Current Events > Were Neanderthals really the least intelligent early Humans?

Topic List
Page List: 1
[deleted]
02/02/24 4:01:58 PM
#2:


[deleted]
... Copied to Clipboard!
nocturnal_traveler
02/02/24 5:15:31 PM
#1:


Or was that just a media caricature?

---
--I understand your opinion. I just don't care about it. ~Jedah--
... Copied to Clipboard!
DarkAssassin89
02/02/24 5:18:18 PM
#3:


The latter. Scientists now think they were smarter than their early human contemporaries.

They likely failed due to being out competed by humans being better at working together in larger numbers as well as their greater mass requiring a lot more energy to keep them going.

---
Dark89
... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn
02/02/24 5:21:09 PM
#4:


It was a media caricature. They actually had bigger brains than us (tho brain size doesn't always mean more intelligent, otherwise we'd have scientist elephants). I think the current understanding was that they were no more or less intelligent than modern humans. They were simply out-competed due to a differing social structure and physicality (they used stabbing spears because their arms didn't have the full rotation to make throwing spears effective, for example).

---
http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif
... Copied to Clipboard!
name_unknown
02/02/24 5:29:01 PM
#5:


Cro-Magnon ftw
... Copied to Clipboard!
Pikachuchupika
02/02/24 5:30:55 PM
#6:


Some of us have Neanderthal dna. Up to 2%.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Robot2600
02/02/24 5:48:24 PM
#7:


not some, all of us (unless literally an aborigine) of us have neanderthal dna.

they weren't out-competed, we interbred (a lot).

as far as intelligence, they make much better jewelry and tools and so must be smarter (most textbooks would say), but I'd argue they were equally as smart as humans.

new research is coming out showing homo sapiens using the same advanced "leaf-shaped" stone tools that supposedly only neanderthal could make.

their culture might have been more advanced, but a human and a neanderthal would learn new skills and intellectual things at an equal rate.

neanderthals required about 4000-5000 calories compared to a human's 1500-2000.

---
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Questionmarktarius
02/02/24 5:51:53 PM
#8:


Pikachuchupika posted...
Some of us have Neanderthal dna. Up to 2%.
Neanderthals never went extinct. Horny Sapiens just merged the two subspecies.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Guide
02/02/24 5:55:25 PM
#9:


We literally outfucked them. They were overall better, but more expensive per unit; comparatively, humans could zerg rush.

---
evening main 2.4356848e+91
https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU
... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony
02/02/24 5:56:57 PM
#10:


We out unga bunga them

---
See profile pic
... Copied to Clipboard!
[deleted]
02/05/24 5:01:32 AM
#13:


[deleted]
... Copied to Clipboard!
Notti
02/05/24 5:45:45 AM
#11:


Their mistake was trusting us.

---
http://m.youtube.com/TheYoungTurks/videos Bernie>Biden>poo>Trump http://RightWingWatch.org http://reddit.com/r/BreadTube http://fb.me/OccupyDemocrats
... Copied to Clipboard!
Zikten
02/05/24 6:14:20 AM
#12:


They apparently were taught in the 50s and 60s that Neanderthals were little more than animals. My boomer dad thinks they couldn't even talk. I recently had an argument with him about it. The older you are, the less likely you are to understand what Neanderthals were like I guess. Boomers tend to not keep up with developments in research. They still think what they learned in school is the truth
... Copied to Clipboard!
RiKuToTheMiGhtY
02/05/24 6:49:18 AM
#14:


They did not go extinct, they merged with us as the DNA is present in 2% of people. We just had more homo sapiens then neanderthals and we required less food/calories so after so many babies we got more traits of homo sapiens due to there being more babies born.

---
doa-plus.com - We Press Forward. . . By Pressing Back.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1