10:	CrimsonGear80 posted... no that was but nothing in x-men '97 is altered like that. the show is airing as intended. It is a continuation of the old 97 cartoon so Rogue had a butt and now she doesn't is the same thing. This is isn't supposed to be treated like a new series as it even starts where the old one left off and these are the same characters in the same costumes with the same development from the previous. I get the argument why removing the butt is good to make it watchable for kids, but you don't then argue that isn't censoring. I was mostly joking <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332227] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>no that wasbut nothing in x-men '97 is altered like that. the show is airing as intended.</quote>It is a continuation of the old 97 cartoon so Rogue had a butt and now she doesn't is the same thing.This is isn't supposed to be treated like a new series as it even starts where the old one left off and these are the same characters in the same costumes with the same development from the previous.I get the argument why removing the butt is good to make it watchable for kids, but you don't then argue that isn't censoring. I was mostly joking</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 3:39:01 PM #11:	WingsOfGood posted... It is a continuation of the old 97 cartoon so Rogue had a butt and now she doesn't is the same thing. This is isn't supposed to be treated like a new series as it even starts where the old one left off and these are the same characters in the same costumes with the same development from the previous. all wrong. you just want to cry about "censorship" cause apparently you can only get turned on by cartoon women. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but that doesn't mean you get to complain about every show not catering to you. --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332240] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>It is a continuation of the old 97 cartoon so Rogue had a butt and now she doesn't is the same thing.This is isn't supposed to be treated like a new series as it even starts where the old one left off and these are the same characters in the same costumes with the same development from the previous.</quote>all wrong. you just want to cry about "censorship" cause apparently you can only get turned on by cartoon women.I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but that doesn't mean you get to complain about every show not catering to you. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 3:40:14 PM #12:	CrimsonGear80 posted... all wrong. all wrong? So this is not a continuation of the old 97 cartoon? Rogue is not literally the same exact character from the old 97 cartoon? The plot has nothing to do with the old 97 cartoon? <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332264] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>all wrong.</quote>all wrong?So this is not a continuation of the old 97 cartoon? Rogue is not literally the same exact character from the old 97 cartoon? The plot has nothing to do with the old 97 cartoon?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
streamofthesky 03/12/24 3:40:34 PM #13:	CrimsonGear80 posted... it actually isn't... Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. Mark Twain It literally is. And I'll take legendary author Mark Twain's word on it over some random censorship PR account on gamefaqs. <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:979332270] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>it actually isn't...</quote><quote>Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. Mark Twain</quote>It literally is.And I'll take legendary author Mark Twain's word on it over some random censorship PR account on gamefaqs.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TMOG 03/12/24 3:41:38 PM #14:	Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists <cite>TMOG posted [p:979332287] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Jupiter 03/12/24 3:42:16 PM #15:	So with the art style having less detail in general therefore being different means the art style itself is censored? Rogue's green on her suit is no longer shiny. Does that mean it was censored? Gambit's knee guards seem to be larger in the original. I guess that got censored too. --- Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/kid_prodigy23 <cite>Jupiter posted [p:979332297] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>So with the art style having less detail in general therefore being different means the art style itself is censored? Rogue's green on her suit is no longer shiny. Does that mean it was censored? Gambit's knee guards seem to be larger in the original. I guess that got censored too. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monferno_AQW 03/12/24 3:42:47 PM #16:	TMOG posted... Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists --- Switch Friend Code: SW-5881-7864-9002 <cite>Monferno_AQW posted [p:979332306] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>TMOG posted... </cite><quote>Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#17	Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 3:45:26 PM #18:	WingsOfGood posted... all wrong? So this is not a continuation of the old 97 cartoon? Rogue is not literally the same exact character from the old 97 cartoon? The plot has nothing to do with the old 97 cartoon? it is not being altered from it's original state, like Yu-gi-oh was. it's airing as intended, it doesn't matter what it's a continuation of. streamofthesky posted... It literally is. And I'll take legendary author Mark Twain's word on it over some random censorship PR account on gamefaqs. so if watch a show for nudity but it ends up having no nudity in it, you consider it "censored"? you can quote whoever you want, but you'd still be wrong. --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332356] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>all wrong?So this is not a continuation of the old 97 cartoon? Rogue is not literally the same exact character from the old 97 cartoon? The plot has nothing to do with the old 97 cartoon?</quote>it is not being altered from it's original state, like Yu-gi-oh was. it's airing as intended, it doesn't matter what it's a continuation of.streamofthesky posted... </cite><quote>It literally is.And I'll take legendary author Mark Twain's word on it over some random censorship PR account on gamefaqs.</quote>so if watch a show for nudity but it ends up having no nudity in it, you consider it "censored"?you can quote whoever you want, but you'd still be wrong. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 3:47:58 PM #19:	CrimsonGear80 posted... it is not being altered from it's original state, like Yu-gi-oh was. it's airing as intended, it doesn't matter what it's a continuation of. censor can also refer to them looking at the 1997 show and saying "we have to CHANGE this for the continuation because that is no longer suitable for kids" this is different than changing a color for no real reason again not saying it is a bad thing, maybe it is a good thing, it is pointless to say this isn't censorship. I get that people hate those weird youtubers who fuss over it but you can't rewrite words just because of them. not all censorship is bad and shying away from calling it what it is means you act like all censorship is bad <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332392] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>it is not being altered from it's original state, like Yu-gi-oh was. it's airing as intended, it doesn't matter what it's a continuation of.</quote>censor can also refer to them looking at the 1997 show and saying "we have to CHANGE this for the continuation because that is no longer suitable for kids"this is different than changing a color for no real reasonagain not saying it is a bad thing, maybe it is a good thing, it is pointless to say this isn't censorship. I get that people hate those weird youtubers who fuss over it but you can't rewrite words just because of them. not all censorship is bad and shying away from calling it what it is means you act like all censorship is bad</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
DiScOrDtHeLuNaTiC 03/12/24 3:54:56 PM #20:	WingsOfGood posted... It is a continuation of the old 97 cartoon so Rogue had a butt and now she doesn't is the same thing. This is isn't supposed to be treated like a new series as it even starts where the old one left off and these are the same characters in the same costumes with the same development from the previous. I get the argument why removing the butt is good to make it watchable for kids, but you don't then argue that isn't censoring. I was mostly joking Well, about that... TMOG posted... Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists --- The world may be going to Hell, but I am personally awash with convenience. <cite>DiScOrDtHeLuNaTiC posted [p:979332502] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>It is a continuation of the old 97 cartoon so Rogue had a butt and now she doesn't is the same thing.This is isn't supposed to be treated like a new series as it even starts where the old one left off and these are the same characters in the same costumes with the same development from the previous.I get the argument why removing the butt is good to make it watchable for kids, but you don't then argue that isn't censoring. I was mostly joking</quote>Well, about that...TMOG posted... </cite><quote>Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ButteryMales 03/12/24 3:55:15 PM #21:	So I was reading the article and it seems less bad the title sounds. It seems he created the modern continuation, not the original 90s show, like the original 90s show wasn't created by Jack Kirby and Stan Lee. <cite>ButteryMales posted [p:979332505] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>So I was reading the article and it seems less bad the title sounds.It seems he created the modern continuation, not the original 90s show, like the original 90s show wasn't created by Jack Kirby and Stan Lee.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonOPPAl 03/12/24 3:55:52 PM #22:	Damn, no wonder Rogue's butt is so flat in this reboot --- https://imgur.com/aMaI3hj https://imgur.com/7PsdJNc https://imgur.com/eK8vZVn https://imgur.com/u2HR4nG https://imgur.com/nQGM5cZ <cite>NeonOPPAl posted [p:979332511] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>Damn, no wonder Rogue's butt is so flat in this reboot </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 03/12/24 4:01:42 PM #23:	TMOG posted... Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists Yes and I say this as someone who literally binged season 1 of the 97 show. Maybe it's different from the other seasons, but I'm putting my money that it will still look the same. --- DI MOLTO! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:979332609] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>TMOG posted... </cite><quote>Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists</quote>Yes and I say this as someone who literally binged season 1 of the 97 show. Maybe it's different from the other seasons, but I'm putting my money that it will still look the same. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
RchHomieQuanChi 03/12/24 4:03:21 PM #24:	TMOG posted... Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists Also...the scene from the 97 trailer that people use for comparison is literally from a wide shot where Rogue isn't meant to be the main focus --- I have nothing else to say <cite>RchHomieQuanChi posted [p:979332637] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>TMOG posted... </cite><quote>Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists</quote>Also...the scene from the 97 trailer that people use for comparison is literally from a wide shot where Rogue isn't meant to be the main focus </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 03/12/24 4:04:54 PM #25:	RchHomieQuanChi posted... Also...the scene from the 97 trailer that people use for comparison is literally from a wide shot where Rogue isn't meant to be the main focus Yeah it was just a lot of dishonesty going on, and because it was a funny meme. --- DI MOLTO! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:979332671] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>RchHomieQuanChi posted... </cite><quote>Also...the scene from the 97 trailer that people use for comparison is literally from a wide shot where Rogue isn't meant to be the main focus</quote>Yeah it was just a lot of dishonesty going on, and because it was a funny meme. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 4:06:10 PM #26:	WingsOfGood posted... censor can also refer to them looking at the 1997 show and saying "we have to CHANGE this for the continuation because that is no longer suitable for kids" this is different than changing a color for no real reason no, it means they are actually altering already existing content, like yu-gi-oh was... --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332695] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>censor can also refer to them looking at the 1997 show and saying "we have to CHANGE this for the continuation because that is no longer suitable for kids"this is different than changing a color for no real reason</quote>no, it means they are actually altering already existing content, like yu-gi-oh was... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Tanthalas 03/12/24 4:06:37 PM #27:	TMOG posted... Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists I've actually been meaning to ask this. Whenever they talk about her behind, it's always the same picture. --- Sir Markham pointed out, drinking another brandy. "A chap who can point at you and say 'die' has the distinct advantage". <cite>Tanthalas posted [p:979332700] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>TMOG posted... </cite><quote>Are we still on the "Rogue's butt is censorship" thing even after it was pointed out that it was in one scene of one episode and that's why exactly one screenshot of it exists</quote>I've actually been meaning to ask this. Whenever they talk about her behind, it's always the same picture. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 4:06:44 PM #28:	Prestoff posted... Yeah it was just a lot of dishonesty going on, and because it was a funny meme. perhaps it could be. what if it turns out to be the opposite and later in interviews they say they felt Rogue butt was too big for modern kid audiences on Disney plus? would you consider that censoring? <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332703] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>Prestoff posted... </cite><quote>Yeah it was just a lot of dishonesty going on, and because it was a funny meme.</quote>perhaps it could be. what if it turns out to be the opposite and later in interviews they say they felt Rogue butt was too big for modern kid audiences on Disney plus? would you consider that censoring?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 4:08:16 PM #29:	WingsOfGood posted... perhaps it could be. what if it turns out to be the opposite and later in interviews they say they felt Rogue butt was too big for modern kid audiences on Disney plus? would you consider that censoring? no. they didn't go back and scrub her butt out in the original cartoon. this new show is it's own thing, continuation of the old show or not. --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332725] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>perhaps it could be. what if it turns out to be the opposite and later in interviews they say they felt Rogue butt was too big for modern kid audiences on Disney plus? would you consider that censoring?</quote>no. they didn't go back and scrub her butt out in the original cartoon. this new show is it's own thing, continuation of the old show or not. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 4:09:20 PM #30:	CrimsonGear80 posted... no. they didn't go back and scrub her butt out in the original cartoon. this new show is it's own thing, continuation of the old show or not. was asking prestoff you made your opinion clear <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979332740] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>no. they didn't go back and scrub her butt out in the original cartoon. this new show is it's own thing, continuation of the old show or not.</quote>was asking prestoff you made your opinion clear</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#31	Post #31 was unavailable or deleted.
CrimsonGear80 03/12/24 4:10:17 PM #32:	WingsOfGood posted... was asking prestoff you made your opinion clear and I made it clear again. --- PSN: ArsenalGear, NNID: CrimsonG80, XB GT: CrimsonG80 Last game(s) finished: Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (PS5), Like a Dragon Gaiden (PS5) <cite>CrimsonGear80 posted [p:979332761] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>was asking prestoff you made your opinion clear</quote>and I made it clear again. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TMOG 03/12/24 4:11:04 PM #33:	I'm telling you guys things get much better around here when you block Wings lol <cite>TMOG posted [p:979332770] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>I'm telling you guys things get much better around here when you block Wings lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
ArkhamOrigins 03/12/24 4:16:41 PM #35:	TMOG posted... I'm telling you guys things get much better around here when you block Wings lol --- The <cite>ArkhamOrigins posted [p:979332845] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>TMOG posted... </cite><quote>I'm telling you guys things get much better around here when you block Wings lol</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 03/12/24 4:18:12 PM #36:	WingsOfGood posted... perhaps it could be. what if it turns out to be the opposite and later in interviews they say they felt Rogue butt was too big for modern kid audiences on Disney plus? would you consider that censoring? When is it a artistic choice and when does it become censorship? Well to me, the difference would be down to "intention" from the creator. Well more importantly, when a product is finished in creation and they ended up editing things for PR reasons, then yeah I can consider that censorship like they did with Yugioh. If they made the change during pre-production of the show or while they're creating it, it becomes a gray area but I will lead it more to if the executives/producers force the change. --- DI MOLTO! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:979332861] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WingsOfGood posted... </cite><quote>perhaps it could be. what if it turns out to be the opposite and later in interviews they say they felt Rogue butt was too big for modern kid audiences on Disney plus? would you consider that censoring?</quote>When is it a artistic choice and when does it become censorship? Well to me, the difference would be down to "intention" from the creator. Well more importantly, when a product is finished in creation and they ended up editing things for PR reasons, then yeah I can consider that censorship like they did with Yugioh. If they made the change during pre-production of the show or while they're creating it, it becomes a gray area but I will lead it more to if the executives/producers force the change. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dakimakura 03/12/24 4:18:43 PM #37:	Go no ass get fired --- Bees <cite>Dakimakura posted [p:979332867] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>Go no ass get fired </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
aarrgus 03/12/24 4:19:34 PM #38:	I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else... --- Last night I was lying in bed, staring at the stars, and I wondered... Where the *** is my roof?* <cite>aarrgus posted [p:979332879] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
lolife67 03/12/24 4:27:10 PM #39:	aarrgus posted... I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else... You didn't. It's massively overrated. <cite>lolife67 posted [p:979332983] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>aarrgus posted... </cite><quote>I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else...</quote>You didn't. It's massively overrated.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Unknown5uspect 03/12/24 4:31:01 PM #40:	WoG is wog'in out in this topic ain't he. --- How can the moon landing be real if the moon isn't real? <cite>Unknown5uspect posted [p:979333049] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>WoG is wog'in out in this topic ain't he. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#41	Post #41 was unavailable or deleted.
Tanthalas 03/12/24 4:32:43 PM #42:	lolife67 posted... You didn't. It's massively overrated. Lol, the show was fantastic when it released back in the day. It's what made me a huge X-Men fan. --- Sir Markham pointed out, drinking another brandy. "A chap who can point at you and say 'die' has the distinct advantage". <cite>Tanthalas posted [p:979333077] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>lolife67 posted... </cite><quote>You didn't. It's massively overrated.</quote>Lol, the show was fantastic when it released back in the day. It's what made me a huge X-Men fan. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 03/12/24 4:32:51 PM #43:	aarrgus posted... I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else... Upon rewatch, it's really just a product of its time. Batman the Animated series and Xmen 97 were both baby's first "serious" shows that did tackle some mature themes, though at least with Batman the Animated series learned not to take itself too seriously at times. A lot of the corniness of Xmen 97 was when it took itself so serious when it was just goofy...which I think is part of its charm. It's definitely nostalgia goggles for me for Xmen 97 because it was my introduction to the Xmen universe before getting into the comic books. --- DI MOLTO! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:979333082] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>aarrgus posted... </cite><quote>I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else...</quote>Upon rewatch, it's really just a product of its time. Batman the Animated series and Xmen 97 were both baby's first "serious" shows that did tackle some mature themes, though at least with Batman the Animated series learned not to take itself too seriously at times. A lot of the corniness of Xmen 97 was when it took itself so serious when it was just goofy...which I think is part of its charm. It's definitely nostalgia goggles for me for Xmen 97 because it was my introduction to the Xmen universe before getting into the comic books. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
chukklez17dc 03/12/24 4:33:23 PM #44:	lolife67 posted... You didn't. It's massively overrated. For real, I remember this show being kinda bad --- Hello <cite>chukklez17dc posted [p:979333096] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>lolife67 posted... </cite><quote>You didn't. It's massively overrated.</quote>For real, I remember this show being kinda bad </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
LinkDaLunatic 03/12/24 4:33:33 PM #45:	CrimsonGear80 posted... all wrong. you just want to cry about "censorship" cause apparently you can only get turned on by cartoon women. lol at how quickly this dude launched into ad-hom --- There's a time and place for everything... but not now. <cite>LinkDaLunatic posted [p:979333101] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>CrimsonGear80 posted... </cite><quote>all wrong. you just want to cry about "censorship" cause apparently you can only get turned on by cartoon women.</quote>lol at how quickly this dude launched into ad-hom </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
WingsOfGood 03/12/24 4:38:39 PM #46:	aarrgus posted... I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else... I think people liked it because it tried to fit into the comic stories of the day instead of do its own thing. X-Men Evolution for example was a good show but it was more inspired by X-Men than trying to be the X-Men of the comics at the time. <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:979333185] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>aarrgus posted... </cite><quote>I'm continuously astounded by the excitement people have for this show... It's like I watched a completely different (and massively boring) X-Men cartoon in the 1990's than everyone else...</quote>I think people liked it because it tried to fit into the comic stories of the day instead of do its own thing. X-Men Evolution for example was a good show but it was more inspired by X-Men than trying to be the X-Men of the comics at the time.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#47	Post #47 was unavailable or deleted.
aarrgus 03/12/24 4:39:26 PM #48:	Prestoff posted... It's definitely nostalgia goggles for me for Xmen 97 because it was my introduction to the Xmen universe before getting into the comic books. I could definitely see that. I started reading the mainline Marvel stuff around 1990 so I probably had my fill of X-Men by 1992 and maybe that's why it didn't hit all that well with me. And I more fondly remember Batman '89 in the theaters and grew up on reruns of Batman '66, so maybe I was just more inclined to enjoy Batman than X-Men. Then again my favorite superhero was Spider-Man and I wasn't fond of Spider-Man TAS either. shrug --- Last night I was lying in bed, staring at the stars, and I wondered... Where the *** is my roof?* <cite>aarrgus posted [p:979333205] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>Prestoff posted... </cite><quote>It's definitely nostalgia goggles for me for Xmen 97 because it was my introduction to the Xmen universe before getting into the comic books.</quote>I could definitely see that. I started reading the mainline Marvel stuff around 1990 so I probably had my fill of X-Men by 1992 and maybe that's why it didn't hit all that well with me. And I more fondly remember Batman '89 in the theaters and grew up on reruns of Batman '66, so maybe I was just more inclined to enjoy Batman than X-Men. Then again my favorite superhero was Spider-Man and I wasn't fond of Spider-Man TAS either. shrug </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Prestoff 03/12/24 4:44:09 PM #49:	aarrgus posted... I could definitely see that. I started reading the mainline Marvel stuff around 1990 so I probably had my fill of X-Men by 1992 and maybe that's why it didn't hit all that well with me. And I more fondly remember Batman '89 in the theaters and grew up on reruns of Batman '66, so maybe I was just more inclined to enjoy Batman than X-Men. Then again my favorite superhero was Spider-Man and I wasn't fond of Spider-Man TAS either. shrug Oh trust me, you're not the only one. --- DI MOLTO! <cite>Prestoff posted [p:979333283] in 'X-Men '97... [t:80719796]...</cite> <quote>aarrgus posted... </cite><quote>I could definitely see that. I started reading the mainline Marvel stuff around 1990 so I probably had my fill of X-Men by 1992 and maybe that's why it didn't hit all that well with me. And I more fondly remember Batman '89 in the theaters and grew up on reruns of Batman '66, so maybe I was just more inclined to enjoy Batman than X-Men. Then again my favorite superhero was Spider-Man and I wasn't fond of Spider-Man TAS either. shrug</quote>Oh trust me, you're not the only one. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#50	Post #50 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Current Events > 'X-Men '97' Creator Beau DeMayo Fired Weeks Before Show Aires. (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > 'X-Men '97' Creator Beau DeMayo Fired Weeks Before Show Aires.