Current Events > Vogue sides with Amber Heard. Cites believe all women

(+) Yeah! (+)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/2/2/AAefUOAADPmS.jpg
https://www.vogue.com/article/why-its-time-to-believe-amber-heard

Poor Johnny can't catch a break.

And since people are so easy to dupe that I think some people might actually read this and change their mind and feel they need to believe Amber.

She is on record in court of hitting and throwing things at Johnny on different occassions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbHR91Fs87s

Clip is her saying "sure I hit him, sure I throw stuff at him, BUT not on that particular occassion...."

This is counterproductive.

Welp, guess I'm cancelling my subscription to Vogue.

masterpug53 posted...

Welp, guess I'm cancelling my subscription to Vogue.

Nobody subscribes to Vogue

Why is the media so disconnected from public opinion on this issue?

this sounds like an opinion piec- oh it is

But I thought feminism was about equality? I dont doubt Depp may have beat her somehow someday. We dislike her cause she has been the most disingenuous about all this without suffering any consequence like Depp did WHILE ALSO BEATING HIM and worse from the looks of it.

Mikea posted...

this sounds like an opinion piec- oh it is

hmm the actual page didn't say that it was

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/3/0/AAEhCpAADPma.jpg

JuanCarlos1 posted...

But I thought feminism was about equality?

Only on the things that benefit them. Equal pay? Sure. Equal opportunity? Maybe. Equal accountability? Fuck no.

Yeah... no.

Johnnys expression in that thumbnail says it all.

They are both drug addicts abusing one another, if not just physically, but also emotionally and mentally.

Not sure how anyone can side with Amber if they seen anything from the trial going on.

This will likely hurt them lmao

WingsOfGood posted...

hmm the actual page didn't say that it was

Literally does at the top though.

Well, yeah, believe all women. That's why we have a judicial system to determine the probable truth of a matter. And then, if they're found to be lying, you don't have to believe them anymore.

Returning_CEmen posted...

They are both drug addicts abusing one another, if not just physically, but also emotionally and mentally.

BoTh SiDeS

But she beats him too?

Deutschenlied posted...

But she beats him too?

According to Julia Fox women hitting men isn't abuse

Returning_CEmen posted...

They are both drug addicts abusing one another, if not just physically, but also emotionally and mentally.

only evidence of him hitting her was a headbutt he says was accident

meanwhile
she cut off his finger - amber denies but logically her story is bs
she slammed his head in a door - on tape
she hits him multiple times - she admits on a tape, she admits in court
she throws stuff at him - video evidence of this and she admits to it in court
she extorted him for money - proven in court she pocketed the 7million settlement that was supposed to be given to charity and that she went on television and lied that she gave to charity

"both sides!!!"

@Returning_CEmen

Heard is literally the reason you don't trust anyone based on gender automatically. Trust, much like respect, is earned. Not given.

Deutschenlied posted...

But she beats him too?

too?

Johnny never beat her.

She claims he pummeled her in the face with heavy rings on his hand.
She gives photo of the aftermath.

Not a single bruise.

Likely she hallucinated if not straight up lied to extort.

Irony posted...

BoTh SiDeS

The person in rhe article defending Amber also shat on the idea of "Both Sides". It's a nothing argument you use when you don't have anything real to contribute to conversations. They added to the stupidity by saying you should blindly believe someone cause they're gender tho. They're making the "both sides" put downers look even more dumb.

But tbf, this time the post you were using it against was also writing off the whole situation instead of putting any real thought into it. You guys got a really dumb back and fourth going on with no one looking smart >_>

its kinda silly to even pick sides in civil shit like this...

Funkydog posted...

Literally does at the top though.

huh, I actually looked before posting and might say they added it but maybe I didn't see it

sorry guys I failed

Deutschenlied posted...

But she beats him too?

Yep.

https://twitter.com/depplyhaIIows/status/1519767062436102147

All Im saying go is abuse is deeper than just physical harm.

And for clarification I am not siding with Amber Heard

BuckVanHammer posted...

its kinda silly to even pick sides in civil shit like this...

not when one side will be banned from all films

and the stake isn't wanting to see them in films but that justice is served

if Amber with all her EXTENSIVE documentation of their relationship could prove he abused her, let him never work in hollywood again...

but she couldn't

instead HER evidence proved SHE beat him

@BuckVanHammer

WingsOfGood posted...

only evidence of him hitting her was a headbutt he says was accident

he did the most abuse out of all even if accidental compared to her rap sheet.
totally screwed johnny is.

What_ posted...

Nobody subscribes to Vogue

Exactly

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

They think it has "only" in it

Questionmarktarius posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/3/3/0/AAEhCpAADPma.jpg

Damn that that is it. Explains it all.

Anna Wintour's credibility has always been rocky.

WingsOfGood posted...

huh, I actually looked before posting and might say they added it but maybe I didn't see it

sorry guys I failed

I mean, it's definitely possible it wasn't there originally.

Opinion or not, they'll get flack for it though.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


I know this isn't actually the case cause Im not a big conspiracy guy. But it's almost like they're purposely being poison to their own side. And there's these people who are in every conversation that started with logic. People who come join and make it very easy to point at them and use them to generalize the whole group while pushing their own views that they can deliver in a more "reasonable" way in the moment.

It's why I tried to move away from generalizing any group. Because I feel like it makes me easier to manipulate. If you can convince me everyone is dumb but the people who believe what you believe, that's obviously gonna make it seem obvious you're right.

WingsOfGood posted...

not when one side will be banned from all films

and the stake isn't wanting to see them in films but that justice is served

if Amber with all her EXTENSIVE documentation of their relationship could prove he abused her, let him never work in hollywood again...

but she couldn't

instead HER evidence proved SHE beat him

@BuckVanHammer

i mean for a publication to pick a side. thats just bad business. their fucked up relationship isnt a movement or cause. just a shitty situation all around that we'll never get the whole story about...

WingsOfGood posted...

only evidence of him hitting her was a headbutt he says was accident

He also slammed a door on her feet during a little escapade when he was trying to get away from her and she was chasing him lol

Ugh

You shouldnt believe all any group lmfao. What an ignorant statement.

kingdrake2 posted...

he did the most abuse out of all even if accidental compared to her rap sheet.
totally screwed johnny is.

what?

What did he do?

So far what we found is:

he got drunk and passed out - she took pictures while he was asleep
he let her friends live in his properties
he flew out her family and friends to his private island
he bought her a horse
when she would video tape him he got upset
in arguments where she hit him and admitted to it, he said he needed to leave the relationship

@kingdrake2

What I miss?

Tyranthraxus posted...

He also slammed a door on her feet during a little escapade when he was trying to get away from her and she was chasing him lol

that was the situation she slammed door on his head, he thought he might have hit her feet when trying to close the door to escape her cause she yelped and he popped his head out to check on her and then she slammed door on his head

she could totally have faked it

that incident right?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]


such as J.K. Rowling hahaha

WingsOfGood posted...

that was the situation she slammed door on his head, he thought he might have hit her feet when trying to close the door to escape her cause she yelped and he popped his head out to check on her and then she slammed door on his head

she could totally have faked it

that incident right?

Yeah. Was probably a bad decision to open the door but things can get confusing in the heat of the moment.

JuanCarlos1 posted...

But I thought feminism was about equality?

Lol

WingsOfGood posted...

that was the situation she slammed door on his head, he thought he might have hit her feet when trying to close the door to escape her cause she yelped and he popped his head out to check on her and then she slammed door on his head

Losing a toenail to a swinging door really fuckin hurts.

I would be SHOCKED if Depp didnt hit her too. This sounds like a toxic relationship where both people are violent and bring out the worst in each other.

WingsOfGood posted...

What I miss?

nothing probably. dare not pay attention to the drama between 2 scorned people in court.