Current Events > netflix CEO says he will glady order more of transphobe dave chapelles crap

(+) Yeah! (+)

This whole topic is a more offensive joke than anything Dave Chapelle ever said.

The beautiful thing about this whole thing is.................. that you aren't obligated to watch it.

did you guys forget about SNL also? he basically admitted to buying into the whole "jewish cabal" thing as well.

1. Abandon any and all forms of entertainment and sit there
2. Learn to accept that the human race is messed up and simply dont support whichever program or network bothers you

Basically every avenue of entertainment is tainted to some degree, even Disney and stuff that you wouldnt expect. With that said, we have basically two choices:

1. Abandon any and all forms of entertainment and sit there
2. Learn to accept that the human race is messed up and simply dont support whichever program or network bothers you

The beautiful thing about this whole thing is.................. that you aren't obligated to watch it.

Let's be real, the real reason you won't watch his show isn't because of what he said.

Comedians can make jokes.

Just think, way back in 2010, the last year before the internet became obsessed with trans people, CE loved Dave Chappelle and routinely said absolutely hateful things about anything trans. Now that it's trendy, they've jumped on the band wagon to virtue signal.

She knows I am not lying, she is just mad. Give her time to calm down and she will see what I am talking about.

Nice. I love Dave Chappelle

1-10 is the enemy. dave is also the enemy.

symptoms of the problem are still a problem because they spread the problem and cause more people to buy into it

nah.

did you guys forget about SNL also? he basically admitted to buying into the whole "jewish cabal" thing as well.

fuck dave. his life is the fucking joke now.

1-6 are the enemy. dave is also the enemy

7-10 are fake news, so the "narrative" is the enemy, as there is no actual narrative. That user was saying "trans women believe false thing!" when in reality, that user believes false thing about what trans women actually believe.

No, I was asking the source to people asking Chappelle to sit down, and him refusing to respond or running away.

I'm not seeing anything about that anywhere, which is why I asked. I guess she made that up for some reason, in a post accusing others of lying.

Dave Chappelle us a transphobic motherfucker.

Though he was never hateful when he told black jokes.....I don't understand why that happens to be.

What was that? Did you even read all of my post? When you say fake news, guess what that is? A False narrative. Do you even hear the stuff what the other says? Or are you trying to put words in my mouth because you're mad and clearly not thinking correctly.

was his Clayton Bixby sketch just a means to use the n word on TV over and over... or shitting on racism and the KKK?

was his Real World sketch making fun of black people... or social commentary about lack of diversity in reality TV casting and treating minority cast members as "tokens?"

was his Racial Draft sketch hateful and racist... or social commentary about the culture of celebrities being "race-claimed" (especially mixed-race celebrities)?

was his sketch about racial profiling and the legal system "telling black jokes"... or an illustration of systemic racism in the legal system?

I am still waiting for a response @figureofspeech

Are you saying that trans women believe a false narrative or are you saying that "trans women believe a false narrative" is itself a false narrative? I can't understand any question you are asking until I understand your honest answer to THAT question.

His most recent special had no nuance and was pure hate

Are you saying that trans women believe a false narrative or are you saying that "trans women believe a false narrative" is itself a false narrative? I can't understand any question you are asking until I understand your honest answer to THAT question.

okay, so we're on the same page then.

We always were.....

You and Conflict just want to be confrontational.

I am saying the public perception (the people who haven't even privy into an ACTUAL transgender debate and learn from someone who study gender and sex) have believe the false narrative that transgender are in denial that there is no difference between ciswoman and transwomen.

For instance they will see an article like this first:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/(redacted)

Before talking to an ACTUAL transgender person or even talking someone who study the subject.

But my problem right now is you guys are getting so upset you don't even know what I an even talking about. You didn't read most of my post, you skimp through it and you immediately decided it was transphobic.

We always were.....

You and Conflict just want to be confrontational.

I don't think Chapelle is a transphobe. Won't even argue about it.

Clearly you were the one who was upset because you felt compelled to jump in like you had to defend yourself. I was prepared to just have a conversation with they other user while brushing you aside for talking what appeared to be upset nonsense, which... I mean come on... You took a 10 word sentence and turned it into an itemized numbered list. Who does that?)

I don't see anyone saying that "cisgender women and trans women are born with the same type of genitalia" so again, the false narrative here is in your perception that there is a false narrative.

Would you say that a trans man who is able to get pregnant is no different from a cisgender woman?

For instance they will see an article like this first:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/of-course-trans-women-are-not-women

Before talking to an ACTUAL transgender person or even talking someone who study the subject.

and dave helps promote that ignorant view

Exactly.

His most recent special had no nuance and was pure hate, that motherfucker.

What's your opinion about Bolsonaro?

I said in the original post that it was obvious transgender knows the difference between ciswomen and transgender women. It was one sentence. The easiest sentence. Also you never ask three times. You only ask once.

I posted a link showing an article where someone clearly believes that nonsense. You didn't even open the link.

And here we go, you're going off topic. You're continuing a very tiring argument that has been going on for years. I am cutting it short

My argument is this and only this: the public perception is an ignorant view of believing that transwomen believes there's no difference between ciswoman and transwomen.

I posted the example that the Washington examiner believes that ignorant view. This isn't my narrative. This exist out there.

Who?

I likely misunderstood you as a result.