Current Events > RE4R being review bombed for being "woke" is making the news

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
boxoto 04/07/23 5:23:44 PM #1:	Resident Evil 4 Remake is the latest game to be review bombed on Metacritic. As the world struggles to define what woke means, gamers have defined it as the inability to look up a female characters skirt or the lack of large in-game breasts. The horror. Resident Evil 4 Remake is being review bombed across all platforms Trolls have spared no platform. As pointed out on ResetEra and Reddit, Resident Evil 4 Remake is being review bombed across all platforms listed on Metacritic, bringing its user scores down so low that they look ridiculous compared to the overwhelmingly positive critic reception. Its even woke in areas, reads one review that doesnt explain what on earth that means. Ada Wong censored, complains another. Ashley censored, politically correct reworks of dialogues. Other 0/10 reviews complain about Ashleys tights and bits, among other things. Last week, Ada Wong voice actress Lilly Gao faced an intense harassment campaign from players who were upset about the original voice actress (Jolene Anderson) being replaced. The relentless attacks caused Gao to remove all her posts from her Instagram profile and later scrub her social media presence. Its unclear if Metacritic is taking any action against the review bombing, which has been ongoing for almost a week now. Capcom has not addressed the issue. https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/resident-evil-4-remake-review-122703411.html --- Don't you agree, Zach? https://streamable.com/bmh5oq <cite>boxoto posted [p:972700869] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote><quote>Resident Evil 4 Remake is the latest game to be review bombed on Metacritic. As the world struggles to define what woke means, gamers have defined it as the inability to look up a female characters skirt or the lack of large in-game breasts. The horror.Resident Evil 4 Remake is being review bombed across all platformsTrolls have spared no platform. As pointed out on ResetEra and Reddit, Resident Evil 4 Remake is being review bombed across all platforms listed on Metacritic, bringing its user scores down so low that they look ridiculous compared to the overwhelmingly positive critic reception.Its even woke in areas, reads one review that doesnt explain what on earth that means. Ada Wong censored, complains another. Ashley censored, politically correct reworks of dialogues.Other 0/10 reviews complain about Ashleys tights and bits, among other things.Last week, Ada Wong voice actress Lilly Gao faced an intense harassment campaign from players who were upset about the original voice actress (Jolene Anderson) being replaced. The relentless attacks caused Gao to remove all her posts from her Instagram profile and later scrub her social media presence.Its unclear if Metacritic is taking any action against the review bombing, which has been ongoing for almost a week now. Capcom has not addressed the issue. </quote>https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/resident-evil-4-remake-review-122703411.html</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Irony 04/07/23 5:24:12 PM #2:	People obviously haven't seen Ashley without the jacket on her breasts are big --- I am Mogar, God of Irony and The Devourer of Topics. <cite>Irony posted [p:972700880] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>People obviously haven't seen Ashley without the jacket on her breasts are big</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE 04/07/23 5:25:40 PM #3:	Lara got a reduction. Samus got a reduction. Tifa got a reduction. There is a pattern here. You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern. I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever. No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here. If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was. Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation. It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly. Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive. It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy. Fuck! <cite>MICHALECOLE posted [p:972700907] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Lara got a reduction.Samus got a reduction.Tifa got a reduction.There is a pattern here.You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.Fuck!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#4	Post #4 was unavailable or deleted.
MarcyWarcy 04/07/23 5:28:06 PM #5:	MICHALECOLE posted... Lara got a reduction. Samus got a reduction. Tifa got a reduction. There is a pattern here. You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern. I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever. No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here. If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was. Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation. It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly. Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive. It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy. Fuck! Whatever happened to that guy? --- Looks like this gamer's paradise has turned into a gamer's hell............................................... <cite>MarcyWarcy posted [p:972700949] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>MICHALECOLE posted... </cite><quote>Lara got a reduction.Samus got a reduction.Tifa got a reduction.There is a pattern here.You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.Fuck!</quote>Whatever happened to that guy?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
NeonTentacles 04/07/23 5:29:42 PM #6:	Ashley's boobs are pretty good and they even jiggle, especially in the model viewer, but she doesnt have any panty shots anymore which sucks --- https://imgur.com/aMaI3hj https://imgur.com/7PsdJNc https://imgur.com/eK8vZVn https://imgur.com/u2HR4nG https://imgur.com/nQGM5cZ <cite>NeonTentacles posted [p:972700983] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Ashley's boobs are pretty good and they even jiggle, especially in the model viewer, but she doesnt have any panty shots anymore which sucks</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheSavageDragon 04/07/23 5:29:45 PM #7:	MarcyWarcy posted... Whatever happened to that guy? Probably died due to lack of giant boobs <cite>TheSavageDragon posted [p:972700984] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>MarcyWarcy posted... </cite><quote>Whatever happened to that guy?</quote>Probably died due to lack of giant boobs</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MICHALECOLE 04/07/23 5:30:08 PM #8:	rip <cite>MICHALECOLE posted [p:972700997] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>rip </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Agonized_rufous 04/07/23 5:30:40 PM #9:	Still at higher scores than the actual bad ports of re4 --- "All I have is my balls and my word, and I don't break them for anyone!"-Tony Montana <cite>Agonized_rufous posted [p:972701007] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Still at higher scores than the actual bad ports of re4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hyperskate65 04/07/23 5:32:12 PM #10:	Lara got a reduction. Samus got a reduction. Tifa got a reduction. There is a pattern here. You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern. I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever. No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here. If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was. Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation. It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly. Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive. It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy. Fuck! --- his comparison suggests we're closet african americans. PSN BlahblahUnicornx <cite>hyperskate65 posted [p:972701037] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Lara got a reduction.Samus got a reduction.Tifa got a reduction.There is a pattern here.You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.Fuck!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#11	Post #11 was unavailable or deleted.
Skankhair 04/07/23 5:35:20 PM #12:	MICHALECOLE posted... Lara got a reduction. Samus got a reduction. Tifa got a reduction. There is a pattern here. You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern. I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever. No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here. If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was. Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation. It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly. Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive. It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy. Fuck! oh my god please be satire <cite>Skankhair posted [p:972701096] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>MICHALECOLE posted... </cite><quote>Lara got a reduction.Samus got a reduction.Tifa got a reduction.There is a pattern here.You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.Fuck!</quote>oh my god please be satire</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
garan 04/07/23 5:35:42 PM #13:	I'm just tired of all these damn remakes. Plus, it sucks that they cut out content. <cite>garan posted [p:972701101] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>I'm just tired of all these damn remakes. Plus, it sucks that they cut out content.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Smashingpmkns 04/07/23 5:36:38 PM #14:	boxoto posted... As the world struggles to define what woke means, gamers have defined it as the inability to look up a female characters skirt or the lack of large in-game breasts They came after gamers --- http://i.imgur.com/x04tPRZ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/t7T392I.jpg <cite>Smashingpmkns posted [p:972701126] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>boxoto posted... </cite><quote>As the world struggles to define what woke means, gamers have defined it as the inability to look up a female characters skirt or the lack of large in-game breasts</quote>They came after gamers </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeeak4444 04/07/23 5:40:40 PM #15:	About as much of an example of SDE you can get. --- Typical gameFAQers are "Complainers that always complain about those who complain about real legitimate complaints."-Joker_X <cite>Zeeak4444 posted [p:972701234] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>About as much of an example of SDE you can get. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 04/07/23 5:43:44 PM #16:	MarcyWarcy posted... Whatever happened to that guy? He's still here, he just changed his username. --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:972701282] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>MarcyWarcy posted... </cite><quote>Whatever happened to that guy?</quote>He's still here, he just changed his username.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#17	Post #17 was unavailable or deleted.
hockeybub89 04/07/23 5:47:26 PM #18:	Someone on this board said Ada is one step from a burqa. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:972701354] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Someone on this board said Ada is one step from a burqa.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Skankhair 04/07/23 5:50:17 PM #19:	[LFAQs-redacted-quote] Thank you. Its a doozy! <cite>Skankhair posted [p:972701411] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote><cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> Thank you. Its a doozy!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#20	Post #20 was unavailable or deleted.
Rharyx211 04/07/23 5:54:19 PM #21:	I feel like if a reviewer wants to include the term "woke" in an article, they have to actually define what the fuck they think it means. (This extends to people in real life as well.) --- Watch "Final Fantasy XV Abridged" and "Kingdom Hearts Abridged" right here! https://www.youtube.com/user/mcknett3 <cite>Rharyx211 posted [p:972701476] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>I feel like if a reviewer wants to include the term "woke" in an article, they have to actually define what the fuck they think it means.(This extends to people in real life as well.)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
TheSavageDragon 04/07/23 5:54:34 PM #22:	GranolaPanic posted... Was it originally satire or serious? I know others post it satirically now. I didnt know that at first. It was 100% serious. He was constantly whining on the PS4 board about it and actively partaking in every single "OMG Aloy is ugly" topic that got posted there. <cite>TheSavageDragon posted [p:972701481] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>GranolaPanic posted... </cite><quote>Was it originally satire or serious? I know others post it satirically now. I didnt know that at first.</quote>It was 100% serious. He was constantly whining on the PS4 board about it and actively partaking in every single "OMG Aloy is ugly" topic that got posted there.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#24	Post #24 was unavailable or deleted.
Supaitwo 04/07/23 5:55:31 PM #25:	hockeybub89 posted... Someone on this board said Ada is one step from a burqa. Fucking what? --- After 25 years he's the very best like no one ever was. <cite>Supaitwo posted [p:972701496] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>hockeybub89 posted... </cite><quote>Someone on this board said Ada is one step from a burqa.</quote>Fucking what?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Number090684 04/07/23 5:55:37 PM #26:	GranolaPanic posted... https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/6/3/AABfkMAAER0b.jpg 100% Usual suspects bitching like always. <cite>Number090684 posted [p:972701499] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>GranolaPanic posted... </cite><quote>https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/5/6/3/AABfkMAAER0b.jpg</quote>100%Usual suspects bitching like always.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 04/07/23 5:58:24 PM #27:	Capital G gamers are losing their shit because now even their precious Japanese developers are "going woke" Guess they'll have to stick to games with half naked, questionably aged anime girls that focus more on titillation than anything else. --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:972701540] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Capital G gamers are losing their shit because now even their precious Japanese developers are "going woke"Guess they'll have to stick to games with half naked, questionably aged anime girls that focus more on titillation than anything else.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Srk700 04/07/23 5:58:25 PM #28:	You can tell which "reviewers" haven't even finished the game when they complain about "Ashley not having ballistics anymore". <cite>Srk700 posted [p:972701542] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>You can tell which "reviewers" haven't even finished the game when they complain about "Ashley not having ballistics anymore".</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
hockeybub89 04/07/23 6:03:14 PM #29:	Supaitwo posted... Fucking what? I can't remember who it was --- http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png he/him/they/them <cite>hockeybub89 posted [p:972701633] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Supaitwo posted... </cite><quote>Fucking what?</quote>I can't remember who it was</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#30	Post #30 was unavailable or deleted.
Supaitwo 04/07/23 6:12:17 PM #31:	Adas new attire is a big improvement on the stupid cocktail dress from the original. --- After 25 years he's the very best like no one ever was. <cite>Supaitwo posted [p:972701786] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Adas new attire is a big improvement on the stupid cocktail dress from the original.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Hayame_Zero 04/07/23 6:12:52 PM #32:	The reason the whole "woke" thing is so out of control is because of the news capitalizing on rando tweets and user reviews that were barely getting any traction to begin with. Of course when you have social media with minimal filters for opinion, you're obviously going to get dumb or backwards opinions. But publishing stories about them is making it worse than it is. --- ...I think I'm done here... <cite>Hayame_Zero posted [p:972701795] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>The reason the whole "woke" thing is so out of control is because of the news capitalizing on rando tweets and user reviews that were barely getting any traction to begin with. Of course when you have social media with minimal filters for opinion, you're obviously going to get dumb or backwards opinions. But publishing stories about them is making it worse than it is.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarcyWarcy 04/07/23 6:13:11 PM #33:	GranolaPanic posted... Was it originally satire or serious? I know others post it satirically now. I didnt know that at first. He constantly talked about it and seemed pretty serious --- Looks like this gamer's paradise has turned into a gamer's hell............................................... <cite>MarcyWarcy posted [p:972701797] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>GranolaPanic posted... </cite><quote>Was it originally satire or serious? I know others post it satirically now. I didnt know that at first.</quote>He constantly talked about it and seemed pretty serious</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
VirtuousWrath 04/07/23 6:13:45 PM #34:	Irony posted... People obviously haven't seen Ashley without the jacket on her breasts are big Came here to say this. I just got to this cutscene last night and yeah, there was 0 reduction lol. People have diluted terms to now being completely meaningless. --- "I sung of chaos and eternal night, taught by the heav'nly muse to venture down the dark descent, and up to reascend... <cite>VirtuousWrath posted [p:972701808] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Irony posted... </cite><quote>People obviously haven't seen Ashley without the jacket on her breasts are big</quote>Came here to say this. I just got to this cutscene last night and yeah, there was 0 reduction lol.People have diluted terms to now being completely meaningless.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
boxoto 04/07/23 6:14:19 PM #35:	[LFAQs-redacted-quote] @GoldKnightSkye --- Don't you agree, Zach? https://streamable.com/bmh5oq <cite>boxoto posted [p:972701813] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote><cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> @GoldKnightSkye </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Ivynn 04/07/23 6:23:21 PM #36:	GranolaPanic posted... Was it originally satire or serious? Oh he was dead serious lol --- http://i.imgur.com/vDci4hD.gif <cite>Ivynn posted [p:972701950] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>GranolaPanic posted... </cite><quote>Was it originally satire or serious?</quote>Oh he was dead serious lol</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Darkfire12 04/07/23 6:27:22 PM #37:	It is even woke in areas! --- insert funny joke here <cite>Darkfire12 posted [p:972702019] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>It is even woke in areas!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Dakimakura 04/07/23 6:29:05 PM #38:	right hate Ashy because no looking up her skirt and smaller mommy milkers left hate Ashley because she isn't ugly --- "Let the bears pay the bear tax I pay the Homer tax." - Bart Simpson <cite>Dakimakura posted [p:972702047] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>right hate Ashy because no looking up her skirt and smaller mommy milkersleft hate Ashley because she isn't ugly</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#39	Post #39 was unavailable or deleted.
Dakimakura 04/07/23 6:34:23 PM #40:	MICHALECOLE posted... Lara got a reduction. Samus got a reduction. Tifa got a reduction. There is a pattern here. You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern. I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever. No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here. If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was. Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation. It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly. Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive. It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy. Fuck! the left is trying to cover up big breasted women! We exist too! --- "Let the bears pay the bear tax I pay the Homer tax." - Bart Simpson <cite>Dakimakura posted [p:972702159] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>MICHALECOLE posted... </cite><quote>Lara got a reduction.Samus got a reduction.Tifa got a reduction.There is a pattern here.You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.Fuck!</quote>the left is trying to cover up big breasted women!We exist too!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rharyx211 04/08/23 12:08:43 AM #41:	GranolaPanic posted... I hate mouse Ashley. Mouse Ashley is adorable. Someone should mod her into the game. --- Watch "Final Fantasy XV Abridged" and "Kingdom Hearts Abridged" right here! https://www.youtube.com/user/mcknett3 <cite>Rharyx211 posted [p:972708127] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>GranolaPanic posted... </cite><quote>I hate mouse Ashley.</quote>Mouse Ashley is adorable.Someone should mod her into the game.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monolith1676 04/08/23 1:04:42 AM #42:	I figured it was getting review bombed because they added microtransactions. --- Gears of War 1 Assassination Legend <cite>Monolith1676 posted [p:972708763] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>I figured it was getting review bombed because they added microtransactions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BakonBitz 04/08/23 1:10:42 AM #43:	VirtuousWrath posted... Came here to say this. I just got to this cutscene last night and yeah, there was 0 reduction lol. People have diluted terms to now being completely meaningless. Yep. First time I saw her I figured that jacket was hiding her true size. I swear they're even a little bigger. --- Game collection: http://www.backloggery.com/bakonbitz Gaming channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwVQm69J7bGScbv3_50C0dA <cite>BakonBitz posted [p:972708809] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>VirtuousWrath posted... </cite><quote>Came here to say this. I just got to this cutscene last night and yeah, there was 0 reduction lol.People have diluted terms to now being completely meaningless.</quote>Yep. First time I saw her I figured that jacket was hiding her true size. I swear they're even a little bigger.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#44	Post #44 was unavailable or deleted.
Nosferatu_Zodd 04/08/23 1:11:41 AM #45:	MICHALECOLE posted... Lara got a reduction. Samus got a reduction. Tifa got a reduction. There is a pattern here. You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern. I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever. No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here. If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was. Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation. It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly. Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive. It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy. Fuck! Vyrulisse wrote this --- https://i.pinimg.com/originals/6b/1a/6a/6b1a6a72ead402776666d859cc06a746.jpg <cite>Nosferatu_Zodd posted [p:972708825] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>MICHALECOLE posted... </cite><quote>Lara got a reduction.Samus got a reduction.Tifa got a reduction.There is a pattern here.You can say I'm a loser, but you can't deny what is happening. It's not a conspiracy. It's not internet nerds preemptively being outraged. We said it would happen and it did. We knew it would because it's happened already. Because it's a clear and continuous pattern.I don't care. I'm a fucking nerd. Whatever.No, I don't need big breasts on a female character to find her interesting as a character. You don't need profanity and gratuitous bloodshed to have a good time at the movies. But if there's a PG-13 sequel or remake to an R-rated movie, people flip a table because they're being denied something they used to have. It's the same thing here.If you go to favorite place to eat and find one day that they've stopped serving alcohol, you'd be within your rights to go someplace else even if the food is just as good as it always was.Even if you don't care about fictional breasts (or real breasts on women playing fictional characters). Even if you're not into women period, it's still a bad thing to remove all buxom women from the media. You are saying that there is a certain type of person who you do not want to be featured in the media and it's through no fault of their own. This is like taking every story which had a Jewish character in it and replacing them with non-Jewish characters. You would be selectively removing a group of people from having any media presence or representation.It's not just censorship. It's discrimination. How are women with large breasts supposed to feel in real life when they're not good enough to make it into movies? What does it say to them that body types and personality types are treated one and the same and that busty types are the "bimbo" types that we don't want? I suppose they can go out and get reductions if they want to be treated fairly.Cover Tifa up more. Take away her midriff. Make it so that there's no bounce or jiggle -- just fat dead space. But don't flatten her because women with sizable breasts are somehow bad people according to the censors who think themselves progressive.It's like there's an Anti-Tit League that gets to dictate who has an appropriate enough body type to achieve representation. And, according to them, women with small wastes and large busts are unworthy.Fuck!</quote>Vyrulisse wrote this</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Rharyx211 04/08/23 1:15:13 AM #46:	GranolaPanic posted... They already did. Hell yeahhh --- Watch "Final Fantasy XV Abridged" and "Kingdom Hearts Abridged" right here! https://www.youtube.com/user/mcknett3 <cite>Rharyx211 posted [p:972708857] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>GranolaPanic posted... </cite><quote>They already did.</quote>Hell yeahhh</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#47	Post #47 was unavailable or deleted.
Flauros 04/08/23 1:20:23 AM #48:	Rharyx211 posted... Mouse Ashley is adorable. Someone should mod her into the game. Ive seen cute mods of her and mods that make her submissive+breedable --- https://i.imgur.com/EX6Md7k.gif https://i.imgur.com/ygAzHKB.mp4 https://i.imgur.com/c84omp7.gif https://i.imgur.com/Hj9RrC6.mp4 <cite>Flauros posted [p:972708910] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Rharyx211 posted... </cite><quote>Mouse Ashley is adorable.Someone should mod her into the game.</quote>Ive seen cute mods of her and mods that make her submissive+breedable </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Supaitwo 04/08/23 4:41:17 AM #49:	Monolith1676 posted... I figured it was getting review bombed because they added microtransactions. They didnt add micro transactions. --- After 25 years he's the very best like no one ever was. <cite>Supaitwo posted [p:972710221] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Monolith1676 posted... </cite><quote>I figured it was getting review bombed because they added microtransactions.</quote>They didnt add micro transactions.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
boxoto 04/08/23 4:45:53 AM #50:	Flauros posted... mods that make her submissive+breedable :/ --- Don't you agree, Zach? https://streamable.com/bmh5oq <cite>boxoto posted [p:972710248] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Flauros posted... </cite><quote>mods that make her submissive+breedable</quote>:/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Monolith1676 04/08/23 5:28:34 AM #51:	Supaitwo posted... They didnt add micro transactions. Yep they did. https://www.gamespot.com/videos/resident-evil-4-adds-mercenaries-and-microtransactions-gamespot-news/2300-6461097/ --- Gears of War 1 Assassination Legend <cite>Monolith1676 posted [p:972710445] in RE4R being... [t:80405401]...</cite> <quote>Supaitwo posted... </cite><quote>They didnt add micro transactions.</quote>Yep they did.https://www.gamespot.com/videos/resident-evil-4-adds-mercenaries-and-microtransactions-gamespot-news/2300-6461097/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Current Events > RE4R being review bombed for being "woke" is making the news (+) Yeah! (+)

Current Events > RE4R being review bombed for being "woke" is making the news